STRIKING BACK

The Library Of Striking Back & Taking Action Against Anti-Pesticide & Environmental Terrжrism

―――――――――――――――――――――

The Purpose Of This Web-Page Is To Provide Information That Will Lead To Striking Back Actions That Will Stop The Subversive Conspiracy To Impose Reckless & Arbitrary Prohibition Against Pest Control Products

―――――――――――――――――――――

A bold, vigorous assault has won many a faltering cause.

―   Ira Clarence Eaker ( 1896 – 1987 ), General of the United States Army Air Forces during World War II.

You are not beaten until you admit it.  

―   George S Patton ( 1885 – 1945 ), General who commanded corps and armies in North Africa, Sicily, and the European Theater of Operations during World War II.

We must take action to STRIKE BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Anti-Pesticide & Environmental Terrжrism

Prohibition Is NOT Necessary

Any prohibition against pest control products is NOT justified because strict regulations based on scientific research already protect our health and our environment.

ALL prohibitions are 100 per cent politically–based and 0 per cent science–based.

Prohibition is NOT necessary since pest control products are scientifically safe.

NO pest control product can be sold or used until Health Canada’s scientists have evaluated ALL the existing evidence to determine whether the product meets stringent health and safety requirements.

Conventional pest control products are effective, economical, low-risk, and scientifically safe, and NO harm will occur when they are used properly.

The assessment proving that pest control products are scientifically-safe is a process that can take up to ten years and cost hundreds of millions of dollars.

Only those pest control products that pose NO unacceptable risk to human health or the environment become Health-Canada-approved and federally-legal.

Canada has one of the most stringent regulatory approval systems in the world.

Health Canada requires each new pest control product to go through about two-hundred separate tests to examine health and environmental impacts as well as value.

And the cost to manufacturers to get a pest control product from the lab to store shelves is about 250 million dollars.

There is not one known illness or death from the proper use of pest control products used in the urban landscape.

By comparison, there are thousands of deaths per year from known cancer-causing substances such as cigarette smoke and alcohol.

In fact, pest control products used in the urban landscape are  …

  • Health-Canada-approved
  • federally-legal
  • safe for children *
  • scientifically-safe
  • practically-non-toxic
  • good for the environment

*  except when stored improperly in the home.

Furthermore, pest control products used in the urban landscape  …

  • cause NO harm
  • DO NOT cause cancer
  • DO NOT run-off into lakes and streams
  • enhance the urban landscape

Prohibition has led to CATASTROPHIC CARNAGE.

In jurisdictions like Ontario, prohibition led to the death of an elderly man who was forced to hand-pull toxic noxious weeds.

In jurisdictions where prohibition has been implemented, the professional lawn care industry has suffered immense losses, in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

Moreover, because of prohibition, green spaces are over-run with weeds, infested with insects, and dismally destroyed  ―  they look like garbage dumps.

Prohibition is NOT necessary because, overall, when pest control products are used properly, there are NO harmful irreversible effects to health and environment.

Overall, when pest control products are used properly, there are NO harmful irreversible effects to health and the environment.

We must STRIKE BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

Explore the following links  …

Myth-Busting — Pesticide Bans — The Myths About Anti-Pesticide Prohibition

Myth-Busting — Pesticide Bans — White Paper Report On Pesticide Bans — The Myths About Banning Pesticides — Part 1

Myth-Busting — Pesticide Bans — White Paper Report On Pesticide Bans — The Myths About Banning Pesticides — Part 2 — The Wisdom Of Real Experts — Heroes Speaking Out Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrism

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Anti-Pesticide & Environmental Terrжrism

Catastrophic Carnage

Prohibitions result in CATASTROPHIC CARNAGE caused by business bankruptcies, business failures, garbage dump green spaces, stunningly exorbitant costs, horrific fines, and even illness and death.

Because of prohibition against pest control products used in the urban landscape, we now have a more dangerous outdoor environment, a black market in pesticides, and a trail of economic destruction with hundreds of small businesses destroyed and thousands of people out of work.

Prohibitions have taken away the ability of people to safeguard themselves against noxious weeds and disease-carrying insects.

There are legitimate concerns about noxious weeds, which in extreme cases can contribute to death, and which force millions to medicate themselves or live with severe allergic effects.

Surely the entirely unproven concerns of a few politically-connected fear-mongering fanatжcs should be balanced against the strictly-tested, lengthy and scientifically-documented use of pesticides applied under controlled conditions to deal with human health problems caused by noxious plants and disease-carrying insects.

Prohibitions have created a trail of economic destruction with thousands of people out of work.

Here is a summary of CATASTROPHIC CARNAGE caused by business bankruptcies and business failures in Ontario  ―

  • Anti-pesticide prohibitions have DESTROYED thousands of businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry in Ontario and in several jurisdictions across Canada.
  • ONTARIO ―  Because of the 2009 provincial prohibition in Ontario, businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry lost over 500,000,000 dollars, with over 12,500 unemployed.
  • ONTARIO ―  In the province of Ontario, for several years, one-business-per-week disappeared into total oblivion, and, by 2012, HALF of these businesses closed their doors.

