THE WISDOM OF CANADIAN CONSUMER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION – THE PUBLIC DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS – ANTI-PESTICIDE POLLS ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Anti-Pesticide Polls are CONCOCTED in order to validate the ARBITRARY PROHIBITION against the use of pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.

 

Anti-Pesticide Polls are NOT TO BE TRUSTED since they are HOPELESSLY BIASED AGAINST PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS. 

 

Such Anti-Pesticide Polls lead to MIS-PERCEPTION about the necessity of PROHIBITION because they are BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY ANTI-PESTICIDE ORGANIZATIONS.

 

These polls have been REPEATEDLY DEBUNKED by legitimate organizations like Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association.

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association ( CCSPA )

 

 

Anti-Pesticide Polls have been DEBUNKED !

 

According to Anti-Pesticide Polls ORCHESTRATED by Anti-Pesticide Activists, 7 of every 10 residents support a PROHIBITION of pest control products.

 

This is WRONG !

 

Anti-Pesticide Polls showing resident-support for the PROHIBITION against pest control products have been DEBUNKED.

 

Such Anti-Pesticide Polls lead to MIS-PERCEPTION about the necessity of PROHIBITION because they are BOUGHT AND PAID FOR by Anti-Pesticide Organizations.

 

Moreover, Anti-Pesticide Activists did NOT like the 2011 poll results that basically and effectively CONTRADICTED their own BOGUS Anti-Pesticide Polls.

 

A MORE LEGITIMATE POLL was conducted by Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association ( CCSPA ) in British Columbia.

 

In 2011, CCSPA conducted a POLL in British Columbia that provided the following conclusions  ―

 

●   The VAST MAJORITY of residents are OPPOSED to the PROHIBITION of conventional pest control products

 

●   The VAST MAJORITY of residents FAVOUR the continued use of pest control products around their homes and in public green spaces

 

●   The VAST MAJORITY of residents said « yes » to  conventional pest control products

 

●   Residents are CONFIDENT they can SAFELY USE pest control products

 

●   Residents see the BENEFITS of pest control products

 

●   There is a MISPERCEPTION that most residents want the PROHIBITION of pest control products in the Urban Landscape

 

●   84 PER CENT of residents WANT INSECT CONTROL on their lawns if products are applied by a Professional Lawn Care company

 

●   70 PER CENT of residents WANT WEED CONTROL on their lawns if products are applied by a Professional Lawn Care company

 

●   Only an INFINITELY SMALL number of residents say « no » to the use of pest control products

 

●   25 PER CENT of residents WANT PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS NO MATTER WHAT

 

●   Residents want to continue to have the option to use pest control products

 

●   Residents SUPPORT THE CONTINUED USE OF PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS in the Urban Landscape

 

 

 

WEB-PAGE  ―  POLLS  ―  CANADIAN CONSUMER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION

 

 

POLL  –  THE PUBLIC REJECTS PESTICIDE BANS  –  THE WISDOM OF CANADIAN CONSUMER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION  –  THE PUBLIC DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2bo

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

The Public DOES NOT WANT Pesticide Bans

 

 

The FRIVOLOUS AND UNENFORCEABLE MUNICIPAL PESTICIDE BANS promoted by the Canadian Cancer Society, Pesticide Free BC, Wildsight, Suzuki, and others, are STARTING TO WEAR THIN ON HOME-OWNERS AND CITY STAFF.

 

Health Canada is known for the MOST STRINGENT PESTICIDE REVIEWS IN THE WORLD, and there is NO NEED TO WORRY ABOUT EXPOSURE TO PESTICIDES. EITHER ON LAWNS OR EVEN IN SWIMMING POOLS when the directions for use are followed.

 

If it is safe to swim and play in a pesticide-treated pool, then it is safe to walk and play on a pesticide-treated lawn.

 

Of all pest control products sold in Canada, MORE THAN 60 PER CENT ARE FOR AGRICULTURE while LESS THAN 2 PER CENT ARE FOR THE DOMESTIC MARKET, which includes the lawn care products.

