Summary
The assessments from both the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists and the European Food Safety Authority ( EFSA ) have said …
Glyphosate Is Not Likely Carcinogenic.
Both organizations DISCREDITED a study from International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ).
On March 20th, 2015, the IARC’s study arbitrarily classified the herbicide glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, as « probably carcinogenic » on the basis of « limited evidence ».
IARC’s use of the term « limited evidence » clearly implied that its study was SEVERELY FLAWED, DISTORTED, and UNBALANCED.
Here is a summary of the findings of the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists ―
Glyphosate Does NOT Cause
Cancer In Lab Rats.
Glyphosate Is NOT Genotoxic,
Meaning It Does NOT Cause Cellular
Damage Or Mutations.
Credible, High Quality Epidemiological
Studies Do NOT Show A Link Between
Glyphosate Exposure And Cancer.
The European Food Safety Authority ( EFSA ) functions as an advisor to policy-makers in the European Union ( EU ).
The EFSA’s assessment on glyphosate is expected to lead the European Union to RENEW APPROVAL FOR GLYPHOSATE.
――――――――――――――――――――
Expert Panel Of Scientists
Says Glyphosate Is
NOT Carcinogenic,
Disputing IARC Study
December 8th, 2015
Givology
Selected And Adapted Excerpts
The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists is DISPUTING a study from International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ).
IARC had concluded that glyphosate is PROBABLY CARCINOGENIC TO HUMANS. [ WRONG ! ]
Glyphosate is the world’s most widely-used weed control product and the main ingredient in Roundup herbicide.
The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists presented its ASSESSMENT to the annual meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis on December 14th, 2015.
The Panel will publish its ASSESSMENT at a later date after peer review.
According to the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists ―
The International Agency For Research On
Cancer ( IARC ) Mis-Interpreted, Or Incorrectly-
Weighted, Some Of The Data It Reviewed.
[ IARC ] Ignored Other Data Before Classifying
Glyphosate As A Probable Human Carcinogen.
NONE Of The [ IARC ] Results [ Were ] From
A Very Large Database, Using Different
Methodologies Provides Evidence Of, Or A
Potential Mechanism For, Human Carcinogenesis.
The assessment from the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists is similar to that of the European Food Safety Authority ( EFSA ), which, in November 2015, said …
… Glyphosate Is Not Likely Carcinogenic.
See later segment for more information about EFSA.
The manufacturer of glyphosate, Monsanto, provided the INDUSTRY-FUNDED SUPPORT for the sixteen-member Glyphosate Panel Of Expert-Scientists, which was assembled by Intertek Scientific & Regulatory Consultancy.
Ten of the sixteen scientists on the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists have been consultants for Monsanto in the past, and two others are former Monsanto employees, according to a roster published on Monsanto’s web-site.
See later segment for more information about the MEMBERS of the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists.
This is all GOOD NEWS !
This means that Monsanto is able to attract the BEST OF EXPERT SCIENTISTS, and will continue to support campaigns that demonstrate that …
… Glyphosate Is NOT A Human Health Risk.
Pesticide-Hating Fanatics say that the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists is somehow down-playing the risk to human health and trying to discredit the IARC study by casting doubt on some of the scientific studies that it reviewed.
Nonetheless, even the United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) agrees with the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists ―
Glyphosate Is Considered Safe.
――――――――――――――――――――
Members Of The
2015 Glyphosate Expert
Panel Of Scientists
Retrieved On January 7th, 2016
Monsanto Web-Site
Selected And Adapted Excerpts
In 2015, an expert panel was convened to review the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) monograph on glyphosate.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
WILLIAMS, Gary
M.D.
Professor of Pathology, Department of Pathology.
Director of Environmental Pathology and Toxicology.
Head, Program on Medicine, Food and Chemical Safety, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Professor of Clinical Public Health, School of Health Sciences and Practice, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
This expert has previously served as a consultant to Monsanto Company and, as part of that consulting relationship, published peer-reviewed data regarding glyphosate.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
SORAHAN, Tom
Ph.D., Doctor of Science ( D.Sc. )
Professor of Occupational Epidemiology, Institute of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Honorary Fellow, Faculty of Occupational Medicine.