Here is a summary of CATASTROPHIC CARNAGE outside of Ontario  ―

  • BRITISH COLUMBIA ―  Because of the threats of imminent provincial prohibition in British Columbia, all businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry have STAGNATED, and, because of the reckless imposition of local municipal prohibitions, many businesses have lost OVER 40 PER CENT of their customers.
  • QUEBEC ―  Because of the 2004-2006 provincial prohibition in Quebec, OVER 60 PER CENT of the businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry were annihilated  ―  HUNDREDS  of businesses disappeared into total oblivion.
  • QUEBEC ―  In the province of Quebec, those businesses that survived prohibition six years earlier, by 2012, LOST OVER 70 PER CENT of their customers.
  • HALIFAX ―  Because of the 2000 municipal prohibition in Halifax Regional Municipality, in the province of Nova Scotia, businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry LOST OVER 50 PER CENT of their customers.

The devastation of businesses in the Professional Lawn Care Industry was extensive because there were no valid economical alternatives to replace the prohibited products.

Consequently, businesses were incapable of providing adequate weed and insect control, and were unable to keep their customers satisfied.

Prohibitions have destroyed inflicted terrжr, despair, and destitution on thousands of hapless victims throughout the professional lawn care industry.

Prohibitions have destroyed the modern professional lawn care industry.

Prohibition have also destroyed all green spaces, which became weed-infested and insect-destroyed garbage dumps  ―  a great urban ecological disaster.

Prohibitions are needless, senseless, and malicious.

Prohibitions are NOT necessary since pest control products are Health-Canada-approved, federally-legal, scientifically-safe, practically-non-toxic, and will cause NO harm.

We must STRIKE BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

Explore the following links  …

Carnage Created By Catastrophic Anti-Pesticide Prohibition — Main Web-Page

Carnage Created By Catastrophic Anti-Pesticide Prohibition — Re-Direct Links

Carnage Created By Garbage Dump Green Spaces — Who Wants To Live In #@!!% Pest-Infested Garbage Dumps ?!?!

Carnage Created By Garbage Dump Green Spaces — Pesticide Bans Have Never Made Our Green Spaces Look So #@!!% Ugly — Photo Gallery

British Columbia Pesticide Ban — Conspiracy To Prohibit Pest Control Products In The Urban Landscape

British Columbia Pesticide Ban — Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides

Halifax Pesticide Ban — Lawn Care Businesses Destroyed By Bans — Nova Scotia

Halifax Pesticide Ban — Fiesta Herbicide Prohibited — History Of Anti-Pesticide Prohibition — Nova Scotia

Quebec Pesticide Ban — Victory Against Terrжrists — Dow Defeats Ban

Quebec Pesticide Ban — Victory Against Terrжrists — Permitted Active Ingredients — History Of Anti-Pesticide Prohibition

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Prohibition In Quebec

The Hudson Challenge

Court Challenge Against Municipal Prohibition

Professional Lawn Care Industry Versus Town Of Hudson

Throughout the 1980s, pesticide-hating fanatжcism was dawning in the town of Hudson, a small isolated ghetto-town of a frustrated anglophone minority located near Montreal, in the province of Quebec.

In 1991, Hudson arbitrarily enacted prohibition against the use of pest control products.

Municipal officials had easily capitulated under the pressure of a mere handful of pesticide-hating fanatжcs that included politician Jack Layton, sheep farmer June Irwin, and others.

Some of the officials responsible for prohibition later became investigated for corruption and tax evasion.

In 1992, Chemlawn Inc and a companion-lawn-care-company were apprehended for ( accidentally ) spraying herbicide on lawns located in the town of Hudson, in defiance of prohibition against the use of pest control products that had been arbitrarily enacted by the municipality in 1991.

Each company was fined three hundred dollars.

The fine was legally CHALLENGED by ChemLawn Inc and the ASHOQ provincial trade association on the basis that the Hudson prohibition was invalid, since it defied existing provincial and federal laws that already allowed the use of the herbicide.

ASHOQ, Association des Services en Horticulture Ornementale du Québec a.k.a. the Quebec Association of Ornamental Horticulture Services ) was officially founded in 1992.

ASHOQ’s principal mandate was to deal with pesticide-hating fanatжcism in jurisdictions like Hudson.

In fact, most of ASHOQ’s vast financial resources were dedicated towards the destruction of the Hudson prohibition.

In 2001, the Supreme Court of Canada up-held the acts of subversion by the Town of Hudson, despite the fact that its by-law clearly contradicted provincial and federal law.

The Supreme Court of Canada was clearly infested with pesticide-hating judges who later were caught celebrating with activists in Hudson.

The Hudson Challenge STRUCK BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Prohibition In Quebec

The NAFTA Challenge

Court Challenge Against Provincial Prohibition

Dow AgroSciences Versus Government Of Canada ( NAFTA )

In the period 2004-2006, Quebec became the first province to arbitrarily impose the anti-pesticide prohibition of pest control products like 2,4-D.

The province then faced a challenge from the manufacturers.

With the victory of the NAFTA challenge, pest control products like 2,4-D were shown to be scientifically safe, and prohibitions were irrefutably invalidated.

On May 25th, 2011, Dow AgroSciences, the manufacturer of the pest control product 2,4-D, settled the NAFTA challenge case with the Canadian government.

The North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, was an agreement signed by the governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States, creating a tri-lateral trade block in North America.

As part of the agreement, a victory for Dow AgroSciences, the government of Quebec was humiliated into making a statement saying that  ―

2,4-D does not pose an unacceptable risk
to human health or the environment. 

Quebec was the first province to declare weed control products containing 2,4-D as possibly carcinogenic, which was later deemed as false with the victory of the NAFTA challenge.

