~~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Overview
~
Why Does The Turf Industry
Need A National Lobby Group ?
~
~
~
We Must Take Action To Strike Back
& Respond Against Irrational Anti-
Turf, Anti-Golf & Anti-Pesticide Hate-
Speech & Harmful-Prohibitions
~
~
~
A single national LOBBY GROUP is desperately needed to represent the entire « TURF INDUSTRY », which includes, of course, the « GOLF INDUSTRY ».
~
This is because leaders of trade associations are absolute FAILURES with their POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING.
~
These AMATEURISH & INEPT industry-leaders only pay lip service to the importance of protecting superintendent & their facilities, & will go no further than writing worthless responses, creating pointless position papers, & sending ineffective letters of complaint to government officials who already hate & despise the golf industry.
~
These leaders & their trade associations have NO CREDIBILITY IN POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING regarding issues like pest control products.
~
Even worse, the industry-leaders’ standard strategy for handling HATE-SPEECH has been to PAY NO ATTENTION to these threats.
~
Incredibly, some industry-leaders have become ACOLYTES of those who conspire to annihilate the « TURF INDUSTRY », & its businesses, its assets, & its customers.
~
Some IDIOTIC industry-leaders have actually adopted the policy to publicly SUPPORT HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS against conventional pest control products needed to protect the urban landscape.
~
The paying-members of trade associations must ask themselves the following question …
~
~
Are We Better Off Than We Were A Decade Ago ?
~
~
The answer is « NO ».
~
Leaders of trade associations have been FAILURES with their POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING.
~
They have failed to make ANY correct decisions.
~
They are COWARDS, they do not care, & they can NO LONGER BE TRUSTED.
~
~
Trust No One In The Associations
~
~
They operate trade associations like IDIOTS.
~
They are responsible for FRAGMENTING the « TURF INDUSTRY » at a time when unity must be paramount.
~
A NATIONAL LOBBY GROUP must be mandated to take action on behalf of the entire « TURF INDUSTRY », & strike back & respond against ALL ANTI-PESTICIDE & ANTI-GOLF HATE-SPEECH, as well as HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS.
~
In the past, some trade associations have made some attempts with POLICIES & LOBBYING.
~
But, they have ALWAYS fallen short, because they are operated by AMATEURS.
~
This is because NOT ONE industry-leader has any expertise, training, or background in matters concerning POLICY-MAKING & LOBBYING.
~
Hence, paying-members of trade associations are NOT being protected from harm by any of their trade associations.
~
STRIKING BACK with a « TURF INDUSTRY » LOBBY GROUP is the ONLY correct solution.
~
~
We Must Strike Back Against Lies &
Mis-information Designed To Humiliate,
Damage, & Destroy Businesses
That Operate In The Turf Industry
~
~
There are road-blocks.
~
Currently, there is no single organization suited to lobby on behalf of the entire « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
Then, leaders MUST FIND AN INDEPENDENT LOBBY GROUP.
~
There are already too many associations & there is a lack of trust between them ?
~
Then, leaders MUST FIND WAYS TO EARN THE TRUST BACK.
~
The « TURF INDUSTRY » is far too diverse ?
~
Then, leaders MUST LEARN TO UNDERSTAND all facets of the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
What direction must be taken by the INDEPENDENT LOBBY GROUP.
~
Read the later section entitled « CRITICAL ISSUES FOR POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING ».
~
If political parties can work together, then so can trade associations.
~
This task is far too difficult, according to some unmotivated leaders ?
~
Then, these LAZY & INCOMPETENT leaders MUST RESIGN FROM THEIR POSITIONS.
~
~
Get Off Our grASS, & Let Us Find Great Hero Leaders
~
~
Perhaps we cannot ascribe malice to leaders which can be explained by INCOMPETENCE & LAZINESS, mixed with a desire to operate with their heads up their bжtts.
~
Nonetheless …
~
~
We Want To Be Better Off A Decade From Now
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Related Issues Concerning
Trade Associations & More
~
~
~
Links ―
~
~
~
Media History Of Western Canada Turfgrass Association
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/wcta-reports-blogs-references-cards/
~
~
~
WCTA-Leaders Must Pull Their Heads Out Of Their Bжtts
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/the-failure-of-western-canada-turfgrass-association/
~
~
~
The Failure Of Western Canada Turfgrass Association
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/2019/06/26/the-failures-of-western-canada-turfgrass-association/
~
~
~
National-Prohibitions Against The Golf Industry’s Pesticides
~
~
~
~
Majority Of BC Golf Courses Non-Compliant
~
~
~
~
Critical Issues For The Golf Industry
& The Failed CGSA Trade Association
~
~
~
~
Guelph Turfgrass Institute
~
~
~
~
Critical Issues That Must Be Addressed By The Golf Industry
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/golf-industry-critical-issues/
~
~
~
2009 Predictions The Golf Industry’s Looming Shipwreck
~
~
~
~
The Library Of Striking Back & Taking Action
Against Anti-Pesticide & Environmental Terrжrism
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/striking-back-against-terrorism/
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Re : |
Proposed Lobby Group For The
|
|
~ |
Date : |
December 2022 |
|
~ |
To : |
WCTA On-LineWestern Canada Turfgrass AssociationProvince Of British Columbia |
|
~ |
From : |
Produced By Force Of Nature& Edited For Length & Clarity~ Selected & Adapted Excerpts |
~ |
|
Reference :
~
Reference — WCTA — 2022 12 00 — Time For A Lobby Group For The Turf Industry In Canada
~
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With A Proposed Turf Industry Lobby Group ?
~
Stake-Holders
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
Trade Association Stake-Holders Are
Fragmented Along Lines Of Specialization
& Their Respective End Products
See below
~
~
~
Statements ―
~
~
The most visible STAKE-HOLDERS in the « TURF INDUSTRY » can be identified as ―
~
• Consulting & research institutes
~
• Equipment manufacturers
~
• Fertilizer manufacturers
~
• Field sport users
~
• Golf course superintendents
~
• Golf course facilities
~
• Golfers
~
• Home-owners
~
• Irrigation contractors
~
• Landscape architects / designers
~
• Landscapers
~
• Municipal & professional sports field managers
~
• Municipal parks & recreation facilities
~
• Pesticide manufacturers
~
• Professional lawn care businesses
~
• Seed producers
~
• Sod producers
~
• Suppliers & dealers
~
• Synthetic turf manufacturers
~
• Trade associations
~
• Urban planners
~
~
Unfortunately, these STAKE-HOLDERS ARE FRAGMENTED ALONG LINES OF SPECIALIZATION AND THEIR RESPECTIVE END PRODUCTS.
~
Even where the stake-holders recognize, by mutual consensus, that their activities have direct dependence, inter-relation and co-relation, this is not reflected at the most crucial level ― POLICY-MAKING.
~
Do industry stake-holders feel there is a NEED for a LOBBY GROUP that brings together all « TURF INDUSTRY » stake-holders, and to become the focal point of negotiation and advocacy at POLICY-MAKING LEVEL ?
~
~
~
~
――――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With A Proposed Turf Industry Lobby Group ?
~
Stake-Holders’ Comments
~
~
~
The following STAKE-HOLDERS in the « TURF INDUSTRY » have commented on Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying ―
~
~
~
• Stake-Holder CGSA
~
No specific representative at Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ).
~
CGSA failed to manage its policy-making, public affairs lobbying, & financial responsibilities.
~
Consequently, it was taken over by National Golf Course Owners Association ( NGCOA ).
~
CGSA is one of the biggest contributors to industry fragmentation across the nation.
~
~
~
• Stake-Holder Lyall – WCTA
~
Represented by Keith Lyall, 2013 president at Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ).
~
Superintendent, Sun Peaks Resort, British Columbia.
~
2021 winner of CGSA / Rain Bird Environmental Achievement of the Year Award.
~
WCTA is one of the biggest contributors to industry fragmentation across the nation.
~
See later section entitled « WCTA THROWS LAWN CARE BUSINESSES UNDER THE BUS — LETTER OF COMPLAINT TO WCTA / MEDIA RELEASE ».
~
~
~
• Stake-Holder Rousseau – WCTA
~
Represented by Jerry Rousseau, executive director at Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ).
~
One of the biggest contributors to industry fragmentation in western Canada is WCTA spear-headed by Rousseau.
~
See later section entitled « WCTA THROWS LAWN CARE BUSINESSES UNDER THE BUS — LETTER OF COMPLAINT TO WCTA / MEDIA RELEASE ».
~
~
~
• Stake-Holder Stricker – GTI
~
Represented by Sara Stricker, communications & outreach coordinator at Guelph Turfgrass Institute ( GTI ).
~
One of the biggest contributors to industry fragmentation across the nation is GTI because it has failed & has betrayed its graduates in the turf industry. See later section & segment.
~
~
~
• Stake-Holder Strutt
~
Lee Strutt, director of agronomy at Cabot Cape Breton Golf Courses, Nova Scotia.
~
No direct affiliation to a trade association.
~
~
~
• Unknown Industry Stake-Holder
~
The unknown president & CEO of a company dealing in turf.
~
There is no profile & no known affiliation to a trade association.
~
How can a person who refuses to identify himself be taken seriously on industry issues concerning lobbying ?
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With A Proposed Turf Industry Lobby Group ?
~
Stake-Holder Stricker – GTI
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Stricker – GTI
~
Description ―
~
~
Sara Stricker, communications & outreach coordinator, Guelph Turfgrass Institute ( GTI ).
~
This stake-holder in the turf industry has commented on Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying.
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Stricker – GTI
~
Key Points ―
~
~
Staff-Members At Guelph Turfgrass Institute ( GTI )
Cannot Be Trusted Because They Have Failed &
Betrayed Their Graduates In The Turf Industry
See below
~
It Is Difficult To Bring Together The
Different Sectors In The Turf Industry
See below
~
Different Sectors Have Different Performance
Requirements, & They Are Growing
Completely Different Species Of Turf Under
Widely Different Environmental Conditions
See below
~
Large-Scale Suppliers, Such As Syngenta,
Envu, & BASF, Have The Best Chance To Make
Moves In The Provincial Or Federal Level
See below
~
Why Would Anyone In The Turf Industry Be Witless
Enough To Give More & More Money & Support To
GTI, An Institution With A Disappointing History Of
Repeated Failures, Betrayals, & Bad Services ?!?!
See below
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Stricker – GTI
~
Statements ―
~
~
Sara Stricker, the communications & outreach coordinator, at the Guelph Turfgrass Institute.
~
Stricker suggests inclusion of cemeteries, seed producers, and professional organizations like the NSGA ( Nursery Sod Growers Association of Ontario ), OGSA ( Ontario Golf Superintendents Association – see later segment ), and STC ( Sports Turf Canada ) to the list of STAKE-HOLDERS.
~
Stricker shares that …
~
… as the Minor Use Commodity Liaison Committee Chair for the Ontario « TURF INDUSTRY », I have struggled with consolidating the NEEDS of the different STAKE-HOLDERS into a concise list of TOP THREE PRIORITIES regarding insects, weeds, and diseases on turf.
~
For example, the MOST IMPORTANT INSECT PESTS for lawn care included chinch bug and ants, whereas sod producers were concerned with bluegrass billbug and white grubs. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
Stricker goes further to note that ―
~
… not only do the DIFFERENT SECTORS have DIFFERENT PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS for their turf, like playability, roll speed, compaction, tensile strength, drought tolerance, colour, and surface hardness, but they are growing completely DIFFERENT SPECIES OF PLANT UNDER WIDELY DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.
~
You might as well be comparing apples to oranges.
~
Do industry stake-holders feel there is a NEED for a LOBBY GROUP that brings together all « TURF INDUSTRY » stake-holders, and to become the focal point of negotiation and advocacy at the POLICY-MAKING LEVEL ?
~
Stricker says, « YES » ―
~
However, IT IS DIFFICULT TO BRING TOGETHER THE DIFFERENT SECTORS.
~
Currently, the Nursery Sod Growers Association of Ontario ( NSGA ) has HIRED A PRIVATE COMPANY TO LOBBY OMAFRA for priorities regarding sod.
~
They had approached LandsCAPE Ontario previously to lobby together, but the two professional associations could not match up their priorities in a way that would be productive.
~
Stricker is of the view that LARGE-SCALE SUPPLIERS SUCH AS SYNGENTA, ENVU [ SEE BELOW ], BASF HAVE THE BEST CHANCE TO MAKE MOVES IN THE PROVINCIAL OR FEDERAL LEVEL.
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
ERASING THE BAYER NAME WITH ENVU !
~
~
In 2022, Envu was revealed as the new name of the standalone company, the result of Bayer divesting itself of its Environmental Science business division.
~
Bayer & Cinven announced the completion of the divestment of Bayer’s Environmental Science business division.
~
Envu has also released a multi-colored logo featuring red, blue, & purple hues.
~
~
~
LINK ―
~
~
√ — ENVU — New Envu Company — The History & Timeline Of Roundup Kangaroo-Trials & Victories In California — Post — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
GTI FRAGMENTATION THROUGH LACK OF TRUST !
~
~
Of course there is FRAGMENTATION within the « TURF INDUSTRY » because institutions like Guelph Turfgrass Institute ( GTI ) CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
~
Why would anyone in the « TURF INDUSTRY » be witless enough to give more & more money & support to an institution with a disappointing history of repeated failures, betrayals, & bad services ?!?!
~
For the second time in thirty years, millions & millions of dollars in donations have been squandered for the construction of more facilities for Guelph Turfgrass Institute ( GTI ) at the University of Guelph.
~
GTI-staff are employed by the government of Ontario.
~
This is the province with a government that imposed HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against pest control products that are desperately needed to protect the urban landscape.
~
Pest control products have been desperately needed by « TURF INDUSTRY » businesses in order to adequately control damaging pest of turf, to protect urban green spaces, & to retain residential & commercial customers.
~
As a result, government of Ontario failed & betrayed legal & tax-paying businesses operating in the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
Many of these businesses have employed thousands & thousands of Guelph-graduates who were unemployed because of Ontario’s HARMFUL-PROHIBITION.
~
More precisely, because of Ontario’s PROHIBITION, businesses operating in the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY » lost over $500 Million, with over 12,500 unemployed, many of them being Guelph-graduates.
~
In addition to a catastrophic loss of customers, Ontario’s HARMFUL-PROHIBITION cost these businesses millions & millions of dollars when they were forced to radically change their operations & re-brand their advertisements.
~
Like its government-employer, GTI-staff have also failed & betrayed their graduates in the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
GTI’s so-called « TURF EXPERTS » have operated as the instruments of government propaganda against pest control products.
~
In essence, GTI’s so-called « TURF EXPERTS » have become the purveyors of subversive-propaganda for its pesticide-hating employer.
~
GTI’s so-called « TURF EXPERTS » fully-support the HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against pest control products needed by the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
In fact, ALL GTI-staff, basically, are mere government officials employed by the provincial government, & they have been told to « TOE-THE-LINE » on extremist narratives like HARMFUL-PROHIBITION
~
Consequently, staff at Guelph Turfgrass Institute ( GTI ) cannot be trusted & deserve no financial donations.
~
Overall, every government official, including GTI-staff, MUST support HARMFUL-PROHIBITION, or face termination from employment, & suffer the loss of the lucrative government pension plan.
~
GTI-staff have been forced to become malevolent anti-pesticide business-loathing extremists, posing as « BENEVOLENT TURF EXPERTS », who do the bidding of the government at the expense of the « TURF INDUSTRY » they are supposed to serve.
~
Additionally, GTI has fallen under further scrutiny because of its failures, betrayals, & bad services with the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
In the midst of financial carnage caused by both the HARMFUL-PROHIBITION & the Chinese pandemic, GTI had the unmitigated gall to ask, yet again, for more millions of dollars for new facilities.
~
The first facilities of the GTI were officially established in 1987.
~
At the time, GTI asked the « TURF INDUSTRY » to pay-out millions of dollars to make the facilities a reality at the University of Guelph.
~
Construction began with the sod-turning ceremony in November 1991.
~
Unfortunately, government of Ontario owned the land the GTI was built on, with the lease expiring in 2018.
~
The PROFIT-HUNGRY provincial government decided not to renew GTI’s lease, preferring to use the land in real estate development.
~
As a result, in 2017, GTI asked the « TURF INDUSTRY » for more money for more facilities … again.
~
Should the « TURF INDUSTRY » have financially supported director Eric Lyons & GTI … again ?!?!
~
Should the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY » support GTI … again ?!?!
~
Should ANY industry provide financial support ?!?!
~
Hasn’t GTI fooled everyone enough, & repeatedly, with its failures, betrayals, & bad services ?!?!
~
Should each person in the « TURF INDUSTRY » say … « I AM A GOOD ENOUGH PERSON TO FORGIVE YOU, BUT NOT STUPID ENOUGH TO TRUST YOU AGAIN ».
~
Observers say ― let GTI perish.
~
Once it has been declared dead, observers believe the « TURF INDUSTRY » will be better off !
~
The « TURF INDUSTRY » must not give any more money or support to GTI !
~
~
~
LINK ―
~
~
√ — GUELPH — Guelph Turfgrass Institute — Why Would Anyone Be Witless Enough To Give More & More Money To An Institution With A History Of Repeated Failures, Betrayals, & Bad Services ?!?! — Post — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With A Proposed Turf Industry Lobby Group ?
~
Stake-Holder Lyall – WCTA
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Lyall – GTI
~
Description ―
~
~
Keith Lyall, 2013 president at Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ).
~
Superintendent, Sun Peaks Resort, British Columbia.
~
2021 winner of CGSA / Rain Bird Environmental Achievement of the Year Award.
~
This stake-holder in the turf industry has commented on Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying.
~
WCTA & CGSA are the biggest contributors to industry fragmentation across the nation.
~
See later section entitled « WCTA THROWS LAWN CARE BUSINESSES UNDER THE BUS — LETTER OF COMPLAINT TO WCTA / MEDIA RELEASE ».
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Lyall – WCTA
~
Key Points ―
~
~
« We All Just Grow Grass »
Is Definitely Not Accurate
See below
~
How Can The Industry Be Fragmented ?
See below
~
When Prohibition Was Proposed In British
Columbia, The Turf Industry Got Zero Support
From Municipal Sports Turf Professionals
See below
~
Municipalities Create Their Own Rules,
So Don’t Waste Your Time With Them
See below
~
Golf Needs To Fight For Itself
& Stand On Its Own Two Feet
See below
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Lyall – WCTA
~
Statements ―
~
~
On the question of FRAGMENTATION in the « TURF INDUSTRY », Keith Lyall, the superintendent at Sun Peaks Resort is assertive that …
~
… there is no « TURF INDUSTRY » under legislation ― at least in British Columbia.
~
Therefore, how can it be FRAGMENTED ? » [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
WCTA FRAGMENTATION THROUGH LACK OF TRUST !
~
~
Of course there is FRAGMENTATION within the « TURF INDUSTRY » because there is NO TRUST in WCTA, spear-headed by leader Jerry Rousseau.