This expert has previously served as a consultant to Monsanto Company and, as part of that consulting relationship, published peer-reviewed data regarding glyphosate.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
AARDEMA, Marilyn
Ph.D.
Independent Toxicology Consultant.
Former Chief Scientific Officer, Toxicology, Bioreliance Corporation.
Former Principal Scientist, Central Product Safety, Procter & Gamble, USA.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
ACQUAVELLA, John
Ph.D., Fellow of the American College of Epidemiology ( FACE )
Professor, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Arhaus University, Denmark.
Former President, American College of Epidemiology.
This expert was previously employed by Monsanto Company and, as part of that employment, published peer-reviewed data regarding glyphosate.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
BERRY, Sir Colin
M.D., Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus, University of London, the Royal London Hospital, United Kingdom.
Past Chairman, Advisory Committee on Pesticides, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
This expert has previously served as a consultant to Monsanto Company.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
BRUSICK, David
Ph.D.
Consultant in Genetic Toxicology and General Toxicology.
Former Vice-President, Covance Labs Inc.
This expert has previously served as a consultant to Monsanto Company.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
BURNS, Michele
M.D., Master of Public Health ( MPH ), Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics ( FAAP ), Fellow of the American College of Medical Toxicology ( FACMT ), FACCT
Assistant Professor, Pediatrics.
Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School.
Staff Physician, Boston Children’s Hospital.
Chief, Program in Medical Toxicology, Boston Children’s Hospital, USA.
Medical Director, Maine & Rhode Island Poison Control Center, USA.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
GREIM, Helmut
M.D.
Professor Emeritus, Toxicology and Environmental Hygiene, Technical University Munich, Germany.
This expert has previously served as a consultant to Monsanto Company and, as part of that consulting relationship, published peer-reviewed data regarding glyphosate.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
GARABRANT, David
M.D., Master of Public Health ( MPH ), Master’s Degree ( MS ), Fellow of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine ( FACOEM ), Fellow of the American College of Preventive Medicine ( FACPM )
Professor Emeritus, Occupational Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, USA.
This expert has previously served as a consultant to Monsanto Company.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
De CAMARGO, Joao Lauro Viana
M.D., Ph.D.
Professor, Department of Pathology, Botucatu Medical School ( FMBo ), UNESP.
Coordinator, Center for the Evaluation of the Impact of the Environment on Human Health, Brazil.
This expert has previously served as a consultant to Monsanto Company.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
KIER, Larry
Ph.D.
Toxicology Consultant.
This expert was previously employed by Monsanto Company and, as part of that employment, published peer-reviewed data regarding glyphosate.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
KIRKLAND, David
Ph.D.
Independent Genetic Toxicity Consultant.
Former Vice-President of Scientific and Regulatory Consulting, Covance Laboratories Europe.
Member, UK Government Advisory Committee on Mutagenicity, United Kingdom.
This expert has previously served as a consultant to Monsanto Company and, as part of that consulting relationship, published peer-reviewed data regarding glyphosate.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
MARSH, Gary
Ph.D., Fellow of the American College of Epidemiology ( FACE )
Professor of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Professor of Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Center for Clinical and Translational Science.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
SOLOMON, Keith
Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus, School of Environmental Sciences, and Director, Centre for Toxicology, University of Guelph, Canada.
This expert has previously served as a consultant to Monsanto Company and, as part of that consulting relationship, published peer-reviewed data regarding glyphosate.
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/the-wisdom-of-the-solomons/
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
WEED, Douglas
M.D., Ph.D., Master of Public Health ( MPH ), Fellow of the American College of Epidemiology ( FACE )
Independent Scientific Consultant.
Adjunct full professor, University of Utah School of Medicine, USA.
Former Chief, Office of Preventive Oncology, National Cancer Institute.
Former Director, Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program.
Member Of The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists
ROBERTS, Ashley
Ph.D.
Senior Vice President, Food and Nutrition Group, Intertek Scientific & Regulatory Consultancy.
This expert has previously served as a consultant to Monsanto Company.