Because of the 2004-2006 provincial prohibition in Quebec, OVER 60 PER CENT of the businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry were annihilated  ―  HUNDREDS of businesses disappeared into total oblivion.

In the province of Quebec, those businesses that survived prohibition six years earlier, by 2012, LOST OVER 70 PER CENT of their customers.

The NAFTA Challenge STRUCK BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Explore the following links  …

Quebec Pesticide Ban — The True History Of Prohibition In Quebec & Hudson

Quebec Pesticide Ban — The True History Of Prohibition In Quebec & Hudson  — Mr Howard Mains

Quebec Pesticide Ban — Lawns & Roadways Look Like Crжp In Hudson — Mr Brian Lilley

Quebec Pesticide Ban — The True History Of Prohibition In Quebec & Hudson — Vive Le Pissenlit Libre

Quebec Pesticide Ban — Quebec Ban Irrefutably Invalidated — The True History Of Prohibition In Quebec & Hudson

Hudson Pesticide Ban — Jack Layton — Prominent Architect Of Prohibition — Anti-Pesticide Speech

Hudson Pesticide Ban — June Irwin — The Wicked Old Clown Witch

Hudson Pesticide Ban — Hudson’s Anti-Pesticide Mayor, Councillors, & Staff, Were Crooks

Hudson Pesticide Ban — Louise Villandré — Former Hudson Quebec Director General & Pesticide Ban Conspirator Sentenced To 30 Months In Jail

Quebec Pesticide Ban & Elsewhere — Carnage Created By Business Failures — Anti-Pesticide Prohibition Destroyed The Professional Lawn Care Industry

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Prohibition In Ontario

The Lowes Challenge

Proposed Court Challenge Against Provincial Prohibition

Mr Jeffrey P Lowes Versus Anti-Pesticide
Fanat
жcs & Government Officials

Civil Action To Recover The Horrific Businesses
Losses Caused By Ontario Prohibition

On April 22nd, 2009  ―  a date which will live in the period of environmental infamy  ―  the full force of the Ontario Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act was recklessly imposed by Ontario’s Liberal government.

The Ontario prohibition against pest control products used in the urban landscape has DESTROYED thousands of businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry.

Because of the 2009 provincial prohibition in Ontario, businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry lost over 500,000,000 dollars, with over 12,500 unemployed.

For several years, one-business-per-week disappeared into total oblivion, and, by 2012, HALF of these businesses closed their doors.

Moreover, because of its reckless and arbitrary prohibition, Ontario’s public and private greens spaces have become weed-infested and insect-destroyed GARBAGE DUMPS that are DANGEROUS for children to play on.

Ontario’s parks, sports fields, and home lawns, have become wholly INFESTED with dandelions and a variety of other weeds, and there is no practical way to remove them, other than by hand-pulling or by replacing the entire lawn with sod.

Beginning in 2009, Mr Jeffrey P Lowes organized CIVIL ACTION against government officials and activists to recover horrific businesses losses caused by the Ontario provincial prohibition against pest control products used in the urban landscape.

In January 2010, Mr Lowes outlined the LIST OF CHARGES against the government of Ontario and the Ministry of the Environment.

Additionally, individual government officials and activists also faced FRAUD CHARGES under the Canadian Criminal Code.

Here is a summary of alleged offences  ―

  • 133 charges and 29 culprits.
  • Conspiring to prevent the supply of approved pest control products.
  • Defrauding access to products.
  • Impeding access to approved pest control products.
  • Misleading with peer-reviewed assessments, reports, and studies.
  • Presenting false and misleading information.
  • Undermining the people and companies in the Professional Lawn Care Industry.

By August 2010, M-REP Communications commenced CIVIL ACTION to recover the horrific businesses losses caused by the Ontario provincial prohibition.

Once the Ontario General Election concluded in October 2011, Mr Lowes resumed the CIVIL ACTION.

In 2011, Lowes estimated that Ontario’s reckless-prohibition was costing businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry 350 MILLION DOLLARS.

Additionally, some of these companies were being TERRЖRIZED WITH FINES dispensed by OVERZEALOUS Ontario government officials.

In one instance, a DEBILITATING FINE WAS IMPOSED FOR TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS for a company that was closely associated with Mr Lowes.

According to Mr Lowes, referring to the CONTROVERSIAL golf industry EXCEPTION to prohibition  ―

That’s why the lawn care companies are scared because they’ve not only made a law based on FALSE MEDICAL REPORTS, the ministry of the environment has an enforcement branch that is basically walking around in JACK-BOOTS, you know, prosecuting anyone that has a nice lawn. 

Unless, of course, you own a GOLF COURSE. 

By the end of 2012, observers stated that, because of the Ontario provincial prohibition, businesses had LOST OVER 500,000,000 DOLLARS, with up to 12,500 UNEMPLOYED.

For several years, ONE-BUSINESS-PER-WEEK DISAPPEARED INTO TOTAL OBLIVION, and, by 2012, HALF THE BUSINESSES HAD CLOSED THEIR DOORS.

On August 21st, 2011, Mr Lowes stated in the Toronto Sun newspaper that politics, NOT science, was driving the Ontario prohibition.

The government of Ontario was more interested in appeasing lobbyists and environmental groups than developing policy based on facts, Mr Lowes said.

Mr Lowes said he was preparing LEGAL CHALLENGES to the Ontario prohibition on behalf of businesses struggling to do their jobs  ―  by banning conventional products, they were being forced to use green alternative pesticides that were⁄are largely INEFFECTIVE.

