UPDATE
Health Canada
Chemicals Evaluated
As ACCEPTABLE FOR
CONTINUED REGISTRATION
By Pest Management
Regulatory Agency
Of Health Canada
――――――――――――――――――――
The Cost Of Pesticide Registration In Canada
According to Dr. Lorne Hepworth, President of CropLife Canada ― http://wp.me/P1jq40-2eG
The process to have a pesticide registered in Canada can take an average of nearly 10 years and costs over 256 million dollars.
That’s a big investment, so the manufacturers ensure the products they submit for registration are SAFE and work the way they are intended to.
――――――――――――――――――――
Reviews And Assessments By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
Health Canada regulates pest control products in Canada.
Pest control products are regulated by Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA ), which requires THOROUGH SCIENTIFIC REVIEWS AND SAFETY ASSESSMENTS to ensure they meet strict health and environmental standards and are shown to have value.
In Canada, pest control products are one of THE MOST STRINGENTLY REGULATED PRODUCTS.
Health Canada employs 350 expert-scientists whose job is to REVIEW AND ASSESS pest control products.
These expert-scientists include ― biologists, chemists, entomologists, epidemiologists, plant pathologists, toxicologists, and weed scientists.
These expert-scientists help ensure that only pest control products that meet the strict health and environmental standards outlined by the Pest Management Regulatory Agency are registered for use or sale in Canada.
Health Canada and PMRA have THE ESSENTIAL EXPERTISE on pest control products.
――――――――――――――――――――
Re-Evaluations By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
Currently, 572 active ingredients are found in approximately 5000 pest control products registered under the PCPA in Canada.
At the time of their initial registration, these pest control products were considered ACCEPTABLE ( i.e. met health, environment and value standards of the time ).
Since then, science has evolved, and additional information may be available which could affect the risk and value profile of a pest control product.
It is incumbent on the PMRA to RE-EVALUATE REGISTRATION AND POST-REGISTRATION DECISIONS ON A REGULAR BASIS to determine whether the use of pest control products continues to be ACCEPTABLE ACCORDING TO CURRENT STANDARDS.
Moreover, Canadian FEDERAL LAW specifies the legal foundation for the RE-EVALUATION of pest control products.
FEDERAL LAW prescribes that the RE-EVALUATION of all pest control products be initiated on a 15-YEAR CYCLE to ensure that they continue to MEET CURRENT SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS.
According to Health Canada, the RE-EVALUATION of pest control products registered before 1995 has provided IMPRESSIVE RESULTS ―
In 2001, the Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA ) implemented the four-program re-evaluation approach1 for pesticides registered prior to January 1995.
This approach is now reaching completion.
As of September 2010, over 90% of the 401 active ingredients covered under the original approach have been addressed, with the vast majority of assessments resulting in changes to the conditions of use.
A significant proportion of the active ingredients ( over 20% ) have been identified for phase-out ( i.e. discontinuation ) as a result of the PMRA’s review or voluntarily discontinuation by their manufacturers.
Very few active ingredients have been accepted for continued use without any label changes [ i.e. MITIGATION MEASURES ].
――――――――――――――――――――
Re-Evaluation Summary Table By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
On March 31st, 2013, Health Canada published a RE-EVALUATION SUMMARY TABLE which provides a summary of the proposed and/or final decisions made with respect to RE-EVALUATION OF ACTIVE INGREDIENTS.
The simple fact of being LISTED in this table DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE PEST CONTROL PRODUCT POSES A SIGNIFICANT HAZARD to the public from use.
Health Canada considered all of the information in a WEIGHT-OF-THE-EVIDENCE APPROACH.
However, chemicals have been REMOVED or PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL by Health Canada.
Additionally, almost ONE-THIRD OF ALL PRODUCTS REMOVED WERE USED EXCLUSIVELY IN THE GOLF INDUSTRY, including Arrest-75W, ProTurf FF II, ProTurf Granular Fungicide V, ProTurf Granular Insecticide 1, Quintozene 75 Per Cent, Terraneb SP, and Tersan 1991.