――――――――――――――――――――
Expert-Scientists At
European Food Safety Authority
Say Glyphosate UNLIKELY
To Cause Cancer
November 12th, 2015
Reuters
Selected And Adapted Excerpts
According to the European Food Safety Authority ( EFSA ) ―
Glyphosate Is UNLIKELY To Cause Cancer In Humans.
The European Food Safety Authority ( EFSA ) functions as an advisor to policy-makers in the European Union ( EU ).
The EFSA’s assessment on glyphosate could lead the 28-member European Union to RENEW APPROVAL FOR GLYPHOSATE.
Glyphosate is a herbicide that was brought into use by Monsanto in the 1970s and is used in its top selling product Roundup as well as in many other herbicides around the world.
Anti-Pesticide & Environmental-Terrorist Organizations have been calling for a BAN [ i.e. PROHIBITION ] after the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) said in March 2015 that glyphosate was « probably carcinogenic to humans ». [ ?!?! ]
BACKGROUND INFORMATION ― IARC has NOT proven that glyphosate causes cancer. And we repeat, IARC has NOT classified glyphosate as « carcinogenic to humans ». Glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer ! According to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ), German Federal Institute For Risk Assessment, Health Canada, and EVERY other science-based national regulatory agency in the world, the weight of evidence is AGAINST carcinogenicity. In other words, according to these agencies, glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer. The IARC study of hazard does NOT indicate the risk of getting cancer. On the other hand, national regulatory agencies, like US EPA and Health Canada, DO evaluate risks. IARC merely looks at what is called hazard, and NOT risk. It DOES NOT take into consideration how much of, or how commonly, a risk glyphosate poses in the real world. IARC has failed to provide any new research concerning glyphosate. If the IARC hazard study against glyphosate is truly valid, then why doesn’t WHO itself demand more government regulation ?!?! Why should national regulatory agencies listen to IARC when it is ignored by WHO ?!?! In fact, glyphosate WILL NOT cause harm and WILL NOT cause cancer !
According to an Anti-Pesticide & Environmental-Terrorist Organization, 1.4 million people had SIGNED A PETITION [ SO WHAT ?!?! ] calling on the European Union to SUSPEND [ i.e. PROHIBIT ] glyphosate approval pending further assessment.
The EFSA said it carried out a thorough analysis and took account of the IARC’s findings.
According to Jose Tarazona, head of the pesticides unit at the EFSA, based in Parma, Italy ―
This has been an exhaustive process ― a full assessment that has taken into account a wealth of new studies and data.
Regarding carcinogenicity, it is UNLIKELY that this substance [ glyphosate ] is carcinogenic.
EFSA is proposing a limit on the maximum safe daily dose over a period of time, of 0.5 milligrams per kilogram ( kg ) of body weight.
EFSA is also proposing a new acute limit, of the same level, for a single intake of glyphosate over a short period, for instance in one meal.
The scientists say an 80-kg person could eat food containing a residue of 40 milligrams of glyphosate per day for the rest of their life.
Monsanto said that was the equivalent of eating 400 kg of fruit or vegetables every day.
EFSA scientists, who worked with experts from nations in the European Union ( EU ), said their study DIFFERED from the IARC’s in that it considered only glyphosate, whereas the IARC had ASSESSED GROUPS OF RELATED CHEMICALS.
IARC’s study alleged that toxic effects could be related to reactions with other constituents. [ ?!?! ]
Sweden, one of the 28 nations in the European Union ( EU ), VOICED RESERVATIONS about IARC’s study.
Sweden has said that it …
… Considered That The Classification Criteria For
Limited Evidence Of Cancer In Humans Were Fulfilled.
In 2016, the European Union ( EU ) must decide whether to RENEW EXISTING APPROVAL for glyphosate use.
