Overview From An Independent Perspective
Who are the activists who DESTROYED HUNDREDS OF BUSINESSES operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry ?!?!
There are BARELY 150 PROMINENT CULPRITS WHO CONSPIRE TO PROHIBIT against the use of pest control products … holding the Canadian public as PESTICIDE-HOSTAGES.
Almost HALF, approximately 60, of all these CULPRITS ( a.k.a. CANCER-LUNATICS ) are DIRECTLY SUPPORTED BY CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY.
About 60 Cancer-Lunatics are provided SAFE, SECURE, WELL-PAYING JOBS, with PAY-OFFS in the form of AWARDS, INCENTIVES, BONUSES, BOUNTIES, and ORGANIZATIONAL FINANCING …
… these PAY-OFFS are provided AT THE EXPENSE OF the jobs they ultimately destroy in the Professional Lawn Care Industry.
These Cancer-Lunatics are EMPLOYEES WHO ARE PAID SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNTS OF MONEY to work as HIRED-GUNS TO COERCE, INTIMIDATE, AND ALARM GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INTO PROHIBITING PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS.
Virtually all are same-sex … uneducated housewives.
Because of Cancer-Lunatics, the owners, employees, and families dependent on Professional Lawn Care businesses have faced TERROR, DESPAIR, and DESTITUTION.
Canadian Cancer Society is a PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT in the CONSPIRACY TO PROHIBIT against pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.
Canadian Cancer Society is RIDICULOUSLY IMPLYING that its NON-EXPERT ASSESSMENT concerning pest control products is somehow being withheld from Health Canada and EVERY other regulatory agency in the world.
Its ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORIST ACTS OF SUBVERSION have EXTENSIVELY DAMAGED and DESTROYED the Professional Lawn Care Industry.
Its Cancer-Lunatics operate as Anti-Pesticide TERRORISTS.
And the Golf Industry and Agriculture Industry WILL BE TERRORIZED NEXT !
——————–
Canadian Cancer Society is responsible
for the DESTRUCTION of the Modern
Professional Lawn Care Industry,
and its Cancer-Lunatics operate
as Anti-Pesticide Terrorists
——————–
Our Position On Pesticides
January 29th, 2013
Media Release
Canadian Cancer Society
Cancer-Lunatic Position On Pesticides
Introduction
In Canada, pesticides are used for either cosmetic reasons ( to improve the look of gardens, lawns and other green spaces ) or non-cosmetic reasons ( to protect our food and water supply, or to prevent the spread of disease).
Our position on the use of pesticides depends on what they are being used for.
Cancer-Lunatic Position On Pesticides
Our Position On Cosmetic Use Of Pesticides
The [ Canadian Cancer ] Society CALLS FOR A BAN ON PESTICIDES USED TO IMPROVE THE APPEARANCE OF GREEN SPACES.
The cosmetic use of pesticides provides no health benefit, and may cause harm. [ Wrong ! ]
Cancer-Lunatic Position On Pesticides
Evidence About Cancer Not Definite
The EVIDENCE ABOUT PESTICIDES AND CANCER IS NOT DEFINITE, but some research studies show a stronger link between some types of pesticides and cancers. [ Wrong ! ]
——————–
Commentary From An Independent Perspective ―
Pest Control Products DO NOT CAUSE CANCER.
Canadian Cancer Society has NO CREDIBLE EXPERTISE.
It is a FUND-RAISING, PROFIT-SEEKING, and LOBBYING organization, and it is NOT a science, research, or health organization.
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – SUBVERSIVE, CONTEMPTIBLE, AND RADICAL ( Web-Page )
Canadian Cancer Society has OFFICIALLY AND PUBLICLY STATED REPEATEDLY that scientific research DOES NOT PROVIDE A CONCLUSIVE LINK between pest control products and cancer, on the following dates ―
• August 21st, 2008
• November 2nd, 2009
• March 8th, 2010
• June 9th, 2012
• January 29th, 2013
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – NO DIRECT PROOF PESTICIDES CAUSE CANCER ( Web-Page )
What is their problem ?!?!?!
Why is Canadian Cancer Society WASTING EVERYBODY’S TIME on the issue of pest control products ?
Health Canada, and NOT Canadian Cancer Society, has THE ESSENTIAL EXPERTISE on the subject of pest control products.
Pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE, CAUSE NO HARM, and DO NOT CAUSE CANCER.
Scientific research shows that, as reported through EPA’s and Health Canada’s VAST TOXICOLOGY DATABASE, NO HARM WILL OCCUR when pest control products are applied properly in the Urban Landscape.
The RISK ASSESSMENT of pest control products indicates that they are PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC.
Consequently, it is a fact that pest control products cause NO HARM, including chronic effects such as CANCER.
There are NO pest control products that are known or probable carcinogens.
There is NOT ONE KNOWN CANCER DEATH from the proper use of pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.
And yet, there are THOUSANDS OF KNOWN DEATHS per year from KNOWN CANCER-CAUSING SUBSTANCES such as unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, excess body weight, alcohol consumption, and over-exposure to the sun.