~
WCTA has TORPEDOED & EXTENSIVELY DAMAGED the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY ».
~
WCTA has « THROWN-UNDER-THE-BUS » the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY » by conspiring to impose HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS against pest control products used in the urban landscape.
~
The TREACHEROUS WCTA has validated HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS that have led to terrжr, despair, & destitution for businesses operating in the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY ».
~
Oddly enough, these businesses were ⁄ are members of WCTA.
~
WCTA is just a bunch of #@!!% bastжrds !
~
~
~
LINKS ―
~
~
√ — WCTA — Rousseau Statements To Special Committee — The Consequences Of Rousseau Supporting The Prohibition Of Pest Control Products — The Owner Of A Professional Lawn Care Franchise Says Resign Now — Who’s Side Are You On ? — pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√ — WCTA — The Failure Of Western Canada Turfgrass Association — Web-Page — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/2019/06/26/the-failures-of-western-canada-turfgrass-association/
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Lyall – WCTA
~
Statements ( continued ) ―
~
~
Lyall adds ―
~
In the tourism / service sector we have multiple groups working to benefit golf courses, including golf and turf associations.
~
The things I have to do are far different than other industries outside of golf.
~
For example, I have to hire, train, supervise, physically work, write purchase orders, prepare budgets, and plan for capital.
~
No way can you compare that to what municipal workers / supervisors / managers do. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
Lyall provides direct experience of the nature of debates between « TURF INDUSTRY » stake-holders, stating ―
~
I once argued that fact ― differences in activities in and outside golf ― with a president of a turf association who said to me « WE ALL JUST GROW GRASS ».
~
That is definitely not accurate.
~
How many sports turf managers go out and fix irrigation breaks ― or even know how too ?
~
How many in those other industries you listed deal with acres of bentgrass at 0.125 of an inch ?
~
Does this POLICY-MAKING approach by government at the national and regional levels pose any challenges for stake-holders in the « TURF INDUSTRY » ?
~
According to Lyall, the FRAGMENTED approach weakens the ability for stake-holders to effectively lobby government ( s ).
~
Lyall shares that …
~
… years ago, when the British Columbia government was considering a cosmetic pesticide ban, I was the chair of the Environmental Advocacy Committee.
~
We reached out to many groups to help support us on the fight to stop this ban and raise funds to update our Provincial Turfgrass IPM Manual.
~
I personally sat down with provincial bureaucrats and even with our Provincial Minister of the Environment.
~
WE GOT ZERO SUPPORT FROM MUNICIPAL SPORTS TURF PROFESSIONALS, they all but refused to join in our letter-writing campaign, and one who sat on our committee never bothered to show up for a single meeting.
~
Do industry stake-holders feel there is a NEED for a LOBBY GROUP that brings together all « TURF INDUSTRY » stake-holders, and to become the focal point of negotiation and advocacy at POLICY-MAKING LEVEL ?
~
Lyall is emphatic about the prospect ―
~
« NO ».
~
In my opinion, GOLF NEEDS TO FIGHT FOR ITSELF AND STAND ON ITS OWN TWO FEET.
~
In British Columbia, MUNICIPALITIES CAN CREATE THEIR OWN [ ARBITRARY & DISCRIMINATORY ] RULES and often do, SO DON’T WASTE YOUR TIME.
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
FRAGMENTATION BECAUSE OF DIVERSE EXCEPTION STATUSES !
~
~
Of course there is FRAGMENTATION within the « TURF INDUSTRY » because PROHIBITIONS are arbitrary & discriminatory.
~
INCONSISTENT & UNFAIR EXCEPTION STATUSES ― The audacity & hypocrisy of provincial & municipal officials is clearly evident when they circumvent their own HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS by taking advantage of exceptions that they wrote into their laws. Typically, PROHIBITIONS have allowed thousands & thousands of inconsistent & unfair exception statuses for pest infestations ― on government-owned green spaces only [ ?!?! ] for controlling invasive, & destructive pests such as European Chafer Insects, Japanese Knotweed, & Japanese Beetle Insects. Additionally, for those residents with the same pest problems on their home properties, they may be shжt-outta-luck relying on any exception. Ideally, there should be no #@!!% exception statuses whatsoever.
~
GOLF FACILITIES ― Typically, HARMFUL-PROHIBITION has never been imposed against golf facilities ― even though golf courses are maintained by applying the-very-same ingredients otherwise prohibited on city-owned green spaces & residential properties. If it is safe for children & adults to walk on pesticide-treated golf courses, & eat pesticide-treated food, but it is seemingly not safe for them to walk & play on pesticide-treated lawns.
~
THERE SHOULD BE NO EXCEPTIONS WHATSOEVER ― HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS are arbitrary & discriminatory because they specifically discriminate against one specific type of business ― « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE ». Observers contend that HARMFUL-PROHIBITION must apply to EVERYONE. In order to be consistent & fair, there should be absolutely no arbitrary exception statuses for anyone. Elected officials must prohibit all pest control products for everyone, including ― • agriculture • cemeteries • forestry • fruit & vegetable production • golf courses • mosquito control • nursery production • orchards • rose gardens • sod production • sports fields • & more.
~
~
~
LINKS ―
~
~
√ — ONTARIO — Pesticide Bans & Destroyers Of Lawn Care Businesses — Post — LINK
~
~
~
√ — ONTARIO — Living In Environmental Infamy — Web-Page — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/ontario-living-in-environmental-infamy/
~
~
√ — CARNAGE — Catastrophic Anti-Pesticide Prohibition — Re-Direct Links — Web-Page — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/carnage-caused-by-anti-pesticide-prohibition/
~
~
√ — CARNAGE — Prohibition Leading To Business Failures — Web-Page — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/carnage-leading-to-business-failures/
~
~
√ — KAMLOOPS BC — Prohibition Is A Blow Against Science & Local Businesses — Corruption Among Officials ?!?! — Suing The SOBs’ Brains’ Out — Post — LINK
~
~
~
√ — KAMLOOPS BC — Lunatжcs Donovan Cavers & Arjun Singh — Get Rid Of These Fanatжcs — The Whole Truth About Kamloops — Post —LINK
~
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Lyall – WCTA
~
Statements ( continued ) ―
~
~
With an even split between the stake-holders interviewed for this article, one of the unquenched deltas that rings loudly is whether there is another organization better suited to conduct lobbying and advocacy on behalf of « TURF INDUSTRY » stake-holders ―
~
« NO », there are already too many organizations.
~
Federal, provincial, and regional golf associations are the best ones to lobby on behalf of golf.
~
Municipalities don’t NEED to lobby, they are government.
~
An additional question that pops up as we go down the rabbit hole is what would be the obstacles to be surmounted in case there is NEED for a new lobby group ?
~
Lyall says ―
~
There’s only one thing you NEED for lobbying and that’s money ― if you have that then you’re fine.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With A Proposed Turf Industry Lobby Group ?
~
Stake-Holder Rousseau – WCTA
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Rousseau – WCTA
~
Description ―
~
~
Represented by Jerry Rousseau, executive director, Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ).
~
This stake-holder in the turf industry has commented on Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying.
~
WCTA is among the biggest contributors to industry fragmentation across the nation.
~
See later section entitled « WCTA THROWS LAWN CARE BUSINESSES UNDER THE BUS — LETTER OF COMPLAINT TO WCTA / MEDIA RELEASE ».
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Rousseau – WCTA
~
Key Points ―
~
~
One Of The Biggest Contributor To Industry
Fragmentation In Western Canada Is
WCTA Spear-Headed By Jerry Rousseau
See below
~
There Are Already Too Many Associations
& Lack Of Trust Between Organizations
See below
~
Currently, There Is No Organization Suited To
Lobby On Behalf Of The Entire Turf Industry
See below
~
Government Tends To See The Turf
Industry As Primarily Sod Producers As It
Relates To Their Agricultural Programs
See below
~
The Turf Industry Is Far Too Diverse
See below
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Rousseau – WCTA
~
Statements ―
~
~
The first thing needed is to define the term « TURF INDUSTRY », says Jerry Rousseau, the executive director of Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ), which has more than 700 members, making it the largest multi-sector turf management industry organization in Canada.
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
FAILURE ― The failed-WCTA has 700 members with dwindling golf industry participation. WCTA ’s policy-making & lobbying is in a sad state of affairs, since the majority of its member-golf-superintendents have been found to violate provincial pesticide laws. WCTA-leaders must be frustrated because their trade association is floundering in failure after failure. Perhaps we cannot ascribe malice to WCTA-leaders which can be explained by incompetence & laziness, mixed with a desire to operate with their heads up their bжtts.
~
~
~
LINKS ―
~
~
√ — WCTA — Dwindling Golf Industry Involvement — Conference Analytics 2004-2018 — Reference — pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√ — WCTA — Dwindling Golf Industry Involvement — Annual Conference & Trade Show Analytics — Reference — pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√ — WCTA — Majority Of BC Golf Courses Non-Compliant — Post — LINK
~
~
~
√ — WCTA — The Failure Of Western Canada Turfgrass Association — Post — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/2019/06/26/the-failures-of-western-canada-turfgrass-association/
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Rousseau – WCTA
~
Statements ( continued ) ―
~
~
Rousseau adds that …
~
… depending on who you ask, there are differences in how this is perceived.
~
For example, government tends to see the « TURF INDUSTRY » as primarily sod producers as it relates to their agricultural programs.
~
There are STAKE-HOLDERS who don’t even realize they are STAKE-HOLDERS, for example, golfers, field sport users, and home-owners.
~
According to Rousseau ―
~
… the biggest contributor to industry FRAGMENTATION is the strong instinct in forming fraternities amongst specializations. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
Humans generally NEED to feel like being part of a group and sometimes those within the group can feel that outsiders don’t understand their concerns and / or issues.
~
One then wonders if this is an industry struggle or relationships dynamics within the provincial governments in Canada.
~
Do industry stake-holders feel there is a NEED for a LOBBY GROUP that brings together all « TURF INDUSTRY » stake-holders, and to become the focal point of negotiation and advocacy at POLICY-MAKING LEVEL ?
~
« YES » and « NO » is Jerry Rousseau’s response [ ?!?!?!?! ] ―
~
« YES », because ideally it would be the best approach in many ways. That is, government would rather speak to one representative ― and when lobbying, it’s better to have everyone singing from the same song page.
~
« NO », because from my experience, the « TURF INDUSTRY » is far too diverse.
~
Rousseau states further, our nation is far too large and the issues / priorities far too variable to ever be completely effective ―
~
Creating an overarching LOBBY BODY [ AKA LOBBY GROUP ] doesn’t fundamentally address the FRAGMENTATION problem and can even make it worse, that is, one perspective takes lead and dominates while others do not always agree ― or feel disproportionally represented.
~
With an even split between the stake-holders interviewed for this article, one of the unquenched deltas that rings loudly is whether there is another organization better suited to conduct lobbying and advocacy on behalf of « TURF INDUSTRY » stake-holders.
~
The short answer is « NO », says Rousseau ―
~
There is « NO » current organization [ AKA LOBBY GROUP ] suited to lobby on behalf of the entire turf management profession and I do not believe it’s a likely possibility.
~
~
~
Background Information
~
TIME FOR ROUSSEAU TO BE TERMINATED !
~
~
Observers are calling for the dismissal of Jerry Rousseau as executive director of Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ). Rousseau has no recognized expertise, no training, & no background in matters concerning POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING on pest control products. WCTA-leaders must be frustrated because of Rousseau’s failures at almost everything !
~
One glaring example are his LIES about WCTA being a research body ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! Rousseau must be dismissed, or at the very least, his role in POLICY & LOBBYING must be terminated & his statements censored. The « TURF INDUSTRY » will NEVER SUCCEED if it depends upon lying-leaders like Rousseau.
~
Of course there are road-blocks in the formation of a LOBBY GROUP. Currently, there is no single organization suited to lobby on behalf of the entire « TURF INDUSTRY ». Then, leaders MUST FIND AN INDEPENDENT LOBBY GROUP. There are already too many associations & there is a lack of trust between them ? Then, leaders MUST FIND WAYS TO EARN THE TRUST BACK. The « TURF INDUSTRY » is far too diverse ? Then, leaders MUST LEARN TO UNDERSTAND all facets of the « TURF INDUSTRY ». What direction must be taken by the INDEPENDENT LOBBY GROUP. Read the later section entitled « CRITICAL ISSUES FOR POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING ». If political parties can work together, then so can trade associations. This task is far too difficult, according to some unmotivated leaders ? Then, these LAZY & INCOMPETENT leaders MUST RESIGN FROM THEIR POSITIONS. The « TURF INDUSTRY » will NEVER SUCCEED if it depends upon leaders like Rousseau. Perhaps we cannot ascribe malice to Rousseau which can be explained by INCOMPETENCE & LAZINESS, mixed with a desire to operate with his head up his bжtt.
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Rousseau – WCTA
~
Statements ( continued ) ―
~
~
Rousseau adds that …
~
… a STAKE-HOLDER audit would help understand this by illustrating the many players involved with their long history of complicated partnerships, inter-connections, overlap and levels of knowledge on any given issue.
~
For example, the golf industry has the National Allied Golf Association [ NAGA ] and their respective provincial counter-parts, that is, AGA-BC, that include representation from golf superintendents, however the provincial groups have never really interacted with the national group.
~
~
~
Background Information
~
ONTARIO GOLF SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION !
~
~
There are great hero leaders who have defended the golf industry
~
The golf industry has, occasionally, been effective in policy-making & public affairs lobbying.
~
The industry boasts having strong & impressive public affairs leaders, such as those listed below.
~
We thank them & many others for their hard work ―
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Mr Jarrod Barakett |
Ontario Golf Superintendents Association ( OGSA ) |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Mr Bob Burrows |
Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ) |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Ms Teri Yamada |
Royal Canadian Golf Association ( RCGA ) – Golf Canada |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
One of the principal reasons why the golf industry was provided with an exception status from the Ontario Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act is because of Mr Jarrod Barakett at Ontario Golf Superintendents Association ( OGSA ), who organized an impeccable public affairs effort.
~
Golf course employees, owners, & golfers provided comments or signed petitions in support of an exception.
~
They submitted a total of 1316 signatures.
~
It worked !
~
~
~
LINK ―
~
~
√ — GOLF INDUSTRY — 2009 Predictions Of The Looming Shipwreck Of The Golf Industry — Canadian Golf Superintendents Association — David Suzuki Foundation — Quintozene — Post — LINK
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
CGSA FRAGMENTATION THROUGH LACK OF TRUST !
~
~
Of course there is FRAGMENTATION within the « TURF INDUSTRY » because IDIOTIC Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ) CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
~
How can anyone TRUST a trade association that managed its POLICY-MAKING, PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING, & FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES so badly that it was taken over by another association ?
~
Superintendents have lost their CGSA.
~
In fall 2017, National Golf Course Owners Association ( NGCOA ) was allowed to TAKE-OVER the failed-CGSA.
~
Incredibly, a very small group of CGSA-leaders permitted themselves to make a settlement that unravels the 50-year legacy of the CGSA.
~
It was like Hitler entering France, with no resistance whatsoever.
~
This will influence thousands of decent & hard-working people, superintendents & their employees, who rely on the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
Not surprisingly, CGSA-leaders have attracted suspicions of alleged conflicts-of-interest.
~
CGSA-leaders have already financially mis-managed our trade association, & they have now, seemingly, abandoned their members.
~
Perhaps we should not ascribe malice to CGSA-leaders for their failures, which can adequately be explained by incompetence & laziness.
~
It must be noted that National Golf Course Owners Association ( NGCOA ) has been making AMATEURISH attempts with PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING.
~
~
~
LINKS ―
~
~
√ — CGSA — Take-Over By Golf Course Owners — Critical Issues — Post — LINK
~
~
~
√ — CGSA — The Media History Of Canadian Golf Superintendents Association — Web-Page — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/canadian-golf-superintendents-association/
~
~
√ — NGCOA — Government Lobbying Of Environmental Issues — pdf — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Rousseau – WCTA
~
Statements ( continued ) ―
~
~
With an even split between the stake-holders interviewed for this article, one of the unquenched deltas that rings loudly is whether there is another organization better suited to conduct lobbying.
~
Jerry Rousseau says ―
~
… centralization tends to follow population demographics, that is, larger groups will hold more weight than smaller groups, those further from the centre will receive less attention to their NEEDS than those nearer.
~
Political will or lack thereof, that is some organizations want « TO BE THE BOSS » while others are happy to follow along.
~
In addition to the philosophically outlined points, Rousseau shares a cluster of thought-provoking points, including …
~
… differences amongst STAKE-HOLDERS in levels of knowledge on any given issue creates difference in setting priorities and sense of urgency.
~
Frequent changes of government ― combined with various levels of government involved, that is, municipal, provincial, national, make it extremely difficult to stay on top of all the issues and perhaps more importantly, forge relationships with politicians.
~
A lobby group is expensive and there are already TOO MANY ASSOCIATIONS and LACK OF TRUST [ SEE BELOW ] between organizations.
~
The unintended consequences of lobby efforts, include losing funding and higher levels of COMPLIANCE SCRUTINY [ SEE BELOW ] .
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
WCTA FRAGMENTATION THROUGH LACK OF TRUST !
~
~
How can anyone TRUST a trade association that has MIS-MANAGED ITS POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING ?
~
LACK OF TRUST between organizations in western Canada ?!?!?!?!
~
Of course there is LACK OF TRUST.
~
The Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ) has TORPEDOED & EXTENSIVELY DAMAGED the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY » by throwing it « UNDER-THE-BUS ».
~
According to Rousseau ―
~
… the biggest contributor to industry FRAGMENTATION is the strong instinct in forming fraternities amongst specializations.
~
WRONG ! The biggest contributor to industry FRAGMENTATION in western Canada is WCTA, spear-headed by Jerry Rousseau.
~
Rousseau said ―
~
… there are already TOO MANY ASSOCIATIONS and LACK OF TRUST between organizations.
~
The WCTA has conspired to impose HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS against pest control products used in the urban landscape.
~
The WCTA has validated HARMFUL-PROHIBITION that has led to terrжr, despair, & destitution for businesses operating in the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY ».
~
These businesses have suffered catastrophic carnage in the form of horrific fines, business destruction, & unemployment.
~
Oddly enough, in western Canada, these businesses were ⁄ are members of WCTA.
~
WCTA-leaders are just a bunch of #@!!% bastжrds !
~
~
~
LINKS ―
~
~
√ — WCTA — Rousseau Statements To Special Committee — The Consequences Of Rousseau Supporting The Prohibition Of Pest Control Products — The Owner Of A Professional Lawn Care Franchise Says Resign Now — Who’s Side Are You On ? — pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√ — WCTA — The Failure Of Western Canada Turfgrass Association — Web-Page — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/2019/06/26/the-failures-of-western-canada-turfgrass-association/
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
BC SUPERINTENDENTS CANNOT BE TRUSTED ?
