The New York Times’ Fanatжcal Attack Against Lawn Care – Lawns Are Symbols of Racism – 2019 08 00

–

Background Information

Introduction

New York Times’ fanatжcal attack against lawn care ―

Lawns Are Symbols of Racism

New York Times’ lawn-hating fanatжcs are lying sacks of crжp ― here’s why ―

New York Times is an American newspaper based in New York City with world-wide influence and readership.

It has long been regarded as a « newspaper of record ».

The paper’s motto is « All the News That’s Fit to Print ».

President Donald Trump considers it a « failed » newspaper.

In its video entitled « How Americans Learned to Love Their Front Lawns », New York Times has ATTACKED LAWN CARE by implying that …

• Maintaining an attractive lawn, a so-called PERFECT LAWN, is NOT desirable.

• Owning and maintaining an attractive lawn is part of a DOCTRINE OF RACISM.

• DECEIVING THE PUBLIC by showing an interview with [ racist ] women who stated they PREFERRED to live exclusively near other white people … neither of them ever said anything about preferring, owning, or maintaining a lawn.

New York Times concocts fake-news and states LIES like they are truth.

It has also spread fake-news about lawns and landscaping, which are linked to …

• global warming • non-essential life-styles • social engineering • wealthy people • and more.

New York Times’ fanatжcal lawn-hating editors and reporters are subversive lying sacks of crжp ― they are affectionately known as NYT-fanatжcs.

NYT-fanatжcs LIE and LIE and LIE and LIE.

―――――――――――――――――――――

August 8th, 2019

The New York Times

RE – Transcript Of New York Times’ Video Attack Against Lawn Care

Video Narrator David Botti

Selected And Adapted Excerpts

Reference –

The Great American Lawn — How the Dream Was Manufactured

Reference — New York Times — 2019 08 09 — The Great American Lawn — How the Dream Was Manufactured

August 13th, 2019

Breibart

RE – New York Times’ Attacks Against Lawn Care

Selected And Adapted Excerpts

Reference –

Lawns Are Symbols Of Racism — Bad For Global Warming

Reference — New York Times — 2019 08 13 — Lawns Are Symbols Of Racism — Bad For Global Warming

―――――――――――――――――――――

Lying Sack Of Crжp – The New York Times’ Fanatжcal Attack Against Lawn Care

Lies About « Lawn-Racism »

New York Times has wrongly implied that …

Owning & Maintaining An Attractive

Lawn Is Part Of A Doctrine Of Racism

An Attractive Lawn Is Non-Essential

Attractive Lawns Can Only Be Owned &
Maintained By Those People Who Are Wealthy

New York Times’ attack against lawn care ―

The New York Times has created a seven-minute-video on how lawn care is PROBLEMATIC, when viewed through the lens of SOCIAL JUSTICE.

« These lawns COME ON THE BACKS OF SLAVES » [ ?!?! ], [ video ] narrator David Botti continues, zooming in on a painting of [ slave-owner & President ] George Washington in a field to highlight [ black ] men cutting the grass with scythes.

[ Video ] narrator David Botti states ―

It’s GRUELING ENDLESS WORK.

By the 1870s we also see American culture slowly start to embrace lawns for the PRIVILEGED [ i.e. WEALTHY and WHITE ] MASSES.

Transcript of New York Times’ video attack against lawn care ―

What was [ slave-owner & President ] General Washington doing a month after independence is declared ?!?!

He’s writing home to his estate manager about landscaping plans.

He’s talking about things like flowering shrubs and planting locust trees, making groves.

See, [ slave-owners & Presidents ] Washington and Thomas Jefferson are die-hard fans of European landscape architecture.

The RICH [ i.e. WEALTHY ] in Europe are building great, sprawling lawns that have NO AGRICULTURAL VALUE. [ i.e. NON-ESSENTIAL ?!?! ]

They’re purely STATUS SYMBOLS.

So [ slave-owners & Presidents ] Washington and Jefferson help popularize these great lawns in America, but only for THOSE WHO CAN AFFORD IT. [ i.e. those who are WEALTHY ].