 

The INFESTATIONS of weeds and bugs is getting UNMANAGEABLE and starting to DETRACT FROM THE HEALTHY COMMUNITY that pesticide-free com-munities thought they were achieving.

 

There are INFERENCES by Anti-Pesticide Activists that Health Canada has fallen asleep at the wheel, and that its extensive and comprehensive reviews of pest control products somehow have no credibility.

 

 

 

REPORT  ―  PROHIBITION STARTING TO WEAR THIN ON HOME-OWNERS AND CITY STAFF

 

 

BRITISH COLUMBIA PESTICIDE BAN — MUNICIPAL BANS STARTING TO WEAR THIN ON HOME-OWNERS & CITY STAFF — SWIMMING POOL & SPA PRODUCTS — SPEAKING OUT — PAUL VISENTIN — 2012 06 22 ( Reports )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Force-Of-Nature-Speaking-Out-2012-06-22-Paul-Visentin-Bans-Starting-To-Wear-Thin-On-Home-Owners-City-Staff-BC-pdf.pdf

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2012/06/25/17618/

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

The Public Does Not Want Pesticide Bans

 

 

The ONLY people who want PESTICIDE BANS are a SMALL GROUP of Anti-Pesticide Lunatics with VESTED INTERESTS IN CONCOCTING IMAGINARY DANGER against pest control products. 

 

Anti-Pesticide POLLS paid for by lunatics in order to validate PROHIBITION appear to have been conducted by DRUNKEN IRRESPONSIBLE DEAD-BEATS.

 

In 2011, one of the principal organizers of the Anti-Pesticide POLLS for Canadian Cancer Society was charged with   ●   impaired operation of a vehicle with « a deadly blood alcohol level »   ●   failing a breath test   ●   failing to remain at the scene of an accident.  ( See later segment. )

 

There is a growing body of evidence that Anti-Pesticide POLLS have NO VALIDITY WHATSOEVER.

 

Anti-Pesticide Lunatics are PUSHING PROHIBITION WITHOUT ANY VALID POLLS.

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Conveniently IGNORING Leading Authorities

 

 

Anti-Pesticide Activists CONVENIENTLY IGNORE the fact that pest control products are HEALTH-CANADA-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC, and CAUSE NO HARM.

 

Anti-Pesticide Activists also CONVENIENTLY IGNORE the expertise of ANY leading authority on matters concerning pest control products.

 

They do so when it suits THEM !

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Scientifically Safe  ―  Agencies

 

 

These LEADING AUTHORITIES are educational, regulatory, research, scientific, and trade agencies from around the world.

 

They are considered as being many or all or the following  …

 

●   Experts

 

●   Highly-Rated

 

●   Independent

 

●   Leaders

 

●   Non-Profit

 

●   Respected

 

●   World-Renowned

 

They have publicly stated that, or have validated the concept that, in one form or another, pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE.

 

These agencies are NOT unduly influenced by any stake-holder in those industries manufacturing and using pest control products.

 

The following educational, regulatory, research, scientific, and trade agencies have CONCLUSIVELY SUPPORTED or VALIDATED the concept that pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE   ―

 

●   American Chemical Society

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Force-Of-Nature-UPDATE-Health-Issues-2011-08-30-Unfounded-Concerns-About-Pesticides-Ames-ACS-pdf-300-dpi.pdf

 

●   American Council for Science and Health

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1XS

 

●   American Cancer Society

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Force-Of-Nature-The-Wisdom-of-Whelan-ACSH-2012-03-30-Myth-BUSTING-Cancer-Rates-Dropping-In-The-U.S.-pdf.pdf

  

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Force-Of-Nature-The-Wisdom-of-Whelan-ACSH-2010-07-08-Cancer-Down-Chemophobia-Up-pdf-300-dpi.pdf

 

●   British Columbia’s Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2c2

 

●   Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association ( CCSPA )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2bo

 

●   Canadian Medical Association  

 

●   CropLife Canada

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2eG

 

●   Environment Alberta  ―  Government of Alberta

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2vo

 