Predictably, Greenpeace called the EFSA’s report as some kind of whitewash. [ ?!?! ]
BACKGROUND INFORMATION ― Anti-Pesticide & Environmental-Terrorist Organizations like Greenpeace … what are they for ?!?! They serve NO useful or beneficial purpose to society, wasting tax-exempt money in order to operate as mere government opponents. Greenpeace does NOT deserve ANY charity tax-exempt statuses. They exist for one reason and one only … and that is to make enviro-profit. So far, Greenpeace has LOST ITS CHARITY STATUS in several jurisdictions, including Canada, and has been told to STAY OUT OF COUNTRIES, like India. Even government officials in Quebec have demanded that Greenpeace STAY OUT OF THE PROVINCE, accusing its fanatical-activists of being « a bunch of job killers ». Greenpeace’s TAX-EXPEMPT STATUS MUST BE INVESTIGATED, and ITS CHARITY STATUS MUST BE REVOKED WORLD-WIDE.
――――――――――――――――――――
Industry-Funded Science
Of Glyphosate Study
Does NOT Discredit It
December 9th, 2015
The Western Producer
Selected And Adapted Excerpts
Dr David Garabrant, a member of the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists that reviewed a potential link between glyphosate and cancer says it doesn’t matter who pays for scientific research.
Dr Garabrant’s connection to corporate agriculture is under the microscope because he participated in the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists. [ ?!?! ]
Here is a summary of the findings of the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists ―
Glyphosate Does NOT Cause
Cancer In Lab Rats.
Glyphosate Is NOT Genotoxic,
Meaning It Does NOT Cause Cellular
Damage Or Mutations.
Credible, High Quality Epidemiological
Studies Do NOT Show A Link Between
Glyphosate Exposure And Cancer.
Dr David Garabrant, a University of Michigan Epidemiologist, said INDUSTRY-FUNDED SCIENCE versus PUBLICLY-FUNDED receives too much attention.
Instead, the public should EVALUATE THE MERITS OF THE SCIENCE.
According to Dr Garabrant ―
We should FOCUS ON THE QUALITY OF THE ANALYSIS AND THE QUALITY OF THE COMMENTS, not the affiliation of the author.
The concern, always present in a case control study, is whether you can re-construct that past information accurately.
People with cancer wonder why they got it … what did I eat … what chemicals were I exposed to ?
There’s always concern … about reporting bias.
We’re supposed to critique each other’s work … an active and heated discourse, that’s part of science.
Dr Garabrant was part of the Panel’s sub-group that evaluated studies on glyphosate exposure, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and multiple myeloma.
Dr Garabrant said both IARC and the 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists reviewed similar scientific papers, but the Panel experts gave LESS WEIGHT TO STUDIES WHERE SUBJECTS ARE INTERVIEWED FOLLOWING A CANCER DIAGNOSIS.
Dr Garabrant and the Panel relied on a 2005 paper by Dr Anneclaire De Roos of the University of Washington.
Dr De Roos studied more than 50,000 pesticide applicators in Iowa and North Carolina who documented their exposure to glyphosate prior to any sort of diagnosis.
Dr De Roos concluded that …
… Glyphosate Exposure Was NOT Associated
With An Incidence Of Cancer.
According to Dr Garabrant ―
We felt that study [ by Dr De Roos ] was FAR MORE RELIABLE than the other studies.
We think the limitations of the other studies made them NOT GOOD INDICATORS of … the relative risk.
The Panel members, including University of Guelph Toxicologist Dr Keith Solomon, said IARC relied too heavily on questionable studies.
According to Dr Solomon ―
IARC’s equivalent working groups’ reviews suffered from significant weaknesses such as selectivity in the choice of data reviewed, failure to use all relevant biologic information … and failure to use weight-of-evidence ( WOE ) evaluations.
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
IARC’S Anti-Glyphosate Hazard Study Against Glyphosate Is Severely Flawed, Distorted, Biased, & Unbalanced Pesticide-Hating Fanaticism !
Glyphosate ( Roundup ) WILL NOT cause cancer.
International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ), a mere subsidiary of WHO, has NOT officially classified glyphosate as « carcinogenic to humans ».
However, on March 20th, 2015, the IARC’s study arbitrarily classified the herbicide glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, as « probably carcinogenic » on the basis of « limited evidence ».
IARC’s use of the term « limited evidence » clearly implied that its study was SEVERELY FLAWED, DISTORTED, and UNBALANCED.
Nonetheless, the IARC’s study has NOT classified glyphosate as « carcinogenic to humans ».
In other words, according to IARC, glyphosate is NOT « carcinogenic to humans ».