THE MYTH OF CANCER – MYTH-BUSTING ( Web-Page )
THE MYTH OF CANCER – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – NO DIRECT PROOF PESTICIDES CAUSE CANCER ( Web-Page )
THE MYTH OF CANCER – THE WISDOM OF KABAT, GEOFFREY C. – 2012 11 20 – CONFLATION OF ADVOCACY WITH SCIENCE – HOW ACTIVISM DISTORTS THE ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH RISKS – INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER ( IARC ) ( Reports )
THE MYTH OF CANCER – THE WISDOM OF RITTER, LEONARD – PESTICIDES DON'T CAUSE CANCER – MYTH-BUSTING – 2012 01 26 ( Report )
THE MYTH OF CANCER – THE WISDOM OF WHELAN & AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH ( ACSH ) – MYTH-BUSTING – CANCER RATES DROPPING IN THE U.S. – 2012 03 30 ( Report )
THE MYTH OF CANCER – THE WISDOM OF WHELAN & AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH ( ACSH ) – MYTH-BUSTING — CANCER – RATES DECLINING – 2011 03 31 ( Report )
THE MYTH OF CANCER – THE WISDOM OF WHELAN & AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH ( ACSH ) – CANCER DOWN, CHEMOPHOBIA UP – 2010 07 08 ( Report )
——————–
Cancer-Lunatic Position On Pesticides
The Precautionary Principle
Our position is based on the precautionary principle, which states …
When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause-and-effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.
( If something may cause harm to humans or the environment, we should be cautious even if the link is NOT DEFINITE yet. )
——————–
Commentary From An Independent Perspective ―
Precautionary Principle Is DISCREDITED.
The ANTI-PESTICIDE VERSION of the so-called Precautionary Principle is ABSOLUTIST, MISUSED, VACUOUS, and is simply another MALICIOUS WEAPON OF COERCION AND ULTIMATE TERROR concocted by Anti-Pesticide Lunatics.
The ANTI-PESTICIDE VERSION of the Precautionary Principle has been DISCREDITED by TRUE EXPERTS like Dr. Keith Solomon.
Solomon is Professor at the Centre for Toxicology and Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, and Director, Canadian Network of Toxicology Centres.
According to Solomon ―
Landscape and garden use of pest control products DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR CONSIDERATION under the precautionary principle.
They are not serious, they are selective to pests, have low toxicity to non–target organisms, and are well understood.
The effects of these pest control products are NOT IRREVERSIBLE.
There is rapid recovery through reinvasion and weed seeds and most need to be used at least once per year.
PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE – INVALIDATED WEAPON OF COERCION ( Web-Page )
——————–
Cancer-Lunatic Position On Pesticides
Green Alternative Pesticides
The [ Canadian Cancer ] Society supports the use of SAFER WAYS [ a.k.a. Green Alternative Pesticides ] to maintain and improve the appearance of lawns, gardens, parks and other green spaces, but does not support the use of Integrated Pest Management for cosmetic purposes.
——————–
Commentary From An Independent Perspective ―
Green Alternatives Are Not Safer And Not Better.
Green Alternative ( a.k.a. Organic ) Pesticides are NOT SAFER and DO NOT WORK !
There are NO viable, efficacious, economical, practical and/or low-risk alternatives to replace conventional pest control products.
In many cases, Green Alternative Pesticides are questionably HIGHER IN TOXICITY, and pose HIGHER ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS.
They are BOGUS AND DISMAL FAILURES.
It is IMPOSSIBLE for home-owners or professionals to keep their properties beautiful, or for growers to control pests in crops, by using so-called Green Alternative Pesticides.
A well-maintained conventional lawn and landscape, or a pest-free crop, can ONLY BE ACHIEVED WITH CONVENTIONAL pest control products.
Fortunately, CONVENTIONAL pest control products are SAFE, EFFECTIVE, ECONOMICAL, and LOW-RISK.
The SAFEST WAY to maintain Green Spaces is with pest control products that are HEALTH-CANADA-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-REGULATED, SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC, and CAUSE NO HARM.
GREEN ALTERNATIVES … BOGUS & DISMAL FAILURES ( Web-Page )
Anti-Pesticide Activists and Government Officials are IMPOSING the use of Green Alternative Pesticides which WRONGLY ASSUMES THAT ALTERNATIVES will be safer and work as well.
But, by definition, ALL EXISTING ALTERNATIVES ARE INFERIOR, which is why they did not win the market-place originally.
Alternative products are usually LESS TESTED as well, raising the prospect that they are NOT ANY SAFER than the products PROHIBITED by Government Officials.
FORCE OF NATURE — GREEN ALTERNATIVES — 2012 12 04 — WHAT IS GREEN CHEMISTRY – ALTERNATIVES INFERIOR ( Reports )
——————–
Commentary From An Independent Perspective ―
Integrated Pest Management ( I.P.M. ) Is A DISMAL FAILURE.
I.P.M. is promoted by people who FALSELY ALLEGE SUCCESS, and who are likely CONCOCTING LIES, MISCONCEPTIONS, and DECEPTIONS for their own nefarious personal interests.
It is IMPOSSIBLE for maintenance professionals in Golf Facilities and Professional Lawn Care to keep their properties playable and/or beautiful by using I.P.M.
In agriculture, I.P.M. is a pest control strategy that uses a variety of complementary strategies including ― mechanical devices, physical devices, genetic, biological, cultural management, and chemical management.
For several decades, I.P.M. has been BASTERDIZED into many versions in order to suit the needs Anti-Pesticide Activists, Educators, and others.
