Swimming In The Assertions By Regulatory, Health, Research, & Administrative Agencies That Have Vindicated No-Actual-Risk Glyphosate
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Overview
~
Vindication In Both
America & Canada !
~
~
Glyphosate Is Vindicated In Both America &
Canada, Where It Continues To Be Registered
As A Successful & Safe Ingredient That Presents
No-Actual-Risks That Are Unacceptable To
Human Health Or The Environment
Regulatory, Health, Research, &
Administrative Agencies World-Wide Have
Vindicated Glyphosate — These Agencies
Include Those Within The United States, The
European Union, The United Nations, Canada
There Are 17 Statements,
There Are 19 Essential Facts &
14 Quick Facts That Explain
Why Glyphosate Is Vindicated
−
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
01. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ No Concerns About Safety ▬
~
~
~
The Herbicide Glyphosate, The Active
Ingredient In Roundup, Is Safe To Use
No One Should Be Listening To
Pesticide-Hating Extremists & Their
Hate-Speech Against Glyphosate
Glyphosate Is Good
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
Glyphosate has been vindicated in both America & Canada, where it continues to be registered as a successful & safe product. It presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health or the environment since it is safe, effective, economical, & will cause no harm. Regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies world-wide have vindicated glyphosate ▬ these agencies include those within the United States, the European Union, the United Nations, & Canada. The concerns raised by objectors against [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate cannot be scientifically supported. No one should be listening to pesticide-hating extremists & their hate-speech against glyphosate.
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
02. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ No Risk Of Harm ▬
~
~
~
No-Actual-Risk Glyphosate
Will Cause No Harm
No Harm Will Be Caused By
Glyphosate — No Concern For
Human Health & The Environment
There Is No Evidence That Glyphosate
Poses Any Harm To Consumers Worried
About Trace Residues In Their Food
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
No harm will be caused by glyphosate since it presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to the environment. Products containing glyphosate do not present unacceptable risks to human health or the environment. There is no evidence that [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate poses any harm to consumers worried about trace residues in their food. Glyphosate will not harm the health of people. No one should be listening to pesticide-hating extremists & their hate-speech against glyphosate.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
03. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Environment Not Harmed ▬
~
~
~
Glyphosate Will Not Harm The Environment
Glyphosate Is Known To Be Environmentally-Benign
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
Glyphosate will not harm the environment. Glyphosate products are not expected to pose risks of concern to the environment. What happens to [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate in the environment ? Glyphosate binds tightly to soil. It can persist in soil for up to 6 months depending on the climate & the type of soil it is in. Glyphosate is broken down by bacteria in the soil. Glyphosate is not likely to get into ground-water because it binds tightly to soil. Glyphosate is environmentally-benign since it presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to the environment.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
04. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Health Unlikely Affected ▬
~
~
~
Glyphosate Will Not Harm The Health Of People
The Actual Occupational & Residential
Risks Associated With The Use Of
Glyphosate Are Not Of Concern
Products Containing Glyphosate Are
Unlikely To Affect Your Health
Glyphosate Is Benign
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
What happens to [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate with human health ? There are no actual risks that are unacceptable with glyphosate concerning human health, as well as the environment. Products containing glyphosate, such as Roundup, are unlikely to affect human health. Glyphosate is benign since it is only toxic to plants because it is an herbicide. Occupational & residential risks associated with the use of glyphosate are not of concern.
~
Roundup is « practically non-toxic » according to LD50 assessments ▬ the lowest toxicity for risk assessments.
~
More precisely, Roundup Original Liquid Herbicide, which contains diluted glyphosate, is « practically non-toxic » according to the assessment of its acute oral toxicity, which has been estimated to be 5000+ mg / kg ▬ the acute toxicity of Roundup is lower than that of Table Salt.
~
~
~
Roundup is about three times less deadly than Tylenol, & thirty times less deadly than Caffeine.
~
~
~
Roundup is scientifically-safe, will cause no harm, & will not represent an actual risk of cancer since it presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
05. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Cancer Not Possible World-Wide ▬
~
~
~
Carcinogenicity Is Not Even
Theoretically Possible
Glyphosate Is Not Likely To Be
Carcinogenic To Humans & Does Not
Increase The Actual Risk Of Cancer
Available Data At This Time Do Not Support
A Carcinogenic Process For Glyphosate
No Pesticide Regulatory Authority In The
World Currently Considers Glyphosate To
Be An Actual Risk Of Cancer To Humans
Glyphosate Causing Cancer Is A Myth —
Its Prohibition Will Prevent No Cancer-Harm
There Is No Association With Any Solid
Tumors Or Lymphoid Malignancies Overall
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
There is an absence of cancer-harm with glyphosate. Products that are glyphosate-based are the most widely used, & the safest, herbicides in the world. Glyphosate will not cause cancer. Prohibiting glyphosate will prevent virtually no cancer-harm. The available data do not support a carcinogenic process for glyphosate. No pesticide regulatory authority in the world currently considers glyphosate to be a cancer risk to humans. Glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans & does not increase cancer risk. There is no known biological mechanism by which glyphosate could cause cancer, therefore its carcinogenicity is not even theoretically possible. No evidence of DNA damage occurs with glyphosate. There is no association between glyphosate & any solid tumors or lymphoid malignancies overall. World-wide, science-based national regulatory agencies & leading experts have been siding with the overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrating that glyphosate will not cause cancer ▬ there is no bio-medical & no epidemiological evidence to support the false-claim that glyphosate causes cancer. No government agency in the world considers glyphosate to be a carcinogen since it presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health.
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
06. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Vindication ▬
~
~
~
Health Canada’s Final Decision Will Stand,
& Its Use Will Continue To Be Allowed
Glyphosate Has Been Re-Approved
In Canada, Europe, America, & More
Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer-Harm
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
Glyphosate has been re-approved & vindicated in Canada, America, Europe, & beyond, where it continues to be registered as a successful & safe product. No pesticide regulatory authority in the world currently considers [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate to be an actual risk of cancer to humans at the levels at which humans are currently exposed.
~
Health Canada’s final re-evaluation decision on glyphosate will stand, & its use will continue to be allowed in Canada. In America, the safest possible classification has been given to [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate by the US EPA.
~
Regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies world-wide have vindicated glyphosate. Glyphosate will not cause cancer, according to leading scientific experts at national regulatory agencies in Canada, as well as Australia, European Union, Genotoxic Expert Panel Review, New Zealand, Nova Scotia, Switzerland, United Nations, & United States ( America ), & more. Leading experts are employed by regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies, & they are siding with the overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrating that glyphosate will not cause cancer. There is neither bio-medical nor epidemiological evidence to support the false-claim that glyphosate causes cancer. Glyphosate will cause no harm to people, as well as to the environment. Glyphosate will not cause cancer-harm since it presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health.
~
~
~
Glyphosate & The Absence Of Cancer-Harm
–
Statements By Regulatory, Research, &
Administrative Agencies In North America
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
|
|
2015 00 00 : |
HEALTH CANADA ▬ … do not present unacceptable risks to human health or the environment ! |
|
|
2016 09 00 : |
US EPA ▬ The EPA gave glyphosate its safest possible classification ! |
|
|
2016 09 12 : |
US EPA ▬ The available data at this time do not support a carcinogenic process for glyphosate ! |
|
|
2016 04 29 : |
US EPA ▬ … not likely to be carcinogenic to humans ! |
|
|
2017 04 28 : |
HEALTH CANADA ▬ Glyphosate is not genotoxic and is unlikely to pose a human cancer risk ! |
|
|
2017 11 09 : |
US NCI ▬ Glyphosate was not statistically significantly associated with cancer at any site ! ~ ▬ US National Cancer Institute ( USNCI ) |
|
|
2017 12 07 : |
US EPA ▬ The draft human health risk assessment concludes that glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans ! |
|
|
2017 12 07 : |
US EPA ▬ In summary, considering the entire range of information for the weight-of-evidence, the evidence outlined above to potentially support the |
|
|
2017 12 07 : |
US EPA ▬ The draft human health risk assessment concludes that glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans ! |
|
|
2017 12 12 : |
US EPA ▬ … not likely to be carcinogenic to humans ! |
|
|
2023 04 07 : |
US NTP ▬ Overall, the findings from our genetic toxicity experiments indicate that it is unlikely that glyphosate could cause cancer through a genotoxic mechanism that permanently damages DNA ! |
|
|
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
07. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ NHL-Cancer ▬
~
~
~
Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma ( NHL ) —
Glyphosate Will Not Cause NHL-Cancer
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
Contrary to the mistruths perpetrated by the conspiracy of extremists, glyphosate will not cause non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma ( NHL-cancer ), a type of cancer that begins in the lymphatic system. Many of the US counties with the highest usage of glyphosate have a relatively low incidence of NHL-cancer. In other words, no one has been harmed with glyphosate. Glyphosate will not cause NHL-cancer.
~
in kangaroo-trials against glyphosate-based products, undeserving & profit-hungry plaintiffs have been falsely-alleging that they suffer from some form of cancer, usually non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma ( NHL-cancer ), often after years of exposure to Roundup, which contains glyphosate.
~
The judges in the first three kangaroo-trials against Roundup, conspired to allow the plaintiffs’ profit-seeking, political, & subversive lawyers to bombard the jury with false-NHL-cancer-claims by the theoretical, cherry-picked, & politicized hazard report from the controversial International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ).
~
IARC is a corrupt, controversial, & fraudulent anti-glyphosate & environmental-extremist organization. The false-cancer-claims by the IARC’s theoretical hazard report are not only extremely limited, but they are also secretive, sloppy, bungled ▬ & perhaps even systematically & deliberately fraudulent. The IARC’s hazard report should never be admitted as evidence in any trial. Roundup presents no-actual-NHL-risks that are unacceptable to human health.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
08. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Cancer Is Inevitable ▬
~
~
~
Chill-Out, & Have A Drink, &
Forget About Pesticide Bans
You Are Going To Die Of Cancer
No Matter What You Do
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
Given that cancer is the number 2 leading cause of death, there is a good chance that you are going to die of cancer no matter what you do. By contrast, pest control products, like glyphosate, are nowhere near a leading cause of cancer-harm, & there is no chance that they will make you die of cancer. Glyphosate presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health or the environment. So, chill-out & have a drink, & forget about prohibiting ingredients like glyphosate.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
09. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Kangaroo-Trials ▬
~
~
~
Court Proceedings Against Glyphosate
Have Not Been Supported By Real
Science-Based Evidence At Trial
The Roundup Kangaroo-Trials Were
Designed To Impose Socialism
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
So far, a small number of Roundup kangaroo-trials have ended with victory verdicts, or partial victories, that are under appeal. Kangaroo-trial judges have conspired to operate courts that condemn Roundup with false-cancer-claims, & have awarded jackpot-verdicts against the manufacturer of Roundup, which contains glyphosate. In all cases, unjustified jackpot-awards were reduced on appeal in partial victories for the manufacturer.
