Summary
On June 24th, 2014, a non-expert assessment by International Union for the Conservation of Nature ( IUCN, a.k.a. Task Force On Systemic Pesticides ), an anti-pesticide & environmental-terrorist organization, alleged that neonicotinoid insecticides MAY be responsible for so-called bee colony collapse disorder. In fact, this Task Force practices activist science, and NOT real science. Its assessment prioritizes politics rather than evidence, and is NOT reliable for risk assessments, policy-making, or media attention. It is clear that IUCN is deceiving the public about neonicotinoid insecticides with a mere bee conspiracy terrorist campaign of fraudulent lies and deception. In essence, IUCN has been easily discredited since its assessment is merely an amateurish attempt to perform pesticide research. Its findings could not even be published in any peer-reviewed and legitimate scientific journal. IUCN even refuses to publish the list of so-called scientists belonging to its Task Force On Systemic Pesticides. The IUCN Task Force assessment of neonicotinoid insecticides is NOT science, but the conjuring up of carefully chosen and contrived data to fit the objective of prohibiting against these products. IUCN does NOT know what scientific integrity means ! No credible legitimate researcher starts with a campaign strategy, and then conjures up some evidence as an afterthought to fit the activist attack campaign. The IUCN anti-neonicotinoid campaign is lacking in integrity, and it is detrimental to the reputation of legitimate researchers the world over, which IUCN-activists are quite happy to decimate for a chance to play politics. That is not science ! IUCN-activists think they can just keep attacking neonicotinoid insecticides until manufacturers will just give up and let them win. That is narrow-minded and disgusting. Manufacturers are forced to lobby when IUCN activist-scientists conjure up evidence in an attempt to damage the reputation or sales of their products, technologies, or business. Manufacturers like Syngenta and Bayer Crop Science are doing what they can to defend neonicotinoid insecticides, not because it is a game to them, but because they know the value of these products, and understand how safe they are. When manufacturers believe their products are safe, beneficial, and irreplaceable, they will do what they can to defend it. Since farmers will always need to protect their crops, these companies could just as easily make profits selling older and more toxic products. IUCN’s activist-scientists think that their noble quest to save the bees makes them impervious to judgment, or needing to behave acceptably. IUCN’s activist-scientists somehow do not understand that their behaviours are deceptive, unethical, and damaging to the reputation of real science.
――――――――――――――――――――
IUCN Is Deceiving The Public
About Neonicotinoid Insecticides
The IUCN Assessment Is
Merely An Amateurish Attempt
To Perform Pesticide Research
The IUCN Assessment Has Been
Discredited Since Its Finding Could
Not Even Be Published In Any
Peer-Reviewed And Legitimate
Scientific Journal
――――――――――――――――――――
Bee Conspiracy Terrorists UNMASKED ― Overview From An Independent Perspective
Fraudulent Non-Expert IUCN Task Force Assessment
On June 24th, 2014, a NON-EXPERT assessment by International Union for the Conservation of Nature ( IUCN, a.k.a. Task Force On Systemic Pesticides ), an Anti-Pesticide & Environmental-Terrorist Organization, FALSELY ALLEGED that Neonicotinoid Insecticides MAY be responsible for so-called Bee Colony Collapse Disorder.
This assessment by IUCN was DISCREDITED, but, unfortunately has been FRAUDULENTLY USED by Bee Conspiracy Terrorists in their CONSPIRACY to RECKLESSLY AND ARBITRARILY IMPOSE PROHIBITION against Neonicotinoid Insecticides !
In fact, IUCN provides NO valid reasons for PROHIBITION.
If we had less conventional neonicotinoid use in the environment, WE WOULD STILL HAVE Bee Colony Collapse Disorder, because MANY BEE-KEEPERS ARE SIMPLY NOT COMPETENT TO MANAGE THEIR HIVES AND AVOID BEE LOSSES.
The assessment by IUCN CONCOCTS THE STORY that there is some kind of bee crisis.
It is ABUNDANTLY CLEAR that there is NO BEE CRISIS since science and statistics DO NOT SUPPORT DEMANDS TO PROHIBIT against Neonicotinoid Insecticides.
NO ONE at IUCN has ANY background, training, or education in matters concerning Neonicotinoid Insecticides.
The assessment by IUCN is VALUELESS AND WORTHLESS.
IUCN’s DEMANDS FOR PROHIBITION will NEVER LEAD TO A RESOLUTION of so-called Bee Colony Collapse Disorder.
The assessment by IUCN is DESIGNED TO ALARM AND ENRAGE the public, and Government Officials, into arriving at INAPPROPRIATE CONCLUSIONS against Neonicotinoid Insecticides.