The Anti-Pesticide-Version of I.P.M. DEMANDS the ELIMINATION of the use of conventional pest control products while at the same time managing pest populations at an acceptable level.
Unfortunately, I.P.M. has been designed to be applicable to the Agriculture Industry, and NOT the Green Space Maintenance Industry.
Overall, Integrated Pest Management is a DISMAL FAILURE AND A WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY for the Green Space Maintenance Industry.
I.P.M. cultural practices DO NOT CONTROL PESTS of established turf and ornamentals. Moreover, using IPM ACCOMPLISHES VIRTUALLY NOTHING in terms of resolving the PUBLIC AFFAIRS ISSUES concerning the PROHIBITION of conventional pest control products.
Pesticide-Free I.P.M. will NEVER achieve the level of total reduction or elimination attained by using conventional pest control products.
Wherever Pesticide-Free I.P.M. is entirely relied upon for the maintenance of turf and ornamentals, damaging pests MAY only be slightly suppressed, AT THE EXPENSE OF PLANT GROWTH, PLAYING CONDITIONS, and APPPEARANCE.
In practice, I.P.M. MAY BE MORE USEFUL in providing some LIMITED IMPROVEMENT towards the efficiency and effectiveness of conventional pest control products.
To compensate for the FAILURE OF I.P.M., Golf Facility and Professional Lawn Care professionals have embarked on a LUDICROUS effort to reduce the expectations of their customers by promoting LOW-END PLAYING and GARBAGE DUMP CONDITIONS.
INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT, FAILURE OF ( IPM ) – #@!!% IPM NONSENSE ( Web-Page )
INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT – LEAST TOXIC PESTICIDES APPLIED AS A LAST RESORT – UPDATE – 2012 11 12 ( Reports )
CARNAGE LEADING TO GARBAGE DUMP GREEN SPACES – WHO WANTS TO LIVE IN #@!!% PEST-INFESTED GARBAGE DUMPS ?!?! ( Web-Page )
——————–
Cancer-Lunatic Position On Pesticides
Golf Courses And Sporting Facilities
The [ Canadian Cancer ] Society wants the use of pesticides to be PHASED-OUT at GOLF COURSES and sports facilities, especially where children often are, or if they are located next to residential and public areas.
——————–
Commentary From An Independent Perspective ―
Total Pesticide Ban ( a.k.a. Phase-Out ) Against Golf Industry.
Cancer-Lunatics want to DESTROY the Golf Industry !
Canadian Cancer Society DEMANDS A PHASE-OUT OF PESTICIDE USE AT GOLF COURSES.
PHASE-OUT means TOTAL GOLF PESTICIDE BAN.
Canadian Cancer Society has TAKEN AIM AGAINST THE GOLF INDUSTRY since 2007, and has CONTINUOUSLY AND REPEATEDLY DEMANDED NO GOLF INDUSTRY EXCEPTION STATUS.
When a TOTAL GOLF PESTICIDE BAN is IMPOSED, the owners, employees, and families dependent on businesses operating in the Golf Industry will face TERROR, DESPAIR, and DESTITUTION.
Cancer-Lunatics want to DESTROY their businesses, as well as their assets, their playing-customers, their homes, their lifestyles, their job security, their families, their children, their loved-ones, and their future.
Canadian Cancer Society FALSELY ALLEGES that in light of the IMAGINARY HARM and the SUPPOSED LACK OF HEALTH BENEFIT [ ?!?! ], A TOTAL PESTICIDE BAN SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AGAINST GOLF COURSES.
Canadian Cancer Society FEIGNS MOCK-CONCERN about the use of POTENTIAL CARCINOGENS [ ?!?! ] for the purposes of merely enhancing the appearance of GOLF COURSES.
A PESTICIDE BAN ( A.K.A. PHASE-OUT ) IS NECESSARY because GOLF IS COSMETIC.
Canadian Cancer Society DEMANDS THE ELIMINATION OF COSMETIC PESTICIDE USE on all Golf Facilities across the nation.
The Golf Industry would be given a THREE YEAR PHASE-OUT TIME for adaptation to PESTICIDE BANS.
The THREE YEAR PHASE-OUT would allow the Golf Industry the opportunity to shift to Green Alternative Pesticides and Practices that have nonetheless been PROVEN TO BE DISASTROUSLY UNSUCCESSFUL in other jurisdictions.
Canadian Cancer Society INTENDS TO DESTROY the Golf Industry.
Canadian Cancer Society has OFFICIALLY AND PUBLICLY DEMANDED A GOLF PESTICIDE BAN, or FALSELY ALLEGED THAT GOLF COURSE PESTICIDES ARE CARCINOGENS, on the following dates ―
• February 21st, 2007
• January 14th, 2008
• April 20th, 2009
• December 2nd, 2009 ― Prince Edward Island
• November 2011
• July 7th, 2012
• January 29th, 2013
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – DEMANDS NO GOLF EXCEPTION STATUS – POSITION STATEMENTS AGAINST THE GOLF INDUSTRY – PESTICIDE BAN ( A.K.A. PHASE-OUT ) NECESSARY BECAUSE GOLF IS COSMETIC ( Web-Page )
——————–
Cancer-Lunatic Position On Pesticides
Pesticides Used As A Last Option
PESTICIDES SHOULD BE USED AS THE LAST OPTION, in the smallest possible amount, and only where needed to make a place usable. [ Wrong ! ]
People should stay away from treated areas for at least 48 hours after the last amount of pesticide is applied.