And almost HALF OF ALL PRODUCTS REMOVED were REMOVED VOLUNTARILY by the registrant, or were NOT SUPPORTED for further re-evaluation ( i.e. the cost to keep the product in the market-place was not profitable for the registrant a.k.a. manufacturer ).
Several active ingredients have been evaluated as ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION, including 2,4-D, Bacillus thuringensis, dicamba, dichlobenil, dithiopyr, MCPA, metalaxyl, Mineral Oil, and propiconazole.
The next segments contains selected and adapted excerpts from the RE-EVALUATION SUMMARY TABLE concerning PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS USED IN THE URBAN LANDSCAPE, which include those products used by the Golf Industry, the Professional Lawn Care Industry, and the Ornamental Plant Maintenance Industry.
REFERENCES ― HEALTH CANADA
HEALTH CANADA — RE-EVALUATION PROGRAM — 2010 12 01 — RE-EVALUATION NOTE REV2010-18 ( Reference )
HEALTH CANADA — RE-EVALUATION PROGRAM — 2010 09 27 — PROGRESS REPORT ON PMRA RE-EVALUATION WORKPLAN ( APRIL 2009 TO MARCH 2010 ) REV2010-15 ( Reference )
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
LIST Of The STATUS
Of Chemicals Evaluated
As ACCEPTABLE FOR
CONTINUED REGISTRATION
By Pest Management
Regulatory Agency
Of Health Canada
March 31st, 2013
Health Canada
Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA )
Selected And Adapted Excerpts
Pest Control Products Used In The Urban Landscape
――――――――――――――――――――
Health Canada regulates pest control products in Canada. Pest control products are regulated by Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA ), which requires thorough scientific reviews and safety assessments to ensure they meet strict health and environmental standards and are shown to have value. In Canada, pest control products are one of the most stringently regulated products. Health Canada employs 350 expert-scientists whose job is to assess pest control products.
――――――――――――――――――――
Health Canada Re-Evaluation Summary Table ― March 31st, 2013
LIST Of Products With Active Ingredients Acceptable For Continued Registration
Banner MAXX Fungicide ( propiconazole 14.3% )
Banvel 483 Herbicide Solution ( dicamba 483 g a.e./L )
Casoron G-4 Granular Herbicide ( dichlobenil 4% )
Civitas Fungicide For Golf Course Turf ( Mineral Oil 98% )
Clear Choice Concentrate Selective Herbicide ( 2,4-D 6.33 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 4.04 g a.e./L, dicamba 0.78 g a.e./L )
Dimension Turf Herbicide ( dithiopyr 124 grams per litre )
Dipel WP Wettable Powder Biological Insecticide ( Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki 32% )
Dormant Oil Emulsifiable Insecticidal Spray ( Mineral Oil, 98.5% )
Instrata Fungicide ( chlorothalonil 362 grams per litre, propiconazole 57 grams per litre, fludioxonil 14.5 grams per litre )
Killex Turf Herbicide Concentrate ( 2,4-D 190 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 100 g a.e./L, dicamba 18 g a.e./L )
MCPA Amine 500 Liquid Farm Weed Killer Rangeland, Grass Pasture and Turf ( MCPA 500 g a.e./L )
Oracle Dicamba Agricultural Herbicide ( dicamba 480 g a.e./L )
Par III Turf Herbicide Solution ( 2,4-D 190 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 100 g a.e./L, dicamba 18 g a.e./L )
Pro Tri-Kil Turf Herbicide ( 2,4-D 190 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 100 g a.e./L, dicamba 18 g a.e./L )
Quali-Pro Propiconazole 14.3 ME Turf Fungicide ( propiconazole 154.5 grams per litre ( 14.3% ) )
Subdue MAXX Fungicide ( metalaxyl-M and S-isomer 240 grams per litre )
Superior Oil Concentrate ( Mineral Oil 83% )
Thuricide 48LV Biological Insecticide ( Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki 19% )
Vanquish Herbicide ( dicamba 480 g a.e./L )
Vectobac 200g Biological Larvicide Granules ( Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis )
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
DETAILS Concerning
Chemicals Evaluated
As ACCEPTABLE FOR
CONTINUED REGISTRATION
By Pest Management
Regulatory Agency
Of Health Canada
March 31st, 2013
Health Canada
Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA )
Selected And Adapted Excerpts
Pest Control Products Used In The Urban Landscape
――――――――――――――――――――
Health Canada regulates pest control products in Canada. Pest control products are regulated by Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA ), which requires thorough scientific reviews and safety assessments to ensure they meet strict health and environmental standards and are shown to have value. In Canada, pest control products are one of the most stringently regulated products. Health Canada employs 350 expert-scientists whose job is to assess pest control products.