Additionally, national government regulators world-wide have concluded that glyphosate is NOT a human health risk, and yet only IARC has arbitrarily claimed that it is « probably carcinogenic ».
Indeed, IARC is NOT even a regulatory authority.
It is a mere subsidiary of the World Health Organization ( WHO ), which has NEVER issued a statement concerning glyphosate and cancer.
If the IARC’s anti-glyphosate study was truly valid, then why didn’t WHO itself demand more government regulation ?!?!
Why should national regulatory agencies listen to IARC when it is ignored by WHO ?!?!
Unfortunately, anti-pesticide fanatics are implying that IARC’s « limited evidence » has somehow been withheld from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ), German Federal Institute For Risk Assessment, Health Canada, and EVERY other science-based national regulatory agency in the world.
In fact, there is NO regulatory agency in the world that regards glyphosate as a human health risk.
In other words, according to these agencies, glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer.
Sadly, the IARC’s anti-glyphosate study was SEVERELY FLAWED, DISTORTED, BIASED, and UNBALANCED.
The selection of « limited evidence » was severely unbalanced since IARC simply cherry-picked the most atypically negative reports in order to validate its pesticide-hating agenda.
IARC also conveniently disregarded dozens of scientific studies that support the conclusion glyphosate is NOT a human health risk !
In view of these facts, THE PESTICIDE-HATING IARC HAS BEEN DISCREDITED !
The IARC’s anti-glyphosate study did NOT assess the risk of getting cancer.
In fact, IARC did NOT evaluate actual human risks, but merely looked at what is called a hazard.
On the other hand, national regulatory agencies, like US EPA and Health Canada, DO evaluate risks.
IARC merely looked at what is called hazard, and NOT risk.
It DOES NOT take into consideration how much of, or how commonly, a risk glyphosate poses in the real world.
Additionally, IARC has also failed to provide any new research concerning glyphosate.
Can glyphosate be considered carcinogenic based on the IARC’s study ?!?!
NO !
Why do science-based national regulatory agencies around the world conclude that glyphosate is NOT a human health risk while only IARC arbitrarily claims it « probably » causes cancer ?!?!
Because IARC is NOT a government regulatory agency, and it DOES NOT evaluate risk.
Moreover, IARC most certainly is NOT a science, NOT a research, and NOT a health organization.
It is clear that IARC has an agenda-driven bias for reasons of mere pesticide-hating fanaticism and politicized science.
Obviously, IARC CANNOT BE TRUSTED !
Exhaustive laboratory, animal, and human research has not supported evidence that pest control products like glyphosate are NOT a human health risk and will NOT cause cancer when used properly.
All of these products have been evaluated for their carcinogenic potential.
Even Canadian Cancer Society’s own web-sites state, repeatedly, that scientific research does NOT provide a conclusive link between pest control products and cancer.
If you question that glyphosate is carcinogenic based on the IARC’s study, perhaps you should consider advocating bans against similarly classified products & activities, like bacon, baked food, burgers, cooked meat, fish, fried food, grapefruit juice, night shift work, paint remover, roasted food, sausages, and vegetables.
IARC has also evaluated chemical agents & activities that have HIGHER carcinogenic hazard than glyphosate, like alcoholic beverages, baby oil, oral contraceptives, outdoor air pollution, painter, plutonium, and sunlight.
In essence, glyphosate is NOT a human health risk, and it is SAFE when used properly.
The IARC’s anti-glyphosate study is SEVERELY FLAWED, DISTORTED, BIASED, & UNBALANCED.
IARC IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED !
――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
For more information about GLYPHOSATE, go to Pesticide Truths, The Web-Site That Dares To Defy With The Whole Truth From An Independent Perspective …
GLYPHOSATE — SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE ACCORDING TO REAL EXPERTS ( Web-Page )
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate/
GLYPHOSATE — SCIENTISTS FIND NO EVIDENCE GLYPHOSATE CAUSES CANCER — DR KEITH R SOLOMON ( Report )
GLYPHOSATE — AS SOCIAL MEDIA OUTPACES GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE, STUPID PROLIFERATES ( Report )
GLYPHOSATE — UNLIKELY TO POSE A CARCINOGENIC HAZARD TO HUMANS — EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY ( EFSA ) ( Report )
https://pesticidetruths.com/2015/11/14/efsa-roundup-so-safe-it-can-be-used-as-desiccant-on-crops/
GLYPHOSATE — ARE YOU PUTTING MONSANTO IN YOUR VAGINA ?!?! ( Lunatic Report )
GLYPHOSATE — WHY DO REGULATORS CONCLUDE THAT THIS HERBICIDE IS SAFE WHILE ONLY INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER ( IARC ) CLAIMS IT PROBABLY CAUSES CANCER ( Blog )
GLYPHOSATE — PROPOSED RE-EVALUATION DECISION PRVD2015-01 – HEALTH CANADA CONSULTATION NOTICE ( Report )
GLYPHOSATE — EXPERT REACTION TO CARCINOGENICITY CLASSIFICATION OF FIVE PESTICIDES BY THE INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER ( IARC ) ( Report )
GLYPHOSATE — GREEN ALTERNATIVES LESS EFFECTIVE & MORE TOXIC THAN ROUNDUP ( Blog )
GLYPHOSATE — US EPA REGISTRATION OF ENLIST DUO ( GLYPHOSATE & 2,4-D ) — DECISION IS PROTECTIVE OF ALL, INCLUDING THE DEVELOPING FETUS, INFANTS AND CHILDREN, THE ELDERLY, AND FARMWORKERS ( Report )
GLYPHOSATE — WE NEED RATIONAL DISCUSSION ABOUT PESTICIDES, WITHOUT RHETORIC — DR JOSEPH A SCHWARCZ ( Blog )
GLYPHOSATE — STOP REGISTRATION OF ENLIST DUO HERBICIDE — LUNATIC SCIENTISTS TELL EPA TO BAN AGENT ORANGE GMO CROPS ( Lunatic Report )
GLYPHOSATE — HOME-MADE PESTICIDES LESS EFFECTIVE & MORE TOXIC THAN ROUNDUP ( Report )
GLYPHOSATE — ACTIVISTS IN HOLLAND WANT TO RECKLESSLY DESTROY THE AGRICULTURE INDUSTRY WITH LIES AND MIS-INFORMATION ABOUT GLYPHOSATE ( Blog )
GLYPHOSATE — MORE THAN HALF OF BRITISH BREADS CONTAIN « TOXIC » PESTICIDES — WE’RE BEING POISONED AGAINST OUR WILL ( Lunatic Report )
GLYPHOSATE — NO MORE POISONOUS THAN PREVIOUSLY ASSUMED, ACCORDING TO GERMANY’S FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT (BfR) ( Report )
GLYPHOSATE — ROUNDUP IS SAFE, ACCORDING TO GERMANY’S FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT (BfR) ( Report )
GLYPHOSATE — REVIEW FAILURE OF POLYETHOXYLATED TALLOWAMINE — LUNATIC JOSETTE WEIR ( Pesticide Link )
GLYPHOSATE — DEATH BY ROUNDUP — PESTICIDE INCIDENT REPORT FROM HEALTH CANADA ( Pesticide Link )
GLYPHOSATE — HEALTH ISSUES ABANDONED — WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY — DOESN’T CHANGE MUCH — LUNATIC LAWYER DIANNE SAXE ( Lunatic Report )
GLYPHOSATE — ATTACK AGAINST GLYPHOSATE — WEST COAST ENVIRONMENTAL LAW — LUNATIC LAWYER DIANNE SAXE — LUNATIC JOSETTE WEIR ( Lunatic Report )
GLYPHOSATE — LACK OF CREDIBLE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE — WEST COAST ENVIRONMENTAL LAW — LUNATIC LAWYER DIANNE SAXE — LUNATIC JOSETTE WEIR ( Report )
GLYPHOSATE — RESPONSE AGAINST LUNATIC JOSETTE WEIR REGARDING FALSE ALLEGATIONS — WEST COAST ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ( Letter to the Editor )
GLYPHOSATE — LUNATIC PROFESSOR DON M HUBER ON TALK-FOR-FOOD RADIO ( Audio Recording )
GLYPHOSATE — TRIGGERING HEALTH CANADA 2008 SPECIAL REVIEW — IGNORING HEALTH CANADA RESPONSE & CONTINUING TO PROMOTE MIS-INFORMATION — LUNATIC JOSETTE WEIR — CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT ( CAPE ) ( Report & Official Documents )
GLYPHOSATE — PURDUE UNIVERSITY DISCREDITS OWN LUNATIC PROFESSOR DON M HUBER ( Pesticide Link )
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
To fight the war against Anti-Pesticide Terrorism, you need facts !