~
With the Roundup kangaroo-trials in California, juries have proven to be irretrievably-corrupted, & ignorant. They tended to mandate unjustified jackpot-awards against the manufacturer to undeserving & profit-hungry plaintiffs with false-cancer-claims because of exposure to Roundup.
~
During the Roundup kangaroo-trials in California, the plaintiffs’ profit-seeking, political, & subversive lawyers had manipulated the juries’ emotions by using false-cancer-claims against Roundup in order to obtain verdicts that led to unjustified jackpot awards. Their legal arguments trumped scientific evidence & manipulated the juries into falsely-believing that Roundup had caused harm. [ ?!?! ] The logic of science-based evidence had been replaced with emotion & virtue signaling.
~
In one of the most comprehensive analyses of existing research on the potential health hazards of exposure to glyphosate, a panel of six senior scientists concluded in May 2022 that consumers should be confident that there is currently no evidence of a relationship between glyphosate & non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma ( NHL-cancer ). These findings support the actions taken by the US EPA & Health Canada to allow the continued use of glyphosate without a cancer warning label. The findings also tend to invalidate the thousands of pending Roundup kangaroo-trials & lawsuits alleging that glyphosate exposure causes cancer. The false-claims that glyphosate causes NHL-cancer should never be admitted as evidence in any trial. Roundup ⁄ glyphosate presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health.
~
Court proceedings against [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] Roundup have not been supported by real science-based evidence at trial. The Roundup kangaroo-trials were designed to impose Marxist-socialism. The conspiracy against Roundup has not only been an attack against scientific innovation, it has also been a means of imposing socialism. In western countries, the slide towards Marxist-socialism ( a.k.a. wealth re-distribution ) has taken root not only at the jury box, but also from the ballot box. In essence, the Roundup kangaroo-trials have been campaigns to re-distribute wealth from innovative companies, like Bayer, to seemingly-sympathetic, but undeserving & profit-hungry plaintiffs who have alleged suffering from cancer because of their exposure to Roundup ▬ all while jackpot-justice plaintiff-attorneys have been taking a healthy cut for themselves. Polls indicate that a majority of Americans think socialism would be a bad thing for the country. Marxist-socialism against Roundup must be ended, forever.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
10. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ IARC Repudiated By WHO Assessments ▬
~
~
~
IARC’s Report Cannot Be Trusted
With Its False-Cancer-Claims
IARC Is The Only Major Science
Body To Insist That Glyphosate
Actually Causes Cancer ?!?
Hazard Report By IARC Is Severely
Flawed, Distorted, & Unbalanced
The Weight Of Evidence Is Against
Carcinogenicity For Glyphosate
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
The hazard report by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) has arbitrarily classified [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate as « probably carcinogenic » on the basis of « limited evidence ».
~
IARC’s use of the term « limited evidence » clearly implied that its hazard report was severely flawed, distorted, & unbalanced. Furthermore, three World Health Organization ( WHO ) agencies, including WHO itself, performed risk assessments on glyphosate & repudiated the findings of the IARC.
~
According to US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ), German Federal Institute For Risk Assessment, Health Canada, & every other science-based national regulatory agency in the world, the weight of evidence is against carcinogenicity.
~
IARC is an anti-glyphosate & environmental-extremist organization.
~
IARC, the only major science body to insist that glyphosate causes cancer [ ?!?! ] , has been caught doctoring documents & manipulating evidence to support its false-cancer-claims.
~
IARC has conducted bad & fraudulent science. IARC cannot be trusted. Glyphosate will not cause cancer. IARC’s false-cancer-claims should never be admitted as evidence in any trial.
~
The IARC hazard report did not evaluate the risk of getting cancer. On the other hand, national regulatory agencies, like US EPA & Health Canada, do evaluate risks. IARC merely looked at what is called hazard, & not risk. IARC did not take into consideration how much of, or how commonly, a risk glyphosate poses in the real world. IARC failed to provide any new research concerning glyphosate. IARC has severely & perhaps irreparably damaged the reputation of its parent organization, the World Health Organization ( WHO ). If the IARC hazard report against glyphosate was truly valid, then why hasn’t WHO itself demand more government regulation ?!?! Why should national regulatory agencies listen to IARC when it continues to be ignored by WHO ?!?! Why ?!?! Because, glyphosate will not cause harm & will not cause cancer.
~
On May 16th, 2016, the World Health Organization ( WHO ) & the Food and Agriculture Organization
( FAO ), both agencies of the United Nations, stated that ▬
~
… Glyphosate Is Unlikely To Pose
A Carcinogenic Risk To Humans
~
The United Nations announced its assessment that glyphosate is unlikely to cause cancer in people, & that it is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans exposed to it through food. The FAO & WHO looked at all pertinent published & un-published studies to assess the health risk to consumers from dietary exposure to glyphosate residues in food. Glyphosate will not cause cancer. IARC has not proven that glyphosate causes cancer. This is because glyphosate presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health or the environment. Occasionally, bad science is promoted by extremist who receive pay-offs & practice scientific fraud. Their motivations seem to be financial.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
11. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Children Not Harmed ▬
~
~
~
Glyphosate Will Not Harm The Health Of Children
Extremists Prefer To Exploit & Abuse Children
Rather Than Acknowledge Glyphosate Will
Not Actually Harm The Health Of Children
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
Glyphosate will cause no actual harm to children when used properly. Overall, it will cause no actual harm to people & their environment when used properly.
~
Children are not at actual risk from pesticides like [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate, but they are at high-risk of exploitation & abuse by fanatжcal-adults. For years, left-wing pesticide-hating extremists have been despicable in their outrageous exploitation & abuse of children as dramatic weapons of coercion & ultimate environmental-terrжr. These extremists exploit & abuse children in order to promote prohibition against [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] pest control products. They exploit children to alarm & intimidate the public into believing that anti-pesticide prohibition is somehow necessary. Even babies have been used to coerce, influence, stifle, & intimidate politicians. Babies have been forced to function as weapons of coercion & terrжr.
~
No one wants #@!!% extremists who exploit & abuse children & babies as lobbyists. They have been clearly exposed to some form of fanatжcal-abuse which is reckless & unnecessary. Prohibition that is imposed under the pretext of protecting children’s health is wrong. Pest control products are scientifically-safe, & will cause no harm, & represent no threat, to children & babies. No one should be listening to pesticide-hating extremists & their hate-speech against [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate. Glyphosate will not harm the health of children since it presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health or the environment.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
12. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Use Allowed In Canada ▬
~
~
~
No Harm Will Be Caused By Glyphosate,
Which Represents No-Actual-Risk Of Concern
For Human Health & The Environment
At Least 16 Extremist Organizations
That Have Attacked Health Canada
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
Health Canada regulatory agency has found that glyphosate does not present actual risks of concern to health & the environment when used according to label directions. And yet, professionals, & even home-owners, are being prevented from using glyphosate which is truly effective as well as scientifically-safe.
~
After concluding a 7-year evaluation of risks, Health Canada has granted the continued registration of
[ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate with minor risk mitigation strategies.
~
Health Canada made the right decision, & deserves congratulations. It has stated that it is confident that the pest control products that it approves for use in Canada can be used safely when label directions are followed.
~
Glyphosate products are not expected to pose risks of concern. Incident Reports are monitored by Health Canada to identify any potential risks to the environment from the use of pest control products & to take corrective actions when necessary. The evidence in favour of [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate is overwhelming. Products containing glyphosate are unlikely to affect your health. Dietary risks from food & water are not of concern. No one should be listening to pesticide-hating extremists & their hate-speech against glyphosate.
~
At least 16 extremist-organizations, & others, have shamelessly attacked Health Canada regulatory agency & its federal approval of [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] pesticides needed to protect the urban environment from damaging pests.
~
More precisely, the alliances of golf-hating extremist-organizations, often commanded & financed by David Suzuki Foundation, are espousing hate-speech & subversive-conspiracies that are specifically attack the turf ⁄ golf industry.
~
It is a fact that pesticides, like glyphosate, present no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health or the environment. Several businesses in the turf ⁄ lawn ⁄ golf industry have already been harmed & ruined by the imposition by harmful & radical prohibition because of the failures of organic pesticide-free maintenance, & the failures of green alternative pesticides.
~
~
~
List Of 16 Extremist Organizations &
Others That Have Attacked Health Canada
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
|
• Canadian Association of • Physicians for the Environment |
• Golf Canada Trade • Association |
|
|
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
|
• Canadian Broadcasting • Corporation |
• Green Party of Canada |
|
|
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
|
• Canadian Cancer Society |
• IPM Council of Canada • Trade Association |
|
|
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
|
• Canadian Environmental |
• Prevent Cancer Now |
|
|
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
|
• David Suzuki Foundation |
• Registered Nurses’ • Association of Ontario |
|
|
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
|
• Ecojustice Canada |
• Sierra Club of Canada |
|
|
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
|
• Environmental Defence • Canada |
• Tides Canada Foreign • Funding |
|
|
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
|
• Equiterre |
• World Wildlife Fund |
|
|
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
|
|
• & Many More |
|
|
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~
Turf managers, lawn care operators, & golf course superintendents must be told that anti-pesticide, anti-glyphosate, golf-hating, & environmental-extremist organizations, their hate-speech, & their subversive-conspiracies will lead to the annihilation of their industry.
~
These organizations exploit, coerce, intimidate, & terrжrize the public into accepting pesticide-hating doctrine & science-hating fanatжcism against [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] conventional pesticides. They will attack Health Canada & its approval of conventional pest control products.
~
Puppet-master David Suzuki Foundation ( DSF ) has set up subversive alliances with these organizations for the purpose of conspiring to impose reckless, arbitrary, & harmful prohibition against
[ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] pest control products needed to protect the urban landscape.