●   Government of Quebec

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Force-Of-Nature-VICTORY-AGAINST-TERRORISTS-Quebec-2011-05-26-Dow-Defeats-Ban-NAFTA-pdf-300-dpi.pdf

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Force-Of-Nature-VICTORY-AGAINST-TERRORISTS-Quebec-2010-02-00-Permitted-Active-Ingredients-History-pdf.pdf

 

●   Health Canada

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1J8

 

●   Institute of Public Affairs  

 

●   International Agency for Research on Cancer  

 

●   Ontario Pesticides Advisory Committee  

 

●   The Fraser Institute

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2bj 

 

●   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

 

●   World Health Organization.

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Who Want This #@!!% BAN NONSENSE ?!?!

 

 

In February 2013, Canadian Association Of Agri-Retailers ( CAAR ) said there is QUESTIONABLE PUBLIC SUPPORT for PROHIBITION against the use of pest control products.

 

If/when ARBITRARY PROHIBITION is IMPOSED, Government Officials do so in DEFIANCE of POLLS that indicate the PUBLIC DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS.

 

The public DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS.

 

The ONLY people who want Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION are a SMALL GROUP of activists with VESTED INTERESTS defended by the IMAGINARY DANGER of pest control products.

 

Manitobans DO NOT WANT THIS BAN NONSENSE.

 

British Columbians DO NOT WANT THIS BAN NONSENSE.

 

Ontarians DO NOT WANT THIS BAN NONSENSE.

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE.

 

 

 

REPORT S ―  CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF AGRI-RETAILERS

 

 

FORCE OF NATURE — MANITOBA CONSPIRACY — 2013 03 23 — STRIKING BACK — PESTICIDE BAN’S FOES GET LOUDER — CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF AGRI-RETAILERS ( CAAR ) — WEED MAN ( Reports )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Force-Of-Nature-Manitoba-Conspiracy-2013-03-23-STRIKING-BACK-Pesticide-Ban%E2%80%99s-Foes-Get-Louder-CAAR-Weed-Man-pdf.pdf

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2013/03/30/manitoba-pesticide-ban-pesticide-bans-foes-get-louder-striking-back-against-anti-pesticide-prohibition-canadian-association-of-agri-retailer-weed-man-2013-03-23/

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2013/03/25/pesticide-bans-foes-get-louder-winnipeg-free-press/

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

British Columbians DO NOT Want This #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

 

In BRITISH COLUMBIA, the public DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS.

 

In 2011, a BC POLL conducted by Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association ( CCSPA ) showed that the VAST MAJORITY of residents are OPPOSED to a PROPOSED ARBITRARY PROHIBITION against the use conventional pest control products, and they actually FAVOUR the continued use of these products around their homes and in public green spaces. 

 

The public in British Columbia DOES NOT SUPPORT A PESTICIDE BAN.

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE.

 

 

 

REPORTS & RESPONSES  ―  POLLS  ―  BRITISH COLUMBIA

 

 

POLL  –  THE PUBLIC REJECTS PESTICIDE BANS  –  BRITISH COLUMBIA  –  MUNICIPAL BANS STARTING TO WEAR THIN ON HOME-OWNERS & CITY STAFF  –  SPEAKING OUT  –  PAUL VISENTIN  –  2012 06 22 ( Reports )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Force-Of-Nature-Speaking-Out-2012-06-22-Paul-Visentin-Bans-Starting-To-Wear-Thin-On-Home-Owners-City-Staff-BC-pdf.pdf

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2012/06/25/17618/

 

 

 

WEB-PAGE  ―  POLLS  ―  CANADIAN CONSUMER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION

 

 

POLL  –  THE PUBLIC REJECTS PESTICIDE BANS  –  THE WISDOM OF CANADIAN CONSUMER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION  –  THE PUBLIC DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2bo

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Ontarians DO NOT Want This #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

 

In ONTARIO, the public DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS.

 

In 2011, an Ontario POLL showed that the public REJECTS PESTICIDE BANS, and MORE THAN HALF of Ontario residents believed that the provincial government DID NOT DO THE RIGHT THING BY IMPOSING AN ARBITRARY PESTICIDE BAN. 