Read … PESTICIDE TRUTHS
Watch … UNCLE ADOLPH
Listen To … NORAHG
Learn From … FORCE OF NATURE
Discover What Anti-Pesticide & Enviro-Lunatic Terrorists Are Doing And Saying About Subversively Imposing Their Life-Style Choices Against Our Society.
Read … Reports, Blogs, & Videos, From Force Of Nature, NORAHG, Pesticide Truths, & Uncle Adolph ― The Whole Truth From An Independent Perspective.
Communities and businesses are being HARMED and DESTROYED and RAPED by LUNATIC-TERRORISTS who ARBITRARILY AND RECKLESSLY IMPOSE PROHIBITIONS against pest control products used in the Urban Landscape and by the Agriculture Industry, and who PERPETRATE OTHER ACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM.
We are living in the 9|11 Era of Anti Pesticide & Environmental Terrorism where at least ONE SUBVERSIVE ACT OF TERRORISM is perpetrated EVERY SINGLE DAY by LUNATIC-TERRORISTS.
A LUNATIC is a person whose actions and manner are marked by extreme recklessness.
The RECKLESS ACTS OF SUBVERSION by these LUNATIC-TERRORISTS has led to the ARBITRARY IMPOSITION of Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION in several jurisdictions throughout North America.
The result was CATASTROPHIC CARNAGE !
Because of LUNATIC-TERRORISTS, provinces like Ontario now have a TRAIL OF ECONOMIC DESTRUCTION WITH HUNDREDS OF SMALL BUSINESSES DESTROYED and THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE OUT OF WORK, a MORE DANGEROUS OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENT, and a BLACK MARKET IN PESTICIDES.
Only TRUE LUNATICS would wish to create a TRAIL OF ECONOMIC DESTRUCTION WITH HUNDREDS OF SMALL BUSINESSES DESTROYED and THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE OUT OF WORK.
Because of LUNATIC-TERRORISTS, we are living in the DARK AGE OF ANTI PESTICIDE TERRORISM where sound science is trumped by FAKE SCIENTISTS, JUNK SCIENCE and UNVERIFIABLE SECRET EVIDENCE through FABRICATION, INNUENDO, and INTERNET RUMOR ― scientific research PROVES that pest control products will CAUSE NO HARM and can be USED SAFELY.
An informed public is better able to protect itself and its communities and businesses from LUNATIC-TERRORISTS who are THE LEAST QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE ANY ADVICE about pest control products or the environment.
NORAHG is the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that seek to harm the Green space and other industries, and the well-being of our communities.
NORAHG morally represents the VAST SILENT MAJORITY of people associated with turf and ornamental plant maintenance who are OPPOSED to LUNATIC-TERRORISTS and their Anti Pesticide PROHIBITIONS, resulting in the CLOSURE or ABANDONMENT of green spaces under the RIDICULOUS PRETEXT CONCOCTED BY LUNATICS of somehow « saving » the environment.
NORAHG is a NATIONAL NON-PROFIT NON-PARTISAN organization that does not accept money from corporations or governments or trade associations, and represents NO VESTED INTERESTS WHATSOEVER.
NORAHG is dedicated to reporting PESTICIDE FREE FAILURES, as well as the work of RESPECTED & HIGHLY RATED EXPERTS who promote ENVIRONMENTAL REALISM and PESTICIDE TRUTHS.
NORAHG strikes back against the MYTHS concerning the need for prohibition against pest control products.
