Conspiracy Against Glyphosate – California Lawsuits – Jackpot Kangaroo Court Justice – Fraud & Corruption Bring Big Payoffs – Questions Bayer’s Defense Attorneys Should Have Asked Plaintiffs – The Wisdom Of Driessen – 2019 00 00

 

 

Summary

 

Glyphosate-Cancer Kangaroo-Trials

 

 

The conspiracy against glyphosate is a coordinated and well-funded attack against society, using glyphosate-cancer litigation, as well as social media, intimidation, and confrontation. 

 

Jackpot justice lawsuits against glyphosate are the product of rampant collusion, misconduct, and even fraud. 

 

Jurors have awarded outrageous amounts of $80,000,000 or more. 

 

The glyphosate-cancer trials have been textbook cases of kangaroo court justice. 

 

With these glyphosate-cancer kangaroo-trials, the legal system will be irretrievably corrupted by this coordinated, well-funded attack by fanatжcs, using glyphosate-cancer litigation, as well as social media, intimidation, and confrontation. 

 

The false-cancer-claims against glyphosate should never be admitted as evidence in ANY trial. 

 

Glyphosate is NOT a carcinogen. 

 

Multiple studies by respected agencies and organizations world-wide have concluded that glyphosate is safe and non-carcinogenic. 

 

National regulatory agencies and organizations that have VINDICATED glyphosate include    US Environmental Protection Agency, European Food Safety Authority, European Chemicals Agency, Food and Agriculture Organization, Germany’s Institute for Risk Assessment, Health Canada, Australia’s Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, and others.  

 

Four decades and 3,300 studies by respected national regulatory agencies and organizations world-wide have concluded that glyphosate is safe and non-carcinogenic, based on assessments of actual risk. 

Overall, the data DO NOT support the false-claims that glyphosate is carcinogenic. 

 

The US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) has evaluated this herbicide, and has reaffirmed that there is NO RISK to public health when used properly. 

 

Additionally, a study conducted by US National Cancer Institute followed the health of 54,000 farmers and commercial pesticide applicators for over two decades, and found NO glyphosate-cancer link. 

 

We must keep fraudulent science out of our courtrooms ! 

 

The false-cancer-claims by the glyphosate-hating International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) are secretive, sloppy, bungled    and perhaps even systematically and deliberately fraudulent. 

 

These IARC claims should NEVER be admitted as evidence in ANY trial. 

Any of IARC’s false-cancer-claims against glyphosate are      such an outlier    so beneath scientific norms    so tainted by conflicts-of-interest and misconduct    so unrelated to actual chemical risks, and    so deceptive and border-line fraudulent. 

 

Glyphosate has been vindicated and continues to be registered as a successful and safe product. 

 

It may be instructive to look at the glyphosate-cancer trials with a line of questioning that would have put glyphosate in a very different light and might have changed the outcome of these kangaroo-trials. 

 

Here are questions that should be answered by plaintiffs who allege that glyphosate was responsible for their cancer   

 

   Do any of your life-style choices present a risk of getting cancer ?!?! 

 

   Does your family history include cancer ?!?! 

 

   Do your eating, exercise, and sleeping habits mitigate cancer ?!?! 

 

   Do you avoid high-fat foods ?!?! 

 

   Do you eat healthy foods ?!?! 

 

   How often have you eaten bacon, sausage, or other processed meats, which are known to be carcinogenic ?!?! 

 

   Do you, or have you, ever smoked ?!?! 

 

   How often have you been exposed to second-hand smoke ?!?! 

 

   How often do you eat fruits and vegetables ?!?! 

 

   Did you always use glyphosate in accordance with label directions ?!?! 

 

   The glyphosate you were exposed to was manufactured by which company ?!?! 

 

   Was the glyphosate you were exposed to manufactured as an inferior and dangerous foreign knock-off ?!?! 

 

Glyphosate has been vindicated and continues to be registered as a successful and safe product. 

 

Glyphosate will NOT cause cancer. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

August 3rd, 2019

 

Juris Dr Paul K Driessen

 

Townhall

 

Selected And Adapted Excerpts

 

Reference 

 

California Lawsuits — Fraud & Corruption

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Reference-Hero-Driessen-2019-08-03-Glyphosate-California-Lawsuits-Fraud-Corruption-Bring-Big-Payoffs-Townhall-2.pdf

 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraud & Corruption

 

Jackpot Justice

 

 

San Francisco area juries have awarded cancer patients some $80,000,000 each, based on FALSE-CLAIMS that the active ingredient in Roundup [ herbicide ], caused their cancer [ ?!?! ]    and that Bayer-Monsanto negligently or deliberately failed to advise consumers that the glyphosate it manufactures is ( allegedly ) carcinogenic [ ?!?! ]. 

 

 

Glyphosate is vindicated and continues to be registered as a successful and safe product.  The US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) has evaluated the herbicide glyphosate, and has reaffirmed that there is NO RISK to public health when used properly.  Glyphosate is NOT a carcinogen. 

 

The false-cancer-claims by the glyphosate-hating International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) are secretive, sloppy, bungled    and perhaps even systematically and deliberately fraudulent.  These IARC claims should never be admitted as evidence in any trial.  Any of IARC’s false-cancer-claims against glyphosate are      such an outlier    so beneath scientific norms    so tainted by conflicts-of-interest and misconduct    so unrelated to actual chemical risks, and    so deceptive and border-line fraudulent.   

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2019/06/15/update-on-glyphosate-herbicide-us-epa-reaffirms-no-risk-to-public-health-glyphosate-does-not-cause-cancer-2019-04-30/

 

 

[ United States District Court Judges ] reduced the original truly outrageous awards of $289,000,000 and even $1,000,000,000 per plaintiff !

 

Meanwhile, ubiquitous ads are still trolling for new clients, saying anyone who ever used Roundup and now has Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, or other cancer, could be the next JACKPOT JUSTICE WINNER. 

 

MASS TORT PLAINTIFF LAW FIRMS have lined up 18,500 additional « corporate victims » for glyphosate-cancer trials. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraud & Corruption

 

Safe & Non-Carcinogenic

 

 

Introduced in 1974, glyphosate is licensed in 130 countries. 

 

Millions of farmers, home-owners, and gardeners have made it the world’s most widely used herbicide    and one of the most intensely studied chemicals in history. 

 

Four decades and 3,300 studies by respected agencies and organizations world-wide have concluded that glyphosate is SAFE AND NON-CARCINOGENIC, based on assessments of ACTUAL RISK. 

 

National regulatory agencies and organizations that have VINDICATED glyphosate include   

 

  US Environmental Protection Agency [ US EPA ]    European Food Safety Authority    European Chemicals Agency    UN Food and Agriculture Organization    Germany’s Institute for Risk Assessment    Australia’s Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority    Health Canada. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraud & Corruption

 

Health Canada

 

 

Health Canada noted that « no pesticide regulatory authority in the world considers glyphosate to be a cancer risk to humans at the levels at which humans are currently exposed ».  [ See full statement below. ]

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

FULL STATEMENT FROM
HEALTH CANADA ON GLYPHOSATE

 

 

Glyphosate Vindicated By Health Canada

 

The Concerns Raised By The Objectors Against
Glyphosate Could Not Be Scientifically Supported
When Considering The Entire Body Of Relevant Data

 

No Pesticide Regulatory Authority In The World Currently
Considers Glyphosate To Be A Cancer Risk To Humans
At The Levels At Which Humans Are Currently Exposed

 

 

 

Health Canada Statement On Glyphosate

 

 

Health Canada’s primary objective in regulating pesticides is to protect Canadians’ health and the environment. 

 

That is why the Department regularly reviews all pesticides to make sure that they continue to meet modern health and safety standards. 

 

Following the release of the Department’s final re-evaluation decision on glyphosate in 2017, Health Canada received eight notices of objection. 

 

There have also been concerns raised publicly about the validity of some of the science around glyphosate in what is being referred to as the Monsanto Papers. 

 

Health Canada scientists reviewed the information provided in these notices, and assessed the validity of any studies in question, to determine whether any of the issues raised would influence the results of the assessment and the associated regulatory decision. 

 

After a thorough scientific review, we have concluded that THE CONCERNS RAISED BY THE OBJECTORS COULD NOT BE SCIENTIFICALLY SUPPORTED WHEN CONSIDERING THE ENTIRE BODY OF RELEVANT DATA. 

 

The objections raised DID NOT create doubt or concern regarding the scientific basis for the 2017 re-evaluation decision for glyphosate. 