According to Mr Lowes, when customers can’t get the results they want from businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry, they CANCEL their contracts and buy the banned products themselves [ on-line or out-of-province ].

The Lowes Challenge STRUCK BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Prohibition In Ontario

The Chudleigh Proposal

Parliamentary Challenge Against Provincial Prohibition
MPP Ted Chudleigh Versus Fanatжcal Liberal Government
Amending The Prohibition To Allow Licensed Lawn Care
Professionals To Apply Conventional Pest Control Products

On May 8th, 2012, Halton Member of Provincial Parliament ( MPP ) Ted Chudleigh introduced his Private Members Bill 88, Pesticides Amendment Act ( Licence for Cosmetic Purposes ), 2012, which will AMEND THE [ CURRENT ] LIBERAL BAN ON PESTICIDES.

MPP Ted Chudleigh’s Bill 88 was introduced to AMEND the prohibition against conventional pest control products, and ALLOW LICENSED PROFESSIONALS to apply these products under strict conditions and in concentrations well within established safety limits.

According to MPP Chudleigh  ―

There are SERIOUS FLAWS with the Liberal BAN on pesticide use. 

Instead of ensuring pesticides are properly applied, the ban risks creating an UNMONITORED BLACK MARKET which is a GREATER THREAT TO OUR ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH because of the unprofessional and improper application of pesticides. 

The Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA ) of Health Canada undertakes rigorous testing before approving a pesticide for use in Canada. 

The system I am proposing ACCEPTS THE SCIENCE behind these tests, and uses the existing licencing [ sic ] framework under the Pesticides Act to ensure that pesticides are applied properly and are not a threat to our health or environment. 

Despite forbidding the use of pesticides for so-called non-essential purposes in the urban landscape, the Ontario prohibition EXEMPTS industries such as golf, agriculture industry, and forestry  ―  this is inconsistent and unfair.

The existing exemptions would not have been affected by MPP Chudleigh’s Bill 88.

According to MPP Chudleigh  ―

The Liberals started with a sound bite and tried to build a policy around it. 

A pesticide ban may sound nice and deliver a good photo-op but dictating can have THE OPPOSITE AND MORE HARMFUL EFFECT than one intends. 

I’m afraid that this is the case with the Liberal pesticide ban. 

My Bill takes THE MORE RESPONSIBLE AND SAFER APPROACH to pesticides approved by Health Canada. 

Those who choose not to use pesticides are free to make that choice. 

However, those who wish to use pesticides, perhaps for hay fever or other allergies, will now be able to do so in a SAFE AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER that does not negatively affect our environment or health. 

MPP Ted Chudleigh’s Bill 88 would have had the added effect of STRENGTHENING the Professional Lawn Care Industry that had been DEVASTATED by Ontario’s arbitrary prohibition  ―  unfortunately, Bill 88 was defeated.

Surely the entirely unproven concerns of a few politically-connected fear-mongering fanatжcs should be balanced against the strictly-tested, lengthy and scientifically-documented use of pesticides applied under controlled conditions to deal with human health problems caused by noxious plants and disease-carrying insects.

The Ontario prohibition was implemented in defiance of overwhelmingly massive and detailed assessments performed by Health Canada, whose work has been discredited by fund-raisers and health care workers ( a.k.a. fanatжcal-activists ) who decided to set their own agendas for conspiring to interfere with public policy against pest control products.

The Chudleigh Proposal STRUCK BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Prohibition In Ontario

What You Can Do

Show The Government Of Ontario Your Support
For A Policy AGAINST The Prohibition Of Pest
Control Products Used In The Urban Landscape

Everyone in the Green Space Industry  ―  no matter where they live  ―  must meet with their Member of Provincial Parliament ( MPP ), regardless of party affiliation.

In order to meet and inform the MPP, you must donate the maximum amount to the party, which is 1,240 dollars in Ontario.

The cost of this donation is insignificant when compared to the catastrophic business losses inflicted by anti-pesticide prohibition.

Any business owner in the Green Space Industry who does not bother to meet with the local MPP is a pitiful fool and an idiot, and does not deserve a career, or a business, or any success.

We must STRIKE BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Explore the following links  …

Chudleigh Proposal — The Voice Of Reason For The Professional Lawn Care Industry — Ontario Pesticide Ban Must Be Amended

Chudleigh Proposal — Amendment To Pesticide Ban

Chudleigh Proposal — Ontario Pesticide Ban — Beginning To Repeal Prohibition

Lowes Challenge — Prohibition Is A Farce — Toronto Sun

Lowes Challenge — Professional Lawn Care Companies Lost $350,000,000 Per Year

Lowes Challenge — Claim For Damages Being Filed

Lowes Challenge — Notice Of Action — The Avengers

Lowes Challenge — Accountability & Transparency With Lowes

Lowes Challenge — Not Gonna Take It Anymore — Lunatжc Meg Sears

Lowes Challenge — Not Gonna Take It Anymore — Companies Worth Less

Lowes Challenge — Not Gonna Take It Anymore — Civil Action

Lowes Challenge — Not Gonna Take It Anymore — CAPE — Trillium

Lowes Challenge — Not Gonna Take It Anymore — Sun-Setting

Lowes Challenge — Sample Judge Ruling — What Is Involved With A Private Prosecution – Official Scribd Document