Clearly, the principal mandate of IUCN is to ATTRACT MORE MEMBERS with its FRAUDULENT assessment, as well as MORE DONATIONS and MORE PROFIT.
Neonicotinoid Insecticides CAUSE NO HARM, and WILL NOT HARM BEES.
IUCN ― BLOG, REPORTS, OFFICIAL DOCUMENT, & VIDEO RECORDING
FORCE OF NATURE — IUCN — 2014 06 28 — NORAHG RESPONDS AGAINST SIERRA CLUB’S FRAUDULENT USE OF NON-EXPERT IUCN REPORT ( Blog )
PESTICIDE TRUTHS — IUCN — 2014 06 24 — CALLS FOR INTERNATIONAL BAN AGAINST NEONICOTINOID INSECTICIDES — INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE CONSERVATION OF NATURE ( IUCN ), JUST ANOTHER LUNATIC ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORIST ORGANIZATION — INSECTICIDES « ARE POISONING WORLD FOOD SUPPLIES » ?!?! — SIERRA CLUB & IUCN BOTH PART OF THE SAME LUNATIC CLUB ( Report, Official Documents, & Video Recording )
PESTICIDE TRUTHS — SIERRA CLUB — 2014 06 23 — LUNATIC WORLD-WIDE INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT ON SYSTEMIC PESTICIDES — INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE CONSERVATION OF NATURE ( IUCN ), JUST ANOTHER LUNATIC ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORIST ORGANIZATION — SIERRA CLUB & IUCN BOTH PART OF THE SAME LUNATIC CLUB ( Official Documents, Scribd )
https://www.scribd.com/doc/231137862/Task-Force-on-Systemic-Pesticides-2014-June23-Sierra-Club-Wiamb
PESTICIDE TRUTHS — IUCN — 2011 03 00 ( 2014 10 20 ) — TASK FORCES ARE NOT OPEN TO ALL MEMBERS, BUT BY INVITATION ONLY ( Report )
FORCE OF NATURE — IUCN — 2014 08 02 — RESPONDING AGAINST SCREECHING MONKEYS — THE AMATEURISH & DISCREDITED IUCN ASSESSMENT BY FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ( FOE ) ( Blog )
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
Bee Conspiracy Terrorist
Campaign Of Lies & Deception
An Exposé Into
Anti-Neonicotinoid
Terrorist Science
IUCN’s Anti-Neonicotinoid
Lunatic-Activist
Strategy Document
December 2nd, 2014
The Risk Monger Blog & BlogActiv
Selected And Adapted Excerpts
[ BlogActiv Team update ― This blog post has been modified by the Risk-Monger following a complaint by Dr Jean-Marc Bonmatin, Researcher, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. A further reaction by the Risk-Monger can be found at the bottom of this page. ]
――――――――――――――――――――
Bee Conspiracy Terrorists UNMASKED
IUCN’s Anti-Neonicotinoid Lunatic-Activist Strategy Document
The Risk-Monger recently came across an IUCN LUNATIC-ACTIVIST STRATEGY DOCUMENT carelessly left on-line by lunatic-activist-scientists that lies at the heart of the FOUNDING of the IUCN Task Force On Systemic Pesticides.
The STRATEGY DOCUMENT spells out a rather DISTASTEFUL ANTI-NEONICOTINOID CAMPAIGN STRATEGY LACKING IN SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY.
This type of ANTI-PESTICIDE CAMPAIGN has been tried and tested before by lunatic-activists, but their behaviour has NEVER BEEN SO CLEARLY ARTICULATED IN WRITING.
I thought this IUCN LUNATIC-ACTIVIST STRATEGY DOCUMENT should be shared so we know the type of RECKLESS LUNATICS are standing behind THE SO-CALLED SCIENCE OF DEFENDING THE BEES.
How did this story unfold ?
According to the IUCN LUNATIC-ACTIVIST STRATEGY DOCUMENT ―
• Under the auspices of the IUCN, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, a group of lunatic-activists ( a.k.a. enviro-terrorists ) MAP OUT A FOUR-YEAR BEE CONSPIRACY TERRORIST CAMPAIGN STRATEGY TO ATTACK THE PESTICIDE INDUSTRY and SEEK THE PROHIBITING OF NEONICOTINOID INSECTICIDES.
• The idea is to COLLECT LIKE-MINDED LUNATIC-RESEARCHERS, get FUNDING to set up a task-force to ATTACK Neonicotinoid Insecticides using the IUCN as a base with World Wildlife Fund ( or some other non-government ( anti-pesticide terrorist ) organization, NGO ) doing the lobbying.