 

Therefore, the Department’s final decision will stand.

 

Health Canada follows a transparent and rigorous science-based regulatory process when making decisions about the safety of pesticides. 

 

As part of this process, Health Canada will publish its response to each notice of objection in the Pest Management Regulatory Agency’s Public Registry on January 14.

 

Our scientists left no stone unturned in conducting this review. 

 

They had access to all relevant data and information from federal and provincial governments, international regulatory agencies, published scientific reports and multiple pesticide manufacturers. 

 

This includes the reviews referred to in the Monsanto Papers. 

 

Health Canada also had access to numerous individual studies and raw scientific data during its assessment of glyphosate, including additional cancer and genotoxicity studies. 

 

To help ensure an unbiased assessment of the information, Health Canada selected a group of 20 of its own scientists who were not involved in the 2017 re-evaluation to evaluate the notices of objection. 

 

NO PESTICIDE REGULATORY AUTHORITY IN THE WORLD CURRENTLY CONSIDERS GLYPHOSATE TO BE A CANCER RISK TO HUMANS AT THE LEVELS AT WHICH HUMANS ARE CURRENTLY EXPOSED. 

 

We continue to monitor for new information related to glyphosate, including regulatory actions from other governments, and will take appropriate action if risks of concern to human health or the environment are identified. 

 

 

 

Explore the following link   

 

 

Reference — glyphosate — 2019 01 11 — Health Canada — Statement On Glyphosate LINK

 

Reference — glyphosate — 2019 01 11 — Health Canada — Statement On Glyphosate

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraud & Corruption

 

National Cancer Institute

 

 

The National Cancer Institute’s ongoing Agricultural Health Study evaluated 54,000 farmers and commercial pesticide applicators for over two decades    and likewise found NO GLYPHOSATE-CANCER LINK.

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

RESEARCH FROM US NATIONAL CANCER
INSTITUTE ( NCI ) ON GLYPHOSATE

 

 

Glyphosate Vindicated By Research Conducted By The US NCI

 

 

 

Summary

 

 

The NCI researchers concluded that    glyphosate was NOT statistically significantly associated with cancer. 

 

This large long-term research was published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute ( JNCI ) on November 9th, 2017. 

 

This was the largest research study of agricultural workers in history, a gold standard, over the longest period of time. 

 

It definitively demonstrated in a real-world environment that glyphosate DOES NOT cause cancer. 

 

 

 

Explore the following link   

 

 

Glyphosate Vindicated By US National Cancer Institute LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2017/11/29/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-victory-against-anti-pesticide-terr%D0%B6rists-glyphosate-vindicated-by-us-national-cancer-institute-2017-11-09/

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraud & Corruption

 

International Agency For Cancer Research    1

 

 

Only the International Agency for Cancer Research ( IARC ) says otherwise    and it based its conclusions on [ a mere ] 8 studies. 

 

 

Four decades and 3,300 studies by respected national regulatory agencies and organizations world-wide have concluded that glyphosate is SAFE AND NON-CARCINOGENIC, based on assessments of ACTUAL RISK.  Overall, the data DO NOT support the FALSE-CLAIMS that glyphosate is carcinogenic. 

 

 

Even worse, IARC MANIPULATED, at least some of these studies, to concoct the FALSE-CANCER-CLAIMS it wanted. 

 

Subsequent reviews by 

 

   Dr Geoffrey Kabat, epidemiologist 

 

   Dr Robert Tarone, statistician at National Cancer Institute 

 

   Ms Kate Kelland, investigative journalist 

 

   Dr David Zaruk, writer at RiskMonger   

 

  and other investigators have demonstrated that the IARC process was TAINTED BEYOND REPAIR. 

 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

THE IARC GLYPHOSATE-GATE    1

 

 

 

Summary

 

 

International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) is an anti-glyphosate & environmental-terrжrist organization. 

 

IARC, the ONLY major science body to insist that glyphosate causes cancer [ ?!?! ], has been caught doctoring documents and manipulating evidence to support its conclusion. 

 

IARC conducts bad science. 

 

Occasionally, bad science is promoted by lunatжcs who receive pay-offs and practice scientific fraud. 

 

The motivation seems to be financial. 

 

A key IARC lunatжc-advisor who lobbied against glyphosate has, in essence, received a pay-off of $160,000. 

 

He was bribed by lawyers who stand to profit from potential lawsuits involving glyphosate. 

 

This is a truly gigantic scandal that has ( predictably ) received scant press coverage. 

 

IARC has severely and perhaps irreparably damaged the reputation of its parent, the World Health Organization ( WHO ). 

 

Anti-glyphosate lunatжcs are crooks and lying sacks of crжp ! 

 

 

 

Explore the following link   

 

 

Glyphosate-Gate LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2018/01/02/lying-sacks-of-cr%D0%B6p-at-iarc-glyphosate-gate-lunat%D0%B6c-liars-blair-portier-lies-scientific-fraud-pays-off-bribery-conspiracy-2017-10-24-22/

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraud & Corruption

 

International Agency For Cancer Research    2

 

 

The IARC’s FALSE-CANCER-CLAIMS should NEVER have been allowed in court. 

 

But the judges in the first three cases let the jackpot-justice plaintiff-lawyers bombard the jury with FALSE-CANCER-CLAIMS by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) , and went even further. 

 

In the Hardeman case, [ United States District Court ] Judge Vincent Chhabria BLOCKED the introduction of EPA analyses that concluded « glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic in humans », based on its careful review of many of the studies just mentioned. 

 

 

Explore the following link   

 

EPA Reaffirms No Risk To Public Health LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2019/06/15/update-on-glyphosate-herbicide-us-epa-reaffirms-no-risk-to-public-health-glyphosate-does-not-cause-cancer-2019-04-30/

 

 

[ United States District Court Judge Vincent Chhabria ] said he wanted « to avoid wasting time or misleading the jury because the primary inquiry is what the scientific studies show, not what the EPA concluded they show ».  [ ?!?! ] 

 

However, IARC didn’t do any original studies either. 

 

[ IARC ] just concluded that glyphosate is « Probably Carcinogenic To Humans – Group 2A », meaning studies it reviewed found LIMITED EVIDENCE OF CARCINOGENICITY in humans, plus sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in lab animals that had been exposed to very high doses or lower doses for prolonged periods of time. 

 

In other words, UNDER CONDITIONS THAT NO ANIMAL OR HUMAN WOULD EVER BE EXPOSED TO IN THE REAL WORLD. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraud & Corruption

 

Questions Bayer’s Defense Attorneys Should Have Asked Plaintiffs

 

 

  Plaintiffs Dewayne Johnson 47 Years Old    Edwin

Hardeman 70    Alva Pilliod 77    Alberta Pilliod 75

 

 

It is also instructive to look at the three San Francisco area glyphosate-cancer trials from another angle    an additional line of questioning that would have put glyphosate and Roundup in a very different light and might have changed the outcome of these glyphosate-cancer kangaroo-trials. 

 

 

The glyphosate-cancer trials have been textbook cases of kangaroo court justice.  With these glyphosate-cancer kangaroo-trials, the legal system will be irretrievably corrupted by this coordinated, well-funded attack by fanatжcs, using glyphosate-cancer litigation, as well as social media, intimidation, and confrontation.  The false-claims that glyphosate is carcinogenic should NEVER be admitted as evidence in ANY trial. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Defense attorneys should have asked about   

 

 

Plaintiffs’ Cancer History & Life-Style Choices

 

 

   Can you describe your family cancer history ? 

 

   Your eating, exercise and sleeping habits ? 

 

   How much you eat high-fat foods ? 

 

   How often you eat fruits and vegetables ? 

 

   Your other life-style choices that doctors and other experts now know play significant roles in whether or not people get cancer ? 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Defense attorneys should have asked about   

 

 

Plaintiffs’ Exposure To Substances & Activities On The
List Of
IARC’s Group 1Carcinogenic To Humans

 

 

   How many times in your life do you estimate you were exposed to substances classified as Group 1Carcinogenic To Humans by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) ?   

 

  including   

 

   Acetaldehyde in alcoholic beverages ? 

 

   Aflatoxin in peanuts ? 

 

   Asbestos ? 

 

   Cadmium in batteries ? 

 

   Lindane insecticide ? 

 

   Sunlight ? 

 

  or any of the 125 other substances and activities in the list of IARC’s Group 1Carcinogenic To Humans ? 

 

   Have you ever smoked ? 