Lowes Challenge — The Pied Piper — Card

Lowes Challenge — What Can You Do

Lowes Challenge — Statements For The Crown Prosecutor

Lowes Challenge — 29 Individual Charges, 133 Counts, Fraud Charges Moving Forward

Lowes Challenge — Sufficient Evidence To Proceed

Lowes Challenge — The Culprits Of The 9|11 Era — Sniveling Maniacs Cry For Protection

Lowes Challenge — We’re Not Gonna Take It Anymore

Lowes Challenge — The Lone Ranger — Card

Lowes Challenge — Fraud & Corruption — Smith — Maniacs Anonymous

Lowes Challenge — Additional Charges — Party Pals

Lowes Challenge — Federal Charges Filed — Economic Impact Study

Lowes Challenge — Holding Those Responsible

Lowes Challenge — We Intend To Lay Charges Of Fraud

Lowes Challenge — Industry Has Little Choice — CELA — Report Card

Lowes Challenge — Waiting For The Hammer To Drop

Ontario Pesticide Ban — Living In Environmental Infamy

Ontario Pesticide Ban — Poll Regarding Prohibition

Ontario Pesticide Ban — Carnage Inflicted By Horrific Fines

Ontario Pesticide Ban & Elsewhere — Carnage Inflicted By Horrific & Arbitrary Fines, & Lifetime Bans

Ontario Pesticide Ban & Elsewhere — Carnage Created By Business Failures — Anti-Pesticide Prohibition Destroyed The Professional Lawn Care Industry

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Prohibition In British Columbia

Government Policy

Because of the threat of imminent PROVINCIAL prohibition in British Columbia ( BC ), all businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry have STAGNATED.

And, because of the reckless imposition of local MUNICIPAL prohibitions, many businesses have LOST OVER 40 PER CENT of their customers.

Then, in 2012, the government of British Columbia stated its policy AGAINST the prohibition of pest control products used in the urban landscape.

On May 17th, 2012, British Columbia’s Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides STOPPED the trend towards needless, senseless, and malicious prohibition.

The Special Committee announced that it will NOT recommend prohibition against pest control products used in the urban landscape.

In jurisdictions outside of British Columbia, the Special Committee could see that prohibitions were leading to catastrophic carnage in the form of business bankruptcies, business failures, urban ecology disasters, garbage dump green spaces, stunningly exorbitant costs, horrific fines, and even illness and death.

It is known that pest control products are scientifically-safe, and NO harm will occur when they are used according to label directions.

Prohibition is NOT necessary.

Not surprisingly, the BC Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides agreed  ―

The scientific evidence, at this time, does not warrant an outright pesticide ban. 

A 2011 POLL, conducted by Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association ( CCSPA ), CONFIRMED that the VAST MAJORITY of residents in British Columbia were OPPOSED to prohibition  ―  they actually FAVOURED the continued use of pest control products around their homes and in public green spaces.

The British Columbia Policy STRUCK BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Prohibition In British Columbia

What You Can Do

Show The Government Of British Columbia Your
Support For Its Policy AGAINST The Prohibition Of
Pest Control Products Used In The Urban Landscape

Everyone in the Green Space Industry  ―  no matter where they live  ―  must meet with their Member of the Legislative Assembly ( MLA ), preferably not from the pesticide-hating New Democratic Party.

In order to meet and inform the MLA, you must donate the maximum amount to the party, which is 1,100 dollars in British Columbia.

The cost of this donation is insignificant when compared to the catastrophic business losses inflicted by anti-pesticide prohibition.

Any business owner in the Green Space Industry who does not bother to meet with the local MLA is a pitiful fool and an idiot, and does not deserve a career, or a business, or any success.

We must STRIKE BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Explore the following links  …

British Columbia — The End Of The Current Anti-Pesticide Siege Of Terrжrism Against The Professional Lawn Care Industry

British Columbia — Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides

British Columbia — Conspiracy To Prohibit Pest Control Products In The Urban Landscape

British Columbia — Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides — Victory Against Terrжrists — Pesticide Use Changes — Granting Exception Status To Lawn Care & Golf Industries

British Columbia — Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides — OFFICIAL DOCUMENT

British Columbia — The Public Rejects Pesticide Bans — Municipal Bans Starting To Wear Thin On Home-Owners & City Staff — Speaking Out — Mr Paul Visentin

British Columbia — The Public Rejects Pesticide Bans — Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association ( CCSPA ) — Poll Indicates Residents Want Pesticides

British Columbia — The Public Rejects Pesticide Bans — Public Rejects Bans — Letter To The Editor

British Columbia — Golf Industry — Pre-Emptive Strike

British Columbia — Here’s Your Chance To Support The War Against Environmental Terrжr — IEPMA The Voice Of The Green Space Industry — Updated

British Columbia — What Have YOU Done In The War Against Environmental Terrжr ?!?! — IEPMA

British Columbia — IEPMA Pushes For Proper Use Initiative Versus Outright Prohibition Of Pest Control Products — Mr John J Holland

Myth-Busting — Pesticide Bans — The Myths About Anti-Pesticide Prohibition

Myth-Busting — Pesticide Bans — White Paper Report On Pesticide Bans — The Myths About Banning Pesticides — Part 1

Myth-Busting — Pesticide Bans — White Paper Report On Pesticide Bans — The Myths About Banning Pesticides — Part 2 — The Wisdom Of Real Experts — Heroes Speaking Out Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrism

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Prohibition In Manitoba

The Postcard Campaign

Challenging Provincial Anti-Pesticide Prohibition

Professional Lawn Care Industry Versus Fanatжcs

Beginning in 2014, Manitoba’s pesticide-hating government officials were expected to impose arbitrary prohibition against conventional pest control products used in the urban landscape.