• Once funding is in place for the campaign organization, start the research, WRITE A MAIN HIGH-IMPACT ANTI-NEONICOTINOID PUBLICATION, and get a few other articles published ( find some big names to use ).
• On that basis, ORGANISE A BROADER BEE CONSPIRACY TERRORIST CAMPAIGN ( with the support of several high-impact lunatic-specialists in public relations ) to promote their anti-neonicotinoid publication.
• Brace for reactions and blow-back from other scientists and industry.
――――――――――――――――――――
Bee Conspiracy Terrorists UNMASKED ― IUCN’s Anti-Neonicotinoid Lunatic-Activist Strategy Document
IUCN Lacking In Integrity With Its Campaign
One little issue to note ―
No Credible Scientist Starts
With A Campaign Strategy,
And Then Conjures Up Some
Evidence As An Afterthought
To Fit The Activist Agenda
That Is Not Science !
This type of ANTI-NEONICOTINOID CAMPAIGN is LACKING IN INTEGRITY, and it is DETRIMENTAL TO THE REPUTATION OF LEGITIMATE RESEARCHERS THE WORLD OVER, which this band of IUCN-terrorists were quite happy to decimate for a chance to play politics.
IUCN-terrorists were also MORE SUCCESSFUL than they would have ever have imagined, by getting Neonicotinoid Insecticides PROHIBITED in the European Union 16 months ahead of their strategic plan.
The Risk-Monger would like to examine the IUCN LUNATIC-ACTIVIST STRATEGY DOCUMENT, and consider why it not only LACKS SCIENTIFIC BEST PRACTICES, but also why policy-makers should RUN CLEAR OF USING THIS CONTRIVED RESEARCH AS EVIDENCE.
The story starts in 2010 during a meeting of lunatic-activist-scientists at the IUCN offices in Switzerland ―
On the 14th June 2010, Prof Goeldlin and Dr Bijleveld met in Switzerland with Dr Simon Stuart, Chairman of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and Ir Piet Wit, Chairman of the IUCN Ecosystems Management Commission.
Based on the results of the meeting in Paris, the following was agreed that the FOUR KEY [ CONTRIVED ] RESEARCH PAPERS will be published in peer-reviewed journals.
Building on these papers a research paper will be submitted to Science ( first choice ) or Nature ( second choice ) which would introduce new analyses and findings across the scientific disciplines to DEMONSTRATE AS CONVINCINGLY AS POSSIBLE the IMPACT of NEONICOTIONOIDES ( sic ) on insects, birds, other species, ecosystem functions, and human livelihoods.
So, these lunatic-scientists, who cannot even spell « Neonicotinoid Insecticides », are planning to CONCOCT new research and findings that will « demonstrate, as convincingly as possible, » that Neonicotinoid Insecticides are a RISK. [ ?!?! ]
A RISK TO WHAT ?!?!
TO ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING THESE LUNATIC-SCIENTISTS CAN FIND ?!?!
The Goal Is Not Science Here,
But To Conjure Up Some Evidence To
Fit The Objective Of PROHIBITING
Against Neonicotinoid Insecticides
A CREDIBLE SCIENTIST would do research, gather evidence, and draw conclusions.
A lunatic-activist-scientist would START WITH A DOGMATIC CONCLUSION, and LOOK FOR THE EVIDENCE TO PROVE A POLITICAL POINT.
The IUCN LUNATIC-ACTIVIST STRATEGY DOCUMENT continues ―
This high-impact paper would have a carefully selected first author, a core author team of 7 people or fewer ( including the authors of the initial four papers ), and a broader set of authors to give global and inter-disciplinary coverage.
A significant amount of the [ CONTRIVED ] supporting evidence will be in the official Supporting On-Line Material accompanying the paper.
A parallel « sister » paper ( this would be a shorter Policy Forum paper ) could be submitted to Science simultaneously, drawing attention to the policy implications of the other paper, and calling for a MORATORIUM [ a.k.a. PROHIBITION ] IN THE USE AND SALE OF NEONICOTINOID PESTCIDES ( sic ).
We would try to pull together some major names [ OF LUNATIC-ACTIVIST-SCIENTISTS ] in the scientific world to be authors of this [ CONTRIVED ] paper.
So, after CONJURING UP SOME EVIDENCE, this activist group of lunatic-researchers would then select a few big names to pose as authors.
For those readers who had assumed that scientists worked on the material that they published in peer review journals, well, they actually do.
These are not real scientists, but what the Risk-Monger, in a previous blog, has dubbed « activist-scientists » whose antics, whether it is on endocrine disruption, GMOs, chemicals, or this subject, Neonicotinoid Insecticides, is NOT AT ALL CREDIBLE OR SCIENTIFIC.