――――――――――――――――――――
DETAILS Concerning Chemicals Evaluated By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
Health Canada Re-Evaluation Summary Table ― March 31st, 2013
2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid ( 2,4-D ) and its salt and ester forms
STATUS
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
NO FURTHER MITIGATION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
PRODUCT NAME ( ACTIVE INGREDIENT )
2,4-D Amine 600 Liquid Herbicide ( 2,4-D, present as dimethylamine salt, 564 g a.e./L )
PRODUCT MIXTURES THAT CONTAIN 2,4-D
Clear Choice Concentrate Selective Herbicide ( 2,4-D 6.33 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 4.04 g a.e./L, dicamba 0.78 g a.e./L )
Killex Turf Herbicide Concentrate ( 2,4-D 190 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 100 g a.e./L, dicamba 18 g a.e./L )
Par III Turf Herbicide Solution ( 2,4-D 190 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 100 g a.e./L, dicamba 18 g a.e./L )
Pro Tri-Kil Turf Herbicide ( 2,4-D 190 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 100 g a.e./L, dicamba 18 g a.e./L )
FINAL DECISION ― 2008 05 16
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION ON LAWN AND TURF, agriculture, forestry, and industrial uses with the exception of the discontinuation of 2,4-D products applied to aquatic areas.
Final MITIGATION MEASURES include new/revised label statements to further protect workers and the environment.
UPDATE ― 2009 09 17
Data required under Section 12 related to chemistry and toxicology, as well as rationales received for environment data requirements, have been reviewed.
These confirmed that 2,4-D continues to be ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
As a result, NO FURTHER MITIGATION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
REFERENCES ― HEALTH CANADA
HEALTH CANADA — 2,4-D — 2009 09 17 — QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS — FINAL DECISION ON THE RE-EVALUATION OF 2,4-D ( Reference )
HEALTH CANADA — 2,4-D — 2008 06 16 — RE-EVALUATION DECISION RVD2008-11 ( Reference )
HEALTH CANADA — 2,4-D — 2008 05 16 — QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT 2,4-D ( Reference )
HEALTH CANADA — 2,4-D — 2006 08 16 — LAWN AND TURF USES OF 2,4-D — RE-EVALUATION NOTE REV2006-11( Reference )
REFERENCES ― ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
EPA — 2,4-D — 2007 08 08 — DECISION NOT TO INITIATE SPECIAL REVIEW FOR 2,4-D ( Reference )
EPA — 2,4-D — 2005 06 00 — RE-REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY DECISION FOR 2,4-D ( Reference )
PRODUCT LABELS
LABEL — 2,4-D AMINE 600 LIQUID HERBICIDE
LABEL — CLEAR CHOICE CONCENTRATE SELECTIVE HERBICIDE
LABEL — KILLEX TURF HERBICIDE CONCENTRATE
LABEL — PAR III TURF HERBICIDE SOLUTION
LABEL — PRO TRI-KIL TURF HERBICIDE
WEB-PAGE & REPORTS ― 2,4-D HERBICIDE
2,4-D HERBICIDE – EVALUATIONS & ASSESSMENTS ( Web-Page )
2,4-D HERBICIDE – HIGHLY IMPLAUSIBLE CARCINOGENIC OUTCOMES WITH 2,4-D – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( EPA ) – CANCER CLASSIFICATION WITH DESCRIPTORS – PART 1 OF 3 – 2012 11 00 ( Report )
2,4-D HERBICIDE – THE INDUSTRY TASK FORCE II ON 2,4-D RESEARCH DATA – REVISED WEB-SITE – MYTHS VERSUS FACTS – UPDATE – 2012 09 00 ( Reports )
2,4-D HERBICIDE – THE VON STACKELBERG STUDY – IMPLAUSIBLE CARCINOGENIC OUTCOMES – 2012 02 01 ( Reports )
――――――――――――――――――――
DETAILS Concerning Chemicals Evaluated By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
Health Canada Re-Evaluation Summary Table ― March 31st, 2013
Bacillus thuringensis
STATUS
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
RE-EVALUATION NOT WARRANTED.