 

   How often have you been exposed to second-hand smoke ? 

 

   How often have you eaten bacon, sausage, or other processed meats    which are also in the list of IARC’s Group 1Carcinogenic To Humans ? 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Defense attorneys should have asked about   

 

 

Plaintiffs’ Exposure To Substances & Activities On The
List Of
IARC’s Group 2AProbably Carcinogenic To Humans

 

 

   How many times have you been exposed to any any substances classified as Probably Carcinogenic by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC )    not just glyphosate   

 

  but also   

 

   Anabolic steroids ? 

 

   Creosote ? 

 

   Diazinon insecticide ? 

 

   Dieldrin insecticide ? 

 

   Emissions from high-temperature food frying ? 

 

   Malathion insecticide ? 

 

   Shift work ? 

 

  or any of the 75 other substances and activities in the list of IARC’s Group 2AProbably Carcinogenic To Humans ? 

 

   How often have you consumed beef or very hot beverages    likewise in the list of IARC’s Group 2AProbably Carcinogenic To Humans ? 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Defense attorneys should have asked about   

 

 

Plaintiffs’ Exposure To Substances & Activities On The
List Of
IARC’s Group 2BPossibly Carcinogenic To Humans

 

 

   How many times have you been exposed to any substances classified as Possibly Carcinogenic by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC )   

 

  including   

 

   Apples ? 

 

   Bracken ferns ? 

 

   Broccoli ? 

 

   Caffeic acid in coffee ? 

 

   Chlordane insecticide ? 

 

   Diesel fuel ? 

 

   Fumonisin ? 

 

   Inorganic lead ? 

 

   Kale ? 

 

   Low frequency magnetic fields ? 

 

   Malathion insecticide ? 

 

   Parathion insecticide ? 

 

   Pickled vegetables ? 

 

   Tea ? 

 

   Titanium oxide in white paint ? 

 

  and other fruits and vegetables   

 

  or any of the 200 other substances and activities in the list of IARC’s Group 2BPossibly Carcinogenic To Humans ? 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Defense attorneys should have asked about   

 

 

Plaintiffs’ Exposure To Pyrethrin Insecticides & Organic Food

 

 

   How often have you eaten Organic Food and perhaps been exposed to Pyrethrin Insecticides ? 

 

Pyrethrin Insecticides used by organic farmers are powerful neurotoxins that are very toxic to bees, cats, and fish    and have been linked by EPA, and other experts, to leukemia and other cancers, and other health problems. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Defense attorneys should have asked about   

 

 

Plaintiffs’ Exposure To Foreign Knock-Offs Of Glyphosate

 

 

   How do you know the glyphosate you were exposed to was manufactured by Bayer and not one of [ the foreign knock-offs ] ? 

 

Large quantities of glyphosate have been manufactured for years in China and other countries. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Defense attorneys should have asked about   

 

 

Plaintiffs’ Exposure To Hundreds Of Other Substances &
Activities
On IARC’s Lists Of  Carcinogenicity To Humans

 

 

In view of all these exposures, please explain how you, your doctors, your lawyers, and the experts you consulted, concluded that   

 

   None of your family history   

 

   None of your life-style choices   

 

   None of your exposures to dozens or even hundreds of other substances on the lists of carcinogens by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC )   

 

  caused or contributed to your cancer   

 

and that your cancer is due SOLELY to your exposure to glyphosate. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Defense attorneys should have asked about   

 

 

Plaintiffs’ Cancers Caused Solely By Glyphosate ?

 

 

Put another way, please explain exactly how you and your experts separated and quantified all these various exposures and life-style decisions    and concluded that Roundup from Bayer-Monsanto was the SOLE REASON you got cancer    and all these other factors played NO role whatsoever.

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

THE IARC GLYPHOSATE-GATE    2

 

 

 

Summary

 

 

International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) has NOT proven that glyphosate causes cancer. 

 

IARC has NOT classified glyphosate as IARC’s Group 1Carcinogenic To Humans. 

 

Additionally, IARC arbitrarily classified the glyphosate as Group 1 on the basis of « limited evidence » of cancer. 

 

Unfortunately, glyphosate-hating fanatжcs have implied that IARC’s « limited evidence » has somehow been withheld from EVERY science-based national regulatory agency in the world. 

 

Nonetheless, IARC has NOT classified glyphosate as Group 1Carcinogenic To Humans. 

 

In other words, according to IARC, glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer ! 

 

And we repeat, IARC has NOT classified glyphosate as Group 1Carcinogenic To Humans. 

 

Glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer ! 

 

The false-cancer-claims by the glyphosate-hating International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) are secretive, sloppy, bungled    and perhaps even systematically and deliberately fraudulent. 

 

Any of IARC’s false-cancer-claims against glyphosate are      such an outlier    so beneath scientific norms    so tainted by conflicts-of-interest and misconduct    so unrelated to actual chemical risks, and    so deceptive and border-line fraudulent.  

 

These claims should never be admitted as evidence in any trial. 

 

According to US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ), German Federal Institute For Risk Assessment, Health Canada, and EVERY other science-based national regulatory agency in the world, the weight of evidence is AGAINST carcinogenicity. 

 

In other words, according to these agencies, glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer. 

 

The IARC hazard report DID NOT indicate the risk of getting cancer. 

 

On the other hand, national regulatory agencies, like US EPA and Health Canada, DO evaluate risks. 

 

IARC merely looked at what is called hazard, and NOT risk. 

 

IARC DID NOT take into consideration how much of, or how commonly, a risk glyphosate poses in the real world. 

 

IARC failed to provide any new research concerning glyphosate. 

 

If the IARC hazard report against glyphosate was truly valid, then why hasn’t WHO itself demand more government regulation ?!?! 

 

Why should national regulatory agencies listen to IARC when it continues to be ignored by WHO ?!?! 

 

Why ?!?! 

 

Because, glyphosate WILL NOT cause harm and WILL NOT cause cancer ! 

 

The World Health Organization ( WHO ) and the Food & Agriculture Organization ( FAO ), both agencies of the United Nations, have stated that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans.

 

On May 16th, 2016, the World Health Organization ( WHO ) and the Food and Agriculture Organization ( FAO ), both agencies of the United Nations, stated that … « glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans ».

 

The United Nations announced its assessment that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to cause cancer in people and that it is UNLIKELY to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans exposed to it through food !

 

The United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization ( FAO ) and World Health Organization ( WHO ) looked at all pertinent published and un-published studies to assess the health risk to consumers from dietary exposure to glyphosate residues in food. 

 

Glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer ! 

 

 

 

Explore the following links   

 

 

Glyphosate Herbicide WILL NOT Cause Cancer — Why Do National Government Regulators In America, Germany, & Canada Conclude That It Is Safe While Only World Health Organization ( WHO a.k.a. IARC ) Claims It MAY Cause Cancer LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2015/08/10/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-why-do-national-government-regulators-in-america-germany-canada-conclude-that-it-is-safe-while-only-world-health-organization-who-aka-iarc-cla/

 

 

Precautionary Principle — Pesticides & Cancer — Conflation Of Advocacy With Science — How Activism Distorts The Assessment Of Health Risks — False Positives In Epidemiology — International Agency For Research On Cancer ( IARC ) — Dr Geoffrey C Kabat LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2012/11/25/precautionary-principle-pesticides-cancer-conflation-of-advocacy-with-science-how-activism-distorts-the-assessment-of-health-risks-false-positives-in-epidemiology-international-a/

 

 

Expert Reaction To Carcinogenicity Classification Of Five Pesticides By The International Agency For Research On Cancer ( IARC ) LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2015/03/20/expert-reaction-to-carcinogenicity-classification-of-five-pesticides-by-the-international-agency-for-research-on-cancer-iarc-science-media-centre/

 

 

United Nations Has Discredited The IARC Anti-Glyphosate Hazard Report LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/05/21/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-victory-against-terrorists-proposal-for-prohibition-against-glyphosate-herbicide-stopped-in-the-european-union-real-trends-against-pe/

 

 

Conspiracy Against Glyphosate – Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2018/11/24/conspiracy-against-glyphosate-victories-against-anti-glyphosate-terr%d0%b6rism-2018-11-24/

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraud & Corruption

 

Conclusion

 

 

News accounts do not reveal whether Bayer-Monsanto lawyers asked these questions [ see previous segments ]    or whether they tried to ask them, but the judges DISALLOWED the questions. 