Their plans to pull together some major names for a Policy Forum paper ( which their friends at Science will also apparently gladly publish ) …
• are NOT intended to advance the body of research in the field of Neonicotinoid Insecticides
• are NOT intended to further scientific discovery
• are NOT intended to enhance knowledge and human understanding
Those would all be noble scientific objectives.
Rather, the goal is to call « for a moratorium [ a.k.a. PROHIBITION ] in the use and sale of neonicotinoid pesticides ».
That Is Not Science At All !
That Is Politics !
And IUCN’s Lunatic-Activist-Scientists
Somehow Do Not Understand That
Such Behaviour Is Deceptive, Unethical,
And Damaging To The Reputation Of Science
By the way, the journal Science did NOT fall for this IUCN NONSENSE, and did NOT publish it ― nor did Nature.
I really wish that someone made this text up as a joke, but this IUCN STRATEGY DOCUMENT came off of the web-site of one of its lunatic-activist-scientists, Henk Tennekes.
As I suspect, they will quickly take this STRATEGY DOCUMENT off-line.
There is NO « For Internal Use Only » label anywhere on the STRATEGY DOCUMENT, so the Risk-Monger recognized it as a public document.
Why Tennekes felt it practical to leave such evidence on the Internet quite simply baffles me.
Do IUCN’s Lunatic-Activist-Scientists Think That Their
Noble Quest To Save The Bees Makes Them Impervious
To Judgment, Or Needing To Behave Acceptably ?
Do They Get, At All, What Scientific Integrity Means ?
The generals in the war-room continue their LUNATIC-ACTIVIST STRATEGY ―
If we are successful in getting these two papers published, there will be enormous impact, and a campaign led by WORLD WILDLIFE FUND etc could be launched right away.
It will be much harder for politicians to ignore a research paper and a Policy Forum paper in Science.
So once the CAREFULLY CHOSEN AND CONTRIVED DATA is published, we BRING IN THE ATTACK DOGS TO HIT THOSE BASTERDS HARD.
Since this was a meeting at the IUCN, the weapon of choice was obvious ― their DAUGHTER NON-GOVERNMENT ( TERRORIST ) ORGANIZATION LOBBYING GROUP, WORLD WILDLIFE FUND ( WWF ).
One of the two authors of this strategy document, Maarten Bijleveld, also happened to be a founding member of WORLD WILDLIFE FUND in the Netherlands.
It must have disappointed him to no end that WORLD WILDLIFE FUND decided to pass on such a salacious bone, but I suppose after the IPCC Himalaya-gate, WORLD WILDLIFE FUND also have to vet whom they refer to as scientists.
The IUCN, however, did not give this activism a pass, and it should be noted that while they PRETEND TO BE THE CREDIBLE VOICE OF INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION, the IUCN’s support of such a mercenary band of anti-scientific lunatic-activists shows THEY ARE AS MUCH A PIG IN THE MUD as Greenpeace or Friends Of The Earth.
It all comes down to winning the lobbying campaign, as the next part of the IUCN LUNATIC-ACTIVIST STRATEGY DOCUMENT demonstrates ―
The most urgent thing is to obtain the necessary policy change to have these pesticides PROHIBITED, not to start a campaign.
A stronger scientific basis for the campaign will hopefully mean a shorter campaign.
In any case, this is going to take time, because THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY WILL THROW MILLIONS INTO A LOBBYING EXERCISE.
This is the TRIED AND TESTED ACTIVIST TECHNIQUE ( think Séralini on GMOs ).
If You Want To Win A Campaign,
First Go Out And Create Some Science
If You Can Get A Few Big Names
To Support Your Science, It Makes
The Campaign Shorter And More Successful
What infuriates the Risk-Monger is how NAÏVE their view of the chemical industry is.
This is NOT A GAME, and their ideas on how they can win are IRRESPONSIBLE AND OFFENSIVE.
That industry will just throw millions of dollars into a lobbying exercise ( like it is nothing and there is no point to it all ) is TRULY RIDICULOUS.
If the chemical industry has a product or substance with weak science or a poor sustainability record, they will not throw millions at it ― they will abandon it.
The Chemical Industry Is Forced To Lobby
When Lunatic-Activist-Scientists Like Those At IUCN
Conjure Up Evidence In An Attempt To Damage
The Reputation Or Sales Of Their Products,
Technologies, Or Business
When Companies Believe Their Products Are
Safe, Beneficial, And Irreplaceable,
They Will Do What They Can To Defend It
At Solvay, we « threw millions » at defending chlorine because we knew it was safe, has saved billions of lives ( look at how it has been used to stop the spread of Ebola today ), and has done an enormous amount of good for society.