MITIGATION MEASURES.
PRODUCT NAMES ( ACTIVE INGREDIENTS )
Dipel WP Wettable Powder Biological Insecticide ( Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki 32% )
Thuricide 48LV Biological Insecticide ( Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki 19% )
Vectobac 200g Biological Larvicide Granules ( Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis )
FINAL DECISION ― 2008 05 06
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES to include new/revised label statements to further protect workers, by-standers and the environment ( includes precautionary statements, personal protective equipment, first aid statements, resistance management statements, a PROHIBITION to use in any type of irrigation system, aerial application instructions, environmental hazard statements, revised directions for use statements for domestic products and other statements ).
UPDATE
Following the publication of RVD2008-18, several stake-holders filed Notices of Objection in July 2008.
The PMRA has carefully reviewed this information, and concluded that a reconsideration of the RE-EVALUATION DECISION for Bacillus thuringiensis is NOT WARRANTED.
However, some MITIGATION MEASURES and label statements have been revised.
REFERENCES ― HEALTH CANADA
HEALTH CANADA — BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS — 2008 05 06 — RE-EVALUATION DECISION DOCUMENT RVD2008-18 ( Reference )
HEALTH CANADA — BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS — 2006 11 16 — PROPOSED ACCEPTABILITY FOR CONTINUING REGISTRATION PACR2006-09 ( Reference )
PRODUCT LABELS
LABEL — DIPEL WP WETTABLE POWDER BIOLOGICAL INSECTICIDE
LABEL — THURICIDE 48LV BIOLOGICAL INSECTICIDE
LABEL — VECTOBAC 200G BIOLOGICAL LARVICIDE GRANULES
――――――――――――――――――――
DETAILS Concerning Chemicals Evaluated By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
Health Canada Re-Evaluation Summary Table ― March 31st, 2013
dicamba
STATUS
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES.
PRODUCT NAMES ( ACTIVE INGREDIENTS )
Banvel 483 Herbicide Solution ( dicamba 483 g a.e./L )
Oracle Dicamba Agricultural Herbicide ( dicamba 480 g a.e./L )
Vanquish Herbicide ( dicamba 480 g a.e./L )
PRODUCT MIXTURES THAT CONTAIN DICAMBA
Clear Choice Concentrate Selective Herbicide ( 2,4-D 6.33 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 4.04 g a.e./L, dicamba 0.78 g a.e./L )
Killex Turf Herbicide Concentrate ( 2,4-D 190 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 100 g a.e./L, dicamba 18 g a.e./L )
Par III Turf Herbicide Solution ( 2,4-D 190 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 100 g a.e./L, dicamba 18 g a.e./L )
Pro Tri-Kil Turf Herbicide ( 2,4-D 190 g a.e./L, mecoprop-P 100 g a.e./L, dicamba 18 g a.e./L )
FINAL DECISION ― 2008 08 05
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION ON LAWN AND TURF, agriculture and industrial uses with the exception of the DISCONTINUATION of dicamba products containing the diethanolamine ( DEA ) form of dicamba.