 

In any event, the bottom line is this   

 

   It is bad enough that the IARC studies at the center of these JACKPOT JUSTICE LAWSUITS are the product of RAMPANT COLLUSION, MISCONDUCT, and even FRAUD, in the way IARC concluded glyphosate is Probably Carcinogenic. 

 

   It is worse that these glyphosate-cancer trials have been driven by jackpot-justice plaintiff-lawyers’ emotional appeals to jurors’ largely MISPLACED FEARS OF CHEMICALS and MINIMAL KNOWLEDGE of chemicals, chemical risks, medicine, and cancer    resulting in OUTRAGEOUS AWARDS of $80,000,000 or more.

 

Worst of all, our Federal District Courts have   

 

   Let MISCONDUCT by jackpot-justice plaintiff-lawyers drive these lawsuits 

 

   PREVENTED defense attorneys from effectively countering FALSE-CANCER-CLAIMS by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) and discussing the agency’s GROSS MISCONDUCT. 

 

   BARRED defense attorneys from presenting the EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that glyphosate is NOT carcinogenic to humans. 

 

The glyphosate-cancer trials have been textbook cases of KANGOROO COURT JUSTICE. 

 

 

With these glyphosate-cancer kangaroo-trials, the legal system will be irretrievably corrupted by this coordinated, well-funded attack by fanatжcs, using glyphosate-cancer litigation, as well as social media, intimidation, and confrontation.  The false-claims that glyphosate is carcinogenic should NEVER be admitted as evidence in ANY trial.   

 

 

The cases are heading to APPEAL, ultimately to the US Supreme Court. 

 

We can only hope appellate judges will return sanity, fairness, and justice to the nation’s litigation process. 

 

Otherwise, our legal system will be irretrievably corrupted; products, technologies, companies, and industries will likely be driven out of existence; and fraud, emotion, and anarchy will reign. 

 

JACKPOT-JUSTICE LAW FIRMS, and their ANTI-CHEMICAL ACTIVIST ALLIES, are already targeting cereals that have « detectable » levels of glyphosate    a few parts per billion or trillion [ ppt ], where 1 ppt is equivalent to 1 second in 32,000 years. 

 

Talc and benzene    foundations for numerous consumer products    are already under attack.  

 

Advanced technology neonicotinoid pesticides could be next. 

 

It’s all part of a coordinated, well-funded attack on America, free enterprise and technology, using glyphosate-cancer litigation, as well as social media, intimidation, and confrontation. 

 

Our legislatures and courts need to rein it in. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

February 3rd, 2019

 

Juris Dr Paul K Driessen

 

Townhall

 

Selected And Adapted Excerpts

 

Reference 

 

California Lawsuits — Keep Fraudulent Science Out of Our Courtrooms

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Reference-Hero-Driessen-2019-02-03-Glyphosate-Keep-Fraudulent-Science-Out-Of-Our-Courtrooms-Townhall.pdf

 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraudulent Science

 

Cases Against Glyphosate

 

 

A California jury recently awarded $289,000,000 in damages ( later reduced to $78,000,000 ) to a former grounds-keeper [ Dewayne Johnson ], who claimed the [ herbicide ] glyphosate caused his non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [ ?!?! ], and Monsanto deliberately or negligently failed to warn him adequately about the chemical’s cancer risks [ ?!?! ]. 

 

The case is on APPEAL, and a second [ kangaroo-trial ] will soon begin before US District Court Judge Vince Chhabria, who himself has 620 more glyphosate cases on his docket. 

 

Overall, more than 9,300 additional cases are in the works against Monsanto and its new owner, Bayer    and personal injury mass-tort law firms are trolling for more alleged victims. 

 

Their print, radio and television ads proclaim   

 

If you were ever exposed to glyphosate and now have cancer, you may be entitled to damages.  Call us now. 

 

If the allegations are correct, compensatory, and even punitive, DAMAGE AWARDS would be justified, though what might be « reasonable » damages is very much open to debate. 

 

However, reputable evidence strongly suggests that there is NO connection between glyphosate use and lymphomas or other cancers. 

 

In fact, the two cases, and indeed the entire mega-litigation argument, HINGES ON ONE STUDY    and [ US District Court ] Judge Chhabria had to decide whether it would be admissible at the upcoming [ kangaroo-trial ]. 

 

Unfortunately, [ US District Court ] Judge Chhabria ruled that jackpot-justice plaintiff-lawyers could introduce that study as evidence, despite the multiple DECEPTIONS surrounding it. 

 

Many experts say the study is HIGHLY SUSPECT, bordering on FRAUDULENT, and should have been BARRED. 

 

 

We must keep FRAUDULENT SCIENCE out of our courtrooms !  

 

 

Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup [ herbicide ]. 

 

Introduced in 1974 and licensed in 130 countries, it is the world’s most widely used herbicide. 

 

Millions of home-owners use it regularly. 

 

Farmers employ it with Roundup-Ready corn, soybeans, and other crops that are engineered to be resistant to it, so as to   

 

   Minimize weeding and tilling. 

 

   Preserve soil structure. 

 

   Reduce erosion and water evaporation. 

 

According to Dr Geoffrey C Kabat, cancer epidemiologist   

 

[ Farmers favour glyphosate ] because it is ENVIRONMENTALLY-BENIGN and has LOW TOXICITY. 

 

The acute toxicity of glyphosate is LOWER than that of TABLE SALT. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraudulent Science

 

Most Extensive Cancer Study

 

 

Multiple studies by respected agencies and organizations world-wide have concluded that glyphosate is safe and non-carcinogenic. 

 

National regulatory agencies and organizations that have VINDICATED glyphosate include   

 

   US Environmental Protection Agency 

 

   European Food Safety Authority 

 

   European Chemicals Agency 

 

   UN Food and Agriculture Organization 

 

   Germany’s Institute for Risk Assessment 

 

   Health Canada 

 

   Australia’s Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority 

 

   And others 

 

 

Four decades and 3,300 studies by respected national regulatory agencies and organizations world-wide have concluded that glyphosate is safe and non-carcinogenic, based on assessments of actual risk.  Overall, the data DO NOT support the false-claims that glyphosate is carcinogenic. 

 

 

The US Agricultural Health Study [ AHS ], conducted by the US National Cancer Institute, followed the health of 54,000 farmers and commercial pesticide applicators for over two decades. 

 

It found NO glyphosate-cancer link. 

 

The AHS is ongoing and is by far the MOST EXTENSIVE such study ever done. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraudulent Science

 

IARC Studies Are Not Research

 

 

Only one agency, the France-based International Agency for Cancer Research ( IARC ), says otherwise. 

 

IARC does NO research of its own. 

 

It simply reviews existing research and classifies chemicals as Carcinogenic, Probably Carcinogenic, or Possibly Carcinogenic    often at EXTREMELY HIGH DOSES that humans are extremely unlikely to encounter in the real world. 

 

Nor does the agency conduct « risk assessments » to determine exposure levels at which chemicals might actually have adverse effects on people. 

 

In fact, some chemicals may cause cancer at EXTREMELY HIGH DOSES, but be completely HARMLESS at levels encountered in our daily lives. 

 

Other substances are HARMFUL AT HIGH DOSES but beneficial or vital at very low doses    not having them in our bodies at certain low levels can cause severe health problems. 

 

To date, IARC has studied over 900 substances    and found ONLY ONE that was Probably Not Carcinogenic. 

 

Its antiquated approach lumps bacon, sausage, sunlight and plutonium together in its Group 1Carcinogenic To Humans category. 

 

Its list of Group 2BPossibly Carcinogens includes   

 

   Pickled vegetables. 

 

   Caffeic acid, which is found in coffee. 

 

   Tea. 

 

   Apples. 

 

   Blueberries. 

 

   Broccoli. 

 

   Kale. 

 

   Onions. 

 

   Other fruits and vegetables. 

 

Glyphosate is listed as Group 2AProbably Carcinogenic, along with   

 

   Creosote. 

 

   Inorganic lead compounds. 

 

   Malathion. 

 

   Many big-word chemicals. 

 

   High-temperature frying. 

 

   « Very hot beverages » ! 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraudulent Science

 

Plaintiff Dewayne Johnson

 

 

Grounds-keeper Dewayne Johnson has said he somehow got « drenched » twice by glyphosate. 

 

But, in each case, Johnson failed to take a shower or wash the chemical off, follow other standard or specific detoxification procedures, or seek immediate medical attention. 

 

Perhaps Johnson’s legal team could make a plausible argument that getting « drenched » twice constituted the extremely high doses that are often cited as carcinogenic International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ). 