——————–
Commentary From An Independent Perspective ―
NO BENEFIT And NO SCIENTIFIC BASIS For Use As Last Option.
There is NO BENEFIT and NO SCIENTIFIC BASIS to simplistic messages like « use least toxic pesticides as a last resort » for the large number of end-users who apply pest control products according to the label and practice good stewardship.
Nor are these messages beneficial for those who neither seek training nor adequately read the label — believing instead that it is safe, practical, and effective to simply choose a product considered a « least toxic pesticide » and apply it only as a « last resort ».
These messages hinder safety and stewardship education and practices that are in the best interest of the end-user, our food supply, public health, and ecosystem preservation.
American Phytopathological Society, Entomological Society of America, and Weed Science Society of America do not promote the use of pest control products above other pest management techniques.
Pest control products should ONLY be used when needed, when risks to non-target organisms and habitats have been carefully considered, and when diligent attention will be given to following all label directions and other applicable laws.
In addition, general and product-specific stewardship must always be practiced to prevent undesired effects under the particular application conditions.
FORCE OF NATURE — UPDATE — INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT — 2012 11 12 — LEAST TOXIC PESTICIDES APPLIED AS A LAST RESORT ( Reports )
——————–
Cancer-Lunatic Position On Pesticides
Re-Entry Interval After An Application
People should STAY AWAY from treated areas for at least 48 HOURS after the last amount of pesticide is applied. [ Wrong ! ]
——————–
Commentary From An Independent Perspective ―
Keep People Off Treated Area Until Foliage Is Dry.
Re-Entry Intervals are set to ensure that any remaining pest control product residues on the treated surface do not pose an unacceptable risk to human health.
Re-Entry Intervals reflect the amount of time required for pest control product levels to dissipate ( either from uptake into the plant, or degraded by natural processes ) to a level that is well below any point of concern.
Re-Entry Intervals are established using a science-based approach to predict the amount of a pest control product that may be deposited onto the skin from contact with any treated surface.
All pest control products used by Professional Lawn Care companies require the following Re-Entry Interval ―
Keep people off treated area until foliage is dry.
This requirement applies to MOST products applied on Golf Course Turf, except Compass 50 WG, which has a Re-Entry Interval of 12 hours, and Heritage MAXX, which has a Re-Entry Interval of 4 hours.
There are NO pest control products applied to turf that require a Re-Entry Interval that is beyond 12 hours, and certainly, there are NONE where 48 hours is required.
Examples Of Re-Entry Interval According To Label Directions
Banner MAXX ( propiconazole ) Golf Course Fungicide ―
Keep people off treated area until foliage is dry.
Compass 50 WG ( trifloxystrobin ) Golf Course Fungicide ―
DO NOT enter or allow worker entry into treated areas during the restricted entry interval ( REI ) of 12 hours.
Daconil 2787 ( chlorothalonil ) Golf Course Fungicide ―
Do not apply this product in a way that will contact workers or other persons or pets either directly or through drift. Only protected handlers may be in the area during application.
DeltaGard ( deltamethrin ) Turf Insecticide ―
DO NOT allow people or pets to re-enter the treated area until product has dried.
Heritage MAXX ( azoxystrobin ) Golf Course Fungicide ―
Do not re-enter treated turf during the restricted entry interval ( REI ) of 4 hours.
Killex ( 2,4-D, mecoprop, dicamba ) Turf Herbicide ―
Do not allow people ( other than applicator ) or pets on treatment area during application. Do not enter treated areas until spray has thoroughly dried.
Merit Solupak ( imidacloprid ) Turf Insecticide ―
Keep children or pets off treated area until spray is dry.
FORCE OF NATURE — GOLF — 2010 07 00 — COLLISION COURSE — RE-ENTRY INTERVALS — SIGN-POSTING — PRE-NOTIFICATION ( Report )
——————–
Cancer-Lunatic Position On Pesticides
Agriculture Industry
The use of pesticides in home or personal fruit-and-vegetable gar-dens should also be PHASED OUT.
Although the pesticides you use at home may be milder than those used for AGRICULTURE [ Wrong ! ], and you may use them less of-ten, there is still risk. [ ?!?! ]
In the AGRICULTURE BUSINESS, there are usually more rules in place to reduce exposure, such as training for people who apply pesticides to properly use equipment that protects them, plans to reduce residue levels and pesticide drift, and rules to limit access to sprayed areas.
We encourage farming practices that reduce the use of pesticides. [ ?!?! ]
——————–
Commentary From An Independent Perspective ―
Growers Are Being LULLED Into CANCER-LUNATIC LA-LA LAND.
Growers in the Agriculture Industry DO NOT want to get too involved with the issue of the PROHIBITION against pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.
For growers, LUNATIC LA-LA LAND is a euphoric dream-like mental state detached from the reality that Anti-Pesticide Enviro-Lunatics will IMMINENTLY ANNIHIHILATE the Agriculture Industry.
Cancer-Lunatics from Canadian Cancer Society want to DESTROY the Agriculture Industry !
Growers are DELUDED into believing that the Agriculture Industry will be FOREVER granted an EXCEPTION STATUS from Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION.