 

Ontario residents WOULD RATHER HAVE THE BAN SCRAPPED OR MODIFIED.  

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE.

 

 

 

WEB-PAGE  ―  POLLS  ―  ONTARIO

 

 

POLL  –  THE PUBLIC REJECTS PESTICIDE BANS  –  ONTARIO  –  POLL REGARDING PROHIBITION  –  2011 00 00 ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3kB

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Manitobans DO NOT Want This #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

 

In MANITOBA, the public DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS.

 

Manitobans DO NOT Want This #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

The public REJECTS Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION in Manitoba. 

 

In February 2013, a POLL conducted by Winnipeg Free Press showed that 60 PER CENT OF THE PUBLIC WERE OPPOSED TO PROHIBITION.

 

In Fall 2012, Professional Lawn Care businesses and clients sent to Manitoba Government Officials the results of a PETITION with 2,500 POST-CARDS OPPOSING A PROPOSED PROHIBITION, which was OVERWHELMING OPPOSITION to Anti-Pesticide Activists who had a MERE 1,000 signatures supporting PROHIBITION, with most signatures ORIGINATING FROM OUTSIDE MANITOBA.

 

The government will have to pry their weed-killers out of their cold, dead hands.

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE.

 

 

 

REPORTS  ―  POLLS  ―  MANITOBA

 

 

POLL  –  THE PUBLIC REJECTS PESTICIDE BANS  –  MANITOBA  –  59 PER CENT AGAINST PESTICIDE BAN  –  SURVEY IS 7 TIMES LARGER BOGUS ORACLE POLL  –  WINNIPEG FREE PRESS  –  2013 02 27 ( Report )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2013/02/27/bogus-oracle-majority-want-ban-poll-gideon-forman-winnipeg-free-press-poll-shows-59-against-pesticide-ban-surveys-7-times-larger/

 

 

POLL  –  THE PUBLIC REJECTS PESTICIDE BANS  –  MANITOBA  –  MOST MANITOBANS SUPPORT BANNING GARDEN, LAWN PESTICIDES ?!?!  –  2013 02 26 ( Report )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2013/02/26/bogus-media-report-gideon-forman-most-manitobans-support-banning-garden-lawn-pesticides-poll-brandon-sun/

 

 

POLL  –  THE PUBLIC REJECTS PESTICIDE BANS  –  MANITOBA  –  THE PUBLIC AND THE PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE INDUSTRY DO NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS  –  2012 09 24 ( Reports )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Force-Of-Nature-Manitoba-Conspiracy-2012-09-24-Lunatic-Infested-Government-Wants-Anti-Pesticide-Prohibition-pdf.pdf

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2012/09/26/manitoba-pesticide-ban-the-public-rejects-prohibition-in-manitoba-theyll-pry-my-weed-killer-out-of-my-cold-dead-hands-lunatic-infested-government-wants-prohibition-in-manitoba/

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

BOGUS Anti-Pesticide Polls

 

 

Since 2008, activists have commissioned several small Anti-Pesticide Polls across Canada.

 

These Anti-Pesticide Polls were ORCHESTRATED by Canadian Cancer Society and other known Anti-Pesticide Terrorist-Organizations that are PAID TO PROMOTE ARBITRARY PROHIBITION.

 

 

ANTI-PESTICIDE & ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-48S

 

 

These Anti-Pesticide Polls were ORCHESTRATED by Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, Canadian Cancer Society, and other known Anti-Pesticide Terrorist-Organizations.

 

These Anti-Pesticide Polls were conducted with SMALL GROUPS of residents.

 

Anti-Pesticide Polls BOUGHT AND PAID FOR by Canadian Cancer Society and other Anti-Pesticide Organizations are NO LONGER considered as legitimate.

 

Not surprisingly, these Anti-Pesticide Polls were declared as BOGUS since they PREDICTABLY indicated that most people favoured a PROHIBITION of conventional pest control products  ―  BIG SURPRISE !