That Lunatic-Activists Think They Can Just
Keep Attacking These Products Or Substances
Until Companies Just Give Up And Let Them Win
That Is Narrow-Minded And Disgusting
Syngenta And Bayer Crop Science Are Doing What
They Can To Defend Neonicotinoid Insecticides,
Not Because It Is A Game To Them,
But Because They Know The Value Of These Products,
And Understand How Safe They Are
Since Farmers Will Always Need To Protect
Their Crops, These Companies Could Just As Easily
Make Profits Selling Older And More Toxic Products
Just ask the farmers in the United Kingdom, who have LOST a considerable amount of their oil-seed rape crop in the first year of the Anti-Neonicotinoid PROHIBITION, if they think this is simply a lobbying exercise !
IT IS NOT A GAME NOR AN EXERCISE ( except, perhaps, to these lunatic-activist-scientists ).
The IUCN LUNATIC-ACTIVIST STRATEGY DOCUMENT concludes ―
In order to prepare for the paper to be submitted to Science it is necessary to plan it simultaneously with the first four more detailed papers ( to be sure that the first four papers do not unintentionally undermine the proposed high-impact one ).
A small meeting is therefore needed to do the necessary planning including the authors of the first four papers, David Gibbons/Mark Avery, Maarten Bijleveld, Pierre Goeldlin, the IUCN SSC and CEM Chairs ( or their designates ) and one or two people experienced in high-impact publishing ( such as Ana Rodriguez ).
Pierre Goeldlin / Maarten Bijleveld
Notre Dame de Londres/ Clarens, 15th July 2010
In TRADITIONAL RESEARCH PROCESSES, evidence is gathered and then published, read in journals by scientists, and cited in other works to help advance the scientific body of knowledge.
This is NOT the case at International Union for the Conservation of Nature ( IUCN, a.k.a. Task Force On Systemic Pesticides ).
――――――――――――――――――――
Bee Conspiracy Terrorists UNMASKED ― IUCN’s Anti-Neonicotinoid Lunatic-Activist Strategy Document
IUCN Public Relations Hacks
In IUCN RESEARCH PROCESSES, lunatic-activist-scientists directly employ people experienced in HIGH-IMPACT PUBLISHING ― in other words, IUCN EMPLOYS PUBLIC RELATION HACKS !
Ana Rodriguez was apparently not available or interested, to be a PUBLIC RELATIONS HACK, so perhaps she referred IUCN to ANOTHER HACK, communications lunatic Laura Maxim.
Laura Maxim is NOT EVEN a bee scientist, but she seems to have been prolifically publishing papers on bees with other lunatic-activist-scientists since 2010.
One of Laura Maxim’s unique lunatic achievements has been serving as co-author with Jeroen Van der Sluijs ( another lunatic, and head of the so-called scientific committee of the IUCN Task Force On Systemic Pesticides, although himself, also, NOT a bee scientist ) on the chapter on the threat to bees in the European Environment Agency’s second volume of Late Lessons from Early Warnings.
Mystifying !
The second IUCN PUBLIC RELATIONS HACK to serve the Bee Conspiracy Terrorists is none other than Mirella von Lindenfels, one-time lunatic media head for Greenpeace, who now runs a communications public relations firm out of the United Kingdom.
Mirella von Lindenfels was the one employed to set up the communications platform and the launch of the IUCN Task Force On Systemic Pesticides back in June 2014.
If the name Mirella von Lindenfels sounds familiar to the readers of this blog, it might be worth going back a few years when she was responsible for setting up another ACTIVIST SCIENCE FRONT GROUP known as IPSO ― the International Programme on the State of the Oceans.
In 2011, Mirella von Lindenfels was supporting a renegade activist-scientist who wanted to build up an international sounding scientific body, but when she published the names of the 26 international scientists, the Risk-Monger and other bloggers discovered that very few of them were actually scientists ( although several of them were affiliated with IUCN ).
This time around, Mirella von Lindenfels learnt her lesson, and is NOT PUBLISHING THE LIST OF LUNATIC-SCIENTISTS belonging to the IUCN Task Force On Systemic Pesticides.
I have written to her office and to the IUCN to get a copy of the member list.
Neither has replied to my request.
Canny ?
Yes.
Transparent ?
No.
And this is how, in 2010, the IUCN Task Force On Systemic Pesticides began.
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
Bee Conspiracy Terrorists UNMASKED ― IUCN’s Anti-Neonicotinoid Lunatic-Activist Strategy Document
Restore Credibility for Science
The Risk-Monger is QUITE ALARMED to see lunatic-activist-scientists behaving in such a manner, and is calling for the following ―
• These lunatic-activist-scientists should be OSTRACIZED from the scientific community. Journals should REFUSE to accept papers for peer review submitted with the names of these campaigners.