Final MITIGATION MEASURES include new/revised label statements to further protect workers from exposure ( e.g. personal protective equipment requirements ) and to protect the environment ( e.g. buffer zones ).
REFERENCES ― HEALTH CANADA
HEALTH CANADA — DICAMBA — 2008 08 05 — RE-EVALUATION DECISION RVD2008-28 ( Reference )
HEALTH CANADA — DICAMBA — 2007 08 27 — PROPOSED RE-EVALUATION DECISION PRVD2007-05 ( Reference )
PRODUCT LABELS
LABEL — BANVEL 483 HERBICIDE SOLUTION
LABEL — ORACLE DICAMBA AGRICULTURAL HERBICIDE
LABEL — VANQUISH HERBICIDE
https://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Label-Vanquish-Herbicide-2010-10-26.pdf
LABEL — CLEAR CHOICE CONCENTRATE SELECTIVE HERBICIDE
LABEL — KILLEX TURF HERBICIDE CONCENTRATE
LABEL — PAR III TURF HERBICIDE SOLUTION
LABEL — PRO TRI-KIL TURF HERBICIDE
――――――――――――――――――――
DETAILS Concerning Chemicals Evaluated By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
Health Canada Re-Evaluation Summary Table ― March 31st, 2013
dichlobenil
STATUS
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES.
PRODUCT NAME ( ACTIVE INGREDIENT )
Casoron G-4 Granular Herbicide ( dichlobenil 4% )
FINAL DECISION ― 2006 03 29 & 2005 10 25
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES include new/revised label statements to further protect workers ( personal protective equipment, re-entry intervals ), domestic handlers( precautionary statements ) and the environment ( environmental hazard statements ); label amendment to limit the maximum application rate to 11.0 kg a.i./ha; and amend commercial labels to identify specific areas where dichlobenil is used for nutsedge control.
REFERENCES ― HEALTH CANADA
HEALTH CANADA — DICHLOBENIL — 2006 03 29 — RE-EVALUATION DECISION DOCUMENT RRD2006-14 ( Reference )
HEALTH CANADA — DICHLOBENIL — 2005 10 25 — PROPOSED ACCEPTABILITY FOR CONTINUING REGISTRATION — RE-EVALUATION OF DICHLOBENIL PACR2005-10 ( Reference )
PRODUCT LABEL
LABEL — CASORON G-4 GRANULAR HERBICIDE
――――――――――――――――――――
DETAILS Concerning Chemicals Evaluated By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
Health Canada Re-Evaluation Summary Table ― March 31st, 2013
dithiopyr
STATUS
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES.
PRODUCT NAME ( ACTIVE INGREDIENT )
Dimension Turf Herbicide ( dithiopyr 124 grams per litre )
FINAL DECISION ― 2009 09 11
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
Proposed MITIGATION MEASURES include new/revised label statements to protect human health and the environment ( including clarification of the maximum number of applications per year, a restricted-entry interval, precautionary environmental statements, and buffer zones ).
REFERENCES ― HEALTH CANADA
HEALTH CANADA — DITHYOPYR — 2009 09 11 — RE-EVALUATION DECISION RVD2009-15 ( Reference )
HEALTH CANADA — DITHYOPYR — 2008 12 03 — CONSULTATION DOCUMENT ON DITHIOPYR — PROPOSED RE-EVALUATION DECISION PRVD2009-01 ( Reference )
PRODUCT LABEL
LABEL — DIMENSION TURF HERBICIDE
https://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Label-Dimension-Turf-Herbicide-2010-07-27.pdf
――――――――――――――――――――
DETAILS Concerning Chemicals Evaluated By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
Health Canada Re-Evaluation Summary Table ― March 31st, 2013
MCPA
STATUS
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES.