And these lawns COME ON THE BACKS OF SLAVES. [ i.e. DOCTRINE OF RACISM ?!?! ]

[ See video at 02 minutes 10 seconds. See later segment. ]

Tools like [ scythes ] keep the grass groomed.

It’s GRUELING ENDLESS WORK.

Time goes by.

―――――――――――――――――――――

Lying Sack Of Crжp – The New York Times’ Fanatжcal Attack Against Lawn Care

More Lies About « Lawn-Racism »

New York Times wrongly implies that …

Owning & Maintaining An Attractive
Lawn Is Part Of A Doctrine Of Racism

New York Times has deceived the public by …

Showing An Interview With White [ Racist ] Women

Who Stated They Preferred To Live Exclusively Near Other

White People … Neither Of Them Ever Said Anything

About Preferring, Owning, Or Maintaining A Lawn

New York Times’ attack against lawn care ―

New York Times refers to the work of historian Ted Steinberg, who calls « tidy lawns » the « outdoor expression of 1950s conformism ».

To drive home the point, NYT inserts vintage footage of two [ racist ] women being interviewed in their yards talking about how they moved to their communities to LIVE EXCLUSIVELY NEAR OTHER WHITE PEOPLE.

[ See video at 05 minutes, 45 seconds. See later segment. ]

[ Neither of these racist women says anything about preferring, owning, or maintaining a lawn. New York Times’ fanatжcal lawn-hating editors and reporters are subversive lying sacks of crжp. ]

Transcript of New York Times’ video attack against lawn care ―

Historian Ted Steinberg calls these rows of TIDY LAWN an « outdoor expression of 1950s conformism ».

But that conformism isn’t meant for everyone.

« I moved here because it was a WHITE community ».

[ See video at 05 minutes 45 seconds. See later segment. ]

« And we understood that it was going to be ALL WHITE and we were very happy to buy a home here. »

―――――――――――――――――――――

Background Information

Racism Is Not Related To Lawn Care

NYT-fanatжcs are lying sacks of crжp ― here’s why ―

Near the end of the video [ at 05 minutes 55 seconds ], it was stated that HOUSING DISCRIMINATION toward people of color occurred in 1950s suburbia.

It is an indisputable fact that people of color often FACED DISCRIMINATION when buying in the suburbs.

However, HOUSING DISCRIMINATION has NEVER been shown to be related to lawn care ownership and maintenance.

Consequently, NYT-fanatжcs have been PROVEN WRONG and DEBUNKED about LAWN-RACISM.

New York Times’ fanatжcal lawn-hating editors and reporters are subversive lying sacks of crжp.

―――――――――――――――――――――

How Americans Learned To Love Their Front Lawns -- Video Recording -- 07 Minutes 10 Seconds -- Video Narrator David Botti

―――――――――――――――――――――

About NORAHG

We Speak The Whole Truth
About Lying Sacks Of Crжp
From An Independent Perspective

We are the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that conspire to destroy the Green space and other industries ( NORAHG ). As a non-profit and independent organization, we are environmentalists who are dedicated to reporting about truth-challenged lawn-hating NYT-fanatжcs ( HUJE ) who conspire to destroy businesses that are dependent on the use of safe and effective conventional pest control products. We also report on the work of several highly-rated leading experts who have recognized expertise, training, and background in matters concerning pest control products, and who promote environmental realism and pesticide truths.

Not surprisingly, lawn-hating NYT-fanatжcs have demonstrated that they are incapable of processing overwhelming scientific evidence. Should we trust these fanatжcs, who conveniently ignore scientific evidence, and attempt to impose their politicized-doctrines and twisted life-style choices against our society ?!?!

We dare to defy the lawn-hating NYT-fanatжcs by exploring the whole truth from an independent perspective on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site … https://pesticidetruths.com/ If you wish to receive free reports on issues that concern you, please contact us at … force.of.de.nature@gmail.com WILLIAM H GATHERCOLE AND NORAH G