~
~
BAD-BOYS ― LACK OF TRUST between organizations in western Canada ?!?!?!?! Of course there is LACK OF TRUST. For example, the BC golf industry has lots of bad-boy superintendents who violate pesticide laws with impunity. This has created difficulties with POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING.
~
MASSIVE VIOLATIONS BY BAD-BOYS ― Government officials in British Columbia ( BC ) indicate that the majority of golf course superintendents have been massively violating provincial pesticide laws & have been overwhelmingly non-compliant with BC’s Amended IPM Regulations. According to officials, out of 318 golf courses, 192 DID NOT HOLD VALID PESTICIDE USE LICENSES. Clearly, the golf industry has a continuous culture of deception in British Columbia. The professionalism of these bad-boy-superintendent-violators who operate the offending golf courses must be seriously questioned.
~
BAD-BOYS OF AUDUBON GOLF ― The majority of BC golf courses that were certified-members of « THE AUDUBON CO-OPERATIVE SANCTUARY PROGRAM FOR GOLF » were either non-licensed, out-of-compliance, or both ― these hypocritical golf courses have pretended being more environmentally-conscious when, in fact, their superintendents have massively violated pesticide laws. Their credibility must be in serious doubt.
~
BAD-BOY ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS ― The majority of golf courses that have been managed by so-called « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » have also been out-of-compliance with BC’s Amended IPM Regulations ― these hypocritical activists have needlessly alarmed & enraged the public by spreading truth-challenged pesticide-hating propaganda. As a result, their credibility has become non-existent.
~
MORE COMPLIANCE SCRUTINY ― BC government officials have indicated that they will continue to conduct compliance audit-inspections of golf courses, including those that have never been inspected. In other words, they will be conducting HIGHER LEVELS OF COMPLIANCE SCRUTINY because of BC’s violator-superintendents. Essentially, these bastжrds have attracted the wrath of the government apparatus against the ENTIRE golf industry. These violators are just a bunch of #@!!% bastжrds !
~
THE FAILURE OF WCTA ― Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ) represents the turf management profession, which includes golf course superintendents. The leaders of WCTA, spear-headed by Jerry Rousseau, have failed to make any correct POLICY-MAKING & LOBBYING, resulting in a sad state of affairs for its members. The MAJORITY of its member-superintendents have VIOLATED provincial pesticide laws. As a result, these violators have PROVOKED HIGHER LEVELS OF COMPLIANCE SCRUTINY against the ENTIRE golf industry. Observers hope that all violator-superintendents will be EXPELLED from WCTA. Or, at the very least, WCTA must demand government ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS against all superintendents who violate pesticide laws. If violator-superintendents can’t be good examples, then they must serve as horrible warnings.
~~
SUPERINTENDENTS FAILED TO READ LIBRARY ― Violator-superintendents have lied & cheated about licensing & complying with BC’s Amended IPM Regulations, despite a large, but evidently under-used, « LIBRARY OF BC GUIDANCE MATERIAL » furnished by the government of British Columbia. Their attention-span has been in serious doubt. Observers could rest assured that violator-superintendents are known to pay MORE ATTENTION to invitations by trade associations to play in golf tournaments at high-end clubs, & to international conferences held at exotic fun-filled locations. The attention-span of violator-superintendents appears to be selective.
~
~
~
LINKS ―
~
~
√ — VIOLATING PESTICIDE LAW — Majority Of BC Golf Courses Non-Compliant — Post — LINK
~
~
~
√ — WCTA — The Failure Of Western Canada Turfgrass Association — Post — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/2019/06/26/the-failures-of-western-canada-turfgrass-association/
~
~
√ — WCTA — The Media History Of Western Canada Turfgrass Association — Web-Page — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/wcta-reports-blogs-references-cards/
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With A Proposed Turf Industry Lobby Group ?
~
Stake-Holder Strutt
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Strutt
~
Description ―
~
~
Lee Strutt, director of agronomy, Cabot Cape Breton Golf Courses, Nova Scotia.
~
No direct affiliation with a trade association.
~
This stake-holder in the turf industry has commented on Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying.
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Strutt
~
Key Points ―
~
~
The Use Of Amenity Turf Management
Is Fragmented By Specialism ?!?!?!?!
See below
~
Everyone’s Needs Are Marginally Different
From One Stake-Holder To Another
See below
~
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Strutt
~
Statements ―
~
~
Further afield, Lee Strutt, the director of agronomy at Cabot Cape Breton, on the sandy beaches of the Atlantic Ocean, in Nova Scotia, shares his experience from United Kingdom stating ―
~
The use of amenity turf management is FRAGMENTED by their own specialism. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
When POLICIES are made through government bodies, it is normally reliant on a single body [ IE GROUP ] or maybe two to lobby POLICY changes.
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
CGSA FRAGMENTATION THROUGH LACK OF TRUST !
~
~
Of course there is FRAGMENTATION within the « TURF INDUSTRY » because Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ) CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
~
CGSA has TORPEDOED & EXTENSIVELY DAMAGED the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY ».
~
Since 2008, the failed-CGSA-leaders have inconceivably endorsed the imposition of HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against pest control products used in the urban landscape … as long as the golf industry continued to be provided with a pesticide ban exception status.
~
The CGSA’s 2009-2010 leaders were especially enthusiastic in their support of HARMFUL-PROHIBITION.
~
Future generations will ask the question ― why ?!?!
~
Observers have repeatedly warned the CGSA-leaders to stop supporting HARMFUL-PROHIBITION.
~
CGSA-leaders must immediately address several more critical issues.
~
For example, CGSA-leaders must strongly adopt the policy that conventional pest control products & fertilizers are scientifically-safe & will cause NO harm.
~
CGSA-leaders must also adopt the policy that the only course of action against HARMFUL-PROHIBITION is through litigation.
~
Whenever successfully elected to power, Liberals, New Democrats, & Greens WILL ALWAYS conspire to impose NATIONAL–PROHIBITION against ALL pest control products, including those desperately-needed by the golf industry.
~
Consequently, CGSA-leaders must also adopt the policy to openly & financially SUPPORT all Conservative political candidates who oppose any PROHIBITION against pest control products & fertilizers.
~
CGSA-leaders must protect golf industry’s pesticide ban exception status by adopting these policies.
~
Unfortunately, CGSA-leaders only pay lip service to the importance of protecting this exception status, & will go no further than writing worthless responses, creating pointless position papers, & sending useless letters of complaint to government officials who already hate & despise the golf industry.
~
And sadly, CGSA has NO CREDIBILITY in POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING regarding pest control products.
~
CGSA CANNOT BE TRUSTED to lobby against the HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS being proposed by golf-hating environmental-extremist organizations.
~
CGSA also CANNOT BE TRUSTED since it has already « THROWN-UNDER-THE-BUS » the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY ».
~
The end may be near for the failed-CGSA !
~
~
~
LINKS ―
~
~
√ — CGSA — The Media History — Web-Page — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/canadian-golf-superintendents-association/
~
~
√ — CGSA — Take-Over By Golf Course Owners — Critical Issues — Post — LINK
~
~
~
√ — CGSA — 2009 Predictions Of The Looming Shipwreck Of The Golf Industry — Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ) — David Suzuki Foundation — Quintozene — Post — LINK
~
~
~
√ — CGSA — Financial Mis-Management By Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ) — IPM Council Of Canada — Cousineau’s Recent Departure From CGSA Is A Welcome Relief — Post — LINK
~
~
~
√ — CGSA — Most Absurd Statement Of The Month — Cousineau — pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√ — CGSA — Happy Holidays — Cousineau — Card — pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√ — CGSA — Quintozene, Environment, & Safety — Health Canada — pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√ — GOLF INDUSTRY — Critical Issues For The Survival Of The Golf Industry — Web-Page — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/golf-industry-critical-issues/
~
~
~
Stake-Holder Strutt
~
Statements ( continued ) ―
~
~
Do industry stake-holders feel there is a NEED for a LOBBY GROUP that brings together all « TURF INDUSTRY » stake-holders, and to become the focal point of negotiation and advocacy at POLICY-MAKING LEVEL ?
~
« YES ».
~
Lee Strutt shares cautious optimism ―
~
« YES », there should ( be a lobby ), however, getting agreement to cover all the STAKE-HOLDERS to lobby against changes in POLICY is really difficult as EVERYONE’S NEEDS ARE MARGINALLY DIFFERENT FROM ONE STAKE-HOLDER TO ANOTHER.
~
With an even split between the stake-holders interviewed for this article, one of the unquenched deltas that rings loudly is whether there is another organization better suited to conduct lobbying and advocacy on behalf of « TURF INDUSTRY » stake-holders.
~
Lee Strutt says ―
~
Getting agreement by all STAKE-HOLDERS that they are universally being represented.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With A Proposed Turf Industry Lobby Group ?
~
Unknown Industry Stake-Holder
~
~
~
~
Unknown Industry Stake-Holder
~
Description ―
~
~
The unknown president & CEO of a company dealing in turf.
~
There is no profile.
~
How can a person who refuses to identify himself be taken seriously on industry issues concerning lobbying ?
~
Nonetheless, this stake-holder in the turf industry has commented on Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying.
~
~
~
~
Unknown Industry Stake-Holder
~
Key Points ―
~
~
Political Influence Through Lobby On
Its Own Is An Old Way Of Thinking
See below
~
I Am Not Convinced Any Longer That A
Lobby Group On Its Own Will Be Effective
In The Policy Changes We Seek
See below
~
~
~
~
Unknown Industry Stake-Holder
~
Statements ―
~
~
The [ UNKNOWN ] president and CEO of a company dealing in turf invites further consideration of stake-holders in turf, posing ―
~
I might suggest adding urban planners and landscape architects / designers to this list and question how synthetic turf manufacturers fit into the listed STAKE-HOLDERS ― and if they do, shouldn’t we include then equipment, fertilizer, and pesticide manufacturers, seed producers, irrigation contractors, and suppliers ?
~
In addition, the larger the group, the more watered down and generic these POLICIES become.
~
One [ UNKNOWN ] industry stake-holder submits thus ―
~
Those who know me and have heard me answer this question before, understand when I suggest that POLITICAL INFLUENCE THROUGH LOBBY ON ITS OWN IS AN OLD WAY OF THINKING.
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
COWARD ― No one knows you because you hide in the shadows of anonymity. Who are you ? You act as if you are an informant marked for death by the Mexican drug cartel. In fact, observers consider you a craven coward who shirks the responsibility for his opinions & his actions.
~
~
~
~
Unknown Industry Stake-Holder
~
Statements ( continued ) ―
~
~
The [ UNKNOWN & COWARDLY ] industry stake-holders goes further ―
~
POLICY and legislative influence today, more than ever, is led at a social political level, while connection to leadership in government is still important.
~
Your ability to control the narrative happens at the community social level and how best can we ― turfgrass / horticultural STAKE-HOLDERS ― influence those conversations both individually and as a collective.
~
… while I agree there is still a NEED to influence decision makers, I AM NOT CONVINCED ANY LONGER THAT A LOBBY BODY [ AKA LOBBY GROUP ] ON ITS OWN WILL BE EFFECTIVE IN THE POLICY CHANGES WE SEEK.
~
With an even split between the stake-holders interviewed for this article, one of the unquenched deltas that rings loudly is whether there is another organization better suited to conduct lobbying and advocacy on behalf of « TURF INDUSTRY » stake-holders.
~
One [ UNKNOWN ] industry stake-holder shared that he DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT THERE IS ONE STAKE-HOLDER OR ORGANIZATION THAT IS BETTER POSITIONED OVER ANOTHER TO ACT ON BEHALF OF ALL STAKE-HOLDERS ― but more importantly that we bring together everyone to participate in a more unified outcome.
~
One [ UNKNOWN & COWARDLY ] industry stake-holder shared ―
~
A unified strategy and story that connects us to why people should care enough to change what we believe is broken.
~
The ability to deliver with confidence a Unique Selling Proposition ( USP ) that matters ― we live in a busy world with a lot of competition as to what is important to all, can we stand out in all this noise ?
~
In so many ways I see this more of a communication challenge than a lobby obstacle.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Re : |
Letter Of Complaint To WCTA / Media Release~ Response To Jerry Rousseau’s Presentation ToBC Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides~ Calling For The Dismissal Of Jerry Rousseau~ Updated & Improved Version |
|
~ |
Date : |
October 26th, 2011 ( Original Version ) |
|
~ |
To : |
Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA )Province Of British Columbia |
|
~ |
From : |
Produced By Force Of Nature& Edited For Length & ClarityFrom The Original VersionSelected & Adapted Excerpts |
|
~ |
Original Version :
~
√ — WCTA — Rousseau Statements To Special Committee — Calling For The Dismissal Of Rousseau — Letter Of Complaint / Media Release — pdf — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With Letter Of Complaint To WCTA / Media Release
~
Betrayal By Rousseau
~
~
~
Rousseau Supports The Prohibition
Of Weed-Control Products
See below
~
~
~
According to Jerry Rousseau, in a presentation to elected government officials ―
~
But mostly, I would comment, those are the weeds.
~
Frankly, we [ THE TREACHEROUS WESTERN CANADA TURFGRASS ASSOCIATION ] don’t care too much about the dandelions. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
They don’t bother too many people. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
Jerry Rousseau supports the HARMFUL-PROHIBITION of weed-control products.
~
He betrayed everyone in the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With Letter Of Complaint To WCTA / Media Release
~
Calling For The Dismissal Of Rousseau
~
~
~
Conspiring To Prohibit Against Pest Control Products
See below
~
~
~
Observers who wrote this letter of complaint / media release are calling for the dismissal of Jerry Rousseau as executive director of Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ).
~
Moreover, WCTA must immediately retract Rousseau’s statements.
~
Rousseau has also been added to list of culprits who conspire to prohibit pest control products that are needed to protect the urban landscape.
~
He is the second director of a trade association to disgrace himself & be placed on this list, the first being Tony DiGiovanni of LandsCAPE Ontario.
~
Observers who wrote this letter of complaint / media release represent the vast silent majority of people in the « TURF INDUSTRY » who are opposed to HARMFUL-PROHIBITION.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With Letter Of Complaint To WCTA / Media Release
~
Reasons For Rousseau Dismissal
~
~
~
Rambling Aimlessly About Issues That
Have Nothing To Do With The Prohibition
Against Pest Control Products
See below
~
~
~
The government of British Columbia invited the public to participate in a consultation concerning a proposal to prohibit against pest control products used in the urban landscape.
~
This was organized by the government’s « SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES », which was appointed by the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia.
~
Jerry Rousseau made a 30-minute presentation to this committee on October 26th, 2011.
~
Clearly, Rousseau was ill-prepared & incompetent with his presentation, failing to address any of the serious issues facing the professional lawn care industry & the golf industry.
~
In fact, he basically ignored the plight & imminent destruction of the professional lawn care industry.
~
Anti-pesticide activists are perpetuating myths about lawn care products, & Rousseau did nothing to challenge these myths.
~
Overall, Rousseau rambled aimlessly about issues that had nothing to do with the PROHIBITION against pest control products ― except one ― he supported the HARMFUL-PROHIBITION of weed-control products.
~
Rousseau should not have been allowed to handle POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING concerning the PROHIBITION against pest control products in the urban landscape.
~
Rousseau has no recognized expertise, no training, & no background in matters concerning POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING on pest control products.
~
WCTA-leaders must be frustrated because of Rousseau’s failures at almost everything !
~
Perhaps we cannot ascribe malice to Rousseau which can adequately be explained by incompetence and laziness.
~
~
~
~
――――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With Letter Of Complaint To WCTA / Media Release
~
Statements By Rousseau
~
~
~
Before the « SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES », Rousseau preferred to ramble aimlessly in the following manner ―
~
• Supporting the HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against herbicides.
~
• Highly-exaggerating claims concerning Western Canada Turfgrass Association. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
• Needlessly debating the use of the word « COSMETIC ». [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
• Pointlessly speculating about residential areas being a source of pest problems. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
• Using an obscure & ridiculous study concerning the health of golfers. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With Letter Of Complaint To WCTA / Media Release
~
Statements From Rousseau’s Presentation
~
~
~
Here are statements from Rousseau’s presentation to « SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES » on October 26th, 2011 ―
~
~
~
Rousseau Statement 1 ―
~
~
Exaggerating Claims Concerning WCTA
See below
~
~
The Western Canada Turfgrass Association, which I represent, is the education & RESEARCH body not only for the golf industry but the turf management industry in general. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
~
~
Background Information
~
RESEARCH ? ― This is untrue & highly-exaggerated claim by Rousseau. WCTA is absolutely NOT a research body. And, this has nothing to do with the proposed HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against pest control products. Rousseau must be dismissed, or at the very least, his role in POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING must be terminated & his statements censored. The « TURF INDUSTRY » will NEVER SUCCEED if it depends upon leaders like Rousseau.
~
~
~
Rousseau Statement 2 ―
~
~
Using An Obscure & Ridiculous Study
Concerning The Health Of Golfers
See below
~
~
There was a major study done, coincidentally in Sweden as well, that followed a half a million golfers for 20 years & did in fact prove that, on average, GOLFERS LIVE ABOUT FIVE YEARS LONGER THAN THE GENERAL POPULATION. [ WHO CARES ?!?! ]
~
That came as quite a shock to a lot of people.
~
Surprisingly ― or not so surprisingly — the more golf you play, the better your chances are of having a long life.
~
Part of that has to do with the fact that better golfers & people that play a lot generally tend to walk.
~
They do carry their clubs.
~
Walking & carrying clubs burns a lot of calories.
~
That’s a great message to get out to kids, but it’s also a great message to get out to our seniors. [ WHO CARES ?!?! ]
~
I think everybody has concerns with the impending health care costs & what’s facing us in the future, & we think that getting people more physically active is one of the things that we should all be looking at. [ WHO CARES ?!?! ]
~
Certainly, golf wants to contribute in that area.
~
~
~
Background Information
~
WHO CARES ABOUT GOLFER LONGEVITY ?!?! ― Golfers live about five years longer than the general population ?!?! Rousseau is rambling aimlessly about issues that have nothing to do with the proposed PROHIBITION against pest control products. Rousseau’s use of this obscure & ridiculous study was a non-sequitur that does not follow any logical defence of the use of pest control products. Rousseau must be dismissed, or at the very least, his role in POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING must be terminated & his statements censored. The « TURF INDUSTRY » will NEVER SUCCEED if it depends upon leaders like Rousseau.
~
~
~
Rousseau Statement 3 ―
~
~
Needlessly Debating The Use Of The Word « Cosmetic »
See below
~
~
We [ WESTERN CANADA TURFGRASS ASSOCIATION ] do not distinguish between COSMETIC pesticides & non-cosmetic. [ WHO CARES ?!?! ]
~
~
~
Background Information
~
WHO CARES ABOUT COSMETIC ?!?! ― It is inconceivable that Rousseau has falsely-alleged that pest control products used by the golf industry are not used for so-called cosmetic purposes. Nevertheless, this has nothing to do with the proposed PROHIBITION against pest control products. Rousseau must be terminated, or at the very least, he must be dismissed from his role in POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING & his statements must be censored. The « TURF INDUSTRY » will NEVER SUCCEED if it depends upon leaders like Rousseau.