PRODUCT NAME ( ACTIVE INGREDIENT )
MCPA Amine 500 Liquid Farm Weed Killer Rangeland, Grass Pasture and Turf ( MCPA 500 g a.e./L )
LAWN & TURF ― FINAL DECISION ― 2008 05 22
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES include new/revised label statements to further protect workers and the environment ( includes personal protective equipment, re-entry intervals, buffer zones, environmental hazards and other statements ).
REFERENCES ― HEALTH CANADA
HEALTH CANADA — MCPA — 2008 05 22 — RE-EVALUATION DECISION DOCUMENT RVD2008-20 ( Reference )
HEALTH CANADA — MCPA — 2006 04 28 — PROPOSED ACCEPTABILITY FOR CONTINUING REGISTRATION — RE-EVALUATION OF THE LAWN AND TURF USES PACR2006-5 ( Reference )
PRODUCT LABEL
LABEL — MCPA AMINE 500
https://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Label-MCPA-Amine-500-2009-12-21-Dow.pdf
――――――――――――――――――――
DETAILS Concerning Chemicals Evaluated By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
Health Canada Re-Evaluation Summary Table ― March 31st, 2013
metalaxyl and metalaxyl-M
STATUS
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES.
PRODUCT NAME ( ACTIVE INGREDIENT )
Subdue MAXX Fungicide ( metalaxyl-M and S-isomer 240 grams per litre )
FINAL DECISION ― 2008 01 30
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES include new/revised label statements to further protect workers and the environment ( including re-entry interval, personal protective equipment, ground and surface water advisory statements, drift prevention statements and other label statements ).
UPDATE ― 2011 09 30
Review of environmental data, required under Section 12 of the PCPA, confirmed that the use of metalaxyl and metalaxyl-m is ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
As a result, revised buffer zones and updated standard statements will be added to certain labels.
REFERENCES ― HEALTH CANADA
HEALTH CANADA — METALAXYL & METALAXYL-M — 2008 01 30 — RE-EVALUATION DECISION DOCUMENT RVD2008-03 ( Reference )
HEALTH CANADA — METALAXYL & METALAXYL-M — 2007 11 05 — PROPOSED RE-EVALUATION DECISION PRVD2007-10 ( Reference )
PRODUCT LABEL
LABEL — SUBDUE MAXX FUNGICIDE
https://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Label-Subdue-MAXX-Fungicide-2006-04-03.pdf
――――――――――――――――――――
DETAILS Concerning Chemicals Evaluated By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
Health Canada Re-Evaluation Summary Table ― March 31st, 2013
Mineral Oil
STATUS
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES.
PRODUCT NAMES ( ACTIVE INGREDIENTS )
Civitas Fungicide For Golf Course Turf ( Mineral Oil 98% )
Dormant Oil Emulsifiable Insecticidal Spray ( Mineral Oil 98.5% )
Superior Oil Concentrate ( Mineral Oil 83% )
FINAL DECISION
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES to include new/revised label statements to further protect workers and the environment ( includes personal protective equipment, restricted re-entry interval, buffer zones, environmental hazards and other statements ).
REFERENCES ― HEALTH CANADA
HEALTH CANADA — MINERAL OIL — 2011 06 14 — REGISTRATION DECISION RD2011-10 — SPRAY OIL 10 TECHNICAL & CIVITAS ( Reference )
HEALTH CANADA — MINERAL OIL — 2008 05 29 — PROPOSED RE-EVALUATION DECISION PRVD2008-19 ( Reference )
PRODUCT LABELS
LABEL — CIVITAS FUNGICIDE FOR GOLF COURSE TURF
LABEL — DORMANT OIL EMULSIFIABLE INSECTICIDAL SPRAY
LABEL — SUPERIOR OIL CONCENTRATE — 1997 00 00
https://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Label-Superior-Oil-Concentrate-1997-00-00.pdf
――――――――――――――――――――
DETAILS Concerning Chemicals Evaluated By Pest Management Regulatory Agency Of Health Canada
Health Canada Re-Evaluation Summary Table ― March 31st, 2013
propiconazole
STATUS
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
MITIGATION MEASURES.
