――――――――――――――――――――
The Whole Truth About The Subversive Conspiracy To Impose Reckless And Arbitrary Prohibition Against Pest Control Products
The Purpose Of This Report Is To Provide Information That Will Lead To Successful Complaints And Litigation Against Anti-Pesticide Government Officials And Activists
――――――――――――――――――――
STRIKING Back Against PROHIBITION Terrorism
Some shiftless suburbanite will eventually be dragged into court in shackles and put before a judge, CHARGED WITH THE DESPICABLE OFFENCE OF SPRAYING A BANNED PESTICIDE upon his / her lawn or garden.
The poor embattled suburbanite will have a lawyer who is eager to lambaste the ECOCRATS for their SHODDY LOGIC, INCESSANT FEAR-MONGERING, and LIMITLESS WILLINGNESS TO BOSS OTHER PEOPLE AROUND.
The lawyer would only need to submit FIVE EXHIBITS.
Exhibit A ― Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides.
Exhibit B ― Environmental Protection Agency.
Exhibit C ― World Health Organization.
Exhibit D ― Province of Alberta.
Exhibit E ― Province of Quebec.
The EXHIBITS would prove to a judge that pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE, and PROHIBITIONS are IRREFUTABLY INVALIDATED
Fighting Against Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION In Courts Across Canada
Sometime this spring or summer, some shiftless suburbanite will be dragged into court in shackles and put before a judge, CHARGED WITH THE DESPICABLE OFFENCE OF SPRAYING A BANNED PEST CONTROL PRODUCT upon his or her lawn or garden.
It could happen in any one of the seven Anti-Pesticide Provinces — Quebec, Ontario, Alberta, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland ( and Labrador ) — that have declared the domestic use of pest control products ILLEGAL.
It could happen in any one of the multitudinous municipalities, including St. John’s, in Newfoundland, whose Anti-Pesticide Elected Officials have ruled that to spray pest control products on a lawn or garden is to poison the Earth and endanger generations yet unborn. [ ?!?! ]
Hopefully, for the sake of drama and entertainment value, the poor embattled suburbanite will have a lawyer who is eager to lambaste the ECOCRATS for their SHODDY LOGIC, INCESSANT FEAR-MONGERING, and LIMITLESS WILLINGNESS TO BOSS OTHER PEOPLE AROUND.
In fact, pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, and PROHIBITIONS are now IRREFUTABLY INVALIDATED by several government bodies, including British Columbia’s Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides.
The lawyer could do well to submit Exhibit A ―
Exhibit A ― Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides
The report released in early May 2012 by British Columbia’s Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides tasked with examining whether the province should follow the lead of other provinces and PROHIBIT against pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.
The Special Committee’s short answer ―
No.
Irrational Restriction
Far be it from me to tell any lawyer how to defend his or her alleged perp, but a good start would be to quote from PAGE 53 of the report by British Columbia’s Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides ―
<< The committee concluded that despite the intensity of arguments in favour of a ban on the cosmetic use of pesticides and a general misunderstanding of the risks associated with chemicals, there is INSUFFICIENT SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT A PROVINCE-WIDE BAN on pesticides for cosmetic use.
The majority of the committee SUPPORTS USING SCIENCE-BASED EVIDENCE and WILL NOT RESTRICT ACCESS TO PRODUCTS THAT ARE APPROVED FOR SAFE USE IN CANADA. >>
« Your Honour », the lawyer could well surmise, « politicians will never let the facts get in the way of a good ban ».
Another quote, from PAGE 47 of the report by British Columbia’s Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides ―
<< From our perspective, the scientific evidence DOES NOT, at this time, warrant preventing British Columbians from buying and using approved domestic-class pesticides for lawn and garden care.
In other words, we are not prepared to say to consumers, « You can no longer go into any store, under any circumstances, and buy 2,4-D » >>.
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES ( Web-Page )
Criminal Chemical
The 2,4-D referred to, of course, is the herbicide dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, the superstar/chief villain of the domestic pest control products controversy.
CONVENTIONAL PRODUCT – 2,4-D HERBICIDE – EVALUATIONS & ASSESSMENTS ( Web-Page )
The suburbanite’s lawyer will face a tougher task if his/her client has a jury trial.
Those 12 people will likely have been exposed to the toxic effects of years of PROPAGANDA BY ECOCRATS.
( « Pesticides poison future generations », etc … )
The alleged perp’s lawyer will have to reach for some heavier artillery and aim for overkill, so to speak.
Pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, and PROHIBITIONS are also IRREFUTABLY INVALIDATED by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The lawyer could submit Exhibit B ―
Exhibit B ― Environmental Protection Agency
On April 10th, 2012, the ruling by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) stated that …
<< There is NO SCIENTIFIC BASIS ON WHICH TO BAN THE DOMESTIC USE OF 2,4-D. >>
The EPA determined 2,4-D is NOT A THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH, THE ENVIRONMENT OR WILDLIFE.
Its conclusion was a response to a request by the Natural Resources Defense Council to have 2,4-D banned in America.
The council is a U.S. Anti-Pesticide and Environmental-Terrorist Organization based in New York City, and has 1.3 million members.
That’s a lot of people not spraying dandelions.
Nonetheless, pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, and PROHIBITIONS are also IRREFUTABLY INVALIDATED by World Health Organization.
The lawyer could also submit Exhibit C ―
Exhibit C ― World Health Organization
The lawyer could also mention, in more than an offhand way, the World Health Organization has maintained for more than 15 years that …
● 2,4-D is not a threat to human health,
● 2,4-D does not cause cancer, and
● 2,4-D does not imperil future generations.
Pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, and PROHIBITIONS have been further IRREFUTABLY INVALIDATED by Province of Alberta.
The lawyer could submit Exhibit D ―
Exhibit D ― Province of Alberta
The Province of Alberta STOPPED the trend towards NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS PROHIBITION.
On August 9th, 2011, the Government of Alberta stated that it WILL NOT CREATE RESTRICTIONS OR LAWS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, that is relied upon for health and safety assessments.
Consequently, the Government of Alberta has indicated that is has NO INTENT TO PROHIBIT THE SALE OF ANY PEST CONTROL PRODUCT.
Alberta has monitored Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITIONS over the past few years and the approaches taken by other jurisdictions, and has found THE BASIS FOR ACTION CONFUSING AND INCONSISTENT.
PROVINCE OF ALBERTA – CONSPIRACY TO PROHIBIT PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS IN THE URBAN LANDSCAPE ( Web-Page )
Additionally, pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, and PROHIBITIONS have been IRREFUTABLY INVALIDATED by Province of Quebec.
The lawyer could submit Exhibit E ―
Exhibit E ― Province of Quebec
On May 25th, 2011, Dow AgroSciences, the manufacturer of the pest control product 2,4-D, SETTLED THE NAFTA CHALLENGE CASE with the Canadian government.
The North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, is an agreement signed by the governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States, creating a tri-lateral trade block in North America.
As part of the agreement, a VICTORY for the company, the Government of Quebec was HUMILIATED into making a STATEMENT saying that …
<< 2,4-D DOES NOT POSE AN UNACCEPTABLE RISK to human health or the environment. >>
Quebec was the first province to declare weed control products containing 2,4-D as POSSIBLY carcinogenic, which has now been DEEMED AS FALSE.
On that basis, municipalities in Quebec instituted NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS PROHIBITIONS against 2,4-D use as a lawn pest control product.
Other jurisdictions outside of Quebec also CONSPIRED to IMPOSE the Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITIONS against 2,4-D under the PRETEXT that it was a so-called carcinogen ― this ALLEGATION is now REFUTED.
In fact, ABSOLUTELY NO regulatory body in the world classifies 2,4-D as a human carcinogen ― 2,4-D is probably the MOST STUDIED and BEST UNDERSTOOD of ANY chemical ― not just pesticide ― in existence.
2,4-D DOES NOT POSE AN UNACCEPTABLE RISK to human health or the environment.
CONVENTIONAL PRODUCT – 2,4-D HERBICIDE – EVALUATIONS & ASSESSMENTS ( Web-Page )
Conclusion
Pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, and PROHIBITIONS are now IRREFUTABLY INVALIDATED.
Even so, the law is the law ― you spray, you pay.
The alleged perp could still be found GUILTY FOR THE DESPICABLE OFFENCE OF SPRAYING A BANNED PEST CONTROL PRODUCT upon his or her lawn or garden.
An Anti-Pesticide Judge would CONVENIENTLY IGNORE the fact that pest control products are HEALTH-CANADA-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC, and CAUSE NO HARM.
An Anti-Pesticide Judge could also CONVENIENTLY IGNORE the expertise of ANY leading authority in matters concerning pest control products.