If province-wide prohibition were to be imposed, Manitoba green spaces would turn into dangerous and pest-infested garbage dumps.

In June 2013, dandelions had already dominated the pesticide-free homes in Manitoba.

According to Mr David Hinton, owner of Weed Man franchise and President of Landscape Manitoba Trade Association  ―

We have a number of concerned members who just don’t want to sit back and let the NDP pass legislation that has NO basis. 

We want to make citizens aware of it. 

It’s only afterwards that people kind of realize what’s involved and realize that they can’t maintain their properties to the same level anymore.  [ i.e. They become garbage dumps. ]

In early June 2013, Landscape Manitoba Trade Association began its Postcard Campaign by sending 150,000 mail-outs to Manitobans in a bid to get them to send in attached postcards to the Manitoba government, telling it the public opposed the proposed anti-pesticide prohibition.

Landscape Manitoba Trade Association represents businesses that operate in the Professional Lawn Care Industry.

The postcards called on home-owners to let anti-pesticide Premier Greg Selinger know that Manitobans opposed prohibition.

In a media release, Mr Hinton  ―

Home-owners who oppose a ban need only to sign the card and drop it in the mail. 

The Postcard Campaign STRUCK BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Prohibition In Manitoba

Rescindment

On April 19th, 2016, the pesticide-hating fanatжcal New Democratic Party ( NDP ) was DEFEATED by the Progressive Conservative Party of Manitoba, led by Brian Pallister, ending the 17-year NDP reign of anti-pesticide terrorism !

Observers expect that the Pallister Government WILL RESCIND the ARBITRARY PROHIBITION against pest control products used in the urban landscape !

Who wants this #@!!% ban nonsense ?!?!

The majority says NO.

The scientific evidence backing up Manitoba’s anti-pesticide prohibition just isn’t there.

The only people who want prohibition are a small minority of pesticide-hating fanatжcs with vested interests in concocting imaginary danger against pest control products.

We KNOW the majority DO NOT want prohibition, as confirmed by viewing the results of legitimate polls.

A Winnipeg Free Press poll showed that 60 per cent were opposed to prohibition.

Yet another newspaper poll reported that a majority of Manitobans do not want prohibition.

Outside of Manitoba, a BC poll conducted by Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association ( CCSPA ) showed that the vast majority of residents are opposed to prohibition, and they actually favour the continued use of these products around their homes and in public green spaces.

Moreover, an Ontario poll showed that the public rejects prohibition, and more than half of Ontario residents believed that the provincial government did not do the right thing by imposing an arbitrary prohibition.

Ontario residents would rather have their provincial prohibition scrapped or modified.

Canadian Association of Agri-Retailers ( CAAR ) says there is questionable public support.

No one wants this #@!!% ban nonsense !

The Manitoba Recindment will STRIKE BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Explore the following links  …

Manitoba Pesticide Ban — Provincial Prohibition Is Being Reversed — Pallister Government To Loosen Cosmetic Pesticide Ban

Manitoba Pesticide Ban — Prohibition Review By New Conservative Pallister Government

Manitoba Pesticide Ban – Prohibition Review By New Conservative Pallister Government

Manitoba Pesticide Ban — Pesticide Ban’s Foes Get Louder — Striking Back Against Anti-Pesticide Prohibition — Canadian Association Of Agri-Retailer — Weed Man

Manitoba Pesticide Ban — Winnipeg Free Press Poll Shows 59 Per Cent Against Pesticide Ban

Manitoba Pesticide Ban — The Public Rejects Prohibition In Manitoba — They’ll Pry My Weed-Killer Out Of My Cold, Dead Hands

Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association — The Public Does Not Want Pesticide Bans

Ontario Pesticide Ban — Poll Regarding Prohibition

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Prohibition In Alberta

Government Policy

On August 9th, 2011, the government of Alberta stated its policy AGAINST the prohibition of pest control products used in the urban landscape.

The government of Alberta stated that it would NOT create restrictions or laws that conflict with the federal government, which is relied upon for health and safety assessments.

Consequently, the government of Alberta indicated that had no intent to prohibit the sale of any pest control product.

Alberta monitored pesticide bans over the past few years and the approaches taken by other jurisdictions, and found the basis for action confusing and inconsistent.

The Alberta Policy STRUCK BACK against anti-pesticide and environmental terrжrism !

Explore the following link  …

Alberta — Conspiracy To Prohibit Pest Control Products In The Urban Landscape

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Anti-Pesticide & Environmental Terrжrism

Warning

Pesticide-hating fanatжcs are advised that all names, statements, activities, and affiliations have been archived for eventual criminal charges.

These lying sacks of crжp will be charged with fraud and conspiracy under the criminal code.

When criminal charges for fraud and conspiracy are laid, these pesticide-hating fanatжcs should be advised that they have ALL have been identified on the basis of their statements, activities, affiliations, and whereabouts.

We must STRIKE BACK against these lying fanatжcs !

Explore the following link  …

The Media Library Of Lying Sacks Of Crжp

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Anti-Pesticide & Environmental Terrжrism

Fanatжcs Will Feel The Terrжr Of The Courts

NORAHG manages the library computer access and retrieval system for ALL anti-pesticide terrжrist acts of subversion, which includes a vast archive of documents, audio clips, and videos on ALL pesticide-hating fanatжcs.