• Scientific bodies and academies NEED TO BE MORE DILIGENT in policing non-scientific activities of their members. Their campaigning only hurts the credibility of such scientific bodies and journals who publish them and must be sanctioned.
• We have to be aware that ACTIVIST SCIENCE ( research that prioritizes politics rather than evidence ) is NOT RELIABLE FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS, POLICY-MAKING, OR MEDIA ATTENTION. Once brandished as ACTIVIST SCIENCE, the data and information should be RE-CATEGORISED AS POLITICS and not science. If industry scientists are excluded for lacking objective neutrality, then excluding such lunatic-activists is a no-brainer.
• There is, now more than ever, the need to restore the post of Chief Scientific Adviser in the European Commission. The role of Anne Glover was to sort out the policy lunatic-activists from the credible scientists before they can influence policymakers. That she did not give in to the lunatic-activist-scientists malicious personal campaign tactics had no doubt caused her a lot of personal grief.
• Policy-makers need to go back and assess where their decisions may have been contaminated by activist science and rectify it, whether it is at the IPCC ( eg, Himalaya-gate ), GMOs or the PROHIBITION against Neonicotinoid Insecticides. In the United States, many lunatic-activists and several congressmen are citing this IUCN Task Force On Systemic Pesticides as the basis for a similar PROHIBITION against Neonicotinoid Insecticides. They cannot be serious !
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
Bee Conspiracy Terrorists UNMASKED ― IUCN’s Anti-Neonicotinoid Lunatic-Activist Strategy Document
The Ethical Challenge
Unlike credible researchers who follow guidelines based on Good Laboratory Practice ( GLP ) or industry scientists, who, on top of GLP, follow industry-wide codes of ethical conduct, these lunatic-activist-scientists DO NOT FEEL COMPELLED TO BEHAVE IN AN ETHICAL MANNER.
The Risk-Monger has been calling long and hard on Non-Government ( Terrorist ) Organizations to join the civilised world and impose ethical rules on the behaviour of their campaigners and scientists.
They must not lie.
They must not falsify evidence.
They must accept facts.
They must behave responsibility.
They absolutely WILL NOT, as they feel that their beliefs in saving the planet override any need to respect basic principles of humanity.
But in the QUESTIONABLE BEHAVIOUR of the founding members of the IUCN Task Force On Systemic Pesticides, humanity should ask whether they, in turn, deserve respect.
――――――――――――――――――――
Bee Conspiracy Terrorists UNMASKED ― IUCN’s Anti-Neonicotinoid Lunatic-Activist Strategy Document
Addendum ( added 3 December 2014 )
A Public Apology To Jean-Marc Bonmatin
Dear Dr Bonmatin
EurActiv has forwarded your charges of criminal proceedings against me for the above blog which you have deemed personally insulting and also insulting to your employers. I have forwarded them to my lawyer and he was rather confused, given that, as a blog covering the history of the formation of the IUCN task force, you were not involved, nor were you mentioned in the exposé I have written, nor have I insulted your employer ( although to your request, I removed the name of your organization as an act of good faith ) ― I have no idea what the other organization is, but as you say you are an expert tied to them, apparently my actions have also insulted them and they are also joining in said criminal proceedings. My lawyer feels that I do not need to remove the blog ( BlogActiv asked me to soften the language a bit, which I had done ), but that I should, in any case, make a public apology for any insult you may have suffered from my analysis of a 2010 document. I am sorry, and in my next blog, I promise not to assess your scientific qualifications as part of the analysis of the IUCN taskforce, you have demonstrated in your letter ( which out of respect to you, I will not publish ) that you are clearly a credible scientist. I regret that you had inferred from my analysis of a document you were not involved in, that I was questioning your research.
As a point of mutual respect, I hope you agree with me that debates should never be behind closed doors ( whether it is from activists or industry lobbyists ). Having the debate about whether the IUCN taskforce has gathered the best scientists in the field should not be done in a courtroom nor in a backroom political situation. I would therefore like to invite you to come to Brussels to debate me or others about your science, in the Parliament or my university or at an non-government organization office. You can also express your views about the above strategy document ― I welcome your views on other points as well ( like a Chief Scientific Adviser or an activist code of ethics ) ― the Risk-Monger concept is based on the idea that debate sometimes needs to be provoked, and if you disagree with me, that is wonderful ― if I can strengthen your arguments against me by being a focal point, then the chief goal of dialogue has been attained. Going to a lawyer to try to shut me up is, I hope you can agree, Dr Bonmatin, not a very efficient form of dialogue. A little while ago, you had declared Neonicotinoid Insecticides to be the new DDT. I am sure you would not want the lawyers from Syngenta and BayerCropScience to engage in a similar form of dialogue with you.
