NEW – OCFP 2012 Literature Review – 112 pages – 1 reference to 2,4-D Lawn Pesticide – Costa Rican Coffee Farmer
By admin | June 1, 2012 – 5:41 pm | Doctors who promote public Misperceptions
The Ontario College of Family Physicians is at it again. More Bull CWAP, who funds this group. Please stop.
This reveiw has once again nothing to do with lawn pesticides or the use of Cosmetic Pesticides. Many recent studies and reviews supporting 2,4-D are not even referenced.
Where is the reference to Quebec agreeing that 2,4-d is safe to use?
Where is the BC Legislature findings on Cosmetic Pesticides?
This report will once again be discredited.
Growing body of evidence, My AZZ.
The Anti-Pesticide Literature Reviews have absolutely NO CREDIBILITY since none of their PAID-FOR-PROFIT authors and reviewers had ANY recognized expertise, training or background in matters concerning pest control products. Moreover, among the authors and reviewers of a previous Anti-Pesticide Literature Review, there were ● doctors who WERE FOUND GUILTY OF PROFESSIONAL MIS-CONDUCT OVER SEXUAL ACTIVITIES ( i.e. raping patients ) ● doctors whose LICENSE WAS SUSPENDED ● doctors who DENY HAVING REVIEWED THE DOCUMENT. There is a GROWING BODY OF EVIDENCE that the authors and reviewers of the BOGUS-OCFP-Review were not only SCIENTIFICALLY IGNORANT, LAZY and OBTUSE, but also UNETHICAL, UNPROFESSIONAL, and even CRIMINAL. WILLIAM H. GATHERCOLE AND NORAH G http://wp.me/P1jq40-37C
https://pesticidetruths.com/