This has been made available to those interested in litigation.

Striking back against these fanatжcs will be easy !

This archive contains names, statements, activities, and affiliations of ALL pesticide-hating fanatжcs, including government officials, as well as ALL anti-pesticide & environmental-terrжrist organizations that do not deserve any charity tax exempt status.

These organizations accumulate nearly unlimited ENVIRO-PROFIT without paying a penny in taxes.

Interested parties need only to send their requests for any information needed in the war against fanatжcal-prohibitions.

We must STRIKE BACK against these lying fanatжcs !

For more information on enviro-profit, explore the following links  …

Enviro-PROFIT — Money Squandered On Partisan, Political, & Subversive Activities

Enviro-PROFIT Investigated By Canada Revenue Agency — The Big Chill On Poor Li’l Enviro-Terrжrist Charities

For more information about prominent pesticide-hating fanatжcs, explore the following links  …

The Architects Of Anti-Pesticide Prohibition

Bell, Warren — Who Is This Diing-Dжng ?!?!

Cancer-Lunatжcs — Canadian Cancer Society

Carson, Rachel — The Queen Of Junk Science

Cavers, Donovan — Green Party Profiteer

Cottam Ghost-Writers — Deceiving The Public Anonymously

Doucet, Paul — Anti-Pesticide Hypochondriac

Feroe, Raquel — Eco-Terrжr-Activist Terrжrizes Edmonton

Forman, Gideon — Lunatжc Ming The Merciless Enviro-Terrжrist

Forman, Gideon — References For Litigation

Forman, Gideon — Paid-For-Profit Slide Show Presentation — Lies & Mis-Information

Hamir, Arzeena — Let Her Roast In Hell Wherever She Goes

Irwin, June — The Wicked Old Clown Witch

Layton, Jack — Prominent Architect Of Lunatжc Terrжrist Prohibition

Manitoba’s Lunatжc Terrжrists Who Imposed Arbitrary Prohibition

May, Elizabeth — Do We Want To Live In A Nation Ruled By Green-Lunatжcs ?!?!

McCumsey, Sheryl — With Her Lunatжc Co-Conspirators In Edmonton

McGuinty, Dalton — Resigns In Disgrace

Moore, Patti — Recipient Of Award For Best Anti-Pesticide Terrжrist-Of-The-Year

O’Leary, Sheilagh — Non-Expert Nude-Artist & Anti-Pesticide Lunatжc-Councillor

Ontario’s Anti-Pesticide Bastжrds

Ontario’s 9|11 Era Culprits — Part 1 Of 4 — Armstrong, Arya, Bell, City Of Toronto, Cooper, Cullen, Forman

Ontario’s 9|11 Era Culprits — Part 2 Of 4 — Fucile, Glor-Bell, Goodhand, Grinspun, Gue, Kasperski, Khatter — Coalition

Ontario’s 9|11 Era Culprits — Part 3 Of 4 — Koswan, McClenaghan, Mackenzie, McGuinty. Mitchell, OCFP — Coalition

Ontario’s 9|11 Era Culprits — Part 4 Of 4 — Page, Reisman, Rickman, Sears, Shapero, Smith, Suzuki — Coalition

Seely, Kathryn — The Lunatжc Grinning Mistress Of Mis-Information In British Columbia

Suzuki, David — Why Do We Celebrate This Guy ?!?!

Tukey, Paul — America’s Master-Bastжrd Anti-Pesticide Terrжrist

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Anti-Pesticide & Environmental Terrжrism

Fighting Anti-Pesticide Fanatжcs

When criminal charges for fraud and conspiracy are laid, legal experts say that there is sufficient information to lead to a successful prosecution.

Many pesticide-hating fanatжcs may be arrested and jailed for fraud.

In court, fanatжcal-defendants will realize that not a single person within their organizations has any recognized expertise, training or background in matters concerning pest control products.

In court, fanatжcal-defendants will be unable to provide any scientific basis for their needless, senseless, and malicious conspiracy to prohibit pest control products.

In court, fanatжcal-defendants will be « left out to dry » by their former co-conspirators.

Other fanatжcs will « rat out » their former co-conspirators.

These fanatжcs will be liable for damages worth millions of dollars.

Pesticide-hating fanatжcs, and their tax-exempt anti-pesticide organizations, deserve no less than  …

  • Arrests
  • Charges of manslaughter
  • Charges of fraud
  • Charges of conspiracy
  • Fines
  • Imprisonment
  • Rescinding of tax-exempt charity status

We must STRIKE BACK against these lying fanatжcs !