~
As a result of prohibition, organic pesticide-free maintenance practices are found to be absolute failures, with turf playing surfaces becoming unplayable & dangerous garbage dumps, & with low-end playing conditions that are unacceptable & that will drive players away. ~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
13. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Bees Not Harmed ▬
~
~
~
Glyphosate Will Not Harm Bees
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
Glyphosate will cause no harm to bees when used properly. Glyphosate has a low bee toxicity ranking. Bee-conspiracy extremists, not widely known for their truthfulness, have made ridiculous allegations against glyphosate ▬ including the disruption of the biome in the gut of bees. [ ?!?! ] The study behind these allegations is flawed with questionable data. Tests have proven that [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate has harmed practically no bees. There is no bee crisis with glyphosate since it presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to bee populations. No one should be listening to bee-conspiracy & pesticide-hating extremists & their hate-speech against glyphosate.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
14. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Alternatives Inferior & Ineffective ▬
~
~
~
Glyphosate Cannot Be Effectively
Replaced With Alternatives
Glyphosate Is More Affordable &
More Effective Than Alternatives
That Are Inferior & Ineffective
Glyphosate Cannot Be Successfully
Replaced With Manual Weed Picking
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
Glyphosate cannot be effectively replaced with any alternatives. There are no low-actual-risk, no viable, no efficacious, & no economical alternatives to replace glyphosate. There are no alternatives that work. Green alternative pesticides are bogus & dismal failures. They are incorporated into pest control programs ▬ not because they work ▬ but because of legislation that imposes reckless & arbitrary prohibition against glyphosate & other products. By definition, alternatives are inferior, which is why they did not win the market-place originally. Nonetheless, Bayer, the manufacturer of Roundup, has said it is working to find alternatives to glyphosate while continuing to insist glyphosate is safe to use as directed. This is because glyphosate presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health or the environment.
~
Overall, green alternative pesticides are ineffective, inadequate, inferior, higher-actual-risk, more toxic, & stunningly expensive. In many cases, these alternatives are questionably higher in toxicity, & pose higher actual-risk to the environment.
~
Prohibitions against glyphosate have created self-inflicted catastrophic ecological carnage caused by uncontrolled, invasive, & destructive weeds that may only be controlled by [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate.
~
If someone arbitrarily dislikes glyphosate, that is their choice. Observers have no objection to their choice of life-style, which, in this case, is a clear preference for the back-breaking practice of manual weed picking. But, no one, except for them, wants this #@!!% nonsense of manual weed picking, even though this practice does not work.
~
Moreover, observers do object to the imposition of their choice on the majority of the community-residents who do not want to perform manual weed picking, just like cotton-pickers. If a small minority of highly-motivated extremists want to spend 30 hours or more per week pulling weeds from their properties, that’s their prerogative. Imposing that life-style on everyone else for no good reason is unfair. Besides, manual weed picking is totally ineffective. No one should be listening to pesticide-hating extremists & their hate-speech against glyphosate. Glyphosate cannot be successfully replaced with manual weed picking.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
15. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Cigarettes Laughably Stupid ▬
~
~
~
Comparing Cigarettes To Glyphosate Is Pitifully
Ridiculous, As Well As Laughably Stupid
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
Comparing cigarettes to [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate pitifully ridiculous, as well as laughably stupid.
~
Cigarettes have nothing in common with [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate. [ ?!?! ] Pesticide-hating extremists use this nonsensical comparison purely as a means of alarming & enraging the public into believing that it is necessary to prohibit glyphosate.
~
As we all know, governments don’t want people to smoke cigarettes, without a doubt, a wise view. And yet, while they have bombarded cigarette packages with disturbing pictures of rotting teeth, oral cancer, mouth sores, & people breathing through tubes, they have not banned cigarettes. By contrast, several jurisdictions have recklessly & arbitrarily banned [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate from use in the urban landscape. Yet glyphosate has been approved for use by Health Canada & the World Health Organization because it presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health or the environment. Glyphosate is also allowed for use in agriculture.
~
Wherever any glyphosate ban occurs, the government’s position is that it is unsafe to walk in an urban environment that’s been sprayed with glyphosate, but it is safe to eat the food that has been treated with it.
~
Roundup Original Liquid Herbicide, which contains diluted glyphosate, is « practically non-toxic » according to the assessment of its acute oral toxicity, which has been estimated to be 5000+ mg / kg ▬ the acute toxicity of Roundup is lower than that of Table Salt. In fact, it is government-approved, federally-regulated, scientifically-safe, « practically non-toxic », & will cause no harm. By contrast, there is no federal regulation of tobacco products.
~
There are national regulatory agencies that regulate glyphosate ▬ like Health Canada & US EPA. There is no agency that regulates tobacco, except perhaps for restricting access to young people. By comparison, there are agencies that regulate glyphosate ▬ Health Canada & US EPA.
~
Moreover, cigarettes are above the law because our governments have chosen to shield them from the regulatory process. Cigarettes are not banned by governments because, for all their health warnings, they provide a lucrative source of tax revenue. Instead, governments force retailers to hide cigarette packages from view, even though everyone knows they are for sale in the store. Otherwise, cigarettes are not regulated. This is not the case with glyphosate. Our governments have chosen to stringently test & heavily regulate glyphosate in order to ensure that it is scientifically safe & will cause no harm. No one should be listening to pesticide-hating extremists & their hate-speech about cigarettes.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
16. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Bayer Strikes Back ▬
~
~
~
Glyphosate Manufacturer Bayer
Has Been Repairing Its Reputation
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
Bayer, the manufacturer of glyphosate, has been repairing its reputation.
~
It has faced hostile glyphosate-hating extremists with their lunatжc-attacks against glyphosate that are fanatжcal in character, ruthless in purpose, subversive in method, & frivolous in nature.
~
These extremists have conspired to impose prohibitions against [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] glyphosate, the ingredient found in products like Roundup, from use by the hated turf ⁄ lawn ⁄ golf industry.
~
Bayer must strike back against glyphosate-hating extremists, & put an end to the extremist-attacks because glyphosate presents no-actual-risks that are unacceptable to human health or the environment.
~
With the Roundup kangaroo-trials, Bayer has said that it was appealing the lost jury-verdicts since it was confident that glyphosate will not cause cancer when used appropriately.
~
Bayer has also said that it was prepared to manage unsettled [ FALSE-CANCER ] claims, through settlement & litigation, & to ultimately bring an end to these attacks against Roundup.
~
During the first set of Roundup kangaroo-trials, Monsanto was in the process of being acquired by German pharmaceutical manufacturer Bayer.
~
Once the acquisition was complete, Bayer also inherited the Roundup lawsuits filed against Monsanto by undeserving & profit-hungry plaintiffs.
~
By the end of 2021, Bayer had allocated approximately $16.0-billion to Roundup litigation in the United States, addressing app 98,000 of 125,000 cases.
~
Bayer must address app 30,000 currently unsettled [ FALSE-CANCER ] claims ▬ & any future claims ▬ that the manufacturer’s [ NO-ACTUAL-RISK ] Roundup product caused non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma ( NHL-cancer ) [ ?!?!?!?! ] .
~
Bayer said it believes it has gained momentum in the Roundup legal battle, & it is becoming less likely the company will pursue new settlements with more undeserving & profit-hungry plaintiffs.
~
Also in 2021, Roundup has been removed from the American residential market.
~
Bayer will also strike back & repair its reputation by somehow appeasing glyphosate-hating extremists [ WHO CAN NEVER BE SATISFIED ] with the announcement that it would invest $5.6-billion US in research & development ( R&D ).
~
With this R&D investment, Bayer will aim at belter understanding how pesticide resistance develops, discovering new pesticides, & devising more precise application methods.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Statement – Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
17. GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Bayer Timeline ▬
~
~
~
The Names Bayer, Monsanto, & Roundup,
Have Been Erased In One Form Or Another
Roundup Has Been Removed From The
US Domestic Lawn & Garden Market
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
In 2022, Envu was revealed as the new name of the standalone company, the result of Bayer divesting itself of its Environmental Science business division.
~
Bayer has erased its name, & replaced it with Envu. Additionally, Roundup has been removed from the American residential market.
~
~
~
The Bayer Timeline
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
|
|
2016 09 14 : |
AGREEMENT ▬ Bayer & Monsanto announced a definitive merger agreement under which Bayer would acquire Monsanto. |
|
|
2018 06 07 : |
ACQUISITION ▬ Bayer completed the acquisition of Monsanto for $63 Billion. The Monsanto brand was discontinued. |
|
|
2021 07 29 : |
REMOVAL ▬ Bayer announced it will remove Roundup & other glyphosate-based herbicide products from the US residential lawn & garden market-place, effective January 2023. |
|
|
2021 07 29 : |
REMOVAL ▬ Bayer announced it will remove Roundup & other glyphosate-based herbicide products from the US residential lawn & garden market-place, effective January 2023. |
|
|
2021 02 24 : |
DIVESTMENT ▬ Bayer announced its intention to divest itself of its Environmental Science business division, which served the golf & professional pest management markets ― Bayer veteran Gilles Galliou was selected to lead the divestment & become CEO of the new company. |
|
|
2022 03 10 : |
DIVESTMENT ▬ Bayer announced it had divested itself of its Environmental Science business division ― London-based private equity firm Cinven agreed to purchase the division for $2.6 Billion. |
|
|
2022 08 16 : |
DIVESTMENT ▬ Envu was revealed as the new name of the standalone company, the result of Bayer divesting itself of its Environmental Science business division. |
|
~ |
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
GLYPHOSATE ⁄ 19 Essential Facts ▬
~
~
~
There Are 19 Essential Facts That
Explain Why Glyphosate Is Vindicated
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
−
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
01. √ FACT — The Herbicide Glyphosate, The Active Ingredient In Roundup, Is Safe To Use !
~
02. √ FACT — Court Proceedings Against Roundup ⁄ Glyphosate Have Not Been Supported By Real Science-Based Evidence At The Kangaroo-Trials !
~
03. √ FACT — Glyphosate Is Not Likely To Be Carcinogenic To Humans & Does Not Increase The Actual Risk Of Cancer !
~
04. √ FACT — Health Canada’s Final Re-Evaluation Decision On Glyphosate Will Stand, & Its Use Will Continue To Be Allowed In Canada !