Growers DO NOT understand that the HATED GOLF INDUSTRY also enjoys an EXCEPTION STATUS, which itself will be SHORT-LIVED.
Both GOLF INDUSTRY and AGRICULTURE INDUSTRY use the VERY SAME ingredients for the control of pests.
If it is safe to eat pesticide-treated food, then it is safe to play on pesticide-treated golf courses.
Anti-Pesticide Cancer-Lunatic Terrorists DISAGREE !
Agriculture Is NEXT !
Cancer-Lunatics want to DESTROY their Agricultural Businesses, as well as their assets, their playing-customers, their homes, their lifestyles, their job security, their families, their children, their loved-ones, and their future.
Canadian Cancer Society, and other Anti-Pesticide Terrorist-Organizations, are planning to ANNIHILATE the Agriculture Industry.
AGRICULTURE – ORGANIC FOOD – NIGHTMARE & EXTORTION – DISMALLY BOGUS ( Web-Page )
AGRICULTURE – TARGETED BY ANTI-PESTICIDE ACTIVISTS … AND MORE ( Web-Page )
AGRICULTURE – AGRICULTURE IS NEXT ! – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY WANTS TO ANNIHILATE THE AGRICULTURE INDUSTRY – JERILYNN MAKI – ENVIRO-TERRORISTS UNMASKED – KAMLOOPS, BRITISH COLUMBIA – 2012 06 12 ( Report )
AGRICULTURE – AGRICULTURE IS NEXT ! – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY WANTS TO ANNIHILATE THE AGRICULTURE INDUSTRY – AGRICULTURE — EXPLORING THE CONNECTION – 2008 08 13 ( Reference )
AGRICULTURE – THE WISDOM OF WHELAN & AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH ( ACSH ) – UNMASKED — AGRICULTURE – PESTICIDES ON FOOD ARE SAFE – 2012 01 18 ( Report )
——————–
Cancer-Lunatic Position On Pesticides
Our Position On Non-Cosmetic Use Of Pesticides
The [ Canadian Cancer ] Society believes that when pesticides are needed to protect our health, safety or food supply, they should be part of a plan that includes pest prevention, using pesticides in the lowest amounts possible and using safer choices.
The risks and benefits of the non-cosmetic use of pesticides should be judged depending on each situation.
Where pesticides are necessary to protect our food supply or against the spread of disease, the Society recommends that:
The choice of chemicals should take into account their potential long-term health effects, like the risk of developing cancer in later years. [ ?!?! ]
Widespread chemical spraying should be used only as a last option [ ?!?! ] to protect human health and safety. [ ?!?! ]
If chemical spraying is needed, people must be warned about the risks and helped to protect vulnerable family members such as infants, elderly people and people with weak immune systems. [ Wrong ! ]
Guidelines that are based on evidence should be set up to help people decide which chemical treatments to use.
——————–
Cancer-Lunatic Position On Pesticides
Using Pesticides In Agriculture
We encourage farming practices that reduce the use of pesticides. The Society strongly believes that efforts to reduce the use of pesticides in agriculture need to be carefully balanced with efforts to protect : food security ( the safety, quality, availability and cost of food ), the health of Canadians, the environment, and the economic stability of farmers and other food producers.
——————–
Commentary From An Independent Perspective ―
MIS-INFORMING And TERRORIZING For Mere Donations.
In fact, there are NO valid reports of pest control product problems with infants, elderly people, and people with weak immune systems.
Furthermore, MEDICATION is the leading cause of poisoning in children, and NOT pest control products.
Besides, who is more knowledgeable ?
The 350 educated independent scientists at Health Canada who evaluate all the existing evidence to determine whether pest control products meet stringent health and safety requirements …
… or the Fact-Deficient Non-Expert Cancer-Lunatic Liars who MISINFORM and TERRORIZE the public for mere donations to Canadian Cancer Society.
——————–
Who are the activists who
DESTROYED HUNDREDS OF
BUSINESSES operating in the
Professional Lawn Care Industry ?!?!
Almost Half Of All
Anti-Pesticide Lunatic-Activists
Are Directly Supported
By Canadian Cancer Society
Who are the activists who DESTROYED HUNDREDS OF BUSINESSES operating in the Professional Lawn Care Industry ?!?!
There are BARELY 150 PROMINENT CULPRITS WHO CONSPIRE TO PROHIBIT against the use of pest control products … holding the Canadian public as PESTICIDE-HOSTAGES.
——————–
Cancer-LUNATICS
Almost HALF, approximately 60, of all these CULPRITS ( a.k.a. CANCER-LUNATICS ) are DIRECTLY SUPPORTED BY CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY.
About 60 Cancer-Lunatics are provided SAFE, SECURE, WELL-PAYING JOBS, with PAY-OFFS in the form of AWARDS, INCENTIVES, BONUSES, BOUNTIES, and ORGANIZATIONAL FINANCING …
… these PAY-OFFS are provided AT THE EXPENSE OF the jobs they ultimately DESTROY in the Professional Lawn Care Industry.
These Cancer-Lunatics are EMPLOYEES WHO ARE PAID SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNTS OF MONEY to work as HIRED-GUNS TO COERCE, INTIMIDATE, AND ALARM GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INTO PROHIBITING PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS.