 

Canadian Cancer Society in particular has INCESSANTLY CONSPIRED to ARBITRARILY PROHIBIT pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.

 

Sadly, these polls were commissioned by MISAPPROPRIATING AND SQUANDERING PUBLIC MONEY THAT WAS NOT DONATED FOR THIS PURPOSE.

 

Each poll cost OVER FIFTEEN-THOUSAND-DOLLARS.

 

Observers estimate that ANTI-PESTICIDE ENVIRO-POLLS cost OVER 750,000 DOLLARS.

 

Unfortunately, Anti-Pesticide Organizations are WASTING MONEY AND RESOURCES since pest control products are HEALTH-CANADA-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC, and CAUSE NO HARM.

 

A MORE LEGITIMATE POLL, conducted by Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association ( CCSPA ) in 2011, indicated that the VAST MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS ARE OPPOSED TO THE PROHIBITION of conventional pest control products.

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Do Anti-Pesticide Polls Really Exist ?

 

 

Anti-Pesticide Polls CONCOCTED by Canadian Cancer Society are SKEWED, and the questions are DECEPTIVE in order to get a desired result.

 

Canadian Cancer Society has virtually NEVER released its survey questions to the media, nor any significant details concerning the results.

 

It is POSSIBLE that Canadian Cancer Society DOES NOT actually perform surveys, but merely INVENTS results for its own nefarious purposes.

 

Each poll cost OVER FIFTEEN-THOUSAND-DOLLARS, and perhaps zealous Cancer-Lunatics have found it more EXPIDITIOUS to merely INVENT the poll results in order for them to qualify for PAY-OFFS in the form of AWARDS, INCENTIVES, BONUSES, and BOUNTIES.

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Cannot Trust Canadian Cancer Society

 

 

Anti-Pesticide Polls conducted by Canadian Cancer Society is speaking on behalf of the Anti-Pesticide Organizations that have a VESTED INTEREST in the ARBITRARY PROHIBITION against pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.

 

Canadian Cancer Society is NOT an independent and trustworthy organization.

 

Its Anti-Pesticide polls are NOT TO BE TRUSTED since they are hopelessly biased against pest control products.

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE.

 

 

 

REPORT  ―  POLLS  ―  CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY

 

 

POLL  –  THE PUBLIC REJECTS PESTICIDE BANS  –  CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY  –  DRUNKEN IRRESPONSIBLE DEAD-BEAT POLLSTER PAUL SECCASPINA  –  DRINKING BUDDY OF ANTI-PESTICIDE LUNATIC GIDEON FORMAN  –  2011 09 01 ( Report )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2011/09/01/exposed-paul-seccaspina-oracle-poll-ceo-member-of-friends-of-wind-pollster-for-cancer-society-pesticide-ban-wind-turbines/

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Drunken Dead-Beat Pollster

 

 

The ONLY people who want PESTICIDE BANS are a SMALL GROUP of Anti-Pesticide Lunatics with VESTED INTERESTS IN CONCOCTING IMAGINARY DANGER against pest control products. 

 

Anti-Pesticide POLLS paid for by lunatics in order to validate PROHIBITION appear to have been conducted by DRUNKEN IRRESPONSIBLE DEAD-BEATS.

 

Now, it seems, these Anti-Pesticide Polls were organized by a DRUNKEN IRRESPONSIBLE DEAD-BEAT.

 

In 2011, one of the principal organizers of the Enviro-Polls used by Anti-Pesticide Organizations, including Canadian Cancer Society, was charged with  …

 

●   impaired operation of a vehicle with « a deadly blood alcohol level »

 

●   failing a breath test

 

●   failing to remain at the scene of an accident

 

He was involved in TWO collisions.

 

Half the town was destroyed with his Black Mercedes, and he tried to get away with it.

 

Unfortunately for him, he left his license plate behind at the first crash scene, and disabled his vehicle at the second crash scene.

 

His licence was suspended for 90 days and his vehicle was impounded for seven days.

 

This guy is close buddies with LEADING Anti-Pesticide Activists  …  possibly drinking buddies, like Gideon Forman.