 

However, IARC’s SECRETIVE, SLOPPY, BUNGLED    or even SYSTEMATICALLY AND DELIBERATELY FRAUDULENT    handling of its glyphosate review makes even that possibility little more than PSEUDO-EVIDENCE that should be barred from [ plaintiff ] Johnson’s case, the pending Edwin Hardeman case, and all other glyphosate [ kangaroo-trials ]. 

 

 

The glyphosate-cancer trials have been textbook cases of kangaroo court justice.  With these kangaroo-trials, the legal system will be irretrievably corrupted by this coordinated, well-funded attack by fanatжcs, using glyphosate-cancer litigation, as well as social media, intimidation, and confrontation.  The false-claims that glyphosate is carcinogenic should NEVER be admitted as evidence in ANY trial.  We must keep fraudulent science out of our courtrooms ! 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of Juris Dr Paul Driessen    Fraudulent Science

 

IARC Tainted Beyond Repair

 

 

International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) supposedly based its 2015 revelation of « glyphosate-causes-cancer » based upon so-called evidence from rodent studies. 

 

However, subsequent reviews [ by the following investigators ] have confirmed that the IARC process was TAINTED BEYOND REPAIR from the very beginning   

 

   Dr Geoffrey Kabat, epidemiologist.   

 

   Dr Robert Tarone, statistician at National Cancer Institute.   

 

   Ms Kate Kelland, investigative journalist.   

 

   Dr David Zaruk, writer at RiskMonger. 

 

   and other investigators. 

 

IARC’s glyphosate review was proposed by US government statistician [ and glyphosate-hating fanatжc ] Christopher Portier, who also helped design the IARC study, and served as special advisor to the IARC « Working Group » that evaluated the chemical. 

 

He did so while also being PAID AS AN ADVISOR to the anti-chemical Environmental Defense Fund. 

 

Then, just days after IARC issued its ruling, Portier signed a contract to receive $160,000 for serving as a litigation consultant for two law firms that were preparing to sue Monsanto on behalf of « glyphosate cancer victims ». 

 

[ Glyphosate-hating fanatжc ] Portier and IARC tried to COVER-UP these BLATANT CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. 

 

Dr Tarone [ statistician at National Cancer Institute ] discovered that, during its deliberations, the IARC panel highlighted certain positive results from rodent studies it relied on    while IGNORING CONTRADICTORY RESULTS from the same studies. 

 

Overall, the data DO NOT support the IARC’s FALSE-CLAIMS that glyphosate is carcinogenic, he determined. 

 

Ms Kelland [ investigative journalist ] found ten instances where « a negative conclusion about glyphosate leading to tumors was either deleted or replaced with a neutral or positive one » between draft and final versions of the IARC report. 

 

[ Glyphosate-hating fanatжc ] Portier himself admitted the animal studies subgroup report concluding « limited evidence » of carcinogenicity somehow got upgraded to « sufficient evidence » for the final report. 

 

Just as disturbing, the chair of IARC’s glyphosate Working Group was ALSO a senior investigator for the AHS pesticide and herbicide analysis. 

 

 

The US Agricultural Health Study ( AHS ) was conducted by the US National Cancer Institute.

 

 

[ Glyphosate-hating fanatжc ] Portier knew the AHS results clearly EXONERATED glyphosate as a carcinogen. 

 

However, Portier did not inform the IARC’s glyphosate Working Group about those results, on the SPURIOUS GROUNDS that they had not yet been published. 

 

Portier later admitted that the study would likely have altered IARC’s decision. 

 

Dr Geoffrey C Kabat, epidemiologist, says   

 

IARC had to CHERRY-PICK the results from two mouse studies in order to make its tortured case that the animal evidence supported a conclusion of carcinogenicity. 

 

International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) also did not have access to the 2017 National Cancer Institute study and apparently IGNORED the 2015 AHS analysis. 

 

The 1993 US Supreme Court decision in Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals requires that, in cases like these FALSE-CANCER-CLAIMS against glyphosate, PLAINTIFFS MUST PROVE to the presiding [ United States District Court ] Judge’s satisfaction that the scientific evidence they intend to present is RELEVANT AND RELIABLE. 

 

It must have been tested and/or peer-reviewed against accepted standards, must be accepted in the applicable scientific community, and must meet basic standards of honesty, integrity and credibility. 

 

Any of IARC’s FALSE-CANCER-CLAIMS against glyphosate are   

 

   Such an OUTLIER. 

 

   So BENEATH scientific norms. 

 

   So TAINTED BY CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST and MISCONDUCT. 

 

   So UNRRELATED to actual chemical risks. 

 

   So DECEPTIVE and border-line FRAUDULENT.

 

 

We must keep fraudulent science out of our courtrooms !  The false-cancer-claims by the glyphosate-hating International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) are secretive, sloppy, bungled    and perhaps even systematically and deliberately fraudulent. 

 

 

IARC’s FALSE-CANCER-CLAIMS against glyphosate should NEVER have been admitted as evidence in ANY trial. 

 

It is bad enough that these [ glyphosate-cancer kangaroo-trials ] are driven by   

 

   Emotional appeals to jurors’ largely misplaced fears of chemicals. 

 

   Minimal knowledge of chemicals, chemical risks, medicine and cancer. 

 

It is far worse when our courts let these lawsuits also be driven by the SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT of one agency, International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ). 

 

 

The glyphosate-cancer trials have been textbook cases of kangaroo court justice.  With these glyphosate-cancer kangaroo-trials, the legal system will be irretrievably corrupted by this coordinated, well-funded attack by fanatжcs, using glyphosate-cancer litigation, as well as social media, intimidation, and confrontation.  The false-cancer-claims against glyphosate should never be admitted as evidence in any trial.  We must keep fraudulent science out of our courtrooms ! 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

August 5th, 2019

 

Juris Dr Paul K Driessen

 

whatfinger.com

 

Selected And Adapted Excerpts

 

Reference 

 

California Lawsuits — Cancer Link Co-Ordinated Well-Funded Attack On America

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Reference-Hero-Driessen-2019-08-05-Glyphosate-California-Lawsuits-Cancer-Link-Co-Ordinated-Well-Funded-Attack-On-America-WhatFinger.com_.pdf

 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Coordinated & Well-Funded Attack Against Society
Using Glyphosate-Cancer Litigation, As Well
As Social Media, Intimidation, & Confrontation

 

US District Court  Judges Provide Stage For
Kangaroo Court Justice Over Roundup Herbicide

 

 

[ United States District Court ] Judges provide stage for KANGAROO COURT JUSTICE over Roundup [ herbicide ] in California. 

 

San Francisco area juries have awarded cancer-patients some $80,000,000 each, based on [ false ] claims that the active ingredient in Roundup [ herbicide ], caused their cancer [ ?!?! ]    and that Bayer-Monsanto negligently or deliberately failed to warn consumers that the glyphosate it manufactures is carcinogenic [ ?!?! ]. 

 

 

Glyphosate is NOT a carcinogen.  It has been vindicated and continues to be registered as a successful and safe product.  The US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) has evaluated this herbicide, and has reaffirmed that there is NO RISK to public health when used properly. 

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2019/06/15/update-on-glyphosate-herbicide-us-epa-reaffirms-no-risk-to-public-health-glyphosate-does-not-cause-cancer-2019-04-30/

 

 

[ United States District Court ] Judges reduced the original truly OUTRAGEOUS AWARDS of $289,000,000 and even $1,000,000,000 per plaintiff ! 

 

Meanwhile, UBIQUITOUS ADS are still TROLLING FOR NEW CLIENTS, saying anyone who ever used Roundup, and now has Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, or other cancer, could be the next JACKPOT JUSTICE WINNER. 

 

Mass tort plaintiff law firms have lined up 18,500 additional « corporate victims » for glyphosate-cancer litigation alone. 

 

Introduced in 1974, glyphosate is licensed in 130 countries. 

 

Millions of farmers, home-owners, and gardeners have made it the world’s most widely used herbicide    and one of the most intensely studied chemicals in history. 

 

Four decades and 3,300 studies by respected agencies and organizations world-wide have concluded that glyphosate is SAFE and NON-CARCINOGENIC, based on assessments of actual risk.

 

[ Conversely ], only the France-based International Agency for Cancer Research ( IARC ), says otherwise    and it based its conclusions on [ a mere ] 8 studies. 

 

National regulatory agencies and organizations that have VINDICATED glyphosate include   

 

US Environmental Protection Agency, European Food Safety Authority, European Chemicals Agency, UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Germany’s Institute for Risk Assessment, and Australia’s Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority. 