PRODUCT NAMES ( ACTIVE INGREDIENTS )
Banner MAXX Fungicide ( propiconazole 14.3% )
Quali-Pro Propiconazole 14.3 ME Turf Fungicide ( propiconazole 154.5 grams per litre ( 14.3% ) )
PRODUCT MIXTURE THAT CONTAINS PROPICONAZOLE
Instrata Fungicide ( chlorothalonil 362 grams per litre, propiconazole 57 grams per litre, fludioxonil 14.5 grams per litre )
FINAL DECISION ― 2011 02 04
ACCEPTABLE FOR CONTINUED REGISTRATION.
Proposed MITIGATION MEASURES includes new/revised label statements ( including personal protective equipment, re-entry intervals, PROHIBITION of high pressure sprayers for remedial wood preservative uses, discontinuation of domestic remedial wood preservative product, buffer zones, and additional advisory statements ).
UPDATE
The label statement regarding retention of effluent water for cranberry use is no longer required for propiconazole products.
REFERENCES ― HEALTH CANADA
HEALTH CANADA — PROPICONAZOLE — 2011 02 04 — PROPOSED RE-EVALUATION DECISION PRVD2011-02 ( Reference )
PRODUCT LABELS
LABEL — BANNER MAXX FUNGICIDE
https://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Label-Banner-MAXX-Fungicide-2012-11-30.pdf
LABEL — QUALI-PRO PROPICONAZOLE 14.3 ME TURF FUNGICIDE
LABEL — INSTRATA FUNGICIDE
https://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Label-Instrata-Fungicide-2008-02-21.pdf
――――――――――――――――――――
Discover What Anti-Pesticide And Enviro-Lunatic Terrorists Are Doing And Saying About Subversively Imposing Their Life-Style Choices Against Our Society
Read … Force Of Nature ― The Whole Truth From An Independent Perspective.
Communities and businesses are being HARMED and DESTROYED and RAPED by PROHIBITIONS against pest control products used in the Urban Landscape, and by other ACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM.
We are living in the 9|11 Era of Anti Pesticide and Environmental Terrorism where at least ONE SUBVERSIVE ACT OF TERROR is perpetrated EVERY SINGLE DAY by these terrorist.
We are living in the DARK AGE OF ANTI PESTICIDE TERRORISM where sound science is trumped by FAKE SCIENTISTS, JUNK SCIENCE and UNVERIFIABLE SECRET EVIDENCE through FABRICATION, INNUENDO, and INTERNET RUMOR ― scientific research PROVES that pest control products CAUSE NO HARM and can be USED SAFELY.
An informed public is better able to protect itself and its communities and businesses from so-called activists who are THE LEAST QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE ANY ADVICE about pest control products or the environment.
NORAHG is the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that seek to harm and destroy the Green space industry, and the well being of our communities.
NORAHG morally represents the VAST SILENT MAJORITY of people associated with turf and ornamental plant maintenance who are OPPOSED to Anti Pesticide PROHIBITION and the CLOSURE or ABANDONMENT of green spaces under the RIDICULOUS PRETEXT of somehow « saving » the environment.
NORAHG is a NATIONAL NON PROFIT NON PARTISAN organization that does not accept money from corporations or governments or trade associations, and represents NO VESTED INTERESTS WHATSOEVER.
NORAHG is dedicated to reporting the work of RESPECTED and HIGHLY RATED EXPERTS who promote ENVIRONMENTAL REALISM and PESTICIDE TRUTHS.
NORAHG pledges to deliver comprehensive reports that are worthy of peoples’ time and of peoples’ concern, reports that might ordinarily never have breached the parapet.