Virtually all are same-sex … uneducated housewives.
——————–
The List Of Anti-Pesticide Golf-Hating Cancer-Lunatics !
BARRON, Jennie ― Kootenay Citizens For Alternatives To Pesticides ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society ― British Columbia
BECK, Christina ― British Columbia
BEGIC, Sanela ― Regina, Saskatchewan
BELL, Warren ― British Columbia
BINNS, Dawn ― Prince Edward Island
BURROWS, Mae ― Toxic Free Canada ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society ― British Columbia
COLERO, Brita ― British Columbia
DAGHOFER, Diana ― Prevent Cancer Now ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society ― British Columbia
Di NAERDO, Joanne ― Ontario
DUNCAN, Robyn ― Wildsight ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society ― British Columbia
DUYKER, Ashley ― British Columbia
ELSTON, Suzanne ― City of Oshawa ― The Environmental Factor ― Prevent Cancer Now ― SHIELDS for Canadian Cancer Society ― Ontario
ESHPETER, Evie ― Alberta
FALCONER, Nancy ― British Columbia
FORMAN, Gideon ― Canadian Association of Physicians
for the Environment ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society in British Columbia
GALLAGHER–JONES, Irene ― Ontario
GOODHAND, Peter ― Toronto, Ontario
GOTAY, Carolyn ― University of British Columbia ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society ― British Columbia
HALE, Ilona ― Kimberley, British Columbia
HAMIR, Arzeena ― Richmond Food Security Society ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society ― British Columbia
HAWKINS, Sarah ― Alberta
HAY, Marie Dolores ― Prince George, British Columbia
HOUSER, Emma ― Newfoundland
HUGHES, Stephanie ― Pesticide Free Nova Scotia ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society ― Nova Scotia
JERTIS, Paula ― Saskatchewan
KAMINSKY, Barbara ― British Columbia
KOSERSKI, Christine ― Ontario
LAZAR, Debbie ― British Columbia
LESCHIED, Heather ― Lake Windermere Project ― Wildsight ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society ― British Columbia
LEVELL, Lisa ― British Columbia
LOGAN, Heather ― Ontario
MacPHAIL, Sue ― British Columbia
MAJOR, Todd ― Canadian Cancer Society ― Toxic Free Canada ― British Columbia
MAKI, Jerilynn ― British Columbia
MAY, Elizabeth ― Green Party of Canada ― Sierra Club of Canada ― Prevent Cancer Now ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society
McCALLUM, Meg ― Pesticide Free Nova Scotia ― Nova Scotia
MEDHURST, Kerensa ― Prince George, British Columbia
MOORE, Patti ― British Columbia
MULCAHY, Lesley ― Nova Scotia
PARKS, Brittney ― British Columbia
PERCHALUK, Kathleen ― Ontario
RAEY, Natasha ― British Columbia
ROBINSON, Selina ― City of Coquitlam ― British Columbia
RUBIN, Carole ― How To Get Your Lawn Off Drugs ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society ― British Columbia
SCALES, Heather ― Prince Edward Island
SCHROEDER-BILLYARD, Adrianne ― British Columbia
SEELY, Kathryn ― British Columbia
SMITH, Cheryl ― Ontario
SNIDER, Ellen ― New Brunswick
STOTTS, Marion ― British Columbia
SWOVELAND, Britt ― British Columbia
TUKEY, Paul ― Safelawns ( U.S.A. ) ― SHIELD for Canadian Cancer Society & Ecojustice
WALKER, Robin ― Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment ― Ottawa, Ontario & Nova Scotia
WEBER, Lisa ― British Columbia
WHITE, Paula ― New Brunswick
WIGMORE, Judy ― Pesticide Free BC ― British Columbia
ZIEGLAR, Donna ― Alberta & Saskatchewan
ZIMMERMAN, Ellen ― Wildsight ― British Columbia
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – LIST OF CANCER-LUNATICS – VERSION 1 – 2012 12 31 ( Reports )
——————–
Demand a REVOCATION
of Canadian Cancer Society’s
REGISTERED CHARITY
TAX-EXEMPT STATUS
COMPLAIN
COMPLAIN
COMPLAIN
The #@!!%
Cancer-Lunatics
Must Be
Investigated
For Charity Fraud
& Conspiracy
The #@!!% Cancer-Lunatics CONSPIRED to IMPOSE NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS PROHIBITION, and deserve NO LESS than …
● ARRESTS
● FINES
● IMPRISONMENT
● SANCTIONS
● RESCINDING OF TAX-EXEMPT CHARITY STATUS
COMPLAINTS against the #@!!% Cancer-Society-Basterds will be CHARGED with FRAUD and CONSPIRACY under the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA.
In the event that criminal charges for FRAUD and CONSPIRACY are laid, the #@!!% Cancer-Society-Basterds should be advised that they have ALL have been identified on the basis of their statements, activities, affiliations, and whereabouts.
In the event that criminal charges for FRAUD and CONSPIRACY are laid, legal experts say that there is sufficient information to lead to a SUCCESSFUL PROSECUTION !
Many #@!!% Cancer-Society-Basterds will be ARRESTED and JAILED for FRAUD !
In court, Cancer-Society-Defendants will realize that NOT A SINGLE PERSON within the Environmental-Terrorist-Movement has ANY recognized expertise, training or background in matters concerning pest control products !