NORAHG RESPONDS on behalf of the VAST SILENT MAJORITY of THE PUBLIC THAT DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS, and SUPPORTS those who work in the Professional Lawn Care Industry, the Golf Industry, and the Agriculture Industry.
RESPECTED & HIGHLY RATED EXPERTS
THE MYTHS ABOUT BANNING PESTICIDES
VAST SILENT MAJORITY
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/the-wisdom-of-canadian-consumer-specialty-products-association/
NORAHG is opposed to PESTICIDE FREE jurisdictions where LUNATIC-TERRORISTS have DOOMED CHILDREN to SUFFER INJURIES since Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION inevitably leads to public and residential green spaces that become DANGEROUS AND PEST-INFESTED GARBAGE DUMPS.
Go to the following links …
ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION DESTROYED GREEN SPACES
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/carnage-leading-to-garbage-dumps/
PESTICIDE BANS MADE OUR GREEN SPACES LOOK #@!!% UGLY – PHOTO GALLERY
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/carnage-leading-to-garbage-dump-green-spaces-photo-gallery/
EMERALD ASH BORER – SAFE & EFFECTIVE INSECTICIDES VERSUS CHAIN SAWS
NORAHG is concerned that, because of PESTICIDE FREE MAINTENANCE of parks and sports fields, CHILDREN ARE AT HIGHER RISK OF SUFFERING INJURIES with DANGEROUS PLAYING SURFACES CREATED BY #@!!% PESTICIDE BANS.
CHILDREN ARE NOT AT RISK
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/children-are-not-at-risk/
NORAHG pledges to deliver comprehensive reports that are worthy of peoples’ time and of peoples’ concern, reports that might ordinarily never have breached the parapet.
NORAHG was the brainchild of William H Gathercole and his colleagues in 1991. Mr Gathercole is now retired, although his name continues to appear as founder.
Force Of Nature was launched by NORAHG for CONTINUOUS transmission on the Internet on January 1st, 2009 ― however, the VERY FIRST Stand-Alone Force Of Nature Report was issued on September 19th, 2008.
On March 15th, 2010, Uncle Adolph independently launched The Pesticide Truths, an easy-to-use Web-Site that collects relevant reports of information right-off-the-press.
Primus inter pares, first among equals, describes Pesticide Truths, Uncle Adolph, and Force Of Nature ― they are formally equal to each other and are all accorded equal respect.
The reports and blogs from Pesticide Truths, Uncle Adolph, and Force Of Nature, in some ways, are like Google for everything concerning the SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES of Anti-Pesticide and Enviro-Lunatic Terrorists.
Many of these reports and blogs provide a sequence of historical events WITH COMMENTARY, the neutrality of which might be disputed.
This is what we do. Don’t thank us. It’s a public service. And we are glad to do it.
For The Complete Library of reports from Force Of Nature, NORAHG, Pesticide Truths, and Uncle Adolph, go to the following archives …
ABOUT UNCLE ADOLPH
https://pesticidetruths.com/about-2/
FORCE OF NATURE WEB-PAGES
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/
NORAHG ⁄ FON ON FACEBOOK ― NORAHG RESPONSES
https://www.facebook.com/norah.gfon
PESTICIDE LINKS ― PESTICIDE QUESTIONS ANSWERED BY HEALTH CANADA
https://pesticidetruths.com/pesticide-qa-links/
TABLE OF CONTENTS ― THE COMPLETE LIBRARY OF WEB-PAGES, REPORTS, & REFERENCES
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/table-of-contents/
THE PESTICIDE TRUTHS WEB-SITE ― ARCHIVE OF REPORTS
UNCLE ADOLPH’S ORIGINAL PESTICIDE TRUTHS BLOG
http://www.uncleadolph.blogspot.ca/
UNCLE ADOLPH ON SCRIBD ― OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS
http://www.scribd.com/uncleadolph
UNCLE ADOLPH ON YOUTUBE ― VIDEO LIBRARY
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVWnwRmNln9JACP3Ap3GF5g
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
2 thoughts on “Glyphosate Herbicide WILL NOT Cause Cancer – The 2015 Glyphosate Expert Panel Of Scientists – European Food Safety Authority ( EFSA ) – 2015 12 08”
Comments are closed.