 

Another reviewer, Health Canada, noted that   

 

NO pesticide regulatory authority in the world considers glyphosate to be a cancer risk to humans at the levels at which humans are currently exposed. 

 

Therefore, NO NEED TO WARN ANYONE. 

 

The National Cancer Institute’s ongoing Agricultural Health Study evaluated 54,000 farmers and commercial pesticide applicators for over two decades    and likewise found NO glyphosate-cancer link.

 

Even worse, International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) MANIPULATED at least some of these studies to CONCOCT the FALSE-CANCER-CLAIMS it wanted. 

 

Subsequent reviews by      Dr Geoffrey Kabat, epidemiologist    Dr Robert Tarone, statistician at National Cancer Institute    Ms Kate Kelland, investigative journalist    Dr David Zaruk, writer at RiskMonger, and other investigators, have demonstrated that the IARC process was TAINTED BEYOND REPAIR.

 

The IARC’s FALSE-CANCER-CLAIMS should NEVER have been allowed in court. 

 

But the [ United States District Court ] Judges in the first three cases let the jackpot-justice plaintiff-lawyers bombard the jury with IARC’s FALSE-CANCER-CLAIMS, and went even further. 

 

 

The false-cancer-claims by the glyphosate-hating International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) are secretive, sloppy, bungled    and perhaps even systematically and deliberately fraudulent.  These IARC claims should never be admitted as evidence in any trial.  Any of IARC’s false-cancer-claims against glyphosate are      such an outlier    so beneath scientific norms    so tainted by conflicts-of-interest and misconduct    so unrelated to actual chemical risks, and    so deceptive and border-line fraudulent. 

 

 

In the Hardeman case, [ United States District Court ] Judge Vincent Chhabria blocked the introduction of EPA analyses that concluded « glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic in humans », based on its careful review of many of the studies just mentioned. 

 

Judge Chhabria said he wanted « to avoid wasting time or misleading the jury, because the primary inquiry is what the scientific studies show, not what the EPA concluded they show ». 

 

However, IARC didn’t do ANY original studies either. 

 

IARC just concluded that glyphosate is Probably Carcinogenic, meaning studies it reviewed found LIMITED EVIDENCE [ ?!?! ] of carcinogenicity in humans, plus SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE [ ?!?! ] of carcinogenicity in lab animals that had been exposed to very high doses or lower doses for prolonged periods of time. 

 

In other words, under conditions that NO animal or NO human would ever be exposed to in the real world.

 

It is also instructive to look at the three San Francisco area glyphosate-cancer trials from another angle    an additional line of questioning that would have put glyphosate and Roundup in a very different light, and might have changed the outcome of these [ glyphosate-cancer kangaroo-trials ].

 

Defense attorneys could have asked   

 

Can you describe your family cancer history ?    your eating, exercise and sleeping habits ?    how much you eat high-fat foods ?    how often you eat fruits and vegetables ?    and your other life-style choices that doctors and other experts now know play significant roles in whether or not people get cancer ?

 

How many times in your life [ Johnson is 47 years old; Hardeman 70; Alva Pilliod 77; Alberta Pilliod 75 ] do you estimate you were exposed to substances on IARC’s list of Group 1Carcinogenic To Humans ?    including sunlight, acetaldehyde in alcoholic beverages, aflatoxin in peanuts, asbestos, cadmium in batteries, lindane    or any of the 125 other substances and activities in Group 1 ?  Have you ever smoked ?  How often have you been exposed to second-hand smoke ?  How often have you eaten bacon, sausage, or other processed meats    which are also in IARC’s Group 1Carcinogenic To Humans ?

 

How many times have you been exposed to any of IARC’s Group 2AProbably Carcinogenic To Humans    not just glyphosate  …  but also anabolic steroids, creosote, diazinon, dieldrin, malathion, emissions from high-temperature food frying, shift work … or any of the 75 other substances and activities in Group 2AProbably Carcinogenic ?  How often have you consumed beef or very hot beverages    likewise in Group 2AProbably Carcinogenic ?

 

How many times have you been exposed to any of IARC’s Group 2BPossibly Carcinogenic To Humans    including bracken ferns, chlordane, diesel fuel, fumonisin, inorganic lead, low frequency magnetic fields, malathion, parathion, titanium oxide in white paint, pickled vegetables, caffeic acid in coffee, tea, apples, broccoli, kale, and other fruits and vegetables  …  or any of the 200 other substances and activities in Group 2BPossible Carcinogens ?

 

Pyrethrin pesticides used by organic farmers are powerful neurotoxins that are very toxic to bees, cats, and fish    and have been linked by EPA and other experts to leukemia and other cancers and other health problems.  How often have you eaten organic foods and perhaps been exposed to pyrethrins ?

 

Large quantities of glyphosate have been manufactured for years in China and other countries.  How do you know the glyphosate you were exposed to was manufactured by Bayer, and not one of them ?

 

In view of all these exposures, please explain how you, your doctors, your lawyers and the experts you consulted concluded that none of your family history    none of your lifestyle choices  …  none of your exposures to dozens or even hundreds of other substances on IARC’s lists of carcinogens    caused or contributed to your cancer    and that your cancer is due solely to your exposure to glyphosate. 

 

Put another way, please explain exactly how you and your experts separated and quantified all these various exposures and life-style decisions    and concluded that Roundup from Bayer-Monsanto was the sole reason you got cancer    and all these other factors played no role whatsoever.

 

News accounts do not reveal whether Bayer-Monsanto lawyers asked these questions    or whether they tried to ask them, but the [ United States District Court ] Judges disallowed the questions. 

 

In any event, the bottom line is this   

 

It is bad enough that the IARC studies at the center of these JACKPOT JUSTICE LAWSUITS are the product of RAMPANT COLLUSION, MISCONDUCT, and even FRAUD, in the way IARC concluded glyphosate is Probably Carcinogenic. 

 

 

The glyphosate-cancer trials have been textbook cases of kangaroo court justice.  With these glyphosate-cancer kangaroo-trials, the legal system will be irretrievably corrupted by this coordinated, well-funded attack by fanatжcs, using using glyphosate-cancer litigation, as well as social media, intimidation, and confrontation.  The false-claim that glyphosate is carcinogenic should NEVER be admitted as evidence in ANY trial.  We must keep fraudulent science out of our courtrooms ! 

 

 

It is worse that these [ glyphosate-cancer kangaroo-trials ] have been driven by plaintiff lawyers’ emotional appeals to jurors’ largely misplaced fears of chemicals and minimal knowledge of chemicals, chemical risks, medicine and cancer    resulting in OUTRAGEOUS AWARDS of $80,000,000 or more.

 

Worst of all, our Federal District Courts have   

 

   Let MISCONDUCT by jackpot-justice plaintiff-lawyers drive these lawsuits. 

 

   PREVENTED defense attorneys from effectively countering IARC’s FALSE-CANCER-CLAIMS against glyphosate and discussing the agency’s GROSS MISCONDUCT. 

 

   BARRED defense attorneys from presenting the extensive evidence that glyphosate is NOT carcinogenic to humans. 

 

The [ glyphosate-cancer trials ] have been textbook cases of KANGAROO COURT JUSTICE.

 

The cases are heading to APPEAL, ultimately to the US Supreme Court. 

 

We can only hope appellate judges will return SANITY, FAIRNESS, and JUSTICE to the nation’s litigation process. 

 

Otherwise, our legal system will be   

 

   IRRETRIEVABLY CORRUPTED.

 

   Products, technologies, companies and industries will likely be DRIVEN OUT OF EXISTENCE, 

 

   FRAUD, EMOTION, and ANARCHY will reign. 

 

 

We must keep FRAUDULENT SCIENCE out of our courtrooms !  

 

 

JACKPOT-JUSTICE LAW FIRMS and their anti-chemical activist allies are already targeting cereals that have « detectable » levels of glyphosate    a few parts per billion or trillion, where 1 ppt is equivalent to 1 second in 32,000 years. 

 

Talc and benzene    foundations for numerous consumer products    are already under attack. 

 

Advanced technology neonicotinoid insecticides could be next.

 

It’s all part of a coordinated, well-funded ATTACK on America using using glyphosate-cancer litigation, as well as social media, intimidation and confrontation. 