MYTH-BUSTING – PESTICIDE BANS – THE MYTHS ABOUT ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION ( Web-Page )
The End of the Current Anti-Pesticide Siege of Terrorism Against the Professional Lawn Care Industry
The Public Does Not Want Prohibition
British Columbians DO NOT want their society to continue living in the 9|11 Era of Anti-Pesticide Enviro-Lunatic Profit-Hungry Terrorism !
On May 17th, 2012, British Columbia’s Special Committee on Cosmetic Pesticides announced that it WILL NOT RECOMMEND PROHIBITION against the use of pest control products in the Urban Landscape.
This VICTORY signals a possible END OF THE CURRENT SIEGE OF ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORISM Against the Professional Lawn Care Industry in British Columbia.
The public DOES NOT WANT Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION.
A recent POLL conducted by Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association ( CCSPA ) CONFIRMED that the VAST MAJORITY of residents in British Columbia are OPPOSED to the PROHIBITION of conventional pest control products, and they actually FAVOUR the continued use of these products around their homes and in public green spaces.
THE WISDOM OF CANADIAN CONSUMER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION ( Web-Page )
Pesticides Cause No Harm
Pest control products CAUSE NO HARM and are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE.
Not surprisingly, the BC Special Committee on Cosmetic Pesticides AGREED ― and deserves CONGRATULATION.
It is COMMON KNOWLEDGE that there are NO pest control products that are known or probable carcinogens.
Pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, and NO HARM WILL OCCUR when they are used according to label directions.
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES ( Web-Page )
MYTH-BUSTING – BEES – CANCER – CHILDREN – POLLS – WATER ( Web-Page )
MYTH-BUSTING – CANCER, THE MYTH OF ( Web-Page )
MYTH-BUSTING – PESTICIDE BANS – THE MYTHS ABOUT ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION ( Web-Page )
Anti-Pesticide Organizations Are Wrong
Organizations that led the SIEGE OF TERRORISM included Canadian Cancer Society ― all are listed among CANADA'S PROMINENT ANTI-PESTICIDE & ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS.
ORGANIZATIONS – ANTI-PESTICIDE & ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – SUBVERSIVE, CONTEMPTIBLE, AND RADICAL ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – REFERENCES FOR LITIGATION ( Web-Page )
These organizations are FUND-RAISING, PROFIT-SEEKING, and LOBBYING organizations ― they are NOT science, research, health, or physicians' organizations.
They FALSELY ALLEGE having UNDISCLOSED, NON-EXISTENT AND UNVERIFIABLE SECRET EVIDENCE about the safety of pest control products.
And yet, they have NEVER provided ANY credible information to Health Canada that justifies their Anti-Pesticide CONSPIRACIES.
This is because NO ONE at Canadian Cancer Society or any other Anti-Pesticide Organization has ANY recognized expertise, training, or background in matters concerning pest control products.
These organizations MUST NOT GET MORE MONEY for LYING AND TERRORIZING !
ENVIRO-PROFIT – MONEY SQUANDERED ON PARTISAN, POLITICAL, and SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES ( Web-Page )
There is NO RECOURSE but OFFICIAL COMPLAINTS AND LITIGATION against Environmental and Anti-Pesticide Organizations.
They DO NOT DESERVE ANY DONATIONS OR SUPPORT.
Nor do they deserve TAX-EXEMPT STATUSES.
They DO deserve to FACE THE SPOTLIGHT OF THE MEDIA and TERROR OF THE COURTS !
In Canada, Anti-Pesticide Organizations like Canadian Cancer Society are presently UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR CHARITY FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY.
The Government of Canada DOES NOT want its society to continue living in the 9|11 Era of Anti-Pesticide Enviro-Lunatic Profit-Hungry Terrorism !
COMPLAINT CHANNELS – BUSINESS, FUND-RAISING, GOVERNMENT, & TAXATION AGENCIES ( Web-Page )
COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN
COMPLAINT CHANNELS – LETTERS TO THE EDITOR – MEDIA CONTACTS LIBRARY ( Web-Page )
Catastrophic CARNAGE Caused by PROHIBITION
In jurisdictions outside of British Columbia, Anti-Pesticide Organizations have already INFLICTED HORRENDOUS AND CATASTROPHIC CARNAGE against businesses operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry, in the form of IMMENSE LOSSES OF REVENUES, BUSINESS FAILURES, BANKRUPTCY, and UNEMPLOYMENT, and even HORRIFIC FINES.