In court, Cancer-Society-Defendants will be unable to provide ANY SCIENTIFIC BASIS for their NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS CONSPIRACY to PROHIBIT against pest control products !
Rat-Out the Cancer-Basterds !
Demand a revocation of Cancer Society’s charity tax-exempt status !
No more free-money for terrorist activities !
Everybody Must STOP Making Donations to the Cancer-Basterds
——————–
The #@!!%
Cancer-Lunatics
DESERVE NO
TAX-FREE MONEY !
Contact the Authorities, and
COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN
What can YOU do against the #@!!% Cancer-Society-Basterds ?
Contact the Authorities, and COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN !
CONTACT BUSINESS, FUND-RAISING, GOVERNMENT, and TAXATION AGENCIES !
COMPLAIN about the MISAPPROPRIATION OF PUBLIC FUNDS at Canadian Cancer Society, and its PARTISAN ROLE IN PROHIBITION.
COMPLAINTS against the #@!!% Cancer-Society-Basterds will make them LIABLE FOR DAMAGES worth MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
If the #@!!% Cancer-Society-Basterds want to operate as Environmental-Terrorists, their CHARITY TAX-EXEMPT STATUS SHOULD BE REVOKED.
COMPLAINTS against them will also lead to A REVOCATION OF THEIR CHARITY TAX-EXEMPT STATUS !
DEMAND A REVOCATION OF THEIR CHARITY TAX-EXEMPT STATUS !
The #@!!% Cancer-Society-Basterds DESERVE NO FREE MONEY !
Environmental-Terrorist-Organizations like GREENPEACE have already lost its status in other jurisdictions.
CONTACT BUSINESS, FUND-RAISING, GOVERNMENT, and TAXATION AGENCIES !
RAT THEM OUT and STOP THE BASTERDS !
NO MORE TAX-FREE-MONEY FOR TERRORIST ACTIVITIES !
——————–
SHORT LIST of
Complaint Channels
Association of Fundraising Professionals
416 941 9144
Better Business Bureau
Eastern and Northern-Ontario, and Outaouais
613 237 4856
Mid-Western and Central Ontario
519 579 3080
Charity Intelligence Canada
416 363 1555
Canadian Taxpayers Federation
306 352 7199
EthicalOil
Complaint Web-Site
http://www.ethicaloil.org/write-the-revenue-minister/
Fill out the form on the web-site to write Minister Shea to report any radical or environmental lobby group you’ve seen masquerading as a charity so that their tax-payers subsidy comes to an end !
Government of Canada
Canada Revenue Agency ― Canada Revenue Agency Charities Directorate ― Charitable Organizations
1 800 267 2384
Government of Canada
Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre
1 888 495 8501
Government of Canada
Canada Revenue Agency ― Informant Leads Program
Brossard, Quebec ― 1 866 896 6317
Saint Catharines, Ontario ― 905 984 4830
Saint John, New Brunswick ― 506 636 4657
Surrey, British Columbia ― 1 866 846 3535
Winnipeg, Manitoba ― 1 866 453 0450
Government of Ontario
Lobbyists Registration Office
416 327 4053
Government of Ontario
Ministry of the Attorney General ― Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee ― Charitable Property Program
1 800 366 0335
Government of British Columbia
Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General
250 387 5311
Imagine Canada
Looking Into and Out for Canada’s Charities and Non-Profits
Calgary, Alberta ― 1 800 263 1178
Ottawa, Ontario ― 613 238 7555
Toronto, Ontario ― 416 597 2293
——————–
NORAHG has archived more information about COMPLAINT CHANNELS on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site …
COMPLAINT CHANNELS – BUSINESS, FUND-RAISING, GOVERNMENT, & TAXATION AGENCIES ( Web-Page )
COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN
COMPLAINT CHANNELS – LETTERS TO THE EDITOR – MEDIA CONTACTS LIBRARY ( Web-Page )
COMPLAINT CHANNELS – HERE’S HOW TO SUE THE BASTERDS’ BRAINS OUT ! – LITIGATION AGAINST ANTI-PESTICIDE ACTIVISTS – 2012 01 28 ( Report )
——————–
DISCOVER WHAT ANTI-PESTICIDE AND ENVIRO-LUNATIC TERRORISTS ARE DOING AND SAYING ABOUT SUBVERSIVELY IMPOSING THEIR LIFE-STYLE CHOICES AGAINST OUR SOCIETY.
Communities and businesses are being HARMED and DESTROYED and RAPED by PROHIBITIONS against pest control products used in the Urban Landscape, and other ACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM.
We are living in THE 9|11 ERA OF ANTI PESTICIDE AND ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM where at least ONE SUBVERSIVE ACT OF TERROR is Perpetrated EVERY SINGLE DAY by Enviro Lunatic Activists.
We are living in the DARK AGE OF ANTI PESTICIDE TERRORISM where sound science is trumped by FAKE SCIENTISTS, JUNK SCIENCE and UNVERIFIABLE SECRET EVIDENCE through FABRICATION, INNUENDO, and INTERNET RUMOUR ― scientific research PROVES that pest control products CAUSE NO HARM and can be USED SAFELY.
An informed public is better able to protect itself and its communities and businesses from so-called activists who are THE LEAST QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE ANY ADVICE about pest control products or the environment.