Looking forward to meeting you in public for a robust debate.
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
Response To The Risk-Monger Blog By Uncle Adolph
Great work.
Here are some links to IUCN info that may come in handy for you ―
• Dr. Maarten Bijleveld
• Jeroen van der Sluijs
• Ottawa River Institute ( Ontario, Canada )
• Sierra Club Richard Cellarius talks about IUCN committee opportunities
• Task Force Invitation Only
See links below.
PESTICIDE TRUTHS — IUCN — 2014 11 11 — DR MAARTEN BIJLEVELD — OTTAWA RIVER INSTITUTE — CHAIR OF IUCN TASK FORCE ON SYSTEMIC PESTICIDES ( Report With Official Documents & Video Recording )
PESTICIDE TRUTHS — IUCN — 2014 06 24 — CALLS FOR INTERNATIONAL BAN AGAINST NEONICOTINOID INSECTICIDES — INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE CONSERVATION OF NATURE ( IUCN ), JUST ANOTHER LUNATIC ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORIST ORGANIZATION — INSECTICIDES « ARE POISONING WORLD FOOD SUPPLIES » ?!?! — SIERRA CLUB & IUCN BOTH PART OF THE SAME LUNATIC CLUB ( Report, Official Documents, & Video Recording )
PESTICIDE TRUTHS — IUCN — 2014 11 10 — JEROEN VAN DER SLUIJS — TASK FORCE ON SYSTEMIC PESTICIDES IUCN TOKYO 2012 FORUM ( Report With Official Documents )
PESTICIDE TRUTHS — IUCN — 2011 03 00 ( 2014 10 20 ) — TASK FORCES ARE NOT OPEN TO ALL MEMBERS, BUT BY INVITATION ONLY ( Report With Video Recording )
――――――――――――――――――――
Read … FORCE OF NATURE And PESTICIDE TRUTHS
Discover What Anti-Pesticide & Enviro-Lunatic Terrorists Are Doing And Saying About Subversively Imposing Their Life-Style Choices Against Our Society.
Read … Reports, Blogs, & Videos, From Force Of Nature, NORAHG, Pesticide Truths, & Uncle Adolph ― The Whole Truth From An Independent Perspective.
Communities and businesses are being HARMED and DESTROYED and RAPED by LUNATIC-TERRORISTS who ARBITRARILY AND RECKLESSLY IMPOSE PROHIBITIONS against pest control products used in the Urban Landscape and by the Agriculture Industry, and who PERPETRATE OTHER ACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM.
We are living in the 9|11 Era of Anti Pesticide & Environmental Terrorism where at least ONE SUBVERSIVE ACT OF TERRORISM is perpetrated EVERY SINGLE DAY by LUNATIC-TERRORISTS.
A LUNATIC is a person whose actions and manner are marked by extreme recklessness.
The RECKLESS ACTS OF SUBVERSION by these LUNATIC-TERRORISTS has led to the ARBITRARY IMPOSITION of Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION in several jurisdictions throughout North America.
The result was CATASTROPHIC CARNAGE !
Because of LUNATIC-TERRORISTS, provinces like Ontario now have a TRAIL OF ECONOMIC DESTRUCTION WITH HUNDREDS OF SMALL BUSINESSES DESTROYED and THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE OUT OF WORK, a MORE DANGEROUS OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENT, and a BLACK MARKET IN PESTICIDES.
Only TRUE LUNATICS would wish to create a TRAIL OF ECONOMIC DESTRUCTION WITH HUNDREDS OF SMALL BUSINESSES DESTROYED and THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE OUT OF WORK.
Because of LUNATIC-TERRORISTS, we are living in the DARK AGE OF ANTI PESTICIDE TERRORISM where sound science is trumped by FAKE SCIENTISTS, JUNK SCIENCE and UNVERIFIABLE SECRET EVIDENCE through FABRICATION, INNUENDO, and INTERNET RUMOR ― scientific research PROVES that pest control products will CAUSE NO HARM and can be USED SAFELY.
An informed public is better able to protect itself and its communities and businesses from LUNATIC-TERRORISTS who are THE LEAST QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE ANY ADVICE about pest control products or the environment.
NORAHG is the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that seek to harm the Green space and other industries, and the well-being of our communities.
NORAHG morally represents the VAST SILENT MAJORITY of people associated with turf and ornamental plant maintenance who are OPPOSED to LUNATIC-TERRORISTS and their Anti Pesticide PROHIBITIONS, resulting in the CLOSURE or ABANDONMENT of green spaces under the RIDICULOUS PRETEXT CONCOCTED BY LUNATICS of somehow « saving » the environment.