 

Our legislatures and courts need to rein it in. 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

The Wisdom Of A REAL Expert

 

Juris Dr Paul K Driessen

 

 

 

Biography

 

 

Paul K Driessen is among several LEADING EXPERTS who have recognized expertise, training, and background in matters concerning pest control products. 

 

He is a Juris Doctor, a leading policy expert on pest control products, and accredited in public relations. 

 

Dr Driessen is senior policy advisor for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow ( CFACT ) and Congress Of Racial Equality, and author of many articles on energy and the environment. 

 

He has degrees in sciences and environmental law. 

 

He is the author of the acclaimed book Eco-Imperialism – Green Power – Black Death. 

 

Dr Driessen speaks out against activists and anti-pesticide prohibitions on a regular basis. 

 

Dr Driessen is among several highly-rated leading experts who have recognized expertise, training, and background in matters concerning pest control products, and who promote environmental realism and pesticide truths.   http://wp.me/p1jq40-8DV  

 

Dr Driessen speaks the truth    and deserves congratulation. 

 

 

 

Here are some examples of Dr Driessen’s wisdom 

 

 

Bee Conspiracy — Chemophobic Anti-Pesticide Groups LINKS

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2013/05/23/bee-colony-collapse-disorder-chemo-phobic-anti-pesticide-groups-want-to-prohibit-neonicotinoid-insecticides-paul-k-driessen-bee-keepers-harm-bees-and-not-pesticides-2013-05-20-13/

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Force-Of-Nature-The-Wisdom-of-Driessen-2013-05-20-13-Myth-BUSTING-Bee-Colony-Collapse-Disorder-pdf.pdf

 

 

Bee Conspiracy — Trouble With Bees Shows How Anti-Pesticide Groups Often Demonize Good Chemicals LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2013/05/14/trouble-with-bees-shows-how-anti-pesticide-groups-often-demonize-good-chemicals-investors-com/

 

 

Environmentalist Fraud & Manslaughter LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2011/02/19/environmentalist-fraud-and-manslaughter/

 

 

Greens Lie, Africans Die LINKS

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Force-Of-Nature-The-Wisdom-of-Driessen-2011-01-14-DDT-and-Politicized-Science-Greens-Lie-Africans-Die-pdf.pdf

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2011/01/14/greens-lie-africans-die-energy-and-environment-right-side-news/

 

 

DDT & Politicized Science In Namibia LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Force-Of-Nature-The-Wisdom-of-Driessen-2010-11-11-DDT-and-Politicized-Science-Namibia-Crichton-Bush-pdf.pdf

 

 

Three Billion Malaria Deaths & Counting LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2010/09/11/3-billion-malaria-deaths-and-counting/

 

 

New York Style Vs The Real Thing With Bedbugs LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2010/08/15/crisis-new-york-style-vs-the-real-thing-editorial/

 

 

The Wisdom Of Paul K Driessen LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/the-wisdom-of-driessen/

 

 

The Wisdom Of Paul K Driessen — Announcement — New Web-Page LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2014/08/06/the-wisdom-of-paul-k-driessen-announcement-new-web-page-2014-08-06/

 

 

The Wisdom Of REAL Experts Who Speak Out Against The Conspiracy To Impose Reckless & Arbitrary Prohibition Against Conventional Pest Control Products LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2014/11/14/the-wisdom-of-real-experts-who-speak-out-against-the-conspiracy-to-impose-reckless-and-arbitrary-prohibition-against-conventional-pest-control-products-2014-11-14/

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

FACTS Regarding Glyphosate

 

 

 

Summary

 

 

A small group of fanatжcal-activists ALARM & ENRAGE the public in order to advance the SUBVERSIVE CONSPIRACY to PROHIBIT against pest control products such as glyphosate herbicide. 

 

Their POLITICIZED-DOCTRINES are also designed to COERCE, INTIMIDATE, & TERRЖRIZE municipal officials into legislating RECKLESS & ARBITRARY PROHIBITION of glyphosate in the urban landscape & in the agriculture industry.  

 

Fanatжcal-activists’ POLITICIZED-DOCTRINES are espoused in media reports, public forums, and on-line web-pages. 

 

They do not know what they are talking about ! 

 

According to Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA )   

 

Health Canada is confident that the pesticides approved for use in Canada, including lawn and garden products, can be used safely when label directions are followed. 

 

[ See link below. ]   

 

Glyphosate, as well as ALL pest control products, has been VINDICATED by Health Canada. 

 

NO ONE should be listening to fanatжcal-activists and their TERRЖR-TALK.   [ See links below. ]     

 

 

 

  FACTS regarding glyphosate when used properly    

 

 

FACT Glyphosate Is Safe, Effective, Economical, & Low-Risk

 

FACT Glyphosate Will NOT Harm The Health Of People

 

FACT Glyphosate Will NOT Harm The Health Of Children

 

FACT Glyphosate Will NOT Cause Cancer

 

FACT Glyphosate Will NOT Harm The Environment

 

FACT Glyphosate Will NOT Harm Bees

 

FACT Glyphosate DOES Belong In The Urban Environment

 

FACT Glyphosate DOES Belong On Farms

 

FACT Glyphosate CANNOT Be Effectively Replaced With Alternatives

 

FACT Glyphosate CANNOT Be Effectively Replaced With Manual Weed Picking

 

FACT Glyphosate Has Been Re-Approved In Europe

 

FACT Comparing Cigarettes To Glyphosate Is Pitifully Ridiculous, As Well As Laughably Stupid

 

FACT Glyphosate Manufacturer Bayer Has Been Repairing Its Reputation

 

FACT Glyphosate Prohibition Will Lead To Failure

 

 

 

Explore the following links   

 

 

Ontario — Because Of Ontario’s Prohibition, The Province Is Living In Environmental Infamy LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/ontario-living-in-environmental-infamy/

 

 

TERRЖR-Talk — Fanatжcal Demands For Municipal Prohibition Against Glyphosate — Chilliwack BC LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2019/09/24/terr%d0%b6r-talk-against-glyphosate-herbicide-fanat%d0%b6cal-demands-for-municipal-prohibition-chilliwack-british-columbia-2019-09-00/

 

 

TERRЖR-Talk — Weasel Words, Green Talk, & Phrases Used By Enviro-Activists LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/terror-talk

 

 

Federal Pesticide Regulation — Mr Lindsay Hanson From The Pest Management Regulatory Agency — Slide Show LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Slide-Show-Health-Canada-Pest-Management-Regulatory-Agency-Hanson-2008-06-09.pdf

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

Does Glyphosate Harm People ?!?!

 

 

 

Summary

 

 

In California, a plaintiff alleged that his cancer was due to exposure to glyphosate, even though that is BIOLOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. 

 

During the kangaroo-trial, the plaintiff’s  manipulated the jury’s emotions by using fake-news about glyphosate in order to score a jackpot $289,999,000 verdict.  [ See link below. ] 

 

Their legal argument trumped scientific evidence and fooled a jury into believing that glyphosate causes harm with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma    which is FALSE. 

 

Even the judge acknowledged that there was NO EVIDENCE OF HARM. 

 

The reason that the jackpot-justice defense-lawyers legal arguments can trump scientific evidence is because we live in a thoroughly post-modern world. 

 

Logic and data have been replaced by emotion and virtue signaling. 

 

The glyphosate-cancer trials have been textbook cases of KANGAROO COURT JUSTICE. 

 

With these kangaroo-trials, the legal system will be IRRETRIEVABLY CORRUPTED by this coordinated, well-funded attack by fanatжcs, using glyphosate-cancer litigation, as well as social media, intimidation, and confrontation. 

 

The false-claim that glyphosate is carcinogenic should NEVER be admitted as evidence in ANY trial. 

 

We must keep FRAUDULENT SCIENCE out of our courtrooms !   

 

According to the scientific evidence, and because it is an herbicide, glyphosate is ONLY toxic to plants. 

 

There is no known biological mechanism by which glyphosate could cause cancer, therefore its carcinogenicity is NOT EVEN theoretically possible. 

 

America will not remain #1 in the world for scientific research if society allows jackpot-justice plaintiff-lawyers to bleed companies dry over crimes they never committed. 

 

World-wide, national regulatory agencies and leading experts have been siding with the overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrating that glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer    there is NO bio-medical and NO epidemiological evidence to support the claim that glyphosate causes cancer. 

 

Do pesticides like glyphosate harm people ?!?!

 

No !

 

Pesticides like glyphosate have been VINDICATED.   [ See links below. ]     

 

What about pesticide bans ?!?! 

 

Do pesticide bans kill people ?!?!