 

These activists and pollsters are not too worried about saving lives or promoting a healthy community.

 

There is a growing body of evidence that Anti-Pesticide POLLS have NO VALIDITY WHATSOEVER.

 

Anti-Pesticide Lunatics are PUSHING ARBITRARY PROHIBITION WITHOUT ANY VALID POLLS.

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE. 

 

 

 

REPORT & WEB-PAGES  ―  POLLS

 

 

PESTICIDE TRUTHS — EXPOSED  –  PAUL SECCASPINA — ORACLE POLL CEO — MEMBER OF FRIENDS OF WIND – POLLSTER FOR CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY — DRINKING BUDDY OF GIDEON FORMAN — 2011 09 01 ( Report )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2011/09/01/exposed-paul-seccaspina-oracle-poll-ceo-member-of-friends-of-wind-pollster-for-cancer-society-pesticide-ban-wind-turbines/

 

 

FORMAN, GIDEON  –  LUNATIC MING THE MERCILESS ENVIRO-TERRORIST ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-29l

 

 

FORMAN, GIDEON  –  REFERENCES FOR LITIGATION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2Wg

 

 

FORMAN, GIDEON  –  SLIDE SHOW  –  PAID-FOR-PROFIT PRESENTATION  –  LIES & MIS-INFORMATION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3oc

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Purpose of Anti-Pesticide Polls

 

 

Anti-Pesticide Terrorist-Organizations used polls to SUBVERT AND POLLUTE the course of events leading to the NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS PROHIBITION of conventional pest control products.

 

The statements and questions within these polls were DECEPTIVELY DESIGNED AND DOCTORED to provide a response that FAVOURED PROHIBITION ! 

 

The statements and questions were more CONCOCTED AS ANTI-PESTICIDE RHETORIC.

 

The PRIMARY PURPOSE of Anti-Pesticide Polls was to COERCE AND INTIMIDATE both the public and Government Officials into supporting ARBITRARY PROHIBITION of pest control products in the Urban Landscape.

 

The SECONDARY PURPOSE of Anti-Pesticide Polls was to DECEIVE AND MIS-INFORM both Government Officials and the public that so-called legitimate alternatives to conventional pest control products were available to control pests in the Urban Environment.

 

Ultimately, these Anti-Pesticide Polls had NO SUBSTANCE AND NO SIGNIFICANCE WHATSOEVER ! 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE.

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Typical Anti-Pesticide Poll Statement  ―  Question No. 1

 

 

TITLE  ―  Cosmetic Use of Pesticides

 

The use of the term COSMETIC implies that the controversy will simply ended with this class of pest control products.

 

In fact, ARBITRARY PROHIBITION will continue with the Golf Industry, the Nursery Industry, and Agriculture Industry.

 

PROHIBITION-TERRORISM WILL NEVER END !

 

STATEMENT  ―  As you may or may not be aware, pesticides may be used to change the appearance of private and public gardens and lawns by controlling such things as unwanted plants and insects.  When pesticides are used in this way, it is referred to as cosmetic use.  Thinking now about your use of pesticides for residential lawn and garden maintenance within the past year, have pesticides been used for cosmetic reasons on your lawn or garden ?

 

QUESTION  ―  If you were provided information on ways to have an attractive lawn and garden without using pesticides, how likely would you be to discontinue the use of pesticides for cosmetic reasons ?

 

The PURPOSE of this so-called question was to make an ANTI-PESTICIDE RHETORIC AGAINST THE USE OF PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS FOR MERE COSMETIC PURPOSES.

 

The phrase UNWANTED PLANTS AND INSECTS was designed to MINIMIZE the perception of pests that are, in fact, DAMAGING AND DESTRUCTIVE.

 

The question IMPLIES that Green Alternatives WERE/ARE available, when, in fact, there were/are NO viable, efficacious, or economical Green Alternatives to replace conventional pest control products. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Typical Anti-Pesticide Poll Statement  ―  Question No. 2

 

 

TITLE  ―  Health Risks Posed by Cosmetic Pesticides

 

The title itself IMPLIES that there is somehow a health risk.