NORAHG is a NATIONAL NON-PROFIT NON-PARTISAN organization that does not accept money from corporations or governments or trade associations, and represents NO VESTED INTERESTS WHATSOEVER.
NORAHG is dedicated to reporting PESTICIDE FREE FAILURES, as well as the work of RESPECTED & HIGHLY RATED EXPERTS who promote ENVIRONMENTAL REALISM and PESTICIDE TRUTHS.
NORAHG busts the THE MYTHS ABOUT BANNING PESTICIDES.
NORAHG RESPONDS on behalf of the VAST SILENT MAJORITY of THE PUBLIC THAT DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS, and SUPPORTS those who work in the Professional Lawn Care Industry, the Golf Industry, and the Agriculture Industry.
NORAHG is opposed to PESTICIDE FREE jurisdictions where LUNATIC-TERRORISTS have DOOMED CHILDREN to SUFFER INJURIES since Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION inevitably leads to public and residential green spaces that become DANGEROUS AND PEST-INFESTED GARBAGE DUMPS.
For more information about GARBAGE DUMPS, go to the following links …
ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION DESTROYED GREEN SPACES
PESTICIDE BANS MADE OUR GREEN SPACES LOOK #@!!% UGLY – PHOTO GALLERY
EMERALD ASH BORER – SAFE & EFFECTIVE INSECTICIDES VERSUS CHAIN SAWS
NORAHG is concerned that, because of PESTICIDE FREE MAINTENANCE of parks and sports fields, CHILDREN ARE AT HIGHER RISK OF SUFFERING INJURIES with DANGEROUS PLAYING SURFACES CREATED BY #@!!% PESTICIDE BANS.
NORAHG pledges to deliver comprehensive reports that are worthy of peoples’ time and of peoples’ concern, reports that might ordinarily never have breached the parapet.
NORAHG was the brainchild of William H Gathercole and his colleagues in 1991. Mr Gathercole is now retired, although his name continues to appear as founder.
Force Of Nature was launched by NORAHG for CONTINUOUS transmission on the Internet on January 1st, 2009 ― however, the VERY FIRST Stand-Alone Force Of Nature Report was issued on September 19th, 2008.
On March 15th, 2010, Uncle Adolph independently launched The Pesticide Truths, an easy-to-use Web-Site that collects relevant reports of information right-off-the-press.
Pesticide Truths, Uncle Adolph, and Force Of Nature, in some ways, are like Google for everything concerning the SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES of Anti-Pesticide and Enviro-Lunatic Terrorists.
For The Complete Library of reports from Force Of Nature, NORAHG, Pesticide Truths, and Uncle Adolph, go to the following archives …
UNCLE ADOLPH ON YOUTUBE ― VIDEO LIBRARY
UNCLE ADOLPH’S ORIGINAL PESTICIDE TRUTHS BLOG
UNCLE ADOLPH ON SCRIBD ― OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS
NORAHG ⁄ FON ON FACEBOOK ― NORAHG RESPONSES
THE PESTICIDE TRUTHS WEB-SITE ― ARCHIVE OF REPORTS
PESTICIDE LINKS ― PESTICIDE QUESTIONS ANSWERED BY HEALTH CANADA
TABLE OF CONTENTS ― THE COMPLETE LIBRARY OF WEB-PAGES, REPORTS, & REFERENCES
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information From An Independent Perspective
The Whole Truth Can Be Found … On The Pesticide Truths Web-Site …
THE PESTICIDE TRUTHS WEB-SITE – ARCHIVE OF REPORTS ( Home Page )
PESTICIDE BANS ARE A FARCE ( Report )
FIESTA CANNOT BE USED TO VALIDATE ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION ( Report )
BEE-KEEPERS ARE KILLING BEES, AND NOT INSECTICIDES ( Web-Page )
REAL TRENDS AGAINST PESTICIDE BANS ( Web-Page )
ENEMIES LIST IN THE 9|11 ERA OF ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORISM ( Report )
CARNAGE CREATED BY CATASTROPHIC ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION ( Main Web-Page )
THE EXORBITANT COST OF PESTICIDE BANS ( Report )
ATTACKS AGAINST GOLF FACILITIES ( Report )
MYTHS ABOUT BANNING PESTICIDES – LEADING SCIENTIFIC HEALTH AND POLICY EXPERTS ( White Paper )
COMPLAINT CHANNELS – COMPLAIN ABOUT THE ANTI-PESTICIDE LUNATICS ( Web-Page )
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