NORAHG is the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that seek to harm and destroy the Green space industry, and the well being of our communities.
NORAHG morally represents the VAST SILENT MAJORITY of people associated with turf and ornamental plant maintenance who are OPPOSED to Anti Pesticide PROHIBITION and the CLOSURE or ABANDONMENT of green spaces under the RIDICULOUS PRETEXT of somehow « saving » the environment.
NORAHG is a NATIONAL NON PROFIT NON PARTISAN organization that does not accept money from corporations or governments or trade associations, and represents NO VESTED INTERESTS WHATSOEVER.
NORAHG is dedicated to reporting the work of RESPECTED and HIGHLY RATED EXPERTS who promote ENVIRONMENTAL REALISM and PESTICIDE TRUTHS.
NORAHG pledges to deliver comprehensive reports that are worthy of peoples’ time and of peoples’ concern, reports that might ordinarily never have breached the parapet.
NORAHG was the brainchild of William H. Gathercole and his colleagues in 1991. Mr. Gathercole is now retired, although his name continues to appear as founder.
Force Of Nature was launched by NORAHG for CONTINUOUS transmission on the Internet on January 1st, 2009 ― however, the VERY FIRST Stand-Alone FORCE OF NATURE Report was issued on September 19th, 2008.
On January 1st, 2009, Force Of Nature Reports were launched for CONTINUOUS transmission on the Internet ― however, the VERY FIRST Stand-Alone Force Of Nature Report was issued on September 19th, 2008.
On March 15th, 2010, Uncle Adolph independently launched The Pesticide Truths, an easy-to-use Web-Site that collects relevant reports of information right-off-the-press.
Pesticide Truths and Force Of Nature, in some ways, are like Google for everything concerning the SURVERSIVE ACTIVITIES of Anti-Pesticide and Enviro-Lunatic Terrorists.
——————–
For the original copy of this Force Of Nature Report, go to the following link …
——————–
Here are Web-Pages and Reports about CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY, just in case you missed them …
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – SUBVERSIVE, CONTEMPTIBLE, AND RADICAL ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – DEMANDS NO GOLF EXCEPTION STATUS – POSITION STATEMENTS AGAINST THE GOLF INDUSTRY – PESTICIDE BAN ( A.K.A. PHASE-OUT ) NECESSARY BECAUSE GOLF IS COSMETIC ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – NO DIRECT PROOF PESTICIDES CAUSE CANCER ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – WANTS TO ANNIHILATE THE AGRICULTURE INDUSTRY – ENVIRO-TERRORISTS UNMASKED – JERILYNN MAKI — KAMLOOPS, BRITISH COLUMBIA – 2012 06 12 ( Reports )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – LIST OF CANCER-LUNATICS – VERSION 1 – 2012 12 31 ( Reports )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – LETTERS TO THE EDITOR – RESPONDING TO LUNATIC JIHADISTS – WARREN BELL – GIDEON FORMAN – BARBARA KAMINSKY ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – LETTERS TO THE EDITOR – RESPONDING TO SCREECHING MONKEYS ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – LETTERS TO THE EDITOR – RESPONDING TO SCREECHING MONKEYS – 2012 ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – LETTERS TO THE EDITOR – RESPONDING TO SCREECHING MONKEYS – 2011 ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – CULPRIT – MOORE, PATTI – RECIPIENT OF THE 2011 AWARD FOR BEST ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORIST-OF-THE-YEAR ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – REFERENCES FOR COMPLAINTS AND LITIGATION ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – CULPRIT – SEELY, KATHRYN – THE LUNATIC GRINNING MISTRESS OF MIS-INFORMATION IN BRITISH COLUMBIA ( Web-Page )
——————–
NORAHG has archived more information on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site …
THE PESTICIDE TRUTHS WEB-SITE
PESTICIDE BANS ARE A FARCE ( Report )
PAUL TUKEY – THE BIN LADEN OF ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORISM ( Web-Page )
PAUL TUKEY – IT’S LIKE INVITING HITLER TO A JEWISH FESTIVAL – 2012 12 11 – CARD
PAUL TUKEY – IT’S LIKE INVITING BIN LADEN TO A 9-11 MEMORIAL – 2012 12 04 – CARD
PAUL TUKEY – WCTA MUST GET ITS HEAD OUT OF ITS ANTI-PESTICIDE BUTT – 2012 12 03 – CARD
WESTERN CANADA TURFGRASS LEADERS MUST PULL ITS ANTI-PESTICIDE HEAD OUT OF THEIR BUTTS ( Web-Page )
REAL TRENDS AGAINST PESTICIDE BANS ( Web-Page )
CARNAGE CAUSED BY CATASTROPHIC ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION – MAIN WEB-PAGE
GOLF DESTRUCTION – GOLF IS NEXT ( Web-Page )
WHITE PAPER – THE MYTHS ABOUT BANNING PESTICIDES ( Part 2 ) – LEADING SCIENTIFIC HEALTH AND POLICY EXPERTS
COMPLAINT CHANNELS – COMPLAIN ABOUT THE ANTI-PESTICIDE LUNATICS ( Web-Page )
THE COMPLETE LIBRARY OF REPORTS & REFERENCES ( Web-Page )
PESTICIDE TRUTHS REPORTS ( Web-Page )
——————–