~
~
~
Rousseau Statement 4 ―
~
~
Pointlessly Speculating About Residential
Areas Being A Source Of Pest Problems
See below
~
~
Like you say, the FUNGUS that we deal with, you won’t find too much in other areas.
~
Of course, golf courses are in urban areas, they’re in rural areas, they’re in interface areas, & yes, we’ll have infestations that could arguably come from a residential-commercial area — absolutely. [ WHO CARES ?!?! ]
~
~
~
Background Information
~
WHO CARES ABOUT FUNGUS ?!?! ― Rousseau makes pointless speculation about sources of pest problems. This has nothing to do with the proposed PROHIBITION against pest control products. Rousseau must be dismissed, or at the very least, his role in POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING must be terminated & his statements censored. The « TURF INDUSTRY » will NEVER SUCCEED if it depends upon leaders like Rousseau.
~
~
~
Rousseau Statement 5 ―
~
~
Supporting The Prohibition Against Herbicides
~
~
But mostly, I would comment, those are the weeds.
~
Frankly, we [ WESTERN CANADA TURFGRASS ASSOCIATION ] don’t care too much about the dandelions. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
They don’t bother too many people. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
~
~
Background Information
~
BETRAYAL ― In essence, this statement shows that Rousseau supports the proposed PROHIBITION against weed-control products. Making this statement before elected government officials betrayed everyone in the « TURF INDUSTRY ». Rousseau must be dismissed, or at the very least, his role in POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING must be terminated & his statements censored. The « TURF INDUSTRY » will NEVER SUCCEED if it depends upon leaders like Rousseau.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With Letter Of Complaint To WCTA / Media Release
~
Unacceptable Statements By Rousseau
~
~
~
WCTA Must Immediately Retract
Rousseau’s Statements
See below
~
~
~
Essentially, what Rousseau stated to the « SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES » is that WCTA supports the HARMFUL-PROHIBITION of herbicides used in the urban landscape.
~
Rousseau’s statement on herbicides is unacceptable.
~
Observers are calling for the dismissal of Jerry Rousseau, or at the very least, his role in POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING must be terminated & his statements must be censored.
~
Moreover, WCTA must immediately retract all of Rousseau’s statements made to « SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES ».
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With Letter Of Complaint To WCTA / Media Release
~
What Is Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides ?
~
~
~
The government of British Columbia invited the public to participate in a consultation concerning a proposal to prohibit pest control products in the urban landscape.
~
This was organized by the government’s « SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES », which was appointed by the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia.
~
For more information, go to segment below entitled « MORE BACKGROUND INFORMATION ».
~
Predictably, anti-pesticide activists are already flooding the government with thousands, yes thousands, of comments filled with lies & mis-information.
~
They are carpet-bombing & terrжrizing the government with the help of Canadian Cancer Society.
~
The issue here is credibility of the source of information, since the vast majority of the comments are orchestrated, through a coast-to-coast campaign, using non-expert volunteers with Canadian Cancer Society.
~
This campaign gives an unsuspecting public the false & fraudulent impression that the anti-pesticide movement has considerable size & power, when in fact, it does not.
~
Canadian Cancer Society has a huge vested interest in perpetuating imaginary dangers about pest control products used in the urban landscape.
~
Doing this attracts huge profit & benefits, in the form of donations, government grants, & celebrity-status.
~
Canadian Cancer Society also has a huge vested interest in perpetuating imaginary dangers about pest control products because it is paid to do so.
~
Incredibly, not a single activist at Canadian Cancer Society has any recognized expertise, any training, or any background in matters concerning pest control products.
~
Nonetheless, Canadian Cancer Society creates malicious illusion by perpetuating myths about pest control products, & the public believes it is reality.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With Letter Of Complaint To WCTA / Media Release
~
Sun-Setting Carnage In Ontario
~
~
~
Because Of Prohibition In Ontario, The Professional
Lawn Care Industry Lost Over 500,000,000 Dollars,
With Over 12,500 Unemployed Professionals
See below
~
~
~
On April 22nd, 2009, the government of Ontario arbitrarily prohibited pest control products used in the urban landscape.
~
Ontario’s HARMFUL-PROHIBITION was 100 per cent politically-based & 0 per cent science-based.
~
This needless, senseless, & malicious PROHIBITION led to the destruction of the modern professional lawn care industry.
~
The same fate awaits British Columbia.
~
The devastation of the professional lawn care industry was extensive because there were no valid economical alternatives to replace the prohibited products.
~
Consequently, professional lawn care businesses were unable to provide adequate weed & insect control, & were unable to keep their customers satisfied.
~
HARMFUL-PROHIBITION legislated by Ontario destroyed the modern professional lawn care industry.
~
Ontario government officials were officially warned about the « SUN-SETTING » carnage that would result from HARMFUL-PROHIBITION.
~
~
~
Background Information
~
« SUN-SETTING » ― Means « THE DECLINE & FINAL PHASE » of the professional lawn care industry.
~
~
~
The Environmental Commissioner’s Report to the Legislative Assembly on October 6th, 2009, officially warned about the sun-setting carnage of that would result from HARMFUL-PROHIBITION ―
~
In the short-term, however, the ban may have SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS on the economic health or continued viability of many lawn care businesses, effectively SUN-SETTING components of an industry.
~
Because of HARMFUL-PROHIBITION in Ontario, the professional lawn care industry lost over 500,000,000 dollars, with over 12,500 unemployed.
~
Because of HARMFUL-PROHIBITION in Ontario, one-company-per-week disappeared into total oblivion.
~
The same fate awaits British Columbia.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With Letter Of Complaint To WCTA / Media Release
~
What Is Western Canada Turfgrass Association ?
~
~
~
WCTA Has Betrayed The Turf Industry
See below
~
~
~
In British Columbia, this trade association supposedly represents the well-being of both the professional lawn care industry & the golf industry.
~
In 2009, for some unfathomable reason, this idiotic trade association, along with Canada Nursery Landscape Association ( CNLA ), decided to squander money & resources on the city of Vancouver campaign of anti-pesticide mis-information.
~
Idiotic trade associations like WCTA & CNLA have betrayed the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
Additionally, they have validated the anti-pesticide agenda, which can eventually lead to TOTAL PROHIBITION against pest control products & fertilizers.
~
They also validated Vancouver’s anti-pesticide agenda for HARMFUL-PROHIBITION by peddling nematode insecticide.
~
In Canada, nematode insecticide is one of many so-called green alternative products that are supposed to replace conventional pest control products.
~
Unfortunately, nematode insecticide does not work & is a dismal failure.
~
WCTA’s peddling of nematode insecticide dates back to 2005.
~
In 2005, WCTA, along with CNLA, commissioned a study of nematode insecticide for the control of European Chafer.
~
The result was an April 2005 report by E S Cropconsult Ltd, which was flawed & mis-leading, is now debunked & discredited.
~
Yet again, idiotic WCTA took the unfathomable position of supporting bogus green alternatives & the HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against conventional pest control products for its own nefarious purposes.
~
Any PROHIBITION against pest control products is not justified in Canada because their strict regulation is based on scientific research.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
STRIKING BACK With Letter Of Complaint To WCTA / Media Release
~
WCTA-Leaders Must Pull Their Heads Out Of Their Bжtts
~
~
~
Rousseau Must Be Dismissed, &
His Statements Must Be Retracted
See below
~
~
~
With the « SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES », Jerry Rousseau & WCTA-leaders did nothing to challenge the myths against pest control products.
~
In 2010, Rousseau even boasted that WCTA had no position statement concerning pest control products, at a time when its members were / are facing eventual disaster, despair, & destitution.
~
This attitude of denial was unacceptable.
~
In fact, WCTA DOES have a position on pest control products.
~
In essence, WCTA supports the HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against conventional pest control products, just like other anti-pesticide organizations.
~
This is unacceptable.
~
And now, Rousseau’s public support of HARMFUL-PROHIBITION is even more unacceptable.
~
He betrayed everyone in the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
Moreover, even if only limited PROHIBITION is implemented against herbicides, the professional lawn care industry will be the first to suffer.
~
If any PROHIBITION is implemented in British Columbia, at either the provincial or municipal level, it will be Rousseau’s & WCTA’s fault.
~
Anyone supporting Rousseau & WCTA does not deserve a career, or a business, or any success, in the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
Rousseau must be dismissed, & his statements must be retracted.
~
Moreover, a failure to act more decisively against HARMFUL-PROHIBITION will be lethal & final for British Columbia, & will have a resounding impact across Canada.
~
Future generations will ask the question ― « WHAT THE HELL WAS WRONG WITH ROUSSEAU & WCTA ? »
~
WCTA must oppose all forms of HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against pest control products.
~
It must oppose even PROHIBITION of weed-control products since this is a first step towards TOTAL PROHIBITION.
~
It must oppose even PROHIBITION on public property since this is also a first step towards TOTAL PROHIBITION that will even include the golf industry.
~
WCTA leaders must pull their heads out of their bжtts.
~
~
~
~
――――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Re : |
Striking Back & Defending The Golf Industry Updated & Improved Version |
|
~ |
Date : |
January 2023 |
|
~ |
About : |
Golf Industry |
|
~ |
From : |
Produced By Force Of Nature & Edited For Length & Clarity From The Original Version Selected & Adapted Excerpts |
|
~ |
Reference :
~
√ — GOLF INDUSTRY — The Critical Issues That Must Be Addressed By The Golf Industry — Wage-Page — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/golf-industry-critical-issues/
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
1. Pest Control Products
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending Pest Control Products
~
The Golf Industry Must Explain To The Public
That Its Use Of Pest Control Products Will Cause
No Harm To Players, Workers, & The Environment
See below
~
Pesticides Used For Turf Maintenance Are
Good For Human Health & The Environment
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will explain to the public that no-risk pest control products used by the turf industry are scientifically-safe, are applied safely, & will cause NO harm to players, workers, & the environment.
~
The golf industry must adopt the policy that the only course of action against HARMFUL-PROHIBITION is aggressive challenges through litigation.
~
Court action will never permanently stop golf-hating extremists, but will drain their resources while the golf industry seeks other courses of action.
~
Finally, the golf industry must establish policies for expelling from its trade associations « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » who falsely-allege that the use of pest control products may harm people & ⁄ or the environment ― which is FALSE.
~
Pest control products used by the golf industry are safe for the environment.
~
Pest control products used by the golf industry actually improve the environment.
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will dispel the many PESTICIDE HATE-SPEECH MYTHS that are concocted by golf-hating activists. See next segment.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Hate Speech
~
~
~
List ―
~
~
Pest control products are scientifically-safe, are applied safely, & will cause NO harm to the environment.
~~
Here is a list of the many PESTICIDE HATE-SPEECH MYTHS that are concocted by extremist-activists ―
~
~
• The Myth Of Prohibition
~
PROHIBITION against so-called « COSMETIC PESTICIDES » used by the « TURF INDUSTRY » will impose restrictions that are NOT necessary. No-risk pesticides are « SAFE » since human health & the environment are already protected by Health Canada’s science-based expertise.
~
~
• The Myth Of Excessive Use
~
Golf course superintendents must be praised because they practice a reasonable version of « MINIMAL PESTICIDE USE ». They will determine the need for pest control products by site-specific historical data & established thresholds that will inevitably « MINIMIZE PESTICIDE USE ». Furthermore, superintendents will NOT over-apply pesticides because they are expensive, & will minimize their use in order to save money. Without question, superintendents are the environmental stewards of the land & are « THE PLANET’S GREAT CONSERVATIONIST », since they are highly-educated professionals in turfgrass management & « MINIMAL PESTICIDE USE ».
~
~
• The Myth Of Superintendents
~
Golf course superintendents will NOT mis-apply pesticides. They & their staff will apply no-risk pesticides professionally, accurately, & competently since they have been through a stringent licensing process with the provincial Ministry of the Environment. The modern superintendent can be described as « THE PLANET’S GREAT CONSERVATIONIST » who satisfies paying customers who want golf courses with HIGH-QUALITY PLAYING CONDITIONS & AESTHETICS ACHIEVED BY THICKER, GREENER, PEST-FREE, & MANICURED TURF. For generations, the modern superintendent has been maintaining & conserving the HEALTH one of the world’s largest ground cover vegetation, & has been contributing extensively to the protection of CRITICAL GREEN-SPACES. HEALTHY golf courses provide many ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS that improve HUMAN HEALTH !
~
~
• The Myth Of Organic
~
« ORGANIC » does not work. « ORGANIC » practices involve the use of inferior & ineffective green alternative pesticides. Without conventional pest control products, « ORGANIC » golf courses will become infested with recurring invasive weeds, destructive insects, & harmful diseases … unless staggering & unlimited amounts of money are wasted on over-worked pest-picking labourers, like at the infamous Vineyard Golf Club, America’s ONLY « ORGANIC » golf course. See later segment.
~
~
• The Myth Of IPM
~
All versions of « INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT » ( IPM ) must be avoided because they are failed, futile, ineffective, & overall, do not control damaging pests in turf. See later segment.
~
~
• The Myth Of Cancer
~
There are NO pest control products that are known or probable carcinogens. Pesticides causing cancer is a MYTH. Prohibiting these products will prevent virtually NO cancer-deaths. Pest control products are nowhere near a leading cause of cancer-death, & there is NO chance that they will make anyone die of cancer. In fact, there is NOT ONE known cancer-death from the proper use of these products when used in the urban landscape, including the golf industry.
~
~
• The Myth Of Children
~
Children are NOT at risk because pesticides will cause NO harm. Expert-scientists at Health Canada & US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) evaluate risks to people, including susceptible groups, in environments where exposure might happen. Consideration of more susceptible populations include ― • CHILDREN • infants • pregnant women • seniors & • women.
~
~
• Children Need Pesticides
~
Children are NOT at risk from pesticides, but are at higher-risk with HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS since pesticide-free playing surfaces will become HAZARDOUS to children who are at high risk of tripping & becoming seriously hurt. Pest control products are desperately needed to maintain safe green spaces. Children need pesticides. According to Dr James S Bus, there is NO evidence that pest control products like 2,4-D cause cancer or any health problems in children. Additionally, there is not a scintilla of credible evidence that children have been harmed by chemicals in the environment, or that they are more vulnerable to such harm. However, enviro-extremists exploit, recruit, coerce, & brain-wash children with mis-information of imminent harm from chemicals like pest control products. NO ONE should be listening to the mis-information by enviro-extremists who know NOTHING about pest control products.
~
~
• Children At-Risk
~
According to University of Massachusetts & University of New Hampshire, organic insect & weed control products present a risk of respiratory & kidney problems, especially in small CHILDREN & pets ― there are potential DANGER when using pesticide-free maintenance.
~
~
• The Myth Of Environment
~
When pesticides & nutrients are used properly, there are NO harmful irreversible effects to human health & the environment. In fact, they are both GOOD & BENEFICIAL for HEALTHY TURFGRASS.
~
According to the GCSAA Board of Directors’ Position Statement entitled « GCSAA BOARD APPROVED 2021-2022 PRIORITY ISSUES AGENDA » which has been published by Golf Course Superintendents Association of America concerning the ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS WITH HEALTHY TURFGRASS ―
~
There are many other ENVIRONMENT BENEFITS TO HEALTHY TURFGRASS including • the capture of run-off pollutants in storm-water • temperature buffer • erosion control • serving as a protective barrier to ground-water.
~
In addition, many entities both public and private rely on HEALTHY GREEN-SPACES like golf courses as a key component in maintaining financial revenues.
~
[ … ]
~
The RESPONSIBLE USE OF PESTICIDES is essential to maintaining HEALTHY TURFGRASS.
~
HEALTHY TURFGRASS allows communities to enjoy many BENEFITS including ― • creation of critical green spaces • providing wildlife habitat • ensuring recreational opportunities.
~
Successful main-stream superintendents will RESPONSIBLY, SAFELY, & EFFECTIVELY USE OF PESTICIDES & NUTRIENTS by following the PROTOCOLS & PERFORMANCE STANDARDS for SCIENCE-BASED & TIME-TESTED & CORRECT maintenance practices. PESTICIDES & NUTRIENTS used for turf maintenance are GOOD for human health & the environment !
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Harmful-Prohibitions
~
~
~
List ―
~
~
Here is a list of the status of HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS imposed by governments across the nation ―
~
~
• Alberta
~
No provincial prohibition. Alberta officials stopped a proposed pesticide ban & stated that the province would not create a ban that conflicted with the federal government.
~
~
• British Columbia
~
Limited provincial prohibition. No prohibition for licensed applicators who have been granted with an exception status, such as golf courses.
~
~
• Manitoba
~
Manitoba has rescinded its existing provincial prohibition by allowing any pesticide that is approved by Health Canada. Manitoba has also harmonized its pesticide classification with the federal government’s existing classes.
~
~
• New Brunswick
~
Limited provincial prohibition against several over-the-counter pesticide products containing the ingredient 2,4-D, but home-owners could still spot-treat weeds using pre-mixed over-the-counter products. « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE » businesses were granted an exception status if their employees had the proper training in Integrated Pest Management, & if they do not use pesticides over more than fifty per cent of a lawn in one season. A total exception status was granted to golf courses.
~
~
• National-Prohibitions
~
See later segment.
~
~
• Newfoundland
~
Limited provincial prohibition, specifically against 2,4-D, mecoprop, dicamba, MCPA, & carbaryl. An exception status was granted to commercial applicators, golf courses, & road-side sprayers.
~
~
• Ontario
~
Provincial prohibition is the most radical & the most harmful prohibition ever. Nonetheless, prohibition has not been imposed against local agriculture, cemeteries, playing fields, & golf courses, even though these areas are maintained by applying the-very-same ingredients otherwise prohibited on public green spaces & residential properties. Ontario has recently harmonized its pesticide classification with the federal government’s existing classes.
~
~
• Prince Edward Island
~
Limited provincial prohibition, specifically against 2,4-D. PEI’s provincial prohibition removed 2,4-D products from use by consumers; however, businesses operating in the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY » have been provided with an exception status. 2,4-D herbicide is prohibited for use by either consumers or businesses on lawns, but it is allowed in the golf industry, which was granted a total exception status.
~
~
• Quebec
~
Limited provincial prohibition, specifically against 2,4-D. Quebec’s provincial prohibition was morally invalidated & defeated when a legal challenge was settled, & the provincial government officials were humiliated into admitting that 2,4-D did not pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. 2,4-D herbicide is allowed in the golf industry, which was granted a total exception status.