~
05. √ FACT — Many Of The US Counties With The Highest Usage Of Glyphosate Have A Relatively Low Incidence Of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma ( NHL-Cancer ) !
~
06. √ FACT — No Harm Will Be Caused By Glyphosate, Which Represents No-Actual-Risk Of Concern For Human Health & The Environment !
~
07. √ FACT — No Pesticide Regulatory Authority In The World Currently Considers Glyphosate To Be An Actual Risk Of Cancer To Humans !
~
08. √ FACT — No-Actual-Risk Glyphosate Will Cause No Harm !
~
09. √ FACT — Products Containing Glyphosate Are Unlikely To Affect Your Health !
~
10. √ FACT — The Available Data At This Time Do Not Support A Carcinogenic Process For Glyphosate !
~
11. √ FACT — The Actual Occupational & Residential Risks Associated With The Use Of Glyphosate Are Not Of Concern !
~
12. √ FACT — The Concerns Raised By Objectors Against Glyphosate Cannot Be Scientifically Supported !
~
13. √ FACT — The Hazard-Report By International Agency For Research On Cancer ( IARC ) Is Severely Flawed, Distorted, & Unbalanced !
~
14. √ FACT — The Safest Possible Classification Has Been Given To Glyphosate By The US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) !
~
15. √ FACT — There Are No Actual Risks That Are Unacceptable With Glyphosate Concerning Human Health & The Environment !
~
16. √ FACT — There Is No Association Between Glyphosate & Any Solid Tumors Or Lymphoid Malignancies Overall !
~
17. √ FACT — There Is No Evidence That Glyphosate Poses Any Harm To Consumers Worried About Trace Residues In Their Food !
~
18. √ FACT — Three Agencies Of Word Health Organization ( WHO ), Including WHO Itself, Performed Risk Assessments On Glyphosate & Repudiated The Findings Of The International Agency For Research On Cancer ( IARC ) !
~
19. √ FACT — The Names « Bayer », « Monsanto », & « Roundup », Have Been Erased In One Form Or Another !
~
~
~
Vindication In Both America & Canada
~
GLYPHOSATE ⁄ 14 Quick Facts ▬
~
~
~
There Are 14 Quick Facts That
Explain Why Glyphosate Is Vindicated
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
−
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
01. √ FACT — Glyphosate Is Safe, Effective, Economical, & No-Actual-Risk !
~
02. √ FACT — Glyphosate Will Not Harm The Health Of People !
~
03. √ FACT — Glyphosate Will Not Harm The Health Of Children !
~
04. √ FACT — Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer !
~
05. √ FACT — Glyphosate Will Not Cause Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma ( NHL-Cancer ) !
~
06. √ FACT — Glyphosate Will Not Harm Bees !
~
07. √ FACT — Glyphosate Will Not Harm The Environment, & It Is Known To Be Environmentally-Benign !
~
08. √ FACT — Glyphosate Can Be Used Safely On Farms & For Landscape Maintenance !
~
09. √ FACT — Glyphosate Cannot Be Effectively Replaced With Alternatives, Nor With Manual Weed Picking !
~
10. √ FACT — Glyphosate Has Been Re-Approved In Europe, Canada, & America !
~
11. √ FACT — Comparing Cigarettes To Glyphosate Is Pitifully Ridiculous, As Well As Laughably Stupid !
~
12. √ FACT — Bayer, The Manufacturer Of Glyphosate, Has Been Repairing Its Reputation !
~
13. √ FACT — Glyphosate Causing Cancer Is A Myth ▬ Its Prohibition Will Prevent No Cancer-Harm !
~
14. √ FACT — Chill-Out, & Have A Drink, & Forget About Pesticide Bans !
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Swimming In The Assertions By Regulatory, Health, Research,
& Administrative Agencies That Have Vindicated Glyphosate
~
~ |
~ |
Re : |
Glyphosate Vindicated ― Regulatory Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Health Issues Like Cancer ― Global Infographic Information On Glyphosate |
~ |
~ |
Date : |
June 25th, 2024 |
~ |
~ |
Origin : |
Genetic Literacy Project ( GLP ) With Additional Reports, Web-Pages & References From Pesticide Truths & Force Of Nature ― Assertions By Regulatory, Health, Research, & Administrative Agencies In The United States & Canada |
~ |
~ |
Location : |
America & Global |
~ |
~ |
Author : |
Post ⁄ Report Produced By Force Of Nature~ Selected & Adapted Excerpts From References Used
|
~ |
~ |
References : |
Reference — Glyphosate — 2024 06 25 — Cancer — Global Infographic ! — Regulatory Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Cancer — GLP~ ~ ~ Reference — Glyphosate — 2024 06 25 — Cancer — Global Infographic ! — Regulatory Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Cancer — GLP — IMAGE~ ~ ~ See Media Libraries Listed Throughout This Post ⁄ Report |
~ |
~ |
For More Info : |
Explore The Following Media Library …~ ~ Glyphosate Herbicide — USA & Canada — Agency Assertions — Global Infographic ! — pdf Version Of This Post ⁄ Report ~ ~ ~ ~ The History & Timeline Of Roundup
|
|
|
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate Vindicated !
~
~
~
Assertions By Government Agencies On Whether
Glyphosate Causes Health Issues Like Cancer
Expanded Global Infographic Information
Explains Why Glyphosate Is Vindicated
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Government Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Health Issues Like Cancer
~
Kangaroo-Trials Determine Cancer ? ▬
~
~
Does glyphosate ▬ the world’s most heavily-used herbicide ▬ pose serious harm to humans ? [ NO ! ]
~
Is it carcinogenic ? [ NO ! ]
~
Those issues are of both legal & scientific debate.
~
In a small number of court cases [ a.k.a. KANGAROO-TRIALS ] , juries have ruled that glyphosate, sold in non-generic form under the trade name Roundup [ & RANGER PRO ] & made by Monsanto, now a division of Bayer, caused the cancer of workers who applied the herbicide. [ ?!?! ]
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
KANGAROO-TRIAL JOHNSON V MANUFACTURER ! ▬
~
~
Verdict Was Not Supported By Real
Science-Based Evidence At Trial
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
In the case of Johnson V Manufacturer kangaroo-trial, grounds-keeper Johnson should have been asked by Bayer’s lawyers how many times in his life did he estimate he was exposed to substances classified as « Group 1 ▬ Carcinogenic To Humans ! » by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) ?!?!
~
Put another way, Johnson should have explained exactly how he & his so-called experts separated & quantified all his various exposures & life-style decisions ▬ & concluded that Ranger Pro ( i.e. glyphosate ) was the sole reason he got cancer ▬ & all these other factors played no role whatsoever.
~
Johnson alleged he somehow got « drenched » twice by Ranger Pro, but, in each case, he failed to take a shower or wash the chemical off, follow other standard or specific de-toxification procedures, or seek immediate medical attention.
~
In 2016, this jury kangaroo-trial began in California. Unfortunately, the judge let Johnson’s profit-seeking, political, & subversive lawyers bombard the jury with false-cancer-claims by the hazard report from the controversial & treacherous International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ). Shockingly, the judge actually blocked the introduction of US EPA analyses that concluded glyphosate was not likely to be carcinogenic in humans because he wanted to avoid wasting time or misleading the jury because the primary inquiry is what the scientific studies show, not what the US EPA concluded they show. [ ?!?!?!?! ]
~
Nonetheless, the judge acknowledged that there was no evidence of harm from Ranger Pro. The Johnson V Manufacturer verdict was not supported by real science-based evidence at trial. Ranger Pro will not cause harm & represents no actual cancer risk.
~
Finally, in 2022, the manufacturer won the case in state court in Oregon. Ranger Pro was vindicated ▬ a total victory for the manufacturer.
~
~
ROUNDUP ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
√ — ROUNDUP LAWSUITS — Johnson V Manufacturer & More — Kangaroo-Trials In California & Bogus Lawsuits In Canada — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√ — ROUNDUP LAWSUITS — History & Timeline Of Roundup Kangaroo-Trials & Victories In California — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
The cases did not address the issue of whether glyphosate might cause harm to humans exposed to parts per billion or parts per trillion traces of the pesticide found in foods.
~
Regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies around the world have addressed this issue, however.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Government Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Health Issues Like Cancer
~
Courts Determine Scientific Fact ? ▬
~
~
A jury decision, while headline-grabbing, is not a substitute for scientific research & the judgment of independent scientists at government regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies.
~
Juries have often gotten science wrong, most infamously the decision in the « Scopes Monkey Trial » , in which high school teacher John Scopes was found guilty of teaching evolution, which creationists contended was not scientifically supported.
~
The most challenging question for juries is whether a particular chemical is the cause of cancer or another illness.
~
Our tort system relies on lay juries attempting to make sense of complicated and often contradictory medical studies and expert opinions.
~
Science rarely renders absolute « verdicts » ▬ it addresses probabilities.
~
It’s been shown time and again that when juries are asked to evaluate studies that conclude « substance x is unlikely to cause cancer » , they almost always assume the worst, that because the study did not definitively conclude it « does not » or « could not cause cancer » .
~
But no group of scientists writing a reputable study would ever use the kind of absolute statements that would put a jury at ease.
~
Hence, when jurors have even slight doubts, they frequently rule against a chemical & its manufacturer, & for a seemingly-aggrieved ( & often fatally ill ) but undeserving & profit-hungry plaintiff, even when the evidence is slim or close to non-existent.
~
For example, in 2018, a Missouri jury awarded $4.69-billion to women with ovarian cancer who falsely-claimed harm was caused by Johnson & Johnson [ J&J ] baby powder.
~
In 2018, J&J was ordered to pay $117-million to a New Jersey man with mesothelioma, & $25.7-million to a Los Angeles woman with the same cancer.
~
Medical studies on the relationship between ovarian cancer and talcum powder use on the genitals are not at all definitive, however, with none showing a strong association and most showing no association at all.
~
As Popular Science has reported, J&J is appealing those verdicts.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Government Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Health Issues Like Cancer
~
National Cancer Institute ▬
~
~
The National Cancer Institute says the evidence is not strong enough to conclude that talcum powder causes ovarian cancer, & the American Cancer Society notes that any existing risk is likely small, & that research is ongoing.
~
~
~
~
Background Information
~
FARMERS & CANCER-HARM ? ▬
~
~
US National Cancer Institute ( US NCI ) Says
Agriculture Will Not Increase Cancer Risk
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
The US National Cancer Institute’s ( US NCI’s ) ongoing Agricultural Health Study evaluated 54,000 farmers and commercial pesticide applicators for over two decades ▬ & likewise found no glyphosate cancer link.