NORAHG was the brainchild of William H. Gathercole and his colleagues in 1991. Mr. Gathercole is now retired, although his name continues to appear as founder.
Force Of Nature was launched by NORAHG for CONTINUOUS transmission on the Internet on January 1st, 2009 ― however, the VERY FIRST Stand-Alone FORCE OF NATURE Report was issued on September 19th, 2008.
On January 1st, 2009, Force Of Nature Reports were launched for CONTINUOUS transmission on the Internet ― however, the VERY FIRST Stand-Alone Force Of Nature Report was issued on September 19th, 2008.
On March 15th, 2010, Uncle Adolph independently launched The Pesticide Truths, an easy-to-use Web-Site that collects relevant reports of information right-off-the-press.
Pesticide Truths and Force Of Nature, in some ways, are like Google for everything concerning the SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES of Anti-Pesticide and Enviro-Lunatic Terrorists.
For The Complete Library of Force Of Nature and A LOOK AT Reports & References, go to the following web-page …
THE COMPLETE LIBRARY OF REPORTS & REFERENCES ( Web-Page )
――――――――――――――――――――
NORAHG has archived more information about HEALTH CANADA RE-EVALUATION SUMMARY TABLE on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site …
FORCE OF NATURE — UPDATE — HEALTH CANADA — 2013 03 31 — RE-EVALUATION SUMMARY TABLE — PRODUCTS REMOVED ( Report )
UPDATES & WARNINGS ( Web-Page )
2,4-D – CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY – FIESTA – GLYPHOSATE – GOLF INDUSTRY – HEALTH ISSUES – IPM – IPRODIONE – KILLER PLANTS – MANUFACTURERS – PROHIBITION – QUINTOZENE – SEEDS – WATER QUALITY
――――――――――――――――――――
NORAHG has archived more information about CANCER CLASSIFICATION on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site …
CANCER CLASSIFICATION – CHEMICALS EVALUATED FOR CARCINOGENIC POTENTIAL – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( EPA ) ( Reports )
CANCER CLASSIFICATION – CANCER CLASSIFICATION WITH DESCRIPTORS – PART 1 OF 3 – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( EPA ) – 2,4-D TO DELTAMETHRIN ( Report )
CANCER CLASSIFICATION – CANCER CLASSIFICATION WITH DESCRIPTORS – PART 2 OF 3 – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( EPA ) – DIAZINON TO MALATHION ( Report )
CANCER CLASSIFICATION WITH DESCRIPTORS – PART 3 OF 3 – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( EPA ) – MECOPROP TO TRITICONAZOLE – 2012 11 00 ( Report )
CANCER CLASSIFICATION – CHEMICALS EVALUATED FOR CARCINOGENIC POTENTIAL – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( EPA ) ( Reference )
――――――――――――――――――――
NORAHG has archived more information on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site …
THE PESTICIDE TRUTHS ARCHIVE OF REPORTS ( Web-Page )
PESTICIDE BANS ARE A FARCE ( Report )
REAL TRENDS AGAINST PESTICIDE BANS ( Web-Page )
CARNAGE CREATED BY CATASTROPHIC ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION – MAIN WEB-PAGE
THE COST OF PESTICIDE BANS ( Report )
ATTACKS AGAINST GOLF FACILITIES ( Report )
MYTHS ABOUT BANNING PESTICIDES – LEADING SCIENTIFIC HEALTH AND POLICY EXPERTS ( White Paper )
2,4-D HERBICIDE ( Web-Page )
COMPLAINT CHANNELS – COMPLAIN ABOUT THE ANTI-PESTICIDE LUNATICS ( Web-Page )
PESTICIDE LINKS ( Web-Page )
https://pesticidetruths.com/pesticide-qa-links/
THE COMPLETE LIBRARY OF REPORTS & REFERENCES ( Web-Page )
――――――――――――――――――――
――――――――――――――――――――