~
~
• Saskatchewan
~
No provincial prohibition.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
2. Pesticide Ban Exception Statuses
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK Against Exception Statuses
~
The Trade Associations Must Ensure There
Will Be Exception Statuses For Every Industry,
In Order To Be Consistent & Fair To Everyone
Throughout The Turf Industry
See below
~
The Trade Associations Must Adopt The Policy
To Plan For The Inevitable & Total Revocation
Of The Golf Industry’s Exception Status In
Most Jurisdictions Across The Nation
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS continue to be EXTREMELY BIASED & HIGHLY PREJUDICIAL, especially against the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY ».
~
Nonetheless, EXCEPTION STATUSES currently include ― • agriculture • cemeteries • forestry • fruit & vegetable production • GOLF COURSES • mosquito control • nursery production • orchards • rose gardens • sod production • sports fields • & more.
~
For example, the government of Ontario has believed that the maintenance standards used by the golf industry require that it be given an PESTICIDE BAN EXCEPTION STATUS.
~
On the matter of a high performance maintenance standard, the government of Ontario issued the following statement in June 2008 ―
~
The MOE [ ONTARIO MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT ] recognizes that GOLF COURSES require high performance standards for the playing surfaces and require some pesticide use to achieve such standards.
~
The EXCEPTION to the PROHIBITION on the use of prescribed pesticides on GOLF COURSES is conditional upon complying with certain requirements.
~
David Suzuki Foundation has expressed the following HATE-SPEECH about the golf industry’s EXCEPTION STATUS ―
~
If provincial PROHIBITIONS EXEMPT GOLF COURSES, as proposed in the discussion paper, municipalities need clear authority to RESTRICT PESTICIDE USE ON GOLF COURSES within their boundaries to better PROTECT public health and the environment. [ ?!?! ]
~
Furthermore, government officials, at every level, may become more aggressive at REVOKING the golf industry’s EXCEPTION STATUS once they realize the fact that, according to a study in Manitoba, up to 6 PER CENT of all conventional pest control products are used for golf course maintenance.
~
The golf industry needs a LOBBY GROUP that will resist any REVOCATION OF THE GOLF INDUSTRY’S EXCEPTION STATUS.
~
This catastrophe is becoming increasingly probable as large scale NATIONAL-PROHIBITIONS. See later segment.
~
The « GOLF INDUSTRY » also needs a LOBBY GROUP that will ensure there will be EXCEPTION STATUSES FOR EVERY INDUSTRY, in order to be CONSISTENT & FAIR TO EVERYONE throughout the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
Interestingly, golf courses often employ THE VERY SAME no-risk conventional products that are used to control invasive weeds & damaging insects on municipal & residential properties, which are currently prohibited in many jurisdictions.
~
Mr William H Gathercole was the original creator of the EXCEPTION STATUS that has allowed the golf industry, throughout North America, to avoid being subjected to prohibitions against its pest control products.
~
In addition, one of the principal reasons why the golf industry was provided with an EXCEPTION STATUS from Ontario’s Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act is because of Mr Jarrod Barakett at Ontario Golf Superintendents Association ( OGSA ), who organized an impeccable public affairs effort.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Exception Statuses
~
~
~
List ―
~
~
Here is a list of provincial prohibitions & their EXCEPTION STATUSES ―
~
~
• Alberta
~
No provincial prohibition. Proposed provincial prohibition stopped. No exception statuses introduced.
~
~
• British Columbia
~
Limited provincial prohibition. Proposed total prohibition stopped. Prohibition not recommended by Special Committee on Cosmetic Pesticides. « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE » businesses & golf courses granted exception statuses.
~
~
• Manitoba
~
Manitoba has rescinded its existing provincial prohibition by allowing any pesticide that is approved by Health Canada. No exception statuses introduced.
~
~
• New Brunswick
~
Limited provincial prohibition, specifically against 2,4-D. Several active ingredients permitted. « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE » businesses & golf courses granted exception statuses.
~
~
• Newfoundland
~
Limited provincial prohibition, specifically against 2,4-D, mecoprop, dicamba, MCPA, & carbaryl. Several active ingredients permitted. A pesticide ban exception status has been provided to industries like agriculture, forestry, golf, & road-related usage. These industries employ the very same pest control products otherwise prohibited for « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE » businesses.
~
~
• Ontario
~
Provincial prohibition is the most radical & the most harmful prohibition ever. Proposed amendment to provincial pesticide ban has begun the process to repeal provincial prohibition. A pesticide ban exception status has been provided to industries like agriculture, cemeteries, playing fields, & golf courses.
~
~
• Prince Edward Island
~
Limited provincial prohibition, specifically against 2,4-D. Several active ingredients permitted. « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE » businesses & golf courses granted exception statuses.
~
~
• Quebec
~
Limited provincial prohibition, specifically against 2,4-D. Prohibition morally invalidated because ban was defeated by lawsuit. Several active ingredients permitted. Golf courses granted exception status.
~
~
• Saskatchewan
~
No provincial prohibition. Proposed total prohibition stopped. Proposed prohibition against neonicotinoids stopped. No exception statuses introduced.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Close The Loophole
~
~
~
List ―
~
~
Here is a list of ten organizations that have publicly stated, in one form or another, that they DO NOT WANT ANY EXCEPTION STATUSES FOR THE GOLF INDUSTRY.
~
They have specifically demanded that the LOOPHOLE be closed in the province of Ontario ―
~
~
• Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment ( CAPE )
~
• Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS )
~
• Canadian Environmental Law Association ( CELA )
~
• David Suzuki Foundation
~
• Green Party of Ontario
~
• Liberal Party of Ontario ( LPO )
~
• New Democratic Party of Ontario ( NDP )
~
• Pesticide Free Ontario ( PFO )
~
• Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario ( RNAO )
~
• Sierra Club of Canada
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
3. National-Prohibitions
~
~
~
Key Point ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK Against National-Prohibitions
~
The Golf Industry Must Ensure That, When
Health Canada Has Imposed National-
Prohibitions Against Pest Control Products,
It Considered All Of The Information In
A Weight-Of-The-Evidence Approach
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
Even with the PESTICIDE BAN EXCEPTION STATUS, since 2013, almost ONE-THIRD OF ALL GOLF COURSE PRODUCTS WERE NATIONALLY-PROHIBITED, including ― • Arrest-75W • ProTurf FF II 14-3-3 Turf Fertilizer With 15.4 Per Cent Quintozene • ProTurf Granular Fungicide V Containing Chloroneb • ProTurf Granular Insecticide 1 With Diazinon • Quintozene 75 Per Cent • Terraneb SP • Tersan 1991.
~
In addition, chlorpyrifos & diazinon are active ingredients that have also been NATIONALLY-PROHIBITED throughout the entire « TURF INDUSTRY », which includes, of course, golf courses.
~
Since 2015, Canada’s further NATIONAL-PROHIBITIONS came as NO surprise since the decisions by the Liberal-controlled Health Canada had been mostly implemented within mere months after Liberal Party won in the Canadian General Election on October 19th, 2015.
~
As expected, once elected to power, Canada’s Trudeau Liberal Government quickly conspired to propose & enact NATIONAL-PROHIBITIONS against more of the « TURF INDUSTRY’S » desperately-needed pest control product ingredients, such as ― • carbaryl • chlorothalonil • iprodione • neonicotinoids.
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will ensure that Health Canada has considered all of the information in a WEIGHT-OF-THE-EVIDENCE APPROACH whenever it imposes NATIONAL-PROHIBITIONS against its products.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
4. Trade Associations
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK Against Associations
~
The Turf Industry Suffers With
Fragmentation Through Lack Of
Trust In Its Trade Associations
See below
~
Trade Associations Must End Their
Support Of Harmful-Prohibition
See below
~
Trade Associations Must Avoid
Torpedoing Other Industries
See below
~
Associations Must Stop Interfering
With Issues They Know Nothing About
See below
~
Amateurish Trade Associations Are
Clueless Beyond Comprehension
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
Of course there is FRAGMENTATION within the turf industry because trade associations are AMATEURISH & CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
~
The trade associations must adopt the policy to publicly end their support of HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against no-risk conventional pest control products needed to protect the urban landscape.
~
Furthermore, they must also stop choosing pesticide-hating speakers for their conferences. See later segment.
~
Unfortunately, some trade associations have TORPEDOED & EXTENSIVELY DAMAGED the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY » whenever they directly supported HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against so-called « COSMETIC PESTICIDES ».
~
These AMATEURISH trade associations have been interfering with issues they know nothing about.
~
For example, since 2008, in a despicable & pointless effort to distract golf-hating government officials & fanatжcal-activists, trade associations have directly SUPPORTED HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against so-called « COSMETIC PESTICIDES », which BETRAYED & DAMAGED the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY ».
~~
Furthermore, inconceivably, AMATEURISH leaders of Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ) have endorsed the imposition of HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against no-risk pest control products used in the urban landscape … as long as the golf industry is provided with a PESTICIDE BAN EXCEPTION STATUS.
~
The CGSA’s 2009-2010 leaders were especially enthusiastic in their support of HARMFUL-PROHIBITION.
~
According to a CGSA-leader ―
~
[ … ] associations like the CGSA * and Royal Canadian Golf Association ** [ … ] applauded McGuinty & the governing Liberals for making this announcement [ REGARDING THE ONTARIO PROHIBITION ] .
~
[ A ] reason for the golf industry’s SUPPORT of this provincial initiative stems from the fact we will be exempted.
~
* Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ).
** Now called Golf Canada.
~
Consequently, both CGSA & Golf Canada have SEVERELY DAMAGED THEIR CREDIBILITY IN POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING.
~
Not surprisingly, the turf industry suffers with FRAGMENTATION THROUGH LACK OF TRUST in these AMATEURISH trade associations.
~
In fact, if it is safe for children & adults to walk on pesticide-treated golf courses, & eat pesticide-treated food, then it is safe for them to walk & play on pesticide-treated lawns.
~
Finally, trade associations must stop interfering with issues they know nothing about, such as SUPPORTING THE CLOSING OF GOLF COURSES because of the Chinese-coronavirus.
~
For example, the following IDIOTIC trade associations lobbied to rob golfers the freedom to safely practice the game of golf during the Chinese-pandemic, such as ― • Golf Canada • Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ) • National Golf Course Owners Association ( NGCOA ) • Professional Golf Association of BC ( PGA BC ) • & others.
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will put a stop to associations interfering with issues they know nothing about, & end the TORPEDOING of other industries.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Trade Associations
~
~
Facts ―
~
~
• Hundreds & Hundreds Of Lethal Attacks
~
We are now living in the 9|11 era of fanatжcal golf-hating & anti-pesticide terrжrism !
~
The « GOLF INDUSTRY » must officially recognize that it is on a collision course with the LETHAL ATTACKS from organizations, jurisdictions, & institutions that are demanding a REVOCATION OF THE « GOLF INDUSTRY’S » EXCEPTION STATUS.
~
These organizations, jurisdictions, & institutions are filled with golf-hating, anti-pesticide, & science-hating fanatжcs ― & others, like Golf Canada & IPM Council, have become « USEFUL IDIOTS » that naively support these fanatжcs.
~
The « GOLF INDUSTRY » must plan for the inevitable & total REVOCATION OF ITS EXCEPTION STATUS in most jurisdictions across Canada.
~
~
• The End Is Near
~
NO MORE PESTICIDE EXCEPTION STATUS !
~
Decades ago, LETHAL ATTACKS against the « GOLF INDUSTRY » began with the needless, senseless, & malicious PROHIBITIONS against DDT insecticide & mercury fungicides.
~
Since the mid-2000s, these organizations, jurisdictions, & institutions have set their sights on the annihilation of the « GOLF INDUSTRY » by demanding a REVOCATION OF ITS EXCEPTION STATUS, mindless LETHAL ATTACKS, & ⁄ or have conspired to impose reckless & arbitrary PROHIBITIONS against conventional pest control products.
~
~
• The Trade Associations Are Clueless
~
Is anybody addressing these imminent & lethal attacks ?!?! ~
~
Can the « GOLF INDUSTRY’S » trade associations be trusted ?!?! NO ! These trade associations have FAILED their members. Future generations will ask the question ― why did their trade associations not act ?!?! NONE have directly & effectively addressed the LETHAL ATTACKS facing the « GOLF INDUSTRY » ! Furthermore, NO ONE in ANY trade association has ANY expertise regarding the LETHAL ATTACKS against the « GOLF INDUSTRY » ! NO ONE in these associations could even tell you WHO are the golf-hating fanatжcs, WHAT organizations they operate, & WHAT are their strategies against the « GOLF INDUSTRY » ! The trade associations are CLUELESS beyond comprehension ! Is there ANYBODY in the « GOLF INDUSTRY » who can STOP these golf-hating fanatжcs & their LETHAL ATTACKS ?!?! NO ! They are all USELESS AMATEURS. There is NO HOPEFUL FUTURE for anyone in the « GOLF INDUSTRY » unless our trade associations CHANGE DRAMATICALLY.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
CGSA’s Misconduct
~
~
~
Facts ―
~
~
At Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ), AMATEURISH CGSA-leaders have led their association into DISREPUTE & FAILURE with WOKENESS leading to CANCEL-CULTURE ―
~
~
• CGSA’s Historical Misconduct
~
Because of their HISTORICAL MISCONDUCT, CGSA-leaders CANNOT BE TRUSTED. CGSA-leaders have been historically NOTORIOUS for being INCAPABLE OF MAKING ANY CORRECT DECISIONS [ I.E. HISTORICAL MISCONDUCT WITH INEPT & AMATEURISH JUDGMENT ]. Perhaps we should not ascribe malice to CGSA-leaders for their HISTORICAL MISCONDUCT, which can adequately be explained by INCOMPETENCE & LAZINESS. Nonetheless, there are many well-documented examples of HISTORICAL MISCONDUCT by CGSA-leaders that have REFLECTED BADLY on the « GOLF INDUSTRY ».
~
~
• Examples Of Historical Misconduct By CGSA-Leaders
~
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Amateurish |
Mis-treatment |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Betrayal |
Mis-management |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Conflicts-of-interest |
Political-correctness |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
Cowardly |
Pomposity |
|
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Disrespect |
Treacherous |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Idiotic |
Unfit |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Incompetent |
Vicious |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Inept judgment |
Wag-the-dog |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Lack of trust |
Woke |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Lazy |
& more |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~
• CGSA’s Cancel Culture
~
Mr Gordon Witteveen was an early example of CGSA’s CANCEL-CULTURE, where CGSA-leaders VICIOUSLY MISTREATED their trade association’s founding father & the unflinching supporter of the golf superintendent. This is yet another HISTORICAL MISCONDUCT by CGSA-leaders who CANNOT BE TRUSTED to serve their membership.
~
~
• CGSA’s Insidious Take-Over
~
How can anyone TRUST a trade association that managed its POLICY-MAKING, PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING, & FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES so badly that it was taken over by another association ? In fall 2017, National Golf Course Owners Association ( NGCOA ) was allowed to TAKE-OVER the Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ). Incredibly, a very small group of CGSA-leaders were allowed to make a settlement that UNCEREMONIOUSLY UNRAVELLED the great 50-year legacy of the CGSA. Mr John B Steel & earlier CGSA-leaders would have been horrified. This INSIDIOUS TAKE-OVER would BETRAY thousands of decent & hard-working members who rely on the « GOLF INDUSTRY ». Not surprisingly, some CGSA-leaders attracted suspicions of alleged CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST. Furthermore, CGSA-leaders had already financially MIS-MANAGED their trade association, rendering it susceptible to TAKE-OVER. Again, Mr John B Steel & earlier CGSA-leaders would have been horrified. The TAKE-OVER proves, yet again, that modern CGSA-leaders are incapable of making any correct decisions. The TAKE-OVER also validates the historic rivalry with club managers, whereupon superintendents are not considered competent in the management of financial affairs. The AMATEURISH FINANCIAL MISMANAGEMENT of CGSA, which led to the TAKE-OVER, with losses more than 100,000-dollars, certainly DID NOT benefit the advancement of the « GOLF INDUSTRY ». This MISCONDUCT by CGSA-leaders actually contributed to the WEAKENING of the image of the superintendent. Because of this HISTORICAL MISCONDUCT, AMATEURISH CGSA-leaders CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
WCTA’s Speakers
~
~
~
Examples ―
~
~
Here are examples of BAD CHOICES for guest speakers at the winter conferences of the AMATEURISH Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ) in British Columbia.
~
Some of the WCTA speakers are notorious anti-pesticide & golf-hating extremists who have conspired against the golf industry.
~
WCTA has repeatedly failed to protect the golf industry from PESTICIDE HATE-SPEECH ―
~
~
• Paul Tukey
~
A top foreign lobbyist paid by Canadian Cancer Society to subvert the public with fake-news propaganda against pest control products. WCTA squandered vast sums of money for this bad choice. Tukey invited by WCTA is like inviting Bin Laden to a 9|11 memorial. WCTA made a very VERY bad choice as speaker at its winter conference.
~
~
• Pam Charbonneau
~
An anti-pesticide government official, paid-for-profit by Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, University of Guelph. ALL Guelph government-officials, like Charbonneau, became the instruments of anti-pesticide propaganda for the government of Ontario. WCTA made a questionable choice as speaker at its winter conference.
~
~
• Lisa Gue
~
A non-expert pesticide-hating extremist who is paid by David Suzuki Foundation to subversively conspire against ALL pest control products with fake-news propaganda. WCTA made a very VERY bad choice as speaker at its winter conference
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
5. Fertilizers
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending Fertilizers
~
The Golf Industry Must Explain To The
Public That Its Use Of Fertilizers Will
Cause No Harm To The Environment
See below
~
Fertilizers Used By The Golf Industry
Actually Improve The Environment
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
The MISLEADING DOCTRINE of « FERTILIZER NUTRIENT REDUCTION » falsely-alleges that any arbitrary reduction in essential fertilizer nutrients would be helpful environmentally ― this is WRONG.
~
This anti-fertilizer doctrine defies over twenty-five years of research.
~
« FERTILIZER NUTRIENT REDUCTION » will not lead to lower concentrations of fertilizer contaminants in the environment.
~
Golf courses that adopt « FERTILIZER NUTRIENT REDUCTION » may become UNPLAYABLE GARBAGE DUMPS THAT LOOK LIKE DEATH.
~
The « GOLF INDUSTRY’S » main-stream superintendents are being DUPED by « ACTIVIST-EXPERTS » who operate in trade associations, such as ― • Golf Course Superintendents Association of America ( GCSAA ) • National Golf Foundation ( NGF ) • PACE Turf Information Service • United States Golf Association ( USGA ).
~
Some of these trade associations have also attempted to impose another MISLEADING DOCTRINE, « GO BROWN » anti-cosmetic golf course maintenance, based on the false assumption that brown turf requires fewer inputs, saves money, is better for the environment, & plays better ― this is WRONG. See later segment.
~
« ACTIVIST-EXPERTS » have self-designated themselves as the critics against correct & disciplined main-stream golf course superintendents & their management practices.
~
« FERTILIZER NUTRIENT REDUCTION » is a ridiculous & arbitrary doctrine that will quickly doom superintendents, who will become unable to manage their golf courses without essential, yes essential, fertilizer nutrients.