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Anti-Pesticide & Environmental Terrжrism

Heroes Who Speak Out

Those Heroes Speaking Out, Striking Back, &
Taking Action Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrism

Explore the following links  …

Heroes — The Wisdom Of Real Experts Who Speak Out Against The Conspiracy To Impose Reckless & Arbitrary Prohibition Against Conventional Pest Control Products

Heroes — Speaking Out Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrism

―――――――――――――――――――――

Striking Back Against Anti-Pesticide & Environmental Terrжrism

Complaints & Litigation

Here’s How To Take Action, Fight Back,
& Sue The Bastжrds’ Brains’ Out

Explore the following links  …

Complaint Channels — Contact Business, Fund-Raising, Government & Taxation Agencies, & Media Outlets

Litigation — Here’s How To Sue The Bastжrds’ Brains’ Out ! — Litigation Against Anti-Pesticide Activists

Litigation — Fighting Against Anti-Pesticide Prohibition In Courts Across Canada

Litigation — Let’s Terrжrize The Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists, Like Canadian Cancer Society  …  Let’s Legally Exterminжte The Cancer-Vermжn — IEPMA — Ms Vivian Krause — British Columbia

Litigation — Lawsuit By Female Players Who Say Fake Soccer Turf Violates Charter, Threaten Legal Action

Litigation — Here’s How To Sue The Bastжrds’ Brains’ Out — Announcement — Updated & Improved Report

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

Alberta — Edmonton — Anti-Pesticide Councillor

British Columbia — Golf Industry — Pre-Emptive Strike

British Columbia — What Have YOU Done — IEPMA

British Columbia — IEPMA Voice Of Industry — Updated

British Columbia — IEPMA Pushes For Initiatives — Holland

Canada — Benefits Of Turfgrass — CTRF Poster — BLOG

Canada — Targets Of Finance Minister — Tax-Exempt Status Investigated

Canada — Fighting Pesticide Bans In Court

Canada — Enviro-PROFIT — END of Enviro-Lunatжc Terrжrism

Canada — Enviro-PROFIT — Government Taking Money Away

David Suzuki -- Sheila Gunn Reid -- Video Recording -- 06 Minutes 48 Seconds

David Suzuki -- Make The Case Against David Suzuki A Best-Seller -- Video Recording -- 04 Minutes 53 Seconds

David Suzuki — The Case Against Suzuki — Sheila Gunn Reed

David Suzuki — Trade Association Response To The #@!!% Documentary — Part 2

David Suzuki — Complaint To Canada Revenue Agency

David Suzuki — Must Make Amends — Vivian Krause

Global Warming — Ben Stein Sues

Golf Industry — Rallying For Pre-Emptive Strike — Olson — BC

Golf Industry — BC Allied Golf Association — Lobbying

Golf Industry — NGCOA — Government Lobbying

Manitoba — Postcard Campaign

Manitoba — Pesticide Ban’s Foes Get Louder

Manitoba — From My Cold Dead Hands — Before October 1st

Ontario — Chudleigh — Amendment to Pesticide Ban

Ontario — Chudleigh — Beginning To Repeal Prohibition

Ontario — Hamilton — Watering Down Pesticide Ban

Ontario — Lowes — Accountability & Transparency

Ontario — Lowes — We’re Not Gonna Take It ANYMORE — Meg Sears

Ontario — Lowes — We’re Not Gonna Take It ANYMORE — Companies Worth Less

Ontario — Lowes — We’re Not Gonna Take It ANYMORE — Civil Action

Ontario — Lowes — We’re Not Gonna Take It ANYMORE — CAPE — Trillium

Ontario — Lowes — We’re Not Gonna Take It ANYMORE — Sun-Setting

Ontario — Lowes — The Pied Piper — CARD

Ontario — Lowes — What Can YOU Do

Ontario — Lowes — Statements For The Crown Prosecutor

Ontario — Lowes — Sufficient Evidence To Proceed

Ontario — Lowes — We’re Not Gonna Take It ANYMORE

Ontario — Lowes — The Lone Ranger — CARD

Ontario — Lowes — Fraud & Corruption — Smith — Maniacs Anonymous

Ontario — Lowes — Additional Charges — Party Pals

Ontario — Lowes — Federal Charges Filed — Economic Impact Study

Ontario — Lowes — Holding Those Responsible

Ontario — Lowes — We Intend To Lay Charges Of Fraud

Ontario — Lowes — Industry Has Little Choice — CELA — Report Card

Ontario — Lowes — Waiting For The Hammer To Drop

Posters — Benefits Of Golf — CropLife — Library — BLOG

Squamish, BC — Lunatжcs Muzzling Freedom — Drysdale — BLOG

USA — Golf Courses & Chemical Co Target Env Laws — BLOG

USA — Fighting Lunatжcs With A Mascot For Children

USA — Debug the Myths — West Coast — Tukey

USA — Reduced Regulatory Burdens Act

USA — Increased Lobbying Against Regulations

―――――――――――――――――――――

WE SPEAK THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT STRIKING BACK FROM AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE !

We are the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that conspire to destroy the Green space and other industries ( NORAHG ).  As a non-profit and independent organization, we are environmentalists who are dedicated to reporting about truth-challenged pesticide-hating fanatжcs ( HUJE ) who conspire to destroy businesses that are dependent on the use of safe and effective conventional pest control products.  We also report on the work of several highly-rated leading experts who have recognized expertise, training, and background in matters concerning pest control products, and who promote environmental realism and pesticide truths.

Not surprisingly, enviro-fanatжcs have demonstrated that they are incapable of processing overwhelming scientific evidence.  Should we trust these fanatжcs, who conveniently ignore scientific evidence, and attempt to impose their politicized-doctrines and twisted life-style choices against our society ?!?!

NORAHG was the brain-child of Mr William H Gathercole and his colleagues in 1991.  Mr Gathercole is now retired, although his name continues to appear as founder.  We dare to defy the pesticide-hating fanatжcs by exploring the whole truth from an independent perspective on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site   …   http://pesticidetruths.com/   If you wish to receive free reports on issues that concern you, please contact us at   …   force.of.de.nature@gmail.com   WILLIAM H GATHERCOLE AND NORAH G

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

31 comments on “STRIKING BACK