 

YES ! 

 

A man has DIED because of prohibition.   [ See next segment. ] 

 

 

 

Explore the following links   

 

 

Conspiracy Against Glyphosate — $289M Jackpot Verdict That Defies Science LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2018/11/26/conspiracy-against-glyphosate-289m-jackpot-verdict-that-defies-science-the-wisdom-of-the-american-council-on-science-and-health-2018-08-16/

 

 

Vindication — US EPA — Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer, Again LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/09/25/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-again-us-epa-is-successfully-separating-a-health-scare-from-a-health-threat-2016-09-17/

 

 

Vindication — US EPA — Panel Finds Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/05/13/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-us-epa-review-panel-report-has-discredited-iarc-2016-05-03-2/

 

 

Vindication — US National Cancer Institute — Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2017/11/29/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-victory-against-anti-pesticide-terr%D0%B6rists-glyphosate-vindicated-by-us-national-cancer-institute-2017-11-09/

 

 

Lying Sacks Of Crжp — The IARC Glyphosate-Gate LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2018/01/02/lying-sacks-of-cr%D0%B6p-at-iarc-glyphosate-gate-lunat%D0%B6c-liars-blair-portier-lies-scientific-fraud-pays-off-bribery-conspiracy-2017-10-24-22/

 

 

Vindication — Canada — Glyphosate Granted Continued Registration LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2019/01/31/glyphosate-herbicide-health-canada-has-granted-continued-registration-2019-01-11/

 

 

Vindication — Canada — Glyphosate Re-Evaluation Decision LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2017/05/10/glyphosate-herbicide-vindicated-by-health-canada-re-evaluation-decision-the-library-of-victories-against-anti-pesticide-science-hating-fanaticism-2017-04-28/

 

 

Vindication — Canada — Frequently-Asked Questions On Glyphosate LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2017/05/17/update-glyphosate-herbicide-vindicated-by-health-canada-frequently-asked-questions-on-the-re-evaluation-of-glyphosate-the-library-of-updates-warnings-2017-04-28/

 

 

Vindication — Canada — Pesticide Incidents, Including Glyphosate LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2019/08/24/the-wisdom-of-health-canada-incident-reports-2019-08-24/

 

 

Vindication — European Union — Glyphosate Wins Approval For 5 Years LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2017/12/14/glyphosate-vindicated-by-the-european-union-eu-victory-against-anti-pesticide-terr%d0%b6rists-2017-11-27/

 

 

Vindication — European Union — Glyphosate Not Carcinogenic LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2017/04/18/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-glyphosate-vindicated-by-european-chemicals-agencys-echa-committee-for-risk-assessment-rac-victory-against-terrorists-2017-0/

 

 

Vindication — European Union — Glyphosate License Extended For 18 Months LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/07/25/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-be-prohibited-in-the-european-union-victory-against-terrorists-glyphosate-license-extended-for-18-months-real-trends-against-pesticide-bans-2016-06-28/

 

 

Vindication — European Food Safety Authority — Glyphosate Not Likely Carcinogenic LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/01/08/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-the-2015-glyphosate-expert-panel-of-scientists-european-food-safety-authority-efsa-2015-12-08

 

 

Vindication — United Nations — Experts Find Glyphosate Unlikely To Cause Cancer LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/05/21/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-victory-against-terrorists-proposal-for-prohibition-against-glyphosate-herbicide-stopped-in-the-european-union-real-trends-against-pe/

 

 

Vindication — US EPA — No Risk To Public Health With Glyphosate LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2019/06/15/update-on-glyphosate-herbicide-us-epa-reaffirms-no-risk-to-public-health-glyphosate-does-not-cause-cancer-2019-04-30/

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

Man Dies Because Of Prohibition

 

 

 

Summary

 

 

The government of Ontario has imposed its Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act, which is considered as the most extreme ban ever.   [ See link below. ] 

 

That the ban is not only hugely unpopular with Ontario home-owners, it has also proven to be FATAL. 

 

An Ontario resident did not realize that hand-weeding a toxic noxious weed on his property would contribute to his DEATH.   [ See links below. ]   

 

This Ontario resident was ultimately DOOMED by Ontario’s Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act since the safest and most effective method of controlling toxic noxious weeds was arbitrarily and needlessly prohibited by the province. 

 

Skin contact with this toxic noxious weed resulted in severe burns to his hands and arms, eventually forcing him to be hospitalized    ultimately, he DIED. 

 

Unfortunately, since the government IMPOSED its Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act, THE DEATH WAS ONTARIO’S FAULT ! 

 

The hands of the prohibition merchants of death are soaked in blood. 

 

 

 

Explore the following links   

 

 

Man Dies Because Of Prohibition In Ontario LINKS

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2011/07/09/kingston-ontario-man-dies-from-hand-weeding-own-lawn-ontario-pesticide-ban-failure/

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Force-Of-Nature-CARNAGE-2011-07-10-DEATH-PROHIBITION-Man-Dies-Because-of-Prohibition-Ontario-pdf-300-dpi.pdf

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

The Entire Media History

 

 

 

Explore the following web-pages   

 

 

Glyphosate — Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-complete-library-of-victories/

 

 

Glyphosate — The Library Of References LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-references/

 

 

Glyphosate — The Library Of Reports & Blogs LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-reports-blogs/

 

 

Glyphosate — The Library Of Blogs LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-blogs/

 

 

Glyphosate — Scientifically-Safe According To Real Experts LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate/

 

 

 

Explore even more links 

 

 

Glyphosate — Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-complete-library-of-victories/

 

 

Glyphosate — The Library Of Glyphosate References LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-references/

 

 

Glyphosate-Gate — Lunatжc-Liars Blair & Portier — Lies, Scientific Fraud, Pays-Off, Bribery, & Conspiracy LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2018/01/02/lying-sacks-of-cr%D0%B6p-at-iarc-glyphosate-gate-lunat%D0%B6c-liars-blair-portier-lies-scientific-fraud-pays-off-bribery-conspiracy-2017-10-24-22/

 

 

Glyphosate — Fanatжcal Demands For Municipal Prohibition — Comments By TERRЖR-Talkers LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2019/09/24/terr%d0%b6r-talk-against-glyphosate-herbicide-fanat%d0%b6cal-demands-for-municipal-prohibition-chilliwack-british-columbia-2019-09-00/

 

 

Glyphosate — $289M Jackpot Verdict That Defies Science LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2018/11/26/conspiracy-against-glyphosate-289m-jackpot-verdict-that-defies-science-the-wisdom-of-the-american-council-on-science-and-health-2018-08-16/

 

 

Glyphosate — Deranged Lies About School Shootings & Glyphosate LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2019/02/25/the-failure-of-organic-organic-fanat%d0%b6cs-are-deranged-liars-school-shootings-are-caused-by-pesticides-glyphosate-causes-cancer-activists-are-commanded-by/

 

 

Glyphosate — Vindicated By The European Union LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2017/12/14/glyphosate-vindicated-by-the-european-union-eu-victory-against-anti-pesticide-terr%d0%b6rists-2017-11-27/

 

 

Glyphosate — Victories Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrism LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/victories-against-terrorists/

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

WE SPEAK THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT GLYPHOSATE FROM AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE !

 

 

We are the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that conspire to destroy the Green space and other industries ( NORAHG ).  As a non-profit and independent organization, we are environmentalists who are dedicated to reporting about truth-challenged glyphosate-hating fanatжcs ( HUJE ) who conspire to destroy businesses that are dependent on the use of these safe and effective conventional pest control products.  We also report on the work of several highly-rated leading experts who have recognized expertise, training, and background in matters concerning pest control products, and who promote environmental realism and pesticide truths.   https://wp.me/p1jq40-8DV  

 

Not surprisingly, glyphosate-hating fanatжcs have demonstrated that they are incapable of processing overwhelming scientific evidence.  Should we trust these fanatжcs, who conveniently ignore scientific evidence, and attempt to impose their politicized-doctrines and twisted life-style choices against our society ?!?! 

 

NORAHG was the brain-child of Mr William H Gathercole and his colleagues in 1991.  Mr Gathercole is now retired, although his name continues to appear as founder.  We dare to defy the glyphosate-hating fanatжcs by exploring the whole truth from an independent perspective on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site      http://pesticidetruths.com/   If you wish to receive free reports on issues that concern you, please contact us at      force.of.de.nature@gmail.com   WILLIAM H GATHERCOLE AND NORAH G  

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

―――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Uncategorized
https://wp.me/p1jq40-dyQ