Because of Anti-Pesticide Organizations, the owners, employees, and families dependent on Professional Lawn Care businesses have faced TERROR, DESPAIR, and DESTITUTION.
CARNAGE CAUSED BY CATASTROPHIC ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION ( Web-Page )
Golf Industry Exception Status Is Lost
The GOLF INDUSTRY may end up being the BIGGEST LOSER, since it will be expected to develop a province-wide certification process ― it has effectively LOST ITS COMPLETE EXCEPTION STATUS.
Since 2008, in a DESPICABLE effort to DISTRACT activists, government officials, and the public, several Golf Industry Trade Associations like Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ) SUPPORTED the PROHIBITION and attempted to TORPEDO the Professional Lawn Care Industry.
GOLF – THE GOLF INDUSTRY COLLISION COURSE – DEMISE IS IMMINENT ( Web-Page )
GOLF – THE LOOMING GOLF INDUSTRY SHIPWRECK – NO LONGER A HOPEFUL FUTURE ( Web-Page )
British Columbia Conspiracy to Prohibit Pest Control Products in the Urban Landscape
British Columbia ( B.C. or BC ) is the western-most of Canada's provinces and is known for its natural beauty, as well as its RADICAL and SUBVERSIVE LUNATIC Anti-Pesticide Organizations.
ALLEGATIONS from these Anti-Pesticide Organizations about the IMAGINARY DANGER of pest control products are TOTALLY FALSE, and are UNTRUE MIS-REPRESENTATIONS designed to alarm and enrage the public and enhance their BUSINESSES, CASH-FLOW, and PROFIT.
Professional Lawn Care companies have been EXTENSIVELY DAMAGED and STAGNATING because of the THREAT and IMPLEMENTATION of the PROHIBITION of pest control products in the Urban Landscape.
It has led to CATASTROPHIC CARNAGE.
Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION DESTROYED the Modern Professional Lawn Care Industry in many jurisdictions across Canada.
It was NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, MALICIOUS, and UNNECESSARY.
Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION was UNNECCESSARY since pest control products are HEALTH-CANADA-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC, and CAUSE NO HARM.
As a direct result of PROHIBITION, Professional Lawn Care companies have LOST OVER 40 PER CENT OF THEIR CUSTOMERS.
Beginning in 2009, when municipalities in British Columbia started to implement PROHIBITION — BUSINESS GROWTH STAGNATED.
Since 2010, Professional Lawn Care companies have had to REDUCE STAFFING as a DIRECT RESULT of MUNICIPAL ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITIONS.
Professional Lawn Care companies have had to basically put ANY MAJOR INVESTMENT INTO THEIR BUSINESSES ON HOLD because of the continued THREAT of PROHIBITION.
PROHIBITION takes away all the gains made by Professional Lawn Care businesses in the past ten years, and MAKES IT DIFFICULT, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE, TO RECOVER.
Professional Lawn Care customers DEPEND upon the use of safe and effective pest control products to control damaging pests such as weeds and insects.
There ARE NOT ANY GREEN ALTERNATIVES THAT WORK ― they are INEFFECTIVE ― they are COSTLY ― you have to use them two, three, four times the recommended rate to get ANY results out of them.
Professional Lawn Care customers are telling businesses that … « If you can’t get rid of my weeds legally, I’ll do it myself. »
Professional Lawn Care companies have NO REAL GREEN ALTERNATIVES to use on a commercial basis.
Professional Lawn Care companies expect that, in 2012, they WILL CONTINUE TO LOSE MORE BUSINESS DUE TO THE THREAT OF IMMINENT PROHIBITION.
GREEN ALTERNATIVES … BOGUS & DISMAL FAILURES ( Web-Page )
STRIKING BACK AGAINST TERRORISM ( Web-Page )
For the original copy of this Force Of Nature Report, go to the following link …
NORAHG has archived even more information about BRITISH COLUMBIA on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site …
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – CONSPIRACY TO PROHIBIT PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS IN THE URBAN LANDSCAPE ( Web-Page )
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – COQUITLAM, CITY OF – AN ENVIRONMENT THAT IS UNHAPPY, UGLY, UNEMPLOYED, UNENLIGHTENED, AND UNHEALTHY ( Web-Page )
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – COQUITLAM, CITY OF – REFERENCES FOR LITIGATION ( Web-Page )
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – KELOWNA, CITY OF – ANTI-PESTICIDE WOMEN COUNCILLORS ( Web-Page )
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES ( Web-Page )