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will inform the public that fertilizers are scientifically-safe, are applied safely, & will cause NO harm to the environment.
~
Fertilizers used by the golf industry are safe for the environment.
~
Fertilizers used by the golf industry actually improve the environment.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Benefits Of Nitrogen
~
~
~
List ―
~
~
All too often, we tend to forget the true BENEFITS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION, especially after listening to MISLEADING HATE-SPEECH concerning « FERTILIZER NUTRIENT REDUCTION ».
~
The benefits of nitrogen will include the following ―
~
~
• Increasing Shoot Growth
~
This means green, vegetative growth, such as leaves & stems. With adequate nitrogen fertilization, more vigorous shoot growth will be stimulated. Turf will become a thick & attractive ground cover. Additionally, vigorous shoot growth is also important for the recovery of damaged turf.
~
~
• Increasing Root Growth
~
Yes, root growth. Roots need nitrogen too. It is false to believe that withholding nitrogen will improve root growth. In order for root growth to become adversely affected, a very highly toxic quantity of nitrogen would need to be applied to turf.
~
~
• Improving Green Colour
~
Nitrogen, as well as iron, is routinely used for improving the colour of turf. Whether we like to admit it or not, the public prefers green grass. Home-owners want thick, green lawns. Golfers want short, green golf courses. Tax-payers want green parks & sports fields. Let’s face it, green turf is in demand. Additionally, green turf is a good indicator of plant health. Conversely, yellow turf symbolizes that turf is not performing properly.
~
~
• Accelerating Recuperation From Injury
~
This point is worth repeating again. Kentucky bluegrass, creeping bentgrass, & annual bluegrass benefit from more nitrogen when they are damaged. Turf managers mistakenly assume that maintenance levels of nitrogen are sufficient for the recovery of damaged turf.
~
~
• Improving Resistance To Certain Diseases
~
The incidence of certain diseases, such as anthracnose, dollar spot, & red thread, will increase with low nitrogen fertilization. Of course, high nitrogen use may also lead to other types of disease problems.
~
~
• Improving Resistance To Weed Invasion
~
Adequate nitrogen fertilization will provide a thicker turf cover. Consequently, a higher turf density will more effectively crowd out invading weeds. Grass-type & broad-leaved type weeds will have more difficulty establishing themselves in a well-fertilized turf.
~
~
• Improving Resistance To Environmental Extremes
~
An adequate nitrogen fertilization program will develop turf that is better resistant to heat, drought, & cold temperatures.
~
~
• Crowding Out Fine Fescues By Kentucky Bluegrass
~
The fine fescues include species such as red fescue & Chewings fescue. Such grasses are usually mixed with Kentucky bluegrass for low maintenance situations in sunny locations. If high nitrogen is used, Kentucky bluegrass will predominate. However, low nitrogen fertilization, or none at all, will favour the fescues.
~
~
• Classification Of Turfgrasses According To Their Preferred Level Of Maintenance Nitrogen ( Not Grow-In Or Recovery )
~ |
~
|
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
Nitrogen ( N )
|
~ |
Turfgrass Species
|
~ |
~ |
High
1.0 to 1.4 pound N per 1000 sq ft |
~ |
• Annual bluegrass & creeping bentgrass on putting greens grown with high irrigation conditions
• Kentucky bluegrass on municipal sports fields in high-use situations
|
~ |
~ |
Medium-High
1.00 to 1.25 pound |
~ |
• Annual bluegrass & creeping bentgrass on putting greens grown with moderate irrigation
• Kentucky bluegrass on home lawns in sunny locations
|
~ |
~ |
Medium
0.75 to 1.0 pound |
~ |
• Annual bluegrass, bentgrasses, Kentucky bluegrass, & perennial ryegrass on golf course fairways
• Kentucky bluegrass & perennial ryegrass on municipal sports fields with over-seeding practices & restrictions on player use
|
~ |
~ |
Low
0.50 to 0.75 pound |
~ |
• Annual bluegrass, bentgrasses, & fine-leaved fescues on home lawns in sunny locations
• All turfgrasses in shady locations
|
~ |
~ |
Very Low
0.25 to 0.50 pound N per 1000 sq ft |
~ |
• Mixtures of fine-leaved fescues & common Kentucky bluegrass on golf course rough & other low use areas |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
6. Golf-Hating Organizations
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending The Golf Industry
~
The Golf Industry Is On A Collision Course
With Irrational Anti-Pesticide & Anti-Golf
Hate-Speech From Extremist-Organizations
See below
~
The Golf Industry Must Strike Back & Destroy
Golf-Hating Extremist-Organizations, Like David
Suzuki Foundation, By Vigorously Exploiting
Their Many Vulnerabilities In Public Debate,
Such As The Many Myths They Concoct
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
Trade associations must assume their responsibilities to use POLICY-MAKING & PUBLIC AFFAIRS LOBBYING to defend the main-stream superintendents & their facilities from golf-hating / anti-pesticide extremist-organizations.
~
These associations must officially recognize that their member-superintendents are on a collision course with IRRATIONAL ANTI-PESTICIDE & ANTI-GOLF HATE-SPEECH from these extremist-organizations.
~
For example, according to the ANTI-GOLF HATE-SPEECH from David Suzuki Foundation ―
~
We should not put our health in DANGER just because we like to golf. [ ?!?! ]
~
Exceptions for golf courses should be REMOVED. [ ?!?! ]
~
Golf course pesticides contribute to CANCER. [ ?!?! ]
~
[ THE NEW LAW ] allows golf courses to continue using pesticides and gives power to the Ontario Minister of the Environment to allow other exceptions, A POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS LOOPHOLE. [ ?!?! ]
~
Indeed, Suzuki’s HATE-SPEECH has also alleged that pesticides cause cancer & kills golfers. [ ?!?! ]
~
Usually, the trade associations’ strategy for handling HATE-SPEECH & CONSPIRACIES has been to IGNORE IT LIKE AMATEURS.
~
This has certainly been the case with Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ). See segment below.
~
The golf industry must cease its pointless & wasteful public affairs lobbying to educate & to convince pesticide-hating left-wing government officials & activists, particularly those associated with ― • Liberal Party of Canada ( LPC ) & its provincial parties • New Democratic Party of Canada ( NDP ) & its provincial wings • Green Party of Canada & its provincial parties.
~
These parties that will ALWAYS conspire to impose NATIONAL-PROHIBITIONS against all pest control products.
~
They will NEVER reverse their attitudes against so-called « COSMETIC PESTICIDES », regardless of the efforts by AMATEURISH trade associations.
~
The golf industry must adopt the policy to STOP all golf-hating extremist-organizations that conspire to impose HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against conventional pest control products.
~
Examples include Canadian Cancer Society, ( a.k.a. Prevent Cancer Now ), David Suzuki Foundation, World Wildlife Fund ( a.k.a. Liberal Party of Canada ), & many others. See next segment.
~
Golf Canada, & others in the golf industry, must STOP acting like « USEFUL IDIOTS » & STOP financing these golf-hating organizations.
~
They must STOP providing money to organizations like Canadian Cancer Society, otherwise, the golf industry is under threat of being annihilated.
~
Additionally, the golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will strike back & destroy golf-hating extremist-organizations, like David Suzuki Foundation, by vigorously exploiting their many vulnerabilities in public debate, such as the many HATE-SPEECH MYTHS that they concoct. See earlier segment.
~
But sometimes, the HATE-SPEECH is so obviously-filled with egregious lies & mis-information that it requires a more comprehensive rebuttal-response.
~
A LOBBY GROUP that represents the golf industry must be expected to demand an investigation on the non-profit charity-status of extremist-organizations, which hopefully can be revoked in order to eliminate their financing.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Golf-Hating Organizations
~
~
~
List ―
~
~
Golf course superintendents must be told that golf-hating extremist-organizations & their HATE-SPEECH & CONSPIRACIES will lead to the annihilation of the « GOLF INDUSTRY ». The extremists have conspired to impose HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against conventional pest control products that are desperately-needed to protect golf courses & maintain their high performance standard.
~
Here is a list of those organizations that hate & despise the « GOLF INDUSTRY », as well as « USEFUL IDIOT » trade associations that interfere with pesticide issues they know nothing about ―
~
~
• Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment ( CAPE )
~
Prominently conspires with most environmental-extremist organizations, such as Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ). Uses several public affairs shields, such as Pesticide Free Ontario ( PFO ) & Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario ( RNAO ). Uses political shields, like Green Party of Canada ( GPC ). Conspires with manufacturer of green alternative pesticides, Neudorff.
~
~
• Canadian Broadcasting Corporation ( CBC )
~
Conspires against the « GOLF INDUSTRY » with most environmental-extremist organizations, such as David Suzuki Foundation & Prevent Cancer Now.
~
~
• Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS )
~
Prominently conspires with most environmental-extremist organizations, such as Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment ( CAPE ). Uses several public affairs shields, such as Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides ( CAP-NL ), Ecology Action Centre ( EAC ), Pesticide Free BC ( PFBC ), Prevent Cancer Now ( PCN ), & World Wildlife Fund ( WWF ). Uses several political shields, such as Green Party of Canada ( GPC ) & New Democratic Party of Canada ( NDP ). Operates with « USEFUL IDIOTS », such as Golf Canada & IPM Council of Canada. Conspires with manufacturer of green alternative pesticides, Neudorff.
~
~
• Canadian Coalition for Health & Environment ( CCHE )
~
aka Prevent Cancer Now ( PCN ).
~
~
• Canadian Environmental Law Association ( CELA )
~
Legal shield for many environmental-extremist organizations.
~
~
• Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides ( CAP-NL )
~
aka NL Provincial Coalition on Pesticides, aka Concerned Citizens Group, & public affairs shield for Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ) in Newfoundland & Labrador.
~
~
• David Suzuki Foundation ( DSF )
~
Conspires with most environmental-extremist organizations, such as Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ) & Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment ( CAPE ). Conspires with legal shields like Ecojustice Canada & Environmental Defence Canada. Suzuki himself has been honorary board member at Ecojustice Canada.
~
~
• Ecology Action Centre ( EAC )
~
Nova Scotia shield for Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ).
~
~
• Ecojustice Canada ( EC )
~
Legal shield for David Suzuki Foundation ( DSF ). Suzuki himself has been honorary board member.
~
~
• Environmental Defence Canada ( LPC )
~
Legal shield for David Suzuki Foundation ( DSF ). Suzuki himself has been honorary board member. Member of Suzuki-enviro-extremist-alliances.
~
~
• Equiterre
~
Using Liberal Party of Canada ( LPC ) as a political shield. Quebec ambassador for David Suzuki Foundation ( DSF ).
~
~
• Golf Canada
~
aka Royal Canadian Golf Association ( RCGA ). Idiotic trade association that unwittingly conspires as a « USEFUL IDIOT » by financing Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ).
~
~
• Green Party of Canada ( GPC ) & its provincial parties
~
Political shield for Sierra Club, Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ), David Suzuki Foundation ( DSF ), & other environmental-extremist organizations.
~
~
• IPM Council of Canada
~
Idiotic trade association that ignores warnings of golf facilities being in deep trouble because of data thieves downloading golf course data from its web-site. Council directors have refused to protect the « GOLF INDUSTRY ». Unwittingly conspires as a « USEFUL IDIOT » against the « GOLF INDUSTRY » with Canadian Broadcasting Corporation ( CBC ), Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ), David Suzuki Foundation ( DSF ), LandsCAPE Ontario ( LO ), & Prevent Cancer Now ( PCN ).
~
~
• Liberal Party of Canada ( LPC ) & its provincial parties
~
Political shield for World Wildlife Fund ( WWF ) & other environmental-extremist organizations.
~
~
• New Democratic Party of Canada ( NDP ) & its provincial wings
~
Political shield for Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ), & other environmental-extremist organizations.
~
~
• Neudorff Canada
~
The manufacturer of Fiesta green alternative herbicide. Conspires with Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment ( CAPE ) & Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ).
~
~
• Ontario Bee-Keepers’ Association ( OBA )
~
Extremist trade association that operates as public affairs shield for Sierra Club.
~
~
• Pesticide Free BC ( PFBC )
~
Public affairs shield for Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ) in British Columbia.
~
~
• Pesticide Free Ontario ( PFO )
~
Public affairs shield for Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment ( CAPE ), Canadian Environmental Law Association ( CELA ), Sierra Club of Canada, Toronto Environmental Alliance ( TEA ), & World Wildlife Fund of Canada ( WWF ).
~
~
• Prevent Cancer Now ( PCN )
~
Public affairs shield for Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ), David Suzuki Foundation ( DSF ), Green Party ( GP ), & other environmental-extremist organizations. Green Party extremist-activist Elizabeth May herself has been honorary board member.
~
~
• Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario ( RNAO )
~
Conspires with most environmental-extremist organizations, particularly Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment ( CAPE ).
~
~
• Sierra Club of Canada & its provincial chapters
~
Conspires with public affairs shields like Ontario Bee-Keepers’ Association ( OBA ) & Saxe Law Office.
~
~
• Westcoast Environmental Law Association ( WCEL ) ~
~
Conspires as legal shield with most environmental-extremist organizations in British Columbia.
~
~
• Tides Canada
~
Conspires with public affairs shields like David Suzuki Foundation ( DSF ) & others. Conversely, Tides itself conspires as a financial shield for environmental-extremist organizations.
~
~
• World Wildlife Fund ( WWF )
~
Uses Liberal Party of Canada ( LPC ) as a political shield. Also operates as a public affairs shield for Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ).
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
WCTA’s Failures
~
~
~
Examples ―
~
~
Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ) BETRAYS the « GOLF INDUSTRY » because it has FAILED to defend its member-superintendents from HATE-SPEECH & CONSPIRACIES.
~
Here are examples ―
~
~
• WCTA Fails To Confront David Suzuki
~
The pompous & idiotic elected leaders & staff at WCTA have failed to confront & defend its member-superintendents & their facilities from attacks by David Suzuki & his operatives. The #@!!% Suzuki-documentary « DAD & THE DANDELIONS », which first aired on March 2nd, 2017, represented his latest anti-pesticide campaign of terrжr that falsely & strongly implies that golf courses cause cancer & kill golfers. [ ?!?! ] Suzuki’s fanatжcal-operatives spent a year-&-a-half producing the documentary, a cancer-terrжr-attack against the « GOLF INDUSTRY ». It was financed by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation ( CBC ) to the tune of 1-million-dollars. Suzuki intends to leave a legacy of terrжrized & destroyed golf facilities, lost jobs & hardship for golf employees, & weakened communities. What has WCTA done to confront Suzuki-terrжr against the « GOLF INDUSTRY » ?!?! NOTHING. WCTA has responded like COWARDS … do not attack Suzuki. Really ?!?! WCTA has AMATEURISHLY responded … Suzuki cancer-attacks are simply mis-information & alternative opinions. Really ?!?! Why ?!?! Because WCTA-leaders have become Suzuki acolytes. Consequently, WCTA-leaders fail to make any correct decisions. They are cowards & they do not care. WCTA betrays the « GOLF INDUSTRY » since it failed to defend golf superintendents from Suzuki.
~
~
• WCTA Conspires WITH Golf-Hating Cancer-Extremists
~
WCTA has failed to comprehend the threat to the « TURF INDUSTRY » from Canadian Cancer Society ( CCS ). In fact, the inept WCTA-leaders have actually conspired WITH this subversive, contemptible, & radical organization that has repeatedly demanded the total revocation of the « GOLF INDUSTRY’S » pesticide ban exception status. CCS’s acts of subversion have already extensively damaged the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY ». AMATEURISH WCTA-leaders allowed themselves to be appeased by cancer-extremists. Canadian Cancer Society appeasing WCTA-leaders is like Chamberlain being appeased by Hitler. WCTA betrays the « GOLF INDUSTRY » since it failed to defend golf superintendents from Canadian Cancer Society. WCTA-leaders are just a bunch of appeased #@!!% bastжrds !
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
7. Right-To-Know Data-Base
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending The Golf Industry
~
The Golf Industry Must Be Fully Transparent
See below
~
The Turf Industry Must Lobby The Government
Of British Columbia To Rescind Its WorkSafeBC
Guidelines On Politicized Re-Entry Intervals
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will create a fully transparent data-base for public right-to-know concerning its conventional pest control products, as well as related chemicals such as adjuvants, colorants & nutrients.
~
The data-base should include information on PRODUCT LABELS, RE-ENTRY INTERVALS, CANCER ASSESSMENTS, INCIDENT REPORTS, & more. See next segment.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Right-To-Know Data-Base
~
~
~
List ―
~
~
• Ensuring Pesticide Safety
~
Health Canada helps protect the Canadian public by researching, assessing, & collaborating in the management of the health risks & safety hazards associated with the many consumer products that Canadians use every day. Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA ) regulates pest control products in Canada. PMRA requires thorough scientific reviews & safety assessments to ensure that pest control products meet strict health & environmental standards & are shown to have value. Pest control products are one of the most stringently regulated products in Canada. It employs over 350 doctorate-level experts & leading scientific experts on pest control products. Health Canada’s PMRA has the ESSENTIAL expertise on pest control products. Indisputable & conclusive science-based research shows that, as reported through Health Canada’s confidential test data, NO harm will occur when pest control products are used according to label directions. The risk assessments of pest control products indicates that they are practically-non-toxic.
~
~
• Product Labels
~
APPROVED PESTICIDE PRODUCT LABEL DOCUMENTS contain Health Canada’s instruction & safety precautions that will protect human health & the environment. For every conventional pest control product, manufacturers spend 250,000,000-dollars in order to satisfy Health Canada’s scientific risk assessments. Two-hundred separate risk assessments are performed by the 350 professional experts at Health Canada to ensure that these products are scientifically-safe, & will not cause harm to people, animals, or the environment. Fortunately, there is not one known report of harm from the proper use of conventional pest control products used by the « TURF INDUSTRY ».
~
~
• Re-Entry Intervals
~
RE-ENTRY INTERVALS & LABEL STATEMENTS FOR APPLICATIONS ON TURFGRASSES are necessary to ensure that any pest control product residues on the treated turfgrass surfaces do not pose an unacceptable risk to human health. These intervals reflect the amount of time required for pest control product levels to dissipate to a level that is well below any point of concern. They are determined by Health Canada in order to protect people against potential harm from pest control products applied to turfgrasses. Typically, for all pest control products used in the « TURF INDUSTRY », the Health-Canada-approved labels state ― « KEEP PEOPLE OFF TREATED AREA UNTIL FOLIAGE IS DRY ».