 

POLL STATEMENT  ―  There has been public consultation about banning pesticides for sale and for use on residential lawns and landscape.  Some say these pesticides have the potential to pose health risks to people, while others say these pesticides pose no health risks to people.

 

QUESTION  ―  In your opinion, to what extent do you agree or disagree the cosmetic use of pesticides has the potential to pose health risk to  ―  pets/animals  ―  humans  ―  the environment.

 

The so-called health risk can even apply to something as mundane as water, where people can drown in it.

 

In fact, conventional pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE since they have been scrutinized and approved by the HUNDREDS of expert scientists at Health Canada ! 

 

Overall, when they are used properly, there are NO harmful irreversible effects to health and the environment !

 

The weight of scientific research PROVES that pest control products can be USED SAFELY, and NO HARM WILL OCCUR when pest control products are used according to label directions

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

Typical Anti-Pesticide Poll Statement  ―  Question No. 3

 

 

TITLE  ―  Ban on Cosmetic Pesticides

 

STATEMENT  ―  The government is considering new legislation that would result in a reduction in exposure to pesticides used for cosmetic purposes on lawns and gardens.

 

QUESTION  ―  To what extent do you support or oppose  ―  a ban on the cosmetic use of pesticides on lawns and gardens  ―  a ban on the sale of pesticides for cosmetic use on lawns and gardens.

 

Cute trick !

 

There is NO third option that asked if there was NO SUPPORT FOR PROHIBITION.

 

A MORE LEGITIMATE POLL, conducted by Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association ( CCSPA ), indicated that the VAST MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS ARE OPPOSED TO THE PROHIBITION of conventional pest control products.

 

In fact, the CCSPA-Poll indicates that only an INFINITELY SMALL number of residents say « no » to the use of pest control products, and the VAST MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS ARE OPPOSED TO PROHIBITION of conventional pest control products

 

Moreover, pest control products are HEALTH-CANADA-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, and TOTALLY-IRREPLACEABLE.

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!!% BAN NONSENSE

 

The Fraser Institute

 

 

According to The Fraser Institute, the highly-rated Think-Tank of TRUE EXPERTS, PROHIBITIONS against the use of pest control product are ILL-CONCEIVED and DO NOT accurately reflect the current state of scientific knowledge

 

Also according to The Fraser Institute, HASTY PROHIBITIONS of pest control products SHOULD NOT BE IMPLEMENTED until the underlying science is conclusive, and until a comprehensive analysis of the potential side-effects resulting from the PROHIBITION has been undertaken.

 

Incredibly, some municipalities and provinces ARBITRARILY PROHIBIT pest control products that are, in fact,  …

 

●   Health-Canada-Approved,

 

●   Federally-Legal,

 

●   Scientifically-Safe, and

 

●   Practically-Non-Toxic

 

●   Cause No Harm.

 

Moreover, any PROHIBITION of pest control products is NOT JUSTIFIED because STRICT REGULATIONS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ALREADY PROTECT OUR HEALTH and OUR ENVIRONMENT.

 

 

THE WISDOM OF THE FRASER INSTITUTE ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2bj

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

 

The Wisdom of Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association

 

The NORAHG Library of Force Of Nature Reports

 

 

 

Force Of Nature — The Wisdom of Can. Consumer Specialty Products Assn — 2011 08 17 — Poll Indicates Residents WANT Pesticides — pdf — 300 dpi

 

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Discover What Anti-Pesticide And Enviro-Lunatic Terrorists Are Doing And Saying About Subversively Imposing Their Life-Style Choices Against Our Society

 

 

Read  …  Force Of Nature  ―  The Whole Truth From An Independent Perspective.

 

Communities and businesses are being HARMED and DESTROYED and RAPED by PROHIBITIONS against pest control products used in the Urban Landscape, and by other ACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM.

 

We are living in the 9|11 Era of Anti Pesticide and Environmental Terrorism where at least ONE SUBVERSIVE ACT OF TERROR is perpetrated EVERY SINGLE DAY by these terrorist.