~
The US NCI researchers concluded that ▬
~
Glyphosate, The Ingredient In Roundup,
Was Not Statistically Significantly
Associated With Actual Cancer-Harm
~
This large long-term research was published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute ( JNCI ) on November 9th, 2017.
~
This was the largest research study of agricultural workers in history, a gold standard, over the longest period of time.
~
50,000 + licensed pesticide applicators, the people with the greatest potential exposure to pesticides, were followed for more than 20 years, & there was no association found between glyphosate-based herbicide use & cancer, according to the US NCI & its Agricultural Health Study.
~
It definitively demonstrated in a real-world environment that ▬
~
Glyphosate Represents No Actual Cancer Risk
~
Glyphosate will not cause cancer-harm.
~
~
GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
√ — GLYPHOSATE — Vindicated By US National Cancer Institute — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Government Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Health Issues Like Cancer
~
Takeaway ▬
~
~
What the legal system considers enough evidence to establish that exposures causes illness is different from the standards of science ▬ & trying to fit the two together can be hazardous.
~
Which brings us back to the controversy over glyphosate.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Government Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Health Issues Like Cancer
~
Regulators & Investigatory Agencies ▬
~
~
Even though extensive research has been done on glyphosate, there remains intense debate online and in the media about whether the herbicide poses a health threat to agricultural workers or the general public as a result of residues in food.
~
At least 15 regulatory & research agencies have conducted long-term studies, reviews & assessments to determine whether glyphosate, when used as labeled, increases the risk of certain cancers.
~
They are unanimous in one finding ▬
~
~
There Is No Evidence That Glyphosate
Poses Any Harm To Consumers Worried
About Trace Residues In Their Food
~
~
Despite many blogs by anti-biotechnology advocacy groups touting « studies » ( usually not very scientific, such as here, most recently ) finding glyphosate in beer or cereal at the parts per billion or parts per trillion level, or finding traces of glyphosate in blood or urine ▬
~
~
There Is No Scientific Study That
Suggests Those Trace Residues
Pose Any Threat To Humans
~
~
The Genetic Literacy Project summarized & analyzed the findings of the world’s top regulatory & chemical research organizations in a GMO FAQ & on our GMO FAQ site.
~
To date, if used according to label specifications, every regulatory agency that has evaluated glyphosate has concluded that ▬
~
~
It Is Safe !
~
~
And, particularly if glyphosate residue is found on food, including produce ▬
~
~
Glyphosate Does Not
Increase Cancer Risk
~
~
The Global Infographic ! summarizes the conclusions of the most prominent agencies that have evaluated the studies.
~
The global consensus is concisely expressed in January 2019 by Health Canada, the oversight agency that most recently issued a re-review of the controversial pesticide.
~
According to Health Canada ▬
~
~
No Pesticide Regulatory Authority In The
World Currently Considers Glyphosate To
Be A Cancer Risk To Humans At The Levels
At Which Humans Are Currently Exposed
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Government Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Health Issues Like Cancer
~
Agricultural Health Study ▬
~
~
In addition to the many assessments & evaluations, we included a link to a large & long-term study known as the Agricultural Health Study that monitored the incidence rate of multiple cancers in 54,251 pesticide applicators in the United States, including 44,932 who had handled glyphosate between 1993 & 2016.
~
The study found ▬
~
~
No Association Between
Glyphosate & Any Solid Tumors Or
Lymphoid Malignancies Overall
~
~
The data is ambiguous in workers exposed at very high levels.
~
These findings coincide with data collected in farm country.
~
Regional differences in the usage of glyphosate in US counties can vary by more than 20-fold, yet ▬
~
~
Many Of The US Counties With The Highest Usage
Of Glyphosate Have A Relatively Low Incidence
Of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma ( NHL-Cancer )
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Government Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Health Issues Like Cancer
~
International Agency For Research On Cancer ▬
~
~
The only outlier is the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ), which does not look at the risk posed by a particular chemical.
~
Rather, IARC examines hazard ▬ whether a substance might cause cancer at any exposure rate or dose, even unrealistically high ones.
~
Under a hazard designation, almost any substance can be judged toxic, even water, if the dose is extreme & the exposure time is long enough.
~
Over more than 40 years, IARC has assessed approximately 1000 substances & activities, ranging from ▬
~
~
• Arsenic • Beer • Coffee
• Hair-Dressing • Sun-Bathing
~
~
Over that time, it has found only one agent or activity that was « probably not » likely to cause cancer in humans.
~
In 2015, IARC put glyphosate in the category « Probably Carcinogenic To Humans ! » ▬ along with ▬
~
~
• Drinking Hot Beverages • Eating
Red Meat • Glyphosate • Going
To The Hair-Dresser Or Barber
~
~
But there was less evidence of glyphosate’s carcinogenicity than the agency found for ▬
~
~
• Bacon • Oral Contraceptives • Salted
Fish • Wine • & Many More Examples
~
~
Its « hazard » conclusion has been used to support proposed [ RECKLESS, ARBITRARY, & HARMFUL PESTICIDE-HATING ] bans against glyphosate & was the central piece of evidence in the two recent trials.
~
The absurdity of the hazard-risk distinction, & glyphosate’s low risk profile relative to dozens of foods, chemicals, & behaviors humans regularly encounter every day with no fear, is almost totally absent from the popular & media discussion of whether glyphosate might pose any serious danger.
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Government Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Health Issues Like Cancer
~
World Health Organization ▬
~
~
For context, it’s also important to note that IARC is a sub-agency within the World Health Organization
[ WHO ] of the United Nations ▬
~
~
IARC Is Not WHO Itself, As
Many Anti-Chemical Objectors
& Some In The Media Represent
~
~
[ OBJECTORS ARE A VERY SMALL GROUP OF ACTIVISTS ⁄ OPERATIVES WHO CONSPIRE TO IMPOSE ARBITRARY PESTICIDE BANS ] .
~
~
3 Other WHO Agencies, Including WHO
Itself, Performed Risk Assessments On
Glyphosate & Repudiated IARC’s Finding
~
~
But as our Global Infographic ! makes clear, their far more comprehensive analyses are often ignored in media accounts or not even considered by juries.
~
In the Global Infographic ! below, we summarize the most respected research.
~
To believe that glyphosate causes cancer, one would have to believe in a coordinated world-wide conspiracy involving agencies in ▬
~
~
• Africa • America • Asia •
Australia • Canada • Europe • New
Zealand • World Health Organization
~
~
WHO conspired in three separate divisions to suppress evidence of glyphosate’s dangers.
~
In the Global Infographic ! below, there are assertions issued by regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies.
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Global Infographic !
~
~
~
00. Infographic — 2024 06 25 — Glyphosate Infographic — Global Regulatory, Health, & Research Agencies — IMAGE
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Government Agencies On Whether Glyphosate Causes Health Issues Like Cancer
~
Expanded Global Infographic
Information On Glyphosate !
~
Assertions By Regulatory, Health,
Research, & Administrative Agencies
In The United States & Canada
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Health Canada Infographic !
See Also – Health Canada’s Pesticide Safety
Infographics & The Safety Of Pest Control Products
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Expanded Global Infographic Information
~
1. America ⁄ ▬ US EPA ⁄ ▬ Part 1 ⁄ 2
~
~
~
~
US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA )
~
US EPA ⁄ Key Points ▬
~
~
US EPA Hazard Assessment
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated
By The United States
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Glyphosate Is Not Likely To
Be Carcinogenic To Humans
Agency Assessment Found No Other
Meaningful Risks To Human Health
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
~
US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA )
~
US EPA ⁄ Excerpts ▬
~
~
Glyphosate is vindicated in America on December 18th, 2017, according to US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) ▬
~
~
Not Likely To Be Carcinogenic
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
The draft human health risk assessment concludes that glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.
~
The Agency’s assessment found no other meaningful risks to human health when the product is used according to the pesticide label.
~
~
~
~
America ⁄ Additional Details ▬
~
~
~
Background Information
~
AMERICA VINDICATES GLYPHOSATE ! ▬
~
~
World-Wide Vindication
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies world-wide have vindicated glyphosate ▬ these agencies include those within the United States, the European Union, the United Nations, Canada, & more.
~
These agencies have found that glyphosate does not present risks of concern to human health or the environment when used according to label directions.
~
~
US EPA Has Successfully Separated A
Health Scare From A Health Threat
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Glyphosate is vindicated in America & continues to be registered as a successful & safe product.
~
The US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ), the nation’s science-based national regulatory agency, has evaluated the herbicide glyphosate, & has re-affirmed that there is no actual risk to public health when used properly.
~
According to scientific up-to-date knowledge, there is no actual risk to human health from current uses of glyphosate.
~
There is no actual risk to children or adults from currently registered uses.
~
There is no indication that children are more sensitive to glyphosate.
~
Furthermore, glyphosate is not a carcinogen.
~
The US EPA has published the following classification ▬ See below ▬
~
~
The US EPA Gave Glyphosate Its
Safest Possible Classification
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
On the scale, US EPA had given glyphosate its ▬
~
~
« Safest Possible Classification »
~
~
The US Environmental Protection Agency’s ( US EPA’s ) assessment of glyphosate was based upon an extensive data-base that exists for evaluating the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate, including 23 epidemiological studies, 15 animal carcinogenicity studies, & nearly 90 genotoxicity studies for the active ingredient glyphosate.
~
In September 2016, the US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) made the following declaration ▬
~
~
« The EPA Gave Glyphosate Its
Safest Possible Classification »
~
~
The US EPA has successfully separated a health scare from a health threat.
~
On September 12th, 2016, the US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) reported that glyphosate does not cause cancer ▬
~
~
« The Available Data At This Time Do Not Support
A Carcinogenic Process For Glyphosate »
~
~
On April 29th, 2016, the US EPA had also classified glyphosate as ▬
~
~
« Not Likely To Be Carcinogenic To Humans »
~
~
The US EPA’s assessment of glyphosate discredited the anti-glyphosate report by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) which conveniently disregarded several studies on the effects of exposure to glyphosate purely on the basis that these studies showed no positive results.
~
The US EPA report also noted that the studies IARC chose to include in its report had significant limitations.
~
Furthermore, IARC’s anti-glyphosate report was based on a review of the scientific literature that was not comprehensive.
~
IARC deliberately overstated the risks with its arbitrary & selective « cherry picking » studies against glyphosate.
~
No pesticide regulator in the world considers glyphosate to be a carcinogen, & both US EPA reports once again reinforce this important fact.
~
The US EPA is successfully separating a health scare from a health threat.
~
No pesticide regulator in the world considers glyphosate to be a carcinogen, & US EPA reports once again reinforce this important fact.
~
US EPA has been successfully separating a health scare from a health threat.
~
~
~
~
US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA )
~
Glyphosate ⁄ US EPA ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Releasing Draft Risk Assessments for Glyphosate — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Reaffirming No Risk To Public Health – Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Separating A Health Scare From A Health Threat — Glyphosate Herbicide Will Not Cause Cancer … Again — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Evaluating Carcinogenic Potential — EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs — Glyphosate Issue Paper — Post ⁄ PTruths Report With Official Document Scribd — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–EPA Review Panel Report Discrediting IARC — Glyphosate Herbicide Will Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Decision Is Protective Of All, Including The Developing Fetus, Infants & Children, The Elderly, & Farm-Workers — Post ⁄ PTruths Report — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA )
~
America Vindication ⁄ US EPA ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Reaffirming No Glyphosate Risk To Public Health — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer, Again — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Finding Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE–—–Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA )
~
US EPA ⁄ Library Of References ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer, Again — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Evaluation Of Carcinogenic Potential — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Evaluation Of Carcinogenic Potential — HIGHLIGHTED TEXT — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Panel Finds Glyphosate Not Likely To Cause Cancer — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Magically Makes Glyphosate Safety Report Disappear — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Once Again, Concludes That Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Summary Of Meeting With Monsanto — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Final Work Plan — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Glyphosate Re-Registration — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Glyphosate Phobia Results In Hazmat Suits, Respirators — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate ⁄ History Library ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HISTORY – REPORTS ⁄ BLOGS–—–Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HISTORY – REPORTS ⁄ BLOGS–—–The Entire Media History Of Glyphosate — Reports & Blogs By Force Of Nature — Web-Page — LINK
~
~
No Pesticide Regulatory Authority In The World Currently
Considers Glyphosate To Be A Cancer Risk To Humans
~
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-blogs/
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–LIBRARY OF POSTS ⁄ REPORTS ⁄ REFERENCES–—–The Complete Library Of Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-complete-library-of-victories/
~
~
√–—–PESTICIDE TRUTHS–—–LIBRARY OF POSTS ⁄ REPORTS–—–Topics : Health Canada, Ontario, Pesticide Ban, PMRA, 2,4-D, & Much More — Misleading Information ? You Decide ! — The Official Web-Site — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Expanded Global Infographic Information
~
2. America ⁄ ▬ US EPA ⁄ ▬ Part 2 ⁄ 2
~
~
~
~
US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA )
~
US EPA ⁄ Key Points ▬
~
~
US EPA Hazard Assessment
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated
By The United States
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Not Likely To Be Carcinogenic
To Humans
Data Do Not Support
The Cancer Classification
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
~
US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA )
~
US EPA ⁄ Excerpts ▬
~
~
Glyphosate is vindicated in America on December 12th, 2017, according to US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) ▬
~
~
No Support For Cancer Classification
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
In summary, considering the entire range of information for the weight-of-evidence, the evidence outlined above to potentially support the « Suggestive Evidence Of Carcinogenic Potential ! » cancer classification descriptor are contradicted by other studies of equal or higher quality &, therefore, the data do not support this cancer classification descriptor.
~
~
[ … ]
~
~
Not Likely To Be Carcinogenic
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Overall, there is not strong support for the « Suggestive Evidence Of Carcinogenic Potential ! » cancer classification descriptor based on the weight-of-evidence, which includes the fact that even small, non-statistically significant changes observed in animal carcinogenicity & epidemiological studies were contradicted by studies of equal or higher quality.
~
The strongest support is for ▬
~
~
« Not Likely To Be Carcinogenic To Humans »
~
~
~
~
US EPA ⁄ Additional Details ▬
~
~
~
Background Information
~
AMERICA VINDICATES GLYPHOSATE ! ▬
~
~
Glyphosate Does Not Present Actual Risks Of
Concern To Human Health Or The Environment
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Glyphosate is vindicated in America & continues to be registered as a successful & safe product.
~
Regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies, world-wide, have found that conventional products, like glyphosate, do not present risks of concern to human health or the environment when properly used in turf maintenance programs according to label directions.
~
By contrast, organic pesticide-free maintenance with green alternatives is a menace that can become harmful & has been rendered meaningless.
~
Human health & the environment are already protected by Health Canada, US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ), & all other regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies.
~
~
No Chance You Die Of Cancer
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Risk assessments are performed by real expert-scientists at Health Canada & US EPA to ensure that these products can be used safely, & that human health & the environment will be protected.
~
By contrast, organic pesticide-free maintenance will cause harm.
~
Contrary to what pesticide-hating extremists lie about, there are no pest control products that are known or probable carcinogens.
~
Pesticides causing cancer is a myth ▬ prohibiting these products will prevent virtually no cancer-harm.
~
Pest control products are nowhere near a leading cause of cancer-death, & there is no actual chance that they will make you die of cancer.
~
There are no worries & no uncertainties with pest control products.
~
No pesticide regulator in the world considers glyphosate to be a carcinogen, & US EPA reports once again reinforce this important fact.
~
~
US EPA Has The Essential Expertise & The
Ultimate Credibility On Pest Control Products
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Pest control products are one of the most stringently regulated products in America.
~
They are regulated by the US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA or EPA ), which requires thorough scientific reviews & safety assessments to ensure they meet strict health & environmental standards, & are shown to have value.
~
US EPA is an agency created by President Richard Nixon for the purpose of protecting human health & the environment by writing & enforcing regulations based on laws passed by Congress.
~
US EPA employs 1000s doctorate-level experts & leading scientific experts on pest control products.
~
~
Good Laboratory Practice Will Ensure
No-Actual-Risk Pesticides Can Be Used Safely
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
US EPA follows the internationally-accredited Good Laboratory Practice ( GLP ) for assessing the safety of pest control products.
~
All assessments used for the approval of these products must be completed by laboratories sanctioned by Good Laboratory Practice ( GLP ), & using only GLP practices.
~
US EPA employs over 1000 doctorate-level experts and leading scientific experts on pest control products.
~
US EPA has the essential expertise & ultimate credibility on these products because it adheres to the OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice ( GLP ).
~
~
World-Wide Vindication
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies world-wide have vindicated glyphosate ▬ these agencies include those within the United States, the European Union, the United Nations, Canada, & more.
~
These agencies have found that glyphosate does not present actual risks of concern to human health or the environment when used according to label directions.
~
~
~
~
US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA )
~
US EPA ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Evaluating Carcinogenic Potential — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Reaffirming No Risk To Public Health — Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Separating A Health Scare From A Health Threat — Glyphosate Herbicide Will Not Cause Cancer … Again — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs — Glyphosate Issue Paper — Evaluation of Carcinogenic Potential — Post ⁄ PTruths Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US EPA–—–Review Panel Report Discrediting IARC — Glyphosate Herbicide Will Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA )
~
America Vindication ⁄ US EPA ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Reaffirming No Glyphosate Risk To Public Health — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer, Again — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Finding Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE–—–Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate ⁄ History Library ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HISTORY – REPORTS ⁄ BLOGS–—–Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HISTORY – REPORTS ⁄ BLOGS–—–The Entire Media History Of Glyphosate — Reports & Blogs By Force Of Nature — Web-Page — LINK
~
~
No Pesticide Regulatory Authority In The World Currently
Considers Glyphosate To Be A Cancer Risk To Humans
~
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-blogs/
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–LIBRARY OF POSTS ⁄ REPORTS ⁄ REFERENCES–—–The Complete Library Of Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-complete-library-of-victories/
~
~
√–—–PESTICIDE TRUTHS–—–LIBRARY OF POSTS ⁄ REPORTS–—–Topics : Health Canada, Ontario, Pesticide Ban, PMRA, 2,4-D, & Much More — Misleading Information ? You Decide ! — The Official Web-Site — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Expanded Global Infographic Information
~
3. America ⁄ ▬ US NTP ⁄ ▬ Part 1 ⁄ 1
~
~
~
~
US National Toxicology Program ( US NTP )
~
US NTP ⁄ Key Points ▬
~
~
US NTP Hazard Assessment
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated
By The United States
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
It Is Unlikely That Glyphosate
Could Cause Cancer
No Evidence Of Chromosomal
Damage To DNA
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
~
US National Toxicology Program ( US NTP )
~
US NTP ⁄ Excerpts ▬
~
~
Glyphosate is vindicated in America on March 7th, 2023, according to US National Toxicology Program ( US NTP ) ▬
~
~
Unlikely To Cause Cancer
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Overall, the findings from our genetic toxicity experiments indicate that it is unlikely that glyphosate could cause cancer through a genotoxic mechanism that permanently damages DNA.
~
Our findings do not rule out that exposure to glyphosate might cause cancer through other mechanisms.
~
The results of the high-throughput screening study, which focused on whether glyphosate & GBFs [ GLYPHOSATE-BASED FORMULATIONS ( GBFs ) ] cause oxidative stress, will be submitted for publication consideration later in 2023.
~
~
[ … ]
~
~
No Evidence Of DNA Damage
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
The new findings are similar to results reported in previous NTP [ US NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM ( US NTP ) ] studies.
~
Studies conducted by the NTP in 1992 reported that rodents exposed to high levels of glyphosate in feed showed little evidence of toxicity, & there was no evidence of glyphosate causing chromosomal damage to DNA.
~
For these reasons, NTP [ US NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM ( US NTP ) ] did not consider conducting a 2-year rodent cancer bioassay of glyphosate.
~
~
~
~
US EPA ⁄ Additional Details ▬
~
~
~
Background Information
~
AMERICA VINDICATES GLYPHOSATE ! ▬
~
~
No Regulator In The World Considers
Glyphosate To Be A Carcinogen
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Glyphosate is vindicated in America & continues to be registered as a successful & safe product.
~
The US National Toxicology Program ( US NTP ) is a research & administrative inter-agency program that is operated by the US Department of Health & Human Services concerning toxicology within public agencies.
~
No pesticide regulator in the world considers glyphosate to be a carcinogen, & US NTP reports once again reinforce this important fact.
~
In fact, glyphosate has been vindicated around the world !
~
Glyphosate will not cause cancer, according to leading scientific experts at national regulatory agencies in Australia, European Union, Genotoxic Expert Panel Review, New Zealand, Nova Scotia, Switzerland, United Nations, & United States ( America ).
~
Leading experts are regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies are siding with the overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrating that glyphosate will not cause cancer !
~
There is neither bio-medical nor epidemiological evidence to support the false-claim that glyphosate causes cancer.
~
Glyphosate will cause no harm to people & the environment.
~
~
World-Wide Vindication
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies world-wide have vindicated glyphosate ▬ these agencies include those within the United States, the European Union, the United Nations, Canada, & more.
~
These agencies have found that glyphosate does not present actual risks of concern to human health or the environment when used according to label directions.
~
~
~
~
US National Toxicology Program ( US NTP )
~
US NTP ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US NTP–—–Glyphosate & Its Glyphosate Formulations — Reference pdf — LINK
~
03. US National Toxicology Program ( NTP ) — 2023 03 07 — Glyphosate & Its Glyphosatre Formulations
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US NTP–—–Comparison Of The Genotoxicity Of Glyphosate — Poster pdf — LINK
~
03A. US National Toxicology Program ( NTP ) — Comparison Of The Genotoxicity Of Glyphosate — POSTER
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–US NTP–—–Effects Of Glyphosate & Its Formulations On DNA Damage — Poster pdf — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA )
~
America Vindication ⁄ US EPA ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Reaffirming No Glyphosate Risk To Public Health — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer, Again — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Finding Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE–—–Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate ⁄ History Library ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HISTORY – REPORTS ⁄ BLOGS–—–Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HISTORY – REPORTS ⁄ BLOGS–—–The Entire Media History Of Glyphosate — Reports & Blogs By Force Of Nature — Web-Page — LINK
~
~
No Pesticide Regulatory Authority In The World Currently
Considers Glyphosate To Be A Cancer Risk To Humans !
~
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-blogs/
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–LIBRARY OF POSTS ⁄ REPORTS ⁄ REFERENCES–—–The Complete Library Of Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-complete-library-of-victories/
~
~
√–—–PESTICIDE TRUTHS–—–LIBRARY OF POSTS ⁄ REPORTS–—–Topics : Health Canada, Ontario, Pesticide Ban, PMRA, 2,4-D, & Much More — Misleading Information ? You Decide ! — The Official Web-Site — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Expanded Global Infographic Information
~
4. Canada ⁄ ▬ HC PMRA ⁄ ▬ Part 1 ⁄ 2
~
~
~
~
Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( HC PMRA )
~
HC PMRA ⁄ Key Points ▬
~
~
HC PMRA Hazard Assessment
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Glyphosate Has Been
Vindicated By Canada
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Products Containing Glyphosate
Are Unlikely To Affect Your Health
Occupational & Residential Risks
Associated With The Use Of
Glyphosate Are Not Of Concern
The Products Containing Glyphosate
Do Not Present Unacceptable Risks
To Human Health Or The Environment
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
~
Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( HC PMRA )
~
HC PMRA ⁄ Excerpts ▬
~
~
Glyphosate is vindicated in Canada on April 28th, 2017, according to Health Canada ▬
~
~
Protecting Human Health
& The Environment
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Health Canada‘s pesticide re-evaluation program considers potential risks as well as the value of pesticide products to ensure they meet modern standards established to protect human health & the environment.
~
Re-evaluation draws on data from registrants, published scientific reports, information from other regulatory agencies, & any other relevant information.
~
In 2010, Health Canada published a re-evaluation work plan for glyphosate ( REV2010-02 ) outlining the focus of this re-evaluation & indicating that the PMRA [ PEST MANAGEMENT REGULATORY AGENCY ( PMRA ) ] is working cooperatively with the United States Environmental Protection Agency [ US EPA ] .
~
As part of this re-evaluation, the effect of Polyethoxylated Tallow Amines ( POEA ) & the metabolite & transformation product Aminomethylphosphonic acid ( AMPA ) are also included.
~
~
[ … ]
~
~
No Unacceptable Risks To
Health & The Environment
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
All registered pesticides must be re-evaluated by the PMRA [ PEST MANAGEMENT REGULATORY AGENCY ( PMRA ) ] on a cyclical basis to make sure they continue to meet modern health & environment safety standards & continue to have value.
~
In 2015, the PMRA published the outcome of its extensive re-examination of glyphosate for public comment ( PRVD2015-01 ), which concluded that the products containing glyphosate do not present unacceptable risks to human health or the environment when used according to the revised product label directions.
~
~
[ … ]
~
~
Unlikely To Pose A Human Cancer Risk
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
The overall finding from the re-examination of glyphosate is highlighted as follows ▬
~
• Glyphosate is not genotoxic and is unlikely to pose a human cancer risk.
~
• Occupational & residential risks associated with the use of glyphosate are not of concern, provided that updated label instructions are followed.
~
• When used according to revised label directions, glyphosate products are not expected to pose risks of concern to the environment.
~
~
[ … ]
~
~
No Risks Of Concern To Health & Environment
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
An evaluation of available scientific information found that products containing glyphosate do not present risks of concern to human health or the environment when used according to the revised label directions.
~
As a requirement for the continued registration of glyphosate uses, new risk reduction measures are required for the end-use products registered in Canada.
~
No additional data are being requested at this time.
~
~
~
~
Canada ⁄ Additional Details ▬
~
~
~
Background Information
~
CANADA VINDICATES GLYPHOSATE ! ▬
~
~
No Regulator In The World Considers
Glyphosate To Be A Carcinogen
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Health Canada has found that glyphosate does not present risks of concern to human health or the environment when used according to label directions.
~
Glyphosate is vindicated in Canada & continues to be registered as a successful & safe product.
~
No pesticide regulator in the world considers glyphosate to be a carcinogen, & Health Canada reports once again reinforce this important fact.
~
~
Glyphosate Registration Renewed In Canada
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
As of 2017, Health Canada has granted continued registration of products containing glyphosate for sale & use in Canada.
~
The evidence in favour of glyphosate was found to be overwhelming.
~
Products containing glyphosate are unlikely to affect the health of people.
~
Dietary risks from food & water are not of concern.
~
Non-occupational risks are not of concern.
~
Non-occupational risks from by-stander dermal exposure are not of concern.
~
Glyphosate products are not expected to pose risks of concern to the environment.
~
Overall, there are currently no environmental incident reports involving glyphosate in Canada.
~
Health Canada, as well as all other national regulatory agencies world-wide, have vindicated glyphosate.
~
These agencies include those within the European Union, the United States, & the United Nations.
~
~
Extremists Attack Health Canada
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Pest control products are one of the most stringently regulated products in Canada.
~
Nonetheless, we are living in the 9|11 era of anti-pesticide hate-speech & unending environmental-extremism.
~
Enviro-terrжr attacks against glyphosate will never end.
~
Nonetheless, Health Canada will protect the public by researching, assessing, & collaborating in the management of the health risks & safety hazards associated with the many consumer products that people use every day.
~
Health Canada, with its Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA ), stringently regulates pest control products.
~
PMRA requires thorough scientific reviews & safety assessments to ensure that pest control products meet strict health & environmental standards & are shown to have value.
~
It employs over 350 doctorate-level experts & leading scientific experts on pest control products.
~
They perform thorough scientific reviews & safety assessments to ensure that pest control products meet strict health & environmental standards.
~
Health Canada’s PMRA has the essential expertise & ultimate credibility on pest control products.
~
Harmful-prohibition is not necessary.
~
Health Canada’s PMRA has been implementing broad engagement to seek input from the public, Indigenous communities, partners, & other stake-holders, including, unfortunately, environmental-extremist organizations.
~
These extremist organizations have attacked Health Canada & its federal approval of no-actual-risk pesticides.
~
~
~
~
Health Canada ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Re-Evaluation Decision RVD2017-01 — Reference pdf — LINK
~
04. Health Canada– 2017 04 28 — Glyphosate Re-Evaluation Decision RVD2017-01
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Granted Continued Registration — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Vindicated By Re-Evaluation Decision — The Library Of Victories Against Anti-Pesticide Science-Hating Fanaticism — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Vindicated With Frequently Asked Questions On The Health Canada Re-Evaluation Of Glyphosate — The Library Of Updates & Warnings — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Health-Related Videos & Transcripts — The Safety Of Pest Control Products — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Pesticide Safety Infographics — The Safety Of Pest Control Products — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
Health Canada Vindication ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–VINDICATION–—–CANADA–—–Granting Continued Glyphosate Registration — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–VINDICATION–—–CANADA–—–Re-Evaluation Decision — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–VINDICATION–—–CANADA–—–Frequently-Asked Questions On Glyphosate Re-Evaluation Decision — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
Health Canada ⁄ Library Of References ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Statement From Health Canada On Glyphosate — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Re-Evaluation Decision RVD2017-01 — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Frequently Asked Questions On The Re-Evaluation Of Glyphosate — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Proposed Re-Evaluation Decision PRVD2015-01 — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Health Canada & CFIA Statement On Séralini et al ( 2012 ) Publication — Reference pdfs — LINKS
~
~
or
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Re-Evaluation Work Plan — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Request For Special Review — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Reduced-Risk Pesticides In Canada — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Drinking Water — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Pesticides & Health — Reference pdf — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate ⁄ History Library ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HISTORY – REPORTS ⁄ BLOGS–—–Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HISTORY – REPORTS ⁄ BLOGS–—–The Entire Media History Of Glyphosate — Reports & Blogs By Force Of Nature — Web-Page — LINK
~
~
No Pesticide Regulatory Authority In The World Currently
Considers Glyphosate To Be A Cancer Risk To Humans
~
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-blogs/
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–LIBRARY OF POSTS ⁄ REPORTS ⁄ REFERENCES–—–The Complete Library Of Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-complete-library-of-victories/
~
~
√–—–PESTICIDE TRUTHS–—–LIBRARY OF POSTS ⁄ REPORTS–—–Topics : Health Canada, Ontario, Pesticide Ban, PMRA, 2,4-D, & Much More — Misleading Information ? You Decide ! — The Official Web-Site — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate – Expanded Global Infographic Information
~
5. Canada ⁄ ▬ HC PMRA ⁄ ▬ Part 2 ⁄ 2
~
~
~
~
Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( HC PMRA )
~
HC PMRA ⁄ Key Points ▬
~
~
HC PMRA Hazard Assessment
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Glyphosate Has Been
Vindicated By Canada
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
No Pesticide Regulatory Authority In
The World Currently Considers Glypho-
sate To Be A Cancer Risk To Humans
The Concerns Raised By The Objectors
Against Glyphosate Could Not Be
Scientifically Supported
Department’s Final Re-Evaluation
Decision On Glyphosate Will Stand
▬
▬
~
See below
~
~
~
~
Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( HC PMRA )
~
HC PMRA ⁄ Excerpts ▬
~
~
Glyphosate is vindicated in Canada on January 11th, 2019, according to Health Canada ▬
~
~
No Support For Concern &
Final Decision Will Stand
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
After a thorough scientific review, we have concluded that the concerns raised by the objectors could not be scientifically supported when considering the entire body of relevant data.
~
The objections raised did not create doubt or concern regarding the scientific basis for the 2017 re-evaluation decision for glyphosate.
~
Therefore, the Department’s final decision will stand.
~
~
[ … ]
~
~
No Actual Cancer Risk
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
No pesticide regulatory authority in the world currently considers glyphosate to be a cancer risk to humans at the levels at which humans are currently exposed.
~
We [ i.e. HEALTH CANADA ] continue to monitor for new information related to glyphosate, including regulatory actions from other governments, & will take appropriate action if risks of concern to human health or the environment are identified.
~
~
~
~
Health Canada ⁄ Additional Details ▬
~
~
~
Background Information
~
CANADA VINDICATES GLYPHOSATE ! ▬
~
~
No Regulator In The World Considers
Glyphosate To Be A Carcinogen
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Glyphosate is vindicated in Canada & continues to be registered as a successful & safe product.
~
No pesticide regulator in the world considers glyphosate to be a carcinogen, & Health Canada reports once again reinforce this important fact.
~
~
No-Actual-Risk Pesticides Will Cause No Harm
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Before a product is approved, expert-scientists at both US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) & Health Canada must be convinced that no harm is going to result from the proper use of a product.
~
These expert-scientists ensure that all pest control products will be used safely, & that human health & the environment will be protected.
~
Pest control products will cause no harm when used properly.
~
~
Health Canada Has The Essential Expertise &
Ultimate Credibility On No-Actual-Risk Pesticides
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Health Canada protects the Canadian public by researching, assessing & collaborating in the management of the health risks & safety hazards associated with the many consumer products that Canadians use every day.
~
Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( HC PMRA or PMRA ) regulates pest control products in Canada.
~
These products are regulated under the federal Pest Control Products Act, which is administered by PMRA.
~
This agency conducts science-based risk assessments for new pesticides, as well as for registered pesticides that must be re-evaluated on a cyclical basis.
~
PMRA requires thorough scientific reviews & safety assessments to ensure that pest control products meet strict health & environmental standards & are shown to have value.
~
Pest control products are one of the most stringently regulated products in Canada.
~
It employs over 350 doctorate-level experts & leading scientific experts on pest control products.
~
PMRA has the essential expertise & ultimate credibility on pest control products.
~
~
Incident Reports Will Ensure No-Actual-Risk
Pesticides Can Be Used Safely
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Health Canada has stated that it is confident that the pest control products that it approves for use in Canada can be used safely when label directions are followed.
~
Incident Reports are monitored by Health Canada to identify any potential risks to health or the environment from the use of pest control products & to take corrective actions when necessary.
~
The more serious individual Incident Reports may lead to an official evaluation & action.
~
~
Re-Entry Intervals Will Ensure Pesticides
Residues On The Treated Turfgrass Surfaces !
Do Not Pose An Unacceptable Risk
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Re-Entry Intervals are necessary to ensure that any pest control product residues on the treated turfgrass surfaces do not pose an unacceptable risk to human health.
~
These intervals reflect the amount of time required for pest control product levels to dissipate to a level that is well below any point of concern.
~
They are determined by Health Canada in order to protect people against potential harm from pest control products applied to turfgrasses.
~
Typically, for all pest control products used for lawn care maintenance, the Health-Canada-approved labels state ▬
~
« Keep People Off Treated Area Until Foliage Is Dry »
~
~
No-Actual-Risk Pesticides Will Not Cause Cancer
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
Pest control products are nowhere near a leading cause of cancer death, & there is no chance that they will make you die of cancer.
~
There is not one known cancer death from the proper use of these products when used in the urban landscape.
~
By comparison, there are thousands of known deaths per year from known cancer-causing substances such as ▬ • Alcohol consumption • Physical inactivity • Excess body weight • Cigarettes & second-hand smoke • Solar ultra-violet ( UV ) radiation ( i.e. over-exposure to the sun ) • Unhealthy diet • & More.
~
The real big risk factors that are responsible for 12 per cent of global cancer incidence include ▬ • Cigarettes ( i.e. tobacco ) • Obesity • Various pathogens • Not pesticides.
~
Moreover, the key exposures that contribute the most to the burden of occupational cancer in Canada do not include pesticides, according to Canadian Centre for Occupational Health & Safety ( CCOHS ) & Occupational Cancer Research Centre ( OCRC ).
~
Pest control products will not cause cancer.
~
~
Risk Assessments Have Demonstrated That
ONo-Actual-Risk Pesticides Will Cause No Harm !
To Human Health & To The Environment
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
~
~
All pest control products used in Canada must undergo a rigorous scientific assessment process that provides reasonable certainty that no harm to human health or the environment will occur when used according to label directions.
~
For every registration of pest control product, manufacturers must spend 250 million dollars in order to satisfy Health Canada’s scientific Risk Assessments.
~
Over two-hundred separate Risk Assessments are performed by the 350 professional experts at Health Canada to ensure that these products are scientifically-safe, & will cause no harm.
~
Consequently, there is not one known incident report of harm from the proper use of pest control products used by the turf ⁄ lawn ⁄ golf industry.
~
These products are scientifically-safe, & will not cause harm to people, animals, or the environment.
~
~
~
~
Health Canada ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Statement On Glyphosate — Reference pdf — LINK
~
05. Health Canada — 2019 01 11 — Statement From Health Canada On Glyphosate
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Granted Continued Registration — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Vindicated By Re-Evaluation Decision — The Library Of Victories Against Anti-Pesticide Science-Hating Fanaticism — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Vindicated With Frequently Asked Questions On The Health Canada Re-Evaluation Of Glyphosate — The Library Of Updates & Warnings — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–The Entire Media History Of Glyphosate — No Pesticide Regulatory Authority In The World Currently Considers Glyphosate To Be A Cancer Risk To Humans — Reports & Blogs By Force Of Nature — Web-Page — LINK
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-blogs/
~
~
√–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Pesticide Safety Infographics — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Health-Related Videos & Transcripts — The Safety Of Pest Control Products — Blog With Video Recordings — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Re-Entry Intervals For Applications On Turfgrasses — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–HEALTH CANADA–—–Approved Pesticide Product Labels — Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/labels/
~
~
~
~
Glyphosate ⁄ History Library ▬
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HISTORY – REPORTS ⁄ BLOGS–—–Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–HISTORY – REPORTS ⁄ BLOGS–—–The Entire Media History Of Glyphosate — Reports & Blogs By Force Of Nature — Web-Page — LINK
~
~
No Pesticide Regulatory Authority In The World Currently
Considers Glyphosate To Be A Cancer Risk To Humans
~
~
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-blogs/
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–LIBRARY OF POSTS ⁄ REPORTS ⁄ REFERENCES–—–The Complete Library Of Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-complete-library-of-victories/
~
~
√–—–PESTICIDE TRUTHS–—–LIBRARY OF POSTS ⁄ REPORTS–—–Topics : Health Canada, Ontario, Pesticide Ban, PMRA, 2,4-D, & Much More — Misleading Information ? You Decide ! — The Official Web-Site — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Background Information – The Entire Glyphosate History
~
GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Media Library ▬
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–LIBRARY OF VICTORIES–—–Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-complete-library-of-victories/
~
~
√ — GLYPHOSATE–—–LIBRARY OF VICTORIES–—–Conspiracy Against Glyphosate – Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–LIBRARY OF REFERENCES–—–Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-references/
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–LIBRARY OF REPORTS ⁄ BLOGS–—–Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-reports-blogs/
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–LIBRARY OF BLOGS–—–Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-blogs/
~
~
√–—–GLYPHOSATE–—–LIBRARY OF EXPERTS–—–Scientifically-Safe According To Real Experts — Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate/
~
~
√ — GLYPHOSATE-GATE — Lunatжc-Liars Blair & Portier — Lies, Scientific Fraud, Pays-Off, Bribery, & Conspiracy — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√ — GLYPHOSATE — Fanatжcal Demands For Municipal Prohibition — Comments By TERRЖR-Talkers — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√ — GLYPHOSATE — Deranged Lies About School Shootings & Glyphosate — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√ — GLYPHOSATE — Will Not Cause Cancer – Glyphosate Vindicated Around The World — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√ — GLYPHOSATE–—–BEES–—–Will Not Harm Bees — There Is NO Bee Crisis — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√ — GLYPHOSATE–—–LACK OF CREDIBLE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE–—–Scientifically-Safe According To Real Experts — Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate/
~
~
√ — VICTORIES–—–LIBRARY–—–Victories Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrism — Web-Page — LINK
~
http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/victories-against-terrorists/
~
~
√–—–PESTICIDE TRUTHS–—–LIBRARY OF POSTS ⁄ REPORTS–—–Topics : Health Canada, Ontario, Pesticide Ban, PMRA, 2,4-D, & Much More — Misleading Information ? You Decide ! — The Official Web-Site — LINK
~
~
~
~
~
~
▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬ ▬
~
~
~
~
~
Background Information – The Entire Glyphosate History
~
GLYPHOSATE ⁄ Vindication ▬
~
~
~
Regulatory, health, research, & administrative agencies world-wide have vindicated glyphosate ▬ these agencies include those within the European Union, the United States, the United Nations, & Canada. These agencies have found that glyphosate does not present risks of concern to human health or the environment when used according to label directions.
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Reaffirming No Glyphosate Risk To Public Health — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer, Again — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US EPA–—–Finding Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–US NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE–—–Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer — Post ⁄ Report — LINK
~
~
~
√–—–VINDICATION–—–CANADA