~
~
• WorkSafeBC Politicized Re-Entry Intervals
~
Western Canada Turfgrass Association ( WCTA ) has failed to make any correct decisions regarding pesticide policies, particularly on issues concerning RE-ENTRY INTERVALS. It renders its policies by stating, in essence ― « LISTEN TO US & DO NOT LISTEN TO HEALTH CANADA ». Sadly, the pompous & ill-informed WCTA–leaders have publicly adopted the politicized & arbitrary guidelines of WorkSafeBC in defiance of Health Canada’s superior authority on these issues. Incredibly, some WCTA-leaders have shown an inclination towards an overall 24-hour RE-ENTRY INTERVAL for ALL pest control applications, in defiance of the label directions approved by Health Canada. They are WRONG ! WCTA-leaders should be simply recommending « FOLLOW THE LABEL DIRECTIONS » ― end of argument. They should cease & desist with their subversive actions of needlessly burdening the « TURF INDUSTRY » by ridiculously & arbitrarily exaggerating the interpretation of the label directions for pest control products. Rather, WCTA should be lobbying the government of British Columbia to rescind its WorkSafeBC guidelines. Only Health Canada has the essential expertise on RE-ENTRY INTERVALS, & NOT WorkSafeBC, & certainly NOT WCTA. WCTA-leaders are just a bunch of #@!!% bastжrds !
~
~
• Cancer Assessments
~
ASSESSMENT OF PESTICIDES FOR CARCINOGENIC POTENTIAL will ensure that pesticides will only be approved if they will NOT pose a cancer risk. Common cancers are most likely NOT caused by pesticides. Regulatory agencies world-wide, such as US EPA & Health Canada, will only grant a registration for legal pesticide use if it does NOT pose a cancer risk to humans. There is neither strong nor consistent data supportive of a positive association between occupational pesticide exposure & the five most common types of cancer ― breast, colorectal, lung, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, & prostate cancer. Animal toxicology study findings have NOT corresponded to the few epidemiology studies that suggested a link between pesticides & cancer. In conclusion, scientific research DOES NOT PROVIDE A CONCLUSIVE LINK between pest control products & cancer.
~
~
• Incident Reports
~
An INCIDENT is a negative effect, or adverse reaction, to health or the environment that can result from exposure to a pesticide. INCIDENT REPORTS are monitored by Health Canada to identify any potential risks from the use of pest control products & to take corrective actions when necessary. The less serious INCIDENTS on human health include skin rash, headache, or nausea. The more serious INCIDENTS may lead to an official evaluation & action. Nonetheless, Health Canada has stated that it is confident that the pest control products that it approves for use in Canada can be used safely when label directions are followed.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
8. Integrated Pest Management
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK Against IPM
~
The Golf Industry Must Cease Focusing On IPM
See below
~
IPM Will Not Necessarily Lead To Minimal Pesticide Use
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
There are questions about pesticides on golf courses being applied using « INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES » ( IPM ).
~
IPM will still require the judicious use of pest control products, which are absolutely necessary as a last resort to control recurring invasive weeds, destructive insects, & harmful diseases.
~
There is a pesticide-free version of IPM, & it must be avoided because it is failed, futile, ineffective, & overall, does not control damaging pests in turf.
~
IPM threatens the golf industry’s high performance maintenance standard of « PROVIDING PAYING GOLFERS WITH HIGH-QUALITY PLAYING CONDITIONS & AESTHETICS », which can only be achieved through the use of conventional pest control products & fertilizers.
~
Whenever any version of IPM is entirely relied upon, damaging pests may only be slightly suppressed, at the expense of plant growth, safe playing conditions, & appearance.
~
Overall, IPM WILL NOT control recurring invasive weeds, destructive insects, & harmful diseases.
~
Some « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » falsely-allege that the best way to achieve « MINIMAL PESTICIDE USE », & allay environmental concerns, is through the use of pesticide-free IPM, & they are WRONG.
~
In fact, main-stream golf course superintendents must be praised because they are already practicing a reasonable version of « MINIMAL PESTICIDE USE ».
~
They will determine the need for pest control products by site-specific historical data & established thresholds that will inevitably « MINIMIZE PESTICIDE USE ».
~
Without question, superintendents are the environmental stewards of the land & are the planet’s great conservationists, since they are highly-educated professionals in turfgrass management & « MINIMAL PESTICIDE USE ».
~
They are viewed as good for the golf industry & good for golf business.
~
For example, in the province of Ontario, HARMFUL-PROHIBITION has been erroneously-justified by prominently validating the futile & ineffective pesticide-free IPM.
~
Ontario continues to desperately need safe & effective conventional pest control products in order to protect its urban green spaces, which includes golf courses.
~
Not surprisingly, pesticide-free IPM is not based upon any valid & recognized scientific research; it is adopted for mere politicized purposes.
~
Nonetheless, the golf industry must CEASE focusing on IPM as the solution to environmental concerns or public affairs problems.
~
IPM is #@!!% nonsense, will not work, & will not provide a high performance standard on the golf course.
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will discourage superintendents from using any version of IPM.
~
The LOBBY GROUP must also vigorously embark on a massive public affairs lobbying campaign to DISCREDIT IPM, declaring it as failed, futile, & ineffective.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Politicized IPM Attacks
~
~
~
Facts ―
~
~
• Web-Site Of IPM Council Of Canada
~
Golf courses’ on-line IPM-data-base of the IPM Council of Canada must be eliminated forever because it represents an elevated & ongoing threat of harm & destruction to main-stream superintendents. The « GOLF INDUSTRY » NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will to warn their member-superintendents that golf-hating extremists have launched a hacking-attack campaign by downloading sensitive IPM data stored on the web-site of IPM Council of Canada. This web-site contains thousands of detailed reports on the use of pest control products by hundreds of golf superintendents who desperately rely upon these products in order to protect their golf courses. Incredibly, IPM Council of Canada has refused to adequately protect golf superintendents & their facilities from extremists’ elevated & ongoing threat of harm & destruction.
~
~
• Hacking-Attack By Prevent Cancer Now
~
Prevent Cancer Now ( PCN ) has extensively damaged, terrжrized, & destroyed the businesses in the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY ». And golf is NEXT ! Since 2016, PCN began sending messages by e-mail to its extremist-followers ordering the hacking-attack against golf superintendents & their facilities. The PCN target is the web-site of IPM Council of Canada. The « GOLF INDUSTRY » NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will monitor these messages & attacks.
~
~
• Meg Sears’ Revenge
~
The master-mind of the PCN hacking-attacks is Sears herself, a revenge-obsessed fanatжc who holds the « GOLF INDUSTRY » falsely-accountable for the sad death of her son as a result of his supposed exposure to pest control products used by golf facilities near her home. The destruction of golf facilities will serve as the ultimate revenge for the death of her son. Sears is a paid-operative at Prevent Cancer Now ( PCN ), & is also a paid-operative with associates David Suzuki Foundation & Canadian Cancer Society. Since the mid-2000s, Sears’ & her associates’ hate-speech & interference have extensively damaged & destroyed hundreds of businesses that, at one time, operated successfully in the « PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY ». Now golf is NEXT !
~
~
• Politicized IPM Attacks
~
Sears has commanded a small group of golf-hating extremists to download ( i.e. hack ) all of the sensitive IPM data from the unsecured web-site of the IPM Council of Canada. Her objective is to create IRRATIONAL ANTI-PESTICIDE HATE-SPEECH by recklessly evaluating the IPM data in a politicized manner that will humiliate, damage, & destroy businesses that operate in the « GOLF INDUSTRY ». Usually, the « GOLF INDUSTRY’S » main-stream strategy for handling this HATE-SPEECH is to ignore it. But sometimes, the attacks are so obviously-filled with egregious lies & mis-information that they require comprehensive rebuttal-responses. This is one of those times. The « GOLF INDUSTRY » NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will formulate responses to these politicized IPM attacks.
~
~
• Striking Back Against Prevent Cancer Now
~
The « GOLF INDUSTRY » NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will stop the revenge-obsessed [?] Meg Sears & her pesticide-hating associates at Prevent Cancer Now ( PCN ). Trade associations must STRIKE BACK with policy-making & public affairs lobbying that will stop irrational anti-pesticide hate-speech & illegal interference with partisan politics & public policy. The non-profit charity-status of PCN must be investigated & hopefully revoked. Trade associations must STRIKE BACK with A LOBBY GROUP to complain-complain-complain about Sears’ PCN & her associates.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
9. Organic Pesticide-Free Maintenance
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending The Golf Industry
~
~Trade Associations Must Strongly Urge Their
Members To Recognize That Safe, Economical,
& Well-Maintained Golf Courses Can Only Be
Achieved With No-Risk & Effective Conventional
Pest Control Products & Fertilizers, & Not With
Ineffective Organic Pesticide-Free Maintenance
See below
~
Turf Industry Must Get Rid Of The Organic Menace
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
Trade associations must use lobbying to warn their member-superintendents about medieval & ineffective « ORGANIC PESTICIDE-FREE MAINTENANCE » practices concocted by golf-hating anti-pesticide activist-extremists.
~
Additionally, the golf industry must vigorously embark on a massive lobbying campaign to discredit « ORGANIC » practices involving the use of inferior & ineffective « GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES ».
~
Furthermore, trade associations must adopt the policy to expel those superintendents & golf facilities that use « ORGANIC » maintenance practices.
~
Without conventional pest control products, « ORGANIC » golf courses will become infested with recurring invasive weeds & destructive insects & harmful diseases … unless staggering & unlimited amounts of money are wasted on demoralized pest-picking labourers & medieval & ineffective practices, like at the infamous Vineyard Golf Club, America’s ONLY « ORGANIC » golf course.
~
According to public affairs lobbying by National Allied Golf Associations, NONE of Canada’s golf courses have adopted a policy of « NO PESTICIDES » because Canadian conditions are not conducive for « ORGANIC PESTICIDE-FREE MAINTENANCE ».
~
Golf-hating extremists at David Suzuki Foundation have been spreading false-claims that « ORGANIC PESTICIDE-FREE MAINTENANCE » has become a template that serves as an example for the golf industry, which is RIDICULOUS & WRONG.
~
The golf industry’s high performance maintenance standard must « PROVIDE PAYING GOLFERS WITH HIGH-QUALITY PLAYING CONDITIONS & AESTHETICS », which can only be achieved through the use of conventional pest control products.
~
Consequently, there are NO « ORGANIC PESTICIDE-FREE » golf courses in Canada.
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will bring together all of the entire « TURF INDUSTRY » to get rid of the ORGANIC MENACE.
~
The golf industry must also establish policies for EXPELLING those members who adopt these MEDIEVAL & INEFFECTIVE practices.
~
It must also publicly discredit bogus terms like organic-maintenance & pesticide-free-maintenance.
~
The UNAFFORDABLE MENACE & EXPENSIVE FAILURE of organic maintenance must be eradicated from the modern green space industry, forever.
~
Human health & the environment are already PROTECTED by Health Canada, US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) & other national regulatory agencies.
~
These national regulatory agencies, & NOT GREEN ALTERNATIVE USERS, have the ESSENTIAL EXPERTISE & ULTIMATE CREDIBILITY on pest control products.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Organic Menace
~
~
~
Facts ―
~
~
• Unaffordable & Expensive Failure
~
MEDIEVAL & INEFFECTIVE organic pesticide-free maintenance ( aka organic maintenance ) has been an UNAFFORDABLE MENACE & an EXPENSIVE FAILURE. When it comes to HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS against no-risk conventional products, state, municipal, & county officials are THINKING TWICE about banning these products by looking at the MENACE & FAILURE of organic pesticide-free maintenance. There are NO successful practices for organic pesticide-free maintenance ― they are MEDIEVAL & INEFFECTIVE. Whenever HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS are imposed, « GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES » are incorporated into the maintenance program ― not because they work ― but because the rules & legislation will overwhelmingly & unfairly favour these products. The organic menace is doomed to fail.
~
~
• Inferior & Ineffective Green Alternatives
~
There are no successful practices for organic pesticide-free maintenance, only failures that are promoted by extremists with unverifiable success stories. Overall, organic pesticide-free maintenance that relies on « GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES » will not be able to provide well-maintained & economical turfgrass surfaces in the urban landscape. This is because these alternatives are PHONY & INFERIOR & INEFFECTIVE, & will never adequately control infestations of recurring invasive weeds & destructive insects & harmful diseases. They will never reduce, or even eliminate, the need for no-risk conventional pest control products. In all cases, they will never, ever, work.
~
~
• Unfairly Favouring Alternatives
~
Government officials promote organic maintenance only because it somehow aligns with their political precepts & doctrines. Not surprisingly, whenever HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS are imposed, inferior & ineffective green alternative products are incorporated into organic maintenance ― not because they work ― but because of rules & legislation that overwhelmingly & unfairly favours these products. The menace of organic maintenance must be eradicated from the « TURF INDUSTRY », forever.
~
~
• Ecological Carnage & Garbage Dump Green Spaces
~
Green spaces have never looked so #@!!% ugly when using organic pesticide-free maintenance ― the urban environment becomes a garbage dump. It will be impossible for home-owners, & even professionals, to protect their properties from damaging pests by relying on inferior & ineffective green alternative pesticides. « GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES » are INFERIOR & INEFFECTIVE, & WILL NEVER CONTROL infestations of recurring invasive weeds, destructive insects, & harmful diseases. Before the imposition of HARMFUL-PROHIBITIONS, the costs for maintaining public & residential green spaces would have been far LESS EXORBITANT with NO-RISK & AFFORDABLE conventional pest control products. Organic pesticide-free maintenance has been A MENACE & A FAILURE because it will create catastrophic ECOLOGICAL CARNAGE from uncontrolled & dangerous insects like white grubs, & from invasive & dangerous weeds like dandelions on public & residential green spaces. Organically-maintained green spaces inevitably end up looking like GARBAGE DUMPS, with playing surfaces having been extensively damaged & many have been rendered unplayable, compromising the safety of CHILDREN & adults, who are at high-risk of slipping & tripping & becoming SERIOUSLY HURT.
~
~
• Green Alternative Threat
~
Unfortunately, « GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES » may represent a major threat with questionably higher toxicity & with higher environmental risks. In some cases, these alternatives may be considered as unsafe as using Agent Orange, DDT, & other controversial products. By contrast, no-risk conventional products can be used safely & will cause no harm to human health & the environment.
~
~
• Unwanted Organic Menace
~
Organic pesticide-free maintenance may be a menace to the modern « TURF INDUSTRY ». Organic maintenance is often recommended merely to advance the conspiracy to prohibit no-risk conventional pest control products. Polls prove that a majority of home-owners feel that their governments are wrong when implementing HARMFUL-PROHIBITION ― home-owners do not want to be forced into relying on inferior & ineffective green alternatives. This organic menace is particularly alarming for the « GOLF INDUSTRY ».
~
~
• Canadian Organic Golf Menace
~
Organic pesticide-free maintenance is A MENACE & A FAILURE for the « GOLF INDUSTRY ». It is impossible for golf superintendents to maintain high-quality playing conditions & aesthetics by relying upon organic, pesticide-free, & IPM, & other medieval & ineffective forms of maintenance. Without conventional pest control products, golf courses will become pest-infested & unplayable garbage dumps that look dead … unless staggering & unlimited amounts of money are provided by either government hand-outs or ultra-wealthy club-members. In Canada, there have been four, yes only four, attempts by golf courses that have pretended being pesticide-free; they have been put up for sale & have gone into receivership ― one golf course no longer pretends to be organic. There are no longer any organic pesticide-free golf courses in Canada. The organic menace is gone from the « GOLF INDUSTRY ».
~
~
• Canadian Golf Industry’s Official Position
~
The Canadian « GOLF INDUSTRY’S » official position on organic pesticide-free maintenance has been ― • golf courses have not adopted a policy of no-pesticides • Canadian conditions are not conducive for pesticide-free maintenance • acceptable playing conditions can only be achieved through the use of pest control products • these products are a necessity due to the requirement for professional turfgrasses grown in difficult climate conditions. Consequently, there are NO organic pesticide-free golf courses in Canada.
~
~
• American Fake Organic Golf Courses
~
Elsewhere, in America, organic golf courses are forced to adopt medieval & ineffective maintenance which cannot possibly control pests that will damage playing conditions & aesthetics. Virtually all organic golf courses only PRETEND being pesticide-free.
~
~
• Trade Associations
~
National regulatory agencies, world-wide, have found that conventional products do not present risks of concern to human health or the environment when correctly used according to label directions. Therefore, trade associations must be expected to strongly urge their constituent-industries to recognize that safe, economical, & well-maintained green spaces can only be achieved with no-risk & effective conventional pest control products & fertilizers, & not with inferior & ineffective green alternatives. ~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
10. Green Alternative Pesticides
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending Conventional Products
~
Green Alternative Pesticides Are
Phony, Inferior, & Ineffective
See below
~
There Is No Such Thing As Non-Toxic &
Effective Alternatives To Conventional Products
See below
~
Main-Stream Superintendents Do
Not Need Additional Protection By
Imposing Green Alternative Nonsense
See below
~
Trade Associations Must Stop Peddling
Green Alternatives That Do Not Work
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
ALL prohibitions have created catastrophic ECOLOGICAL CARNAGE of uncontrolled, invasive, & destructive pests !
~
Without conventional pest control products, green spaces & hard-landscapes have become pest-infested & dangerous garbage dumps because it is impossible to control invasive weeds & destructive insects by using so-called « GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES ».
~
So-called cosmetic pesticide protections ― they must continue to be gutted by amendments like Ontario’s Bill 132 because human health & the environment are already protected by Health Canada.
~
« GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES » are products that are PHONY & INFERIOR & INEFFECTIVE which should no longer be recommended for turfgrass maintenance.
~
For example, Fiesta Herbicide is an INEFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE when compared to single-applications of three-way conventional herbicides that contain 2,4-D.
~
The vast majority of Fiesta users OVERWHELMINGLY CONDEMN IT.
~
In fact, quite often, observers believe it would be better to do NOTHING rather than use Fiesta Herbicide.
~
Only the use of conventional herbicides has been shown to be effective against broad-leaved weeds ― & their applications are NO-RISK, SAFE, & EFFECTIVE.
~
« GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES » like nematodes, hydrogen peroxide, & compost tea do not work, do not control damaging pests, & may even be dangerous & illegal.
~
Moreover, the golf industry’s trade associations must stop peddling inferior & ineffective « GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES » to their members & the public.
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that must adopt the policy to stop promoting & using green alternatives, which must be denounced as PHONY & INFERIOR & INEFFECTIVE.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Politicized Alternatives
~
~
~
Facts ―
~
~
• Safety Of Alternatives
~
There is no such thing as non-toxic & effective alternatives to conventional pest control products. According to field experience & anecdotal evidence, as well as university studies, « GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES » are NOT equivalent alternatives & NOT safer when compared to conventional products. In some cases, « GREEN ALTERNATIVES » may be considered as unsafe as using Agent Orange, DDT, & other banned products. Many « GREEN ALTERNATIVES » are NOT federally registered & are NOT proven to be scientifically-safe. In many cases, « GREEN ALTERNATIVES » should NOT be allowed anywhere near children.
~
~
• Golf Course Alternatives
~
Overall, practices that rely on « GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES » will NOT be able to provide HIGH-QUALITY PAYING CONDITIONS & AESTHETICS. It is IMPOSSIBLE for main-stream superintendents to protect their golf courses from damaging pests by relying on « GREEN ALTERNATIVES » which are PHONY & INFERIOR & INEFFECTIVE, with questionably higher toxicity & with higher environmental risks. Main-stream superintendents DO NOT need additional « PROTECTION » by imposing « GREEN ALTERNATIVE » nonsense.
~
~
• Protection
~
Government regulations, that arbitrarily prohibit conventional products but NOT « GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES », will NOT stop the public from realizing that a large quantity of politicized mis-information is being spread by officials. Human health & the environment are already PROTECTED by both Health Canada & US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ). These national regulatory agencies, & NOT « GREEN ALTERNATIVE » activists & politicians, have the ESSENTIAL EXPERTISE & ULTIMATE CREDIBILITY on ALL pest control products. Risk assessments are performed by REAL expert-scientists at Health Canada & US EPA to ensure that these products CAN BE USED SAFELY, & that human health & the environment WILL BE PROTECTED.
~
~
• WCTA Peddles Alternatives
~
Western Canada Turfgrass Trade Association ( WCTA ) has appointed itself as promoter of « GREEN ALTERNATIVE PESTICIDES », such as entomo-pathogenic nematode insecticides. The pompous & ill-informed leaders of WCTA have spread mis-information concerning nematode insecticides that are, in fact, NOT effective for the control of damaging insects like European Chafers. WCTA must STOP peddling bogus « GREEN ALTERNATIVES » that DO NOT WORK. WCTA fails as a trade association. When will WCTA ever promote conventional insect control products like chlorantraniliprole or imidacloprid ?!?!
~
~
• Politicized Assurances
~
In order to validate HARMFUL-PROHIBITION, trade association leaders, anti-pesticide government officials, & activists have somehow assured the public that safe, effective, & affordable green alternatives, like nematode insecticides, have been available to replace no-risk conventional pest control products. They were wrong. Overall, it would be better to do nothing rather than use green alternatives, which are not viable, not efficacious, not practical, & not economically viable. These inferior green alternatives cannot be consistently considered as true alternatives to conventional pest control products, since the damaging pests are often only suppressed, & not controlled. Organic pesticide-free maintenance with green alternatives has been a dismal failure.
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
11. High Performance Standard
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending The Golf Industry
~
Furnishing Paying Golfers With High-
Quality Playing Conditions & Aesthetics
See below
~
Providing Golfers Greener, Thicker,
Pest-Free, & Manicured Turf Conditions,
At A Minimum, On All Putting Greens
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will inform the public that all main-stream superintendents will provide a high performance standard that is expected by paying golfers.
~
The golf industry’s high performance maintenance standard must ― « FURNISH PAYING GOLFERS WITH HIGH-QUALITY PLAYING CONDITIONS & AESTHETICS PROVIDED BY GREENER, THICKER, PEST-FREE, & MANICURED TURF CONDITIONS, AT A MINIMUM, ON ALL PUTTING GREENS ».
~
A high performance standard must include the regular use of conventional pest control products & fertilizers, as well as core aeration, based upon the results of real scientific research.
~
These standards cannot involve the use of DESTRUCTIVE & COSTLY & FAILED PRACTICES, such as ― • go brown anti-cosmetic golf maintenance • fertilizer nutrient reduction • integrated pest management practices • minimal pesticide use • organic maintenance • zero cultivation & reduced core aeration • and more. See next segments.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Failed Practices
~
~
~
List ―
~
~
Here is a list of the DESTRUCTIVE & COSTLY & FAILED PRACTICES that do not work, & will not provide a high performance standard on the golf course ―
~
~
• Go Brown Anti-Cosmetic Golf Maintenance
~
• Fertilizer Nutrient Reduction
~
• Integrated Pest Management Practices ( IPM )
~
• Minimal Pesticide Use
~
• Organic Maintenance
~
• Pace Turf Information Service
~
• Pollinator Best Management Practices
~
• Self-Imposing Restrictions & Prohibitions Against Pesticides
~
• Spot Spray & Spot Treatment Replacing Blanket Application
~
• Switching To Ineffective Green Alternative Pesticides
~
• Zero Cultivation & Reduced Core Aeration – see next segment
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Zero-Cultivation
~
~
~
Facts ―
~
~
• Failed Maintenance Practice
~
« ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » perpetuate their treacherous attacks against the « GOLF INDUSTRY » by managing their golf courses with the destructive & costly & failed doctrines of zero-cultivation ( a.k.a. no-soil-aeration ) & reduced core aeration ( i.e. reduced soil core removal ). Zero-cultivation & reduced core aeration do not work, & have no place in decisions concerning golf course maintenance.
~
~
• High Performance Standard
~
By adopting zero-cultivation & reduced core aeration, observers question the « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS’ » ability to adhere to the « GOLF INDUSTRY’S » high performance maintenance standard which must ― « FURNISH PAYING GOLFERS WITH HIGH-QUALITY PLAYING CONDITIONS & AESTHETICS PROVIDED BY GREENER, THICKER, PEST-FREE, & MANICURED TURF CONDITIONS, AT A MINIMUM, ON ALL PUTTING GREENS ». Why do they choose to ignore the overwhelming BENEFITS OF TURF CULTIVATION ?!?! See next paragraph. What possible benefit can be touted by « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » for unilaterally stopping conventional turf cultivation ?!?! « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » must stop zero-cultivation, & adopt a « MASTER PLAN » for conventional turf cultivation. See later paragraph. Zero-cultivation must be stopped, forever.
~
~
• Benefits Of Turf Cultivation
~
Conventional turf cultivation ( i.e. soil aeration ) is the solution to many destructive & costly problems ―
~
• Compaction in the soil alleviated • Water infiltration is improved • Thatch decomposition is increased & wide-spread thatch problems are avoided • Carbon dioxide toxin is better released from the soil • Disease resistance of turf is improved • Fertilizer applied to the soil is more effectively placed • Heat & drought stress resistance of turf is improved • Organic matter in the soil is removed • Oxygen absorption in the soil is improved • Oxygen movement in the soil is also improved • Root system is deeper, healthier, & revitalized • Seed germination is improved for over-seeded turf • Soil is loosened & easier for roots to penetrate.
~
~
• Stop Zero-Cultivation
~
The « GOLF INDUSTRY » must stop zero-cultivation & reduced core aeration, forever. Those golf courses where these doctrines of have been adopted will tend to have poor turf & lower-quality playing conditions. The primary responsibility of main-stream golf superintendents is to ensure « PROVIDING PAYING GOLFERS WITH HIGH-QUALITY PLAYING CONDITIONS & AESTHETICS », which will be thwarted by zero-cultivation & reduced core aeration.
~
~
• Course Of Action
~
Should the adoption of these DESTRUCTIVE & COSTLY & FAILED PRACTICES become grounds for terminating an « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENT » ?!?! In order to deter their mis-guided activism & incompetence, perhaps the « MASTER PLAN » for conventional turf cultivation should be written into superintendents’ contracts. This will ensure that « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » will stop zero-cultivation & reduced core aeration, ensuring that paying-golfers will be satisfied with « HIGH-QUALITY PLAYING CONDITIONS & AESTHETICS ». No excuses. End of discussion. Conventional turf cultivation ( i.e. soil aeration ) must be performed, regularly. Even better, perhaps « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » who have adopted the DESTRUCTIVE & COSTLY & FAILED PRACTICE of zero-cultivation should not be considered for employment. Maybe ?!?! The « GOLF INDUSTRY » NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will stop zero-cultivation & reduced core aeration, forever.
~
~
• Master Plan For Putting Greens
~
Here is a proposed « MASTER PLAN » for conventional turf cultivation ―
~
On golf course putting greens ― core aeration ( i.e. soil core removal ) must be performed by the superintendent once for every 10,000 rounds of play. Beyond 25,000 rounds, non-core cultivation methods ( a.k.a. venting aeration ), such as solid-tine, must be used in the overall turf cultivation program throughout the summer months. In addition, it is recommended that 20 per cent of surface area be removed every year. With the optional quad tine holder, the Jacobsen GA-24 Greens Aerator can achieve a 1 x 1 inch hole pattern & pull more material during two core aerations than competitor products can pull in three. With this quad tine holder, 11.9 per cent of material can be removed in two passes. By comparison, the Toro Procore 648 will require 3 passes to achieve the same result since it will only remove 6.55 per cent with its 1.5-inch x 2.0-inch spacing. The larger hole size ― & closer spacing between holes ― the better. Changing from a 0.25-inch tine to a 0.50-inch tine will increase the surface area impacted by 400 per cent. Using a 0.625-inch tine versus a 0.50-inch tine increases the surface area impacted by approximately 50 per cent.
~
~
• Lobby Group
~
« ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » treacherously attack the « GOLF INDUSTRY » with the imposition of DESTRUCTIVE & COSTLY & FAILED PRACTICES like zero-cultivation & reduced core aeration. « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » represent the greatest threats to the main-stream « GOLF INDUSTRY », & their treacherous attacks must be stopped, forever. The « GOLF INDUSTRY » NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will stop the proliferation of zero-cultivation & reduced core aeration, & will develop a « MASTER PLAN » for conventional turf cultivation, among other practices.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
12. Activist-Superintendents
~
~
~
Key Point ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending The Golf Industry
~
Activist-Superintendents Must Be
Expelled From Trade Associations
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
Main-stream golf course superintendents must be praised ― they are already practicing a reasonable version of « MINIMAL PESTICIDE USE », & they are the planet’s great conservationists.
~
They are viewed as good the golf industry & good for golf business.
~
Conversely, « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » may be viewed as bad for the golf industry & bad for golf business.
~
They cannot be trusted, & they do not represent main-stream golf course superintendents ― in fact, they provide no useful purpose to the golf industry.
~
Moreover, these snowflakes preach DESTRUCTIVE & COSTLY & FAILED PRACTICES, such as ― • go brown anti-cosmetic golf maintenance • fertilizer nutrient reduction • integrated pest management practices • minimal pesticide use • organic maintenance • zero cultivation & reduced core aeration • and more. See earlier segments.
~
Unfortunately, these snowflakes attempt to dictate low expectations for playing conditions to golf facility owners & their paying golf-customers.
~
Fortunately, all snowflakes easily melt under the scrutiny of science, reason, & sanity as they are, seemingly, mentally-challenged & incompetent.
~
Their #@!!% nonsense will drive-away paying golf-customers who do not want their expectations reduced by demands from snowflakes.
~
ALL superintendents must meet the expectations of paying golf-customers by following a high performance maintenance standard ― « FURNISH PAYING GOLFERS WITH HIGH-QUALITY PLAYING CONDITIONS & AESTHETICS PROVIDED BY GREENER, THICKER, PEST-FREE, & MANICURED TURF CONDITIONS, AT A MINIMUM, ON ALL PUTTING GREENS ».
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will adopt the policy to expel « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » from the trade associations, & remove them, forever.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
13. Go Brown
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending The Golf Industry
~
Brown Is Beautiful ?!?!
See below
~
Go Brown Anti-Cosmetic Golf Course Maintenance
Must Be Opposed By Main-Stream Superintendents
See below
~
Go Brown Is Indicative Of Unhealthy,
Unplayable, & Undesirable Playing
Conditions That Look Like Death
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
United States Golf Association ( USGA ) is INFAMOUS with its doctrine of « GO BROWN » despite rendering golf courses TO LOOK LIKE DEATH.
~
In fact, brown is indicative of UNHEALTHY, UNPLAYABLE, & UNDESIRABLE PLAYING CONDITIONS.
~
Paying golfers do not want to play on brown depressing unplayable courses that LOOK LIKE DEATH.
~
Golf-hating extremists want « GO BROWN » junk golf courses with the ridiculous notion that this is somehow environmentally sustainable. [ ?!?! ]
~
« GO BROWN » is embraced by « ACTIVIST-SUPERINTENDENTS » who must be expelled from the golf industry’s trade associations.
~
ALL superintendents must meet the expectations of paying golf-customers by following a high performance maintenance standard ― « FURNISH PAYING GOLFERS WITH HIGH-QUALITY PLAYING CONDITIONS & AESTHETICS PROVIDED BY GREENER, THICKER, PEST-FREE, & MANICURED TURF CONDITIONS, AT A MINIMUM, ON ALL PUTTING GREENS ».
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will discourage superintendents from using « GO BROWN » anti-cosmetic golf course maintenance.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
14. Political Action
~
~
~
Key Point ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending The Golf Industry
~
Superintendents Must Vote Conservative
To Avoid Any National-Prohibitions
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
Whenever successfully elected to power, Liberals, New Democrats, & Greens will always conspire to impose extremist NATIONAL-PROHIBITIONS against all pest control products.
~
With a Conservative victory in the Canadian Federal Election, there will be no NATIONAL-PROHIBITION against pest control products.
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will convince superintendents to vote Conservative.
~
A LOBBY GROUP must meet with Members of Provincial Parliament ( MPP ) & Members of Parliament ( MP ), regardless of party affiliation.
~
Furthermore, a LOBBY GROUP must adopt the policy to openly & financially support all Conservative political candidates who oppose any HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against pest control products & fertilizers.
~
Since 2015, Canada’s NATIONAL-PROHIBITIONS came as NO surprise since the decisions by the Liberal-controlled Health Canada had been mostly implemented within mere months after Liberal Party won in the Canadian General Election on October 19th, 2015.
~
Once elected to power, Canada’s Trudeau Liberal Government quickly conspired to propose & enact NATIONAL-PROHIBITIONS against more of the « TURF INDUSTRY’S » desperately-needed pest control products.
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will ensure that Health Canada has considered all of the information in a WEIGHT-OF-EVIDENCE APPROACH whenever it imposes NATIONAL-PROHIBITIONS against its products.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
15. Teaching ⁄ Research Institutions
~
~
~
Key Point ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending The Golf Industry
~
Get Rid Of Teaching ⁄ Research Institutions
That Are Infested With Anti-Pesticide Activists
See below
~
~
~
Course Of Action ―
~
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will adopt the policy to terminate all relationships with teaching & research institutions that validate & support the HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against pest control products that are used to protect the urban landscape.
~
This would be especially true for University of Guelph.
~
All joint activities & educational seminars must be ended for an indefinite period of time.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Teaching ⁄ Research
Institutions
~
~
~
List ―
~
~
The following teaching ⁄ research institutions have been infested with anti-pesticide extremists & ⁄ or have conspired to impose HARMFUL-PROHIBITION against conventional pest control products ―
~
~
• Dalhousie University
~
Halifax, Nova Scotia
~
• Gaia College
~
Duncan, British Columbia
~
• McMaster University
~
Hamilton, Ontario
~
• Simon Fraser University
~
Burnaby, British Columbia
~
• University of British Columbia ( UBC )
~
Vancouver, British Columbia
~
• University of Guelph
~
Guelph, Ontario
~
• University of Manitoba
~
Winnipeg, Manitoba
~
• University of Ottawa
~
Ottawa, Ontario
~
• University of Waterloo
~
Waterloo, Ontario
~
• University of Western Ontario
~
London, Ontario
~
• University of Winnipeg
~
Winnipeg, Manitoba
~
• University of Windsor
~
Windsor, Ontario
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Critical Issue For Policy-Making & Public Affairs Lobbying
~
16. Heroes Of The Industry
~
~
~
Key Points ―
~
~
STRIKING BACK & Defending The Golf Industry
~
Main-Stream Superintendents Must
Not Forget Their Great Hero-Leaders
See below
~
The Insidious Take-Over By Golf Course
Owners Proves That CGSA-Leaders Are
Incapable Of Making Any Correct Decisions
See below
~
Because Of Historical Misconduct,
Current CGSA-Leaders Cannot Be Trusted
See below
~
~
~
Statements ―
~
~
Strong, good, & active heroes are the players who must set things right & protect others.
~
Heroes struggle, which is why they are admirable ― & also why they need others’ cooperation, votes, or financial support.
~
The combination of good & strong leads to bravery, actions that run the risk or reality of self-sacrifice.
~
Hero stories can remind the golf industry of the leader’s past victories, but also of the powerful forces arrayed against him.
~
Strong enough to protect himself, the hero’s goodness requires that he act on behalf of others as well.
~
The golf industry NEEDS A LOBBY GROUP that will help attract better-motivated leaders that will become heroes.
~
Mr John B Steel was the first hero-president of Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ).
~
He was the longest serving president from 1966 through 1968.
~
One year later, in 1967, the « FIRST ANNUAL NATIONAL CONFERENCE » was held at the Skyline Hotel, in Toronto.
~
Mr Steel was followed by other earlier CGSA’s GREAT HERO LEADERS who also served as presidents, such as ― • Mr David Gourlay Sr • Mr Tom Johnston • Mr Camil Labelle • Mr Douglas Meyer • Mr Gordon Witteveen.
~
Mr Douglas Meyer was CGSA’s LAST GREAT INSPIRATIONAL HERO-LEADER — see previous paragraphs. See next segment.
~
Sadly, current CGSA-leaders have led their association into DISREPUTE & FAILURE.
~
~
~
~
―――――――――――――――――
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
Great Hero Leaders
~
~
~
Facts ―
~
~
• Can Current Leaders Do Better ?
~
To most in the « GOLF INDUSTRY », Mr Douglas Meyer has been held in reverence as a hero & a legendary icon. Under Mr Meyer’s strong participation with the board of directors, Canadian Golf Superintendents Association ( CGSA ) underwent unequalled successes & respectful-acknowledgements as a once-great trade association. As a former CGSA-president, Mr Meyer has been one of the few CREDIBLE industry leaders. Observers have recognized that Mr Meyer was CGSA’s LAST GREAT INSPIRATIONAL HERO-LEADER — & he has exemplified « BIG L LEADERSHIP ».
~
~
• 9 New Major & Progressive Policy Successes
~
During his tenure as president & director, Mr Meyer’s powerful leadership & inspirational guidance led to fantastic successes, with no less than 9 NEW MAJOR & PROGRESSIVE POLICY SUCCESSES, including ― • approved new national occupational standards • began the new benefits & compensation survey for superintendents • created new student scholarship awards & provided new financial assistance to CGSA student-members • ensured new & improved long-range planning for CGSA • established the new John B Steel award for distinguished service • instituted the new major membership opinion survey • launched the CGSA’s new web-site • published new environmental management resource manual • revitalized the master superintendent program. Can current leaders do better ?
~
~
• 30 Important & Progressive Initiative Successes
~
Mr Meyer’s tenure as president & director also led to more than 30 IMPORTANT & PROGRESSIVE INITIATIVE SUCCESSES, including ― • committed CGSA members to excellence in golf course management & environmental responsibility • sponsored the development of the new environmental management resource manual • developed new seminars to include relevant professional development for superintendents • launched awareness campaign to promote new national occupational standards • positively-influenced membership enrollment because of new national occupational standards & new environmental management resource manual • promised the continuing professional development of CGSA members • recognized that superintendents were becoming more like managers • & much more. Can current leaders do better ?
~