 

We are living in the DARK AGE OF ANTI PESTICIDE TERRORISM where sound science is trumped by FAKE SCIENTISTS, JUNK SCIENCE and UNVERIFIABLE SECRET EVIDENCE through FABRICATION, INNUENDO, and INTERNET RUMOR  ―  scientific research PROVES that pest control products CAUSE NO HARM and can be USED SAFELY.

 

An informed public is better able to protect itself and its communities and businesses from so-called activists who are THE LEAST QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE ANY ADVICE about pest control products or the environment.

 

NORAHG is the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that seek to harm and destroy the Green space industry, and the well being of our communities.

 

NORAHG morally represents the VAST SILENT MAJORITY of people associated with turf and ornamental plant maintenance who are OPPOSED to Anti Pesticide PROHIBITION and the CLOSURE or ABANDONMENT of green spaces under the RIDICULOUS PRETEXT of somehow « saving » the environment.

 

NORAHG is a NATIONAL NON PROFIT NON PARTISAN organization that does not accept money from corporations or governments or trade associations, and represents NO VESTED INTERESTS WHATSOEVER.

 

NORAHG is dedicated to reporting the work of RESPECTED and HIGHLY RATED EXPERTS who promote ENVIRONMENTAL REALISM and PESTICIDE TRUTHS.

 

NORAHG pledges to deliver comprehensive reports that are worthy of peoples’ time and of peoples’ concern, reports that might ordinarily never have breached the parapet.

 

NORAHG was the brainchild of William H. Gathercole and his colleagues in 1991.  Mr. Gathercole is now retired, although his name continues to appear as founder.

 

Force Of Nature was launched by NORAHG for CONTINUOUS transmission on the Internet on January 1st, 2009   ―   however, the VERY FIRST Stand-Alone FORCE OF NATURE Report was issued on September 19th, 2008.

 

On January 1st, 2009, Force Of Nature Reports were launched for CONTINUOUS transmission on the Internet   ―   however, the VERY FIRST Stand-Alone Force Of Nature Report was issued on September 19th, 2008.

 

On March 15th, 2010, Uncle Adolph independently launched The Pesticide Truths, an easy-to-use Web-Site that collects relevant reports of information right-off-the-press.

 

Pesticide Truths and Force Of Nature, in some ways, are like Google for everything concerning the SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES of Anti-Pesticide and Enviro-Lunatic Terrorists.

 

For The Complete Library of Force Of Nature and A LOOK AT Reports & References, go to the following web-page  …

 

 

THE COMPLETE LIBRARY OF REPORTS & REFERENCES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2rr

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

NORAHG has archived more information on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site  …

 

 

THE PESTICIDE TRUTHS WEB-SITE

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/

 

 

PESTICIDE BANS ARE A FARCE ( Report )

 

http://wp.me/p1jq40-4mS

 

 

REAL TRENDS AGAINST PESTICIDE BANS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1JO

 

 

CARNAGE CREATED BY CATASTROPHIC ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION  –  MAIN WEB-PAGE

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-5On

 

 

THE COST OF PESTICIDE BANS ( Report )

 

http://wp.me/p1jq40-6h1

 

 

ATTACKS AGAINST GOLF FACILITIES ( Report )

 

http://wp.me/p1jq40-6sN

 

 

MYTHS ABOUT BANNING PESTICIDES  –  LEADING SCIENTIFIC HEALTH AND POLICY EXPERTS ( White Paper )

 

http://wp.me/p1jq40-5DD

 

 

2,4-D HERBICIDE ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1J8

 

 

COMPLAINT CHANNELS  –  COMPLAIN ABOUT THE ANTI-PESTICIDE LUNATICS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1PE

 

 

PESTICIDE LINKS ( Web-Page )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/pesticide-qa-links/

 

 

THE COMPLETE LIBRARY OF REPORTS & REFERENCES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2rr

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

 

69 comments on “THE WISDOM OF CANADIAN CONSUMER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION – THE PUBLIC DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS – ANTI-PESTICIDE POLLS ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED