December 12, 2024

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL TERRЖRISM

The Complete Media History
Of US Anti-Pesticide And
Environmental Terrжrism

――――――――――――――――――

Victories & Failures

――――――――――――――――――

State Pre-Emptions

――――――――――――――――――

――――――――――――――――――――

The Whole Truth About The Victories & Failures Against The Conspiracy To Impose Reckless & Arbitrary Prohibitions & Restrictions Against Pest Control Products That Are, In Fact, Federally-Approved, Scientifically Safe, Practically Non-Toxic, & Will Not Cause Harm To Children, Adults, Animals, Or The Environment

The Purpose Of This Web-Page Is To Provide Information That Will Lead To Successful Complaints & Litigation Against Anti-Pesticide Government Officials & Activists

――――――――――――――――――――

――――――――――――――――――――

US Prohibitions Are Dismal Failures

A major study of America’s legislations has concluded that fanatжcal-prohibitions against conventional pest control products have become dismal failures.

In ALL cases, prohibitions have become dismal failures because of   ―      pesticide-free maintenance      integrated pest management      green alternative pesticides      manual weed picking      stunningly exorbitant costs      fears about litigation.

ALL jurisdictions desperately need conventional pest control products in order to economically and effectively control recurring invasive weeds and destructive insects.

See the remaining text below for examples of victories and failures.

――――――――――――――――――――

Children Are NOT At Risk In America

Anti-pesticide prohibitions in US states are imposed under the pretext of protecting children, when, in fact, children are NOT at risk.

The ultimate goal of anti-pesticide activists is continuing to impose needless prohibition on grounds surrounding schools and day-care centers, and subsequently opening the door to gradual and eventual expansion to total prohibition.

Children across North America, even in those jurisdictions with NO pesticide bans, are all protected since these products are applied at very low doses and represent NO threat to children.

The safety assessments of pest control products by the US Environmental Protection Agency and Health Canada take into consideration children’s physiology, behaviours, and habits while playing on treated grass.

There are NO valid reports of problems with children, and there is NOT ONE known illness or death from the proper use of pest control products used in the urban landscape.

Explore the following links  …

Children Are Not At Risk From Pesticides

School Prohibitions Intensify — Pre-Emption — Children NOT At Risk

Myths About Anti-Pesticide Prohibition

Pesticide Bans Do Not Improve Water Quality

――――――――――――――――――――

US Regulatory Affairs

In the United States, determining regulations for pest control product use is a responsibility shared at the state and national levels.

The US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) regulates pest control products nationally under the authority of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act ( FIFRA ) and other laws to register pest control products, educate applicators, monitor compliance, and investigate problems.

US EPA employs 1,600 expert-scientists such as chemists, engineers, toxicologists, and experts in many other fields of science.

US EPA conducts ecological risk assessments to determine what risks are posed by pest control products, and whether changes to the use or proposed use are necessary to protect the environment.

US EPA issues registration for a pest control product that ensures that use according to label directions will NOT cause unreasonable harmful effects on health or environment.

US EPA ensures that each registered pest control product continues to meet the highest standards of safety to protect human health and the environment.

US EPA has several programs to ensure the review of registered pest control products, including re-registration, tolerance re-assessment, registration review, and special review.

In America, US EPA has the essential expertise on pest control products.

――――――――――――――――――――

America’s Pre-Emption Laws

Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act ( FIFRA ), states are allowed to develop their own regulations that are more comprehensive and stringent than federal regulations.

State regulatory offices typically license Professional Lawn Care companies and other users of pest control products, certify individual applicators, investigate companies, and enforce laws in conjunction with the US EPA and other agencies, according to the National Pesticide Information Center.

The majority of states have legislated pre-emption laws in order to stop US environmental terrжrism.

In general terms, pre-emption refers to the ability of one level of government to over-ride the laws of a lower level.

Pre-emption laws have effectively stopped the possibility of state or municipal prohibitions against pest control products, and even fertilizers, used in the urban landscape and by the agriculture industry.

However, with the support of anti-pesticide organizations, several states and municipalities are fighting to overturn pre-emption laws in order to impose the needless, senseless, and malicious prohibition of products that are, otherwise, EPA-approved, federally-legal, scientifically-safe, practically-non-toxic, and cause NO harm.

――――――――――――――――――――

State Laws For Schools and / or Day-Care Centers

Despite their pre-emption laws, most US states have arbitrarily  imposed restrictions and prohibitions against the use of conventional pest control products at schools and / or day-care centers.

At least 21 states have recommended, or have required, that schools the use of the failed IPM ( Integrated Pest Management ).

At least 16 states restrict when or what pest control product may be applied in schools.

At least 17 states require sign-posting for schools for indoor applications.

At least 26 states require sign-posting for schools for outdoor ( grounds ) applications.

At least 23 states require prior written pre-notification to students, parents, and staff before an application is made to schools.

Explore the following links  …

IPM — Failure Of IPM — #@!!% IPM Nonsense

IPM — Provides No Benefits

IPM — Prohibitions Rely On False-Facts Regarding The Effectiveness Of IPM — British Columbia

――――――――――――――――――――

――――――――――――――――――――

Prohibitions Are Dismal Failures In America

X  FAILURES   –   In ALL cases, prohibitions against conventional pest control products used in the urban landscape have become dismal failures because of  …

  • Pesticide-free maintenance   –    X  FAILURE

  • Integrated Pest Management   –    X  FAILURE

  • Green alternative pesticides   –    X  FAILURES

  • Manual weed picking   –    X  FAILURE

  • Stunningly exorbitant costs   –    X  FAILURE

  • Fears about litigation   –    X  FAILURES

VICTORIES   –   So far, several jurisdictions ( states, cities, counties, districts, and towns ) in America have ended, rejected, rescinded, or stopped their prohibitions against pest control products used in the urban landscape.

Fortunately, the majority of US states have legislated pre-emption laws in order to stop America’s anti-pesticide & environmental terrжrism.

In general terms, pre-emption refers to the ability of one level of government to over-ride the laws of a lower level.

Pre-emption laws have effectively stopped the possibility of state or municipal prohibitions against pest control products, and even fertilizers, used in the urban landscape and by the agriculture industry.

Furthermore, in The Era Of Trump, the golf and professional lawn care industries will no longer fear arbitrary prohibitions against pest control products that are, in fact, safe and effective.

――――――――――――――――――――

Summary Of Victories & Failures

Here are some examples of VICTORIES and XFAILURES   ―

Anne Arundel County, Maryland


VICTORY  –  Proposed self-imposed prohibition rejected

Ashland, Oregon


VICTORY  –  Existing municipal prohibition rescinded

XFAILURES  –  Pesticide-free maintenance

XFAILURES  –  Fears about litigation

Boulder, Colorado


X
FAILURES  –  Pesticide-free maintenance

Chicago, Illinois


VICTORY  –  Existing municipal prohibition rescinded

XFAILURES  –  Integrated Pest Management

Chicago, Illinois  –  Park District of Highland Park


VICTORY  –  Existing municipal prohibition rescinded

XFAILURES  –  Manual weed picking

Durango, Colorado


VICTORY  –  Proposed municipal prohibition stopped

XFAILURES  –  Pesticide-free maintenance

Everett, Washington


VICTORY  –  Existing municipal pesticide-free project ended

XFAILURES  –  Manual weed picking

Golf Industry  –  Sharp Park Golf Course


VICTORY  –  Closure stopped

Kauaʻi, Hawaiʻi


VICTORY  –  Restriction rescinded & ordinance struck down

Lawrence, Kansas


VICTORY  –  Self-imposed municipal prohibition rescinded

XFAILURES  –  Manual weed picking

XFAILURES  –  Stunningly exorbitant costs

Lincoln City, Oregon


VICTORY  –  Self-imposed municipal prohibition rescinded

XFAILURES  –  Manual weed picking

XFAILURES  –  Green alternatives like vinegar acid

Madison, Wisconsin


VICTORY  –  Existing municipal prohibition ignored

VICTORY  –  State pre-emption law prevailed

XFAILURES  –  Pesticide-free failures of Integrated Pest Management

XFAILURES  –  Pesticide-free maintenance failures

Maine, State of


VICTORY  –  All existing & proposed municipal prohibitions stopped & voided

VICTORY  –  State pre-emption law prevailed

Montgomery County, Maryland


VICTORY  –  Proposed county prohibition stopped

VICTORY  –  State pre-emption law prevailed

Ogunquit, Maine


VICTORY  –  Proposed municipal prohibition stopped

VICTORY  –  State pre-emption law prevailed

Portland, Oregon


X
FAILURES  –  Pesticide-free maintenance

XFAILURES  –  Manual weed picking

XFAILURES  –  Stunningly exorbitant costs

Saint Josephine, Oregon


VICTORY  –  Proposed municipal prohibition rejected by voters

Scarborough, Maine


VICTORY  –  Existing municipal prohibition rescinded

XFAILURES  –  Pesticide-free maintenance

XFAILURES  –  Green alternative pesticides

Wallingford, Connecticut


X
FAILURES  –  Pesticide-free maintenance

XFAILURES  –  Manual weed picking

XFAILURES  –  Integrated Pest Management

XFAILURES  –  Stunningly exorbitant costs

Washington Mall


X
FAILURES  –  Pesticide-free maintenance

――――――――――――――――――――

――――――――――――――――――――

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Anne Arundel County

Maryland

Victory …

Proposed Self-Imposed Prohibition
On County-Owned Playgrounds Rejected

Key point …

Ill-Informed Activist-Parents Were
Mock-Concerned About Children &
Pest Control Applications In Parks

Summary

Anne Arundel county council narrowly rejected legislation that would have prohibited against the use of pest control products on county-owned playgrounds.

For the control invasive weed pests and destructive insect pests, the proposed prohibition would have only allowed ineffective [ and non-chemical ?!?! ] green alternative pesticides  ―  conventional & effective pest control products would have been prohibited.

The fanatжcal-prohibition was proposed after complaints, coercion, and intimidation from ill-informed activist-parents who were mock-concerned about children and pest control applications in parks.

Should fanatжcal activist-parents be allowed near children ?!?!

Link

Ban On Playgrounds Rejected

See Also CHILDREN ARE HARMED BY PROHIBITIONS

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Ashland, City of

Oregon

Victory …

Existing Municipal Prohibition Rescinded

Failures …

Pesticide-Free Maintenance Failures

Key points …

City Unable To Keep Up With Weed
Growth On Municipal Properties

Fears About Litigation

Summary

Ashland’s parks commissioners unanimously rescinded prohibition, and re-authorized conventional pest control products on baseball and softball infields since parks department staff reported that organic pesticides proved largely ineffective for controlling weeds.

Weeds had taken over the dirt areas of the in-fields, creating an uneven and unsafe surface, as well as presenting a liability issue for the parks department.

Organic pesticide-free maintenance was a dismal failure.

Links

Failure Of Organic

City Cannot Keep Up With Weed Growth

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Boulder, City of

Colorado

Victory …

Boulder Failures Convinced Durango To
Stop Its Own Proposed Municipal Prohibition

Failures …

Pesticide-Free Maintenance Failures

Key points …

Abundance Of Weeds Throughout Boulder
Parks Make Them Look Like Garbage Dumps

Summary

Durango city councillors had listened to a three-hour debate involving fake-science and calls for decisive action to supposedly save the environment.

They had been persuaded to impose prohibition against the use of pest control products in the urban landscape.

Anti-pesticide lunatжc Katrina Blair had attempted to deceive city councillors by alleging that other jurisdictions have successfully adopted similar ordinances, such as Boulder, Colorado.

Cathy Metz, the city’s director of parks and recreation, noted the abundance of weeds in Boulder parks when relying on so-called organic pesticide-free maintenance.

According to Metz  ―

I don’t think boulder is the example we want to follow.

They get complaints every year about dandelions.

Boulder has become internationally-recognized for the poor condition of its green spaces  …  they are garbage dumps.

Fortunately, pest control products are scientifically-safe, will cause NO harm, and are NO threat to children.

Because the pesticide-free maintenance of Boulder green spaces was such a dismal failure, municipal government officials had no choice than encourage the public to somehow appreciate dandelions.

These officials were not competent to manage Boulder’s green spaces.

Links

Green Spaces Are Garbage Dumps — Other Jurisdictions Like Durango Will Not Make That Mistake

Toxic Pesticides In Boulder, Colorado ?!?! — Video Recording

Failure Of Organic

Council Rejects Prohibition In 5-0 Vote

See Also GARBAGE DUMP GREEN SPACES
See Also DURANGO ( Colorado )

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

California, State of

Links

Sharp Park Golf Course — Golfers Win In Court

Sharp Park Golf Course — Mayor Saves Sharp Park Golf Course

Sharp Park Golf Course — No Injunction

Sharp Park Golf Course — Lawsuit

Iprodione — Prop 65 & Public Health Concerns

Los Angeles

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Chicago, City of

Illinois

Victory …

Existing Municipal Prohibition Rescinded

Failures …

Pesticide-Free Failures With
Integrated Pest Management

Key point …

Prohibition Destroyed Public Green Spaces

Summary

The Chicago Park District has conspired with pesticide-hating enviro-fanatжcs, as well as truth-challenged bee-keepers, to prohibit the use of pest control products used in the urban landscape.

Demands for prohibition were part of a misguided fanatжcal conspiracy to make people’s lives miserable by exposing them to more damaging pest attacks on their properties.

Eventually, the Chicago Integrated Pest Management ( IPM ) and Pesticide-Free Program was pronounced a dismal failure.

The IPM program contributed to the worst playing field conditions the Chicago district had seen in more than a decade.

After four years, Chicago cancelled the IPM program and rescinded the prohibition against pest control products.

Because of Chicago’s adoption of IPM program, weeds represented more than 60 per cent of ground coverage in public green spaces.

IPM cultural practices failed because they DID NOT control weed and insect pests.

Chicago’s pesticide-free maintenance was a dismal failure.

Links

Prohibition Rescinded

Pesticide-Free Failure

Toxic Pesticides Kill Kids ?!?! — Open Letter To Chicago Public Health

Neonicotinoid Prohibition In Chicago — Bee Demise & Its Cause — Mr Art C Drysdale

See Also INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT ( IPM )

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Chicago, City of
Park District of Highland Park

Illinois

Victory …

Existing Municipal Prohibition Rescinded

Failures …

Pesticide-Free Failures With Manual Weed Picking

Key points …

Sports Fields Weed-Ridden Because Of Prohibition

Organic & Pesticide-Free Maintenance Of
Sports Fields Was A Dismal Failure

Summary

Park District of Highland Park has concluded that organic and pesticide-free maintenance of its sports fields was a dismal failure.

The manual weed picking program was deemed totally ineffective.

In order to rid the sports fields of weeds by using manual weed picking, Highland Park observed that you would need an army and concluded that « we don’t think that’s a solution ».

The city’s professional labour force, along with volunteers, were devalorized into a group of mere cotton-pickers.

Highland Park needed to rescue the weed-ridden sports fields from organic and pesticide-free maintenance failures.

Three major sports fields were over-run with more than 60 per cent weed invasion.

The non-expert anti-pesticide activists, like the lunatжc-clowns from Beyond Pesticides, who recommended organic and pesticide-free maintenance, knew nothing and were utterly incompetent.

Pest control products used in the urban landscape are government-approved, federally-legal, scientifically-safe, and practically-non-toxic.

These products did not need to be prohibited.

Organic pesticide-free maintenance was a dismal failure.

Links

Prohibition Failure In Highland Park

Pesticide Ban Lifted

Manual Weed Picking Ineffective

Highland Park

Think Twice — MacLeans

Legislators Scoff At Notification

Beyond Pesticides — Letter to the Editor — Short Version

Beyond Pesticides — Letter to the Editor — Long Version

Dr Bruce Branham

Letter to the Editor — Short Version

Letter to the Editor — Long Version

――――――――――――――――――――

Background Information

Children Are Harmed By Prohibitions

North America

Key point …

Children Are Safer With Pesticides

Key facts about children recruited by enviro-fanatжcs … 

  FACT — Despicable Enviro-Fanatжcs Attempt To Recruit Hapless & Innocent Children Into Environmental-Terrжrism

√  FACT — Enviro-Fanatжcs Advance Their Lunatжc Agendas By Forcing Children To Admire Environmental-Terrжrist-Organizations Such As David Suzuki Foundation, Environmental Defence, Greenpeace, Rainforest Alliance, & Sierra Club

√  FACT — Enviro-Fanatжcs Brain-Wash Children About The Imaginary Danger Of Modern Chemicals, Such As Pest Control Products, That Are, Otherwise, Safe & Effective

  FACT — Enviro-Fanatжcs Caution Children Against New-Home Construction, The Plastics Industry, & Conventional Agriculture

√  FACT — Enviro-Fanatжcs Exploit Children As Weapons Of Coercion & Ultimate Environmental-Terrжr In Order To Coerce, Intimidate, & Terrжrize The Public Into Accepting Lunatжc Agendas Such As Anti-Pesticide Prohibition

  FACT — Enviro-Fanatжcs Force Children To Celebrate Enviro-Lunatжcs Like Al Gore & David Suzuki By Treating Them As « Eco-Heroes »

√  FACT — Enviro-Fanatжcs Tell Children That It Is Best For The Earth For Families To Have No More Than One Child

  FACT — Enviro-Fanatжcs Urge Children To Subversively Persuade Their Parents To « Vote Green » & Buy Organic Food

Summary

When used properly, pest control products are scientifically-safe, and will NOT cause harm to children.

Allegations about the imaginary danger to children are totally false, and are untrue mis-representations designed to alarm and enrage the public for mere money and profit given to anti-pesticide and environmental-terrжrist organizations.

Links

Children Are Safe On A Pesticide-Treated Lawn — Dr Katherine Von Stackelberg

Children Are Safe 2,4-D — Dr James S Bus

2,4-D Is Safe For Kids — Mr William Jordan

Children Are Not Safe With Prohibition

Children Cannot Play Because Of Prohibition

Children Are In Danger Because Prohibition Attracts Bees

The Industry Task Force II On 2,4-D Research Data

Pesticides Are Safe

See Also GARBAGE DUMP GREEN SPACES

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

Delaware, State of

Link

Students Terrжrize University Officials

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Durango, City of

Colorado

Victory …

Proposed Municipal Prohibition Stopped

Failures …

Pesticide-Free Maintenance Failures

Key point …

Durango’s Government Officials Noted The
Abundance Of Weeds In Other Jurisdictions,
Like Boulder When Relying On So-Called
Organic Pesticide-Free Maintenance,
Making Them Look Like Garbage Dumps

Summary

The Durango city council voted unanimously to reject a petition-driven ordinance ( a.k.a. anti-pesticide prohibition ) against the use of conventional pest control products, as well as non-organic fertilizers, on city parks and property.

Durango’s municipal government officials attempted to appease local pesticide-hating lunatжcs with so-called chemical free parks.

Two city-owned parks, Brookside and Pioneer, were designated as so-called chemical free parks.

The condition of these parks relied upon so-called organic pesticide-free maintenance and non-organic fertilizer.

The chemical free parks were abysmal failures.

These parks were examples of why organic maintenance cannot work on a larger scale without turning the entire city into a gigantic garbage dump.

The so-called chemical-free parks were / are unsightly due to the broad-leaved plantain weeds growing amidst the grass where the children play.

It would be preferable to apply pest control products since they are scientifically-safe, will cause NO harm, and are NO threat to children.

Organic pesticide-free maintenance is NOT economically viable without droves of laborers to manually pull unwanted plants.

Links

Council Rejects Prohibition In 5-0 Vote — 1

Council Rejects Prohibition In 5-0 Vote — 2

$100,000 For Organic Parks

Abysmal Failures Of Pesticide-Free Failures

Exorbitant Costs — $34,550 To $237,450

See Also GARBAGE DUMP GREEN SPACES
See Also BOULDER ( Colorado )

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Everett, City of

Washington

Victory …

Existing Municipal Pesticide-Free Project -Ended

Failures …

Pesticide-Free Failures With Manual Weed Picking

Summary

Everett’s Lowell park pesticide-free pilot-project has been ended, and spraying weeds has been resumed with conventional products.

This occurred because not enough volunteers could keep the park up to city standards.

It was too much work for volunteers to maintain the whole park, Dunn said.

Without the use of conventional pest control products, city of Everett was forced to resort to the back-breaking and agonizing job of weed pulling by hand !

Resident weed-picking volunteers, most of whom are elderly and unemployed, were forced to become a group of mere weed-picking niggжrs.

Volunteers were needed because green alternative pesticides were bogus, ineffective, and DID NOT work !

Organic pesticide-free maintenance was a dismal failure in Everett.

Links

Lowell Park Pesticide-Free Pilot Ends City Begins Spraying Weeds With Chemicals

Spraying Resumed — 1

Spraying Resumed — 2

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

Florida, State of

Links

DeLand — Lunatжc Lawsuit Destroys Golf Facility

DeLand — Golf Course Pollution Allegations

Tampa Bay — Approves Ban

Pinellas — Nitrogen & Phosphorus Prohibition

Fertilizer Terrжr — State-Wide Pre-Emption

Fertilizer Terrжr — Nitrogen & Phosphorus Prohibition

――――――――――――――――――――

Background Information

Garbage Dump Green Spaces

North America

Key facts …

  FACT — Pesticide-Free Cultural Practices Are Dismal Failures Because They Result In Garbage Dump Green Spaces In The Urban Environment

√  FACT — Pesticide-Free Cultural Practices Will Not Even Suppress Damaging Pest Populations To An Acceptable Level

√  FACT — In ALL Cases, Prohibitions Have Inflicted Ecological Pest Disasters Leading To Dangerous & Unattractive Garbage Dump Green Spaces In The Urban Environment

  FACT — No One, Except Pesticide-Hating Fanatжcs, Want To Live In #@!!% Dangerous & Pest Infested Garbage Dump Green Spaces

  FACT — Prohibition Is A Dismal Failure, & Inflicts Ecological Pest Disasters Leading To Dangerous & Unattractive Garbage Dump Green Spaces In The Urban Environment

Summary

Without conventional pest control products, green spaces and hard-landscapes have become pest-infested and dangerous garbage dumps because it is impossible to control invasive weeds and destructive insects by using so-called green alternative pesticides and cultural practices.

Links

Catastrophic Carnage Leading To Garbage Dump Green Spaces

Catastrophic Carnage Inflicted By Garbage Dump Green Spaces — Photo Gallery

Reasons For Prohibition Failures — Prohibitions Create Catastrophic Ecological Carnage Of Uncontrolled, Invasive, & Destructive Pests — British Columbia

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

   Golf Industry  –
Sharp Park Golf Course

California

Victory …

Golf Course Closure Stopped

Key point …

Federal Judge Dismissed Legal Challenge
From Golf-Hating Fanatжcs

Summary

Sharp Park Golf Course has been allowed to remain a golf course after a federal judge dismissed a legal challenge from environmental-terrжrist-organizations.

Nonetheless, golf-hating organizations will continue to attack the golf industry.

These organizations  …  what are they for ?!?!

They exist for one reason and one only  …  and that is to make profit.

They prosper from cash donations, illicit businesses, unqualified employment, and government grants, quite often without paying a single penny in taxes.

Sharp Park Golf Course is / was not harming animal species.

According to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sharp Park has likely not pose threats to the existence of frogs and snakes on and around the golf course.

As usual, enviro-lunatжcs hate and despise the game of golf.

Enviro-lunatжcs want to shut down golf facilities like Sharp Park.

Golf-hating organizations like National Parks Conservation Association and Wild Equity Institute have terrжrized the city of San Francisco for years over the future of Sharp Park Golf Course.

Sharp Park may still be closed because of their relentless and unceasing lies and mis-information.

The habitat that enviro-lunatжcs are trying to allegedly recover was originally created when the golf course was built along with a sea wall, isolating the Laguna Sal from ocean waves.

If the golf course had never been built, there would have been no habitat for the endangered species.

Nevertheless, golf-hating enviro-lunatжcs seek the destruction of the golf industry.

These terrжrists attack the golf industry under the pretext of alleged ill-effects on the habitats of obscure and insignificant species like garter snakes and tadpoles.

The golf industry should tell anti-golf activists to get off our grASS and roast in hell.

Links

Environmental Terrжr Under The Pretext Of Protecting Obscure & Insignificant Species

Golfers Win In Court

Mayor Saves Sharp Park Golf Course

No Injunction For Sharp Park Golf Course

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

Highland Park, Park District of

Illinois

Go To CHICAGO, City of ( Illinois )  –  Park District of Highland Park

――――――――――――――――――――

Background Information

Integrated Pest Management ( IPM )

North America

Key facts …

  FACT — IPM Is #@!!% Nonsense & Does Not Work

  FACT — The Pesticide-Free-Version Of IPM Will Not Suppress Damaging Pest Populations To An Acceptable Level

  FACT — IPM Is Inappropriate For The Professional Lawn Care & Golf Industries

√  FACT — Anti-Pesticide Prohibitions Rely On False-Facts Regarding The Effectiveness Of Integrated Pest Management

  FACT — Turf Managers Desperately Need Pesticides, & Do Not Need IPM To Reduce Pesticide Use

  FACT — IPM Is A Dismal Failure, & Does Not Control Pests In Turf

Summary

IPM is promoted by municipal officials who falsely allege success, and who are most likely concocting lies, misconceptions, and deceptions for their own nefarious political interests.

It is impossible for municipal employees to keep city-owned green spaces playable and/or beautiful by using IPM.

The anti-pesticide-version of IPM demands the elimination of the use of conventional pest control products, while at the same time attempting ( and failing ) to manage damaging pest populations at an acceptable level.

Unfortunately, pesticide-free IPM has been designed to be applicable for the production of agricultural crops, and NOT for the maintenance of urban green spaces.

Overall, pesticide-free IPM is a dismal failure, and a waste of time and money for municipalities.

Pesticide-free IPM DOES NOT control pests of established turf and ornamentals.

Pesticide-free IPM will NEVER achieve the level of total reduction or elimination of destructive pests attained by using conventional pest control products.

Wherever pesticide-free IPM is entirely relied upon for the maintenance of turf and ornamentals, damaging pests may only be slightly suppressed, at the expense of plant growth, safe playing conditions, and appearance.

To compensate for the failure of IPM, municipal officials have often embarked on a ludicrous effort to reduce the expectations for the condition of city-owned urban green spaces.

These officials resort to promoting low-end playing conditions and to accept dangerous garbage dump green spaces.

They validate the imposition of an unacceptable and dangerous life-style choice on hapless tax-payers.

Municipal officials would be better-off validating the risk assessment of conventional pest control products, which indicates that they are scientifically-safe, and, when used properly, will NOT cause harm to people, animals, or the environment.

Links

IPM Provides No Benefits

Reasons For Prohibition Failures — Prohibitions Rely On False-Facts Regarding The Effectiveness Of Integrated Pest Management ( IPM )– British Columbia

IPM Does Not Excuse The Use Of Illegal Concoctions

IPM Is A Distraction From Science-Based Assessments

IPM Is A Distraction From Critical Issues Faced By Professional Lawn Care

IPM Is A Distraction From Critical Issues Faced By Golf Industry

Failure Of Integrated Pest Management

IPM Is A Distraction From Adequate Playing Conditions

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victories Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Kauaʻi, County of

Hawaiʻi

Victories …

Restriction Rescinded

Federal Judge Strikes Down Ordinance

Summary

Officials at Kauaʻi County have faced the spotlight of scrutiny and the terrжr of the courts.

Their anti-pesticide restriction could not be defended in court.

Kauaʻi County’s ordinance-restriction arbitrarily and illegally forced the agriculture industry to divulge what pest control products were to be used for crop protection.

Kauaʻi County also arbitrarily and illegally forced the agriculture industry to create arbitrary and unnecessary buffer zones near public places like hospitals, schools, and parks.

Kauaʻi County’s ordinance was struck down.

A federal judge has ruled that the Kauaʻi County law arbitrarily and illegally forcing the agriculture industry to divulge its use of pest control products and Genetically Modified ( GM ) Crops is invalid.

Eventually, US federal magistrate Judge Barry Kurren ruled in favour of four agricultural businesses seeking to stop Kauaʻi County’s arbitrary and illegally restriction from going into effect.

Link

Proposal For Prohibition Against Insecticides Stopped

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Lawrence, City of

Kansas

Victory …

Self-Imposed Municipal Prohibition Rescinded

Failures …

Pesticide-Free Failures with Manual Weed Picking

Pesticide-Free Failures With Exorbitant Costs

Key points …

Volunteers Were Forced To Perform The Back-
Breaking & Agonizing Job Of Manual Weed Pulling

Eventually, Residents Were No Longer Interested To
Volunteer Their Time In A Losing Battle Against Weeds

Summary

In Lawrence, Kansas, anti-pesticide activists had lobbied the city’s commissioners to convert all 52 parks to organic pesticide-free maintenance.

Without the use of conventional pest control products, Lawrence had to resort to the back-breaking and agonizing job of weed pulling by hand.

The city’s professional labour force and volunteers were devalorized into a group of mere cotton-pickers.

Eventually, government officials rescinded prohibition since residents were no longer interested to volunteer their time in a losing battle against weeds.

Before prohibition, Lawrence had spent less than 10,000 dollars per year for pest control products.

However, municipal officials estimated that the stunningly exorbitant cost of prohibition would be 213,000 dollars for equipment, 116,000 dollars annually for staff, and 95,000 dollars annually for materials.

Explore the following link …

Carnage With Cotton-Pickers

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Lincoln City

Oregon

Victory …

Self-Imposed Municipal Prohibition Rescinded

Failures …

Pesticide-Free Failures With Manual Weed Picking

Pesticide-Free Failures With Green
Alternative Pesticides Like Vinegar Acid

Key points …

Parks Surged With Weed Growth
& Looked Like Garbage Dumps

Staff On Their Hands & Knees Weeding
Could Not Keep Up With The Weeds
Even With Exorbitant Costs In Labour

Green Alternatives Like Vinegar Acid
Were More Toxic & More Dangerous
Requiring Protective Masks & Suits

Summary

Lincoln City’s move to eliminate pest control products in its parks resulted in a surge of weed growth.

In response, Lincoln City spent 260 staff hours with people on their hands and knees weeding, and they still could not keep up with the weeds.

Back when the department was applying pest control products, parks workers would spend only 60 hours.

Lincoln City has had to neglect tasks ranging from manicuring trees to pressure-washing and painting trash cans.

Green alternatives like vinegar acid are more toxic and more dangerous.

They can burn the eyes and skin of workers, so municipal employees had to wear protective masks and suits.

Three years after going pesticide-free, pest control products needed to be used again in weed-infested parks.

Lincoln City’s organic pesticide-free maintenance was a dismal failure.

Links

Weeding On Hands & Knees

Pesticide-Free Parks Pose Challenges

See Also GARBAGE DUMP GREEN SPACES
See Also STUNNINGLY EXORBITANT COSTS

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Madison, City of

Wisconsin

Victories …

Existing Municipal Prohibition Ignored

Green Alternatives Stopped

State Pre-Emption Law Prevailed

Failures …

Pesticide-Free Maintenance Failures

Failures With Green Alternative Pesticides

Failures With Integrated Pest Management

Key point …

Schizophrenic History Of Pesticide Use With
Several Violations Of Its Own Anti-Pesticide Policy

Summary

In Madison, Wisconsin, the city’s use of pesticides reflects its schizophrenic history of pesticide use  ―  and several violations of its own anti-pesticide policy.

Madison continues to use hundreds of gallons of pesticides, such as glyphosate, 2,4-D, and several others, on athletic fields and other city lands  ―  because green alternative pesticides and cultural practices DO NOT WORK !

In fact, the city’s anti-pesticide pesticide policy has stated  ―  the city shall NOT USE pesticides to control dandelions and other broadleaf weeds on general parklands, median strips, street terraces, roadsides, general lawn areas, and athletic fields.

This policy was in line with an Integrated Pest Management ( IPM ) approach, where all city departments would give preference to non-pesticide management practices , which DO NOT WORK, and use the supposedly least risky pesticides only as a last resort, which is INCORRECT.

Furthermore, Madison’s anti-pesticide policy conflicted with Wisconsin state statute [ pre-emption law ], stating that local governments may NOT prohibit the use of, or otherwise regulate, pesticides.

Madison’s prohibition is a total and dismal failure.

Link

Madison Changes & Violates Its Own Pesticide Policies

See Also INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT ( IPM )

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Maine, State of

Victory …

All Existing & Proposed Municipal
Prohibitions Stopped & Voided By
State Government Ordinance

State Pre-Emption Law Prevailed

Summary

The State of Maine has deemed prohibition as illegal.

Officials deserve congratulations.

Links

Local Pesticide Bans Outlawed

Rubber Ducky Legislation

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

Maryland, State of

Link

Phosphorus & Nitrogen Ban

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

Massachusetts, State of

Link

Enviro-Terrжrists Unmasked

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victories Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Montgomery County

Maryland

Victories …

Proposed County Prohibition Stopped

State Pre-Emption Law Prevailed

Summary

Montgomery County, Maryland, had self-imposed prohibition on its own public properties regarding the use of conventional pest control products.

Furthermore, it had intended to impose prohibition against residential and commercial lawns.

However, a circuit court judge has struck down the Montgomery County’s general pesticide ban in a ruling that is precedent-setting in America.

Why ?!?!

Because a vast majority of states have pre-emption laws to prevent municipalities and counties from crafting their own laws regarding the use of pest control products and fertilizers.

Montgomery County’s proposed prohibition flouted decades of state primacy in ensuring safe and proper pesticide use.

It also undermined the state of Maryland’s system of comprehensive and uniform product approval and regulation.

Moreover, it intended to prohibit products and conduct that have been affirmatively approved and licensed by the state.

The case was brought to a circuit court judge by plaintiffs including county residents, local lawn care businesses, manufacturers, and the trade association Responsible Industry for a Sound Environment ( RISE ).

The judge made it extremely clear that Montgomery County CANNOT override the state government.

The federal and state regulation of pest control products is so comprehensive by both the state and federal governments that there is NOTHING ELSE the county can do with its prohibition.

Montgomery County’s proposed prohibition ended as a dismal failure, just like many other jurisdictions in America !

Links

Victory Against Screeching Monkeys

Judge Strikes Down Pesticide Ban

Beveridge & Diamond Wins Pre-Emption Case Regarding Local Pesticides Ban

Lawn Businesses Challenge Ban — RISE

Sue The #@!!% Pesticide-Hating SOBs’ Brains’ Out !

Nanny State Ninny Award For October Pesticides For Me But Not For Thee — Video Recording

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

New Jersey, State of

Links

Industry SLAMS Prohibition

The Child Safe Playing Field Act

Nitrogen Prohibition

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

New York, State of

Links

New Paltz — Sports Fields Closed By Ban

New York City — Applied Roundup 500 Times

New York State — Violating State Law — Lifetime Ban From Owning Business

New York State — Pesticide School Ban — Dangerous Surfaces

New York City — Light Fixtures

New York State — Phosporus Restriction

New York Alliance For Environmental Concerns

New York State Turfgrass Association

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

North Dakota, State of

Link

Water Shows FEW Pesticides

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Ogunquit, Town of

Maine

Victories …

Proposed Municipal Prohibition Stopped

State Pre-Emption Law Prevailed

Summary

Residents voted in favour of prohibiting against the use of pest control products used in the urban landscape throughout Ogunquit.

That vote was voided because town officials forgot to check with the Maine Board of Pesticides Control prior to the vote, as required.

This result was in direct contradiction to the vote held earlier when Ogunquit residents defeated a proposal to prohibit against pest control products.

Now the State of Maine has deemed this prohibition as illegal under its pre-emption law.

State officials deserves congratulations.

Links

Won’t Outlaw Pesticides On Private Property

Could Be First Maine Municipality To Ban Pesticide

Restrictions Still Face Committee Approval

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

Ohio, State of

Links

Pesticide DID NOT Make Children Sick

Turfgrass Week

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Failures Of Pesticide-Free Maintenance

Portland, City of

Oregon

Failures …

Pesticide-Free Maintenance Failures

Pesticide-Free Failures With Manual Weed Picking

Pesticide-Free Failures With Exorbitant Costs

Key points …

Because Of Prohibition, Parks Severely
Declined Over A Three Year Period,
Turning Into Garbage Dumps

Ultimately, The City Was Only Able To
Afford Pesticide-Free Parks Through The
Use Of Volunteers Who Were Unreliable

Summary

The city of Portland capitulated under pressure from the anti-pesticide & environmental-terrжrist organization called Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides ( NCAP ).

The only solutions were the huge cost in paid labour and volunteer work as back-breaking weed-pickers, and hazardous flame-throwers.

Ultimately, the city was only able to afford pesticide-free parks through the use of volunteers who were unreliable, and whose enthusiasm severely declined over a three year period.

When using conventional and scientifically-safe pest control products, Portland spent a mere 371 dollars per year to keep the weeds out.

However, pesticide-free parks came with the cataclysmic cost increase of 3,621 dollars in annual maintenance, and 9,455 dollars in start-up costs for each new park.

Stunningly exorbitant cost increases were also required to pay parks department employees to haul weeds collected by volunteers, and to inspect the parks to make sure weeds were under control.

Organic pesticide-free maintenance has meant devalorizing Portland’s professional labour force and volunteers into a group of cotton-pickers.

Link

Organic Failure

See Also GARBAGE DUMP GREEN SPACES
See Also STUNNINGLY EXORBITANT COSTS

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Saint Josephine, County of

Oregon

Victory …

Proposed Municipal Prohibition Rejected By Voters

Summary

67 per cent of Saint Josephine voters rejected a proposal to prohibit against pest control products used by licensed applicators.

Despite being defeated by a 2 : 1 margin, pesticide-hating fanatжcs vowed to regroup and promised that anti-pesticide terrжrism will never end in this Oregon county.

Links

Voters Reject Pesticide Ban

Should Josephine County Ban Pesticides ?!?!

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

Scarborough, Town of

Maine

Victories …

Existing Municipal Prohibition Rescinded

Green Alternatives Stopped

Failures …

Failures With Pesticide-Free Maintenance

Failures With Green Alternative Pesticides

Summary

Scarborough’s government officials rescinded prohibition by replacing an existing 7-month-old policy that promoted the use of organic pesticide-free maintenance.

Organic pesticide-free maintenance was / is a dismal failure.

The new policy allowed conventional pest control products for use on property owned by the town.

Links

Repeal of Anti-Pesticides Policy

Fraudulent Organic Business

Another Organic Lawn Failure — Dylox For Grubs

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

South Dakota, State of

Link

Global Warming

――――――――――――――――――――

Background Information

Stunningly Exorbitant Costs

North America

Key facts …

  FACT — Pesticide-Free Cultural Practices Are Dismal Failures Because Of The Stunningly Exorbitant Costs

  FACT — The Pesticide-Free-Version Of IPM Will Not Suppress Damaging Pest Populations To An Acceptable Level

  FACT — In ALL Jurisdictions, Prohibitions Have Inflicted Hardship & Unbelievable Burdens To The Tax-Payers

√  FACT — No One, Except Pesticide-Hating Fanatжcs, Want The Hardship & The Cost Of This #@!!% Nonsense

  FACT — Prohibition Are Dismal Failures, & Inflict Ecological Pest Disasters Leading To Dangerous & Unattractive Garbage Dump Green Spaces In The Urban Environment

Links

Carnage Created By Stunningly Exorbitant Costs Of Maintenance For Municipalities

Reasons For Prohibition Failures — Prohibitions Inflict The Catastrophic Financial Carnage Of Stunningly Exorbitant Costs — British Columbia

Municipal Pesticide Bans — The Hardship & Cost Of This #@!!% Nonsense — Letter To The Editor

――――――――――――――――――――

Background Information

Trump, The Era of

Key point …

President Trump Will Drain The Swamp
Of Enviro-Terrжrism In Washington

Summary

Not only does President Donald Trump intend to « drain the swamp » in Washington, Mr Trump will NOT represent the twisted-interests of anti-pesticide & environmental-terrжrist organizations like Environmental Working Group.

With President Trump, the golf and agriculture industries will no longer fear arbitrary prohibitions against pest control products that are, in fact, safe and effective.

Overall, with the historic Trump victory, these industries may no longer need to fear arbitrary prohibitions against pest control products.

Dear environmental-terrжrists  …  get your panties out of a wad.

Let us know when the IRS comes after you under President Trump.

With President Trump, anti-pesticide and pro-global-warming terrжrism will come to an end.

Links

End Of EPA Reign Of Terrжr — Dr Steven J Milloy

Evaluating President Trump’s Choices — ACSH

2016’s Man Of The Year Is Now President Of The United States

The Worst President In Modern History

Trump’s Top Environmental Adviser Says Pesticides Aren’t Bad For You — Mr Myron Ebell

With The Trump Victory, Agriculture & Golf Industries No Longer Fear Prohibitions — Video Recordings

How To Get Rid Of Pesticide-Hating Fanatжcs — Senator Ted Cruz

See Also UNITED STATES ( USA )  –  Glyphosate
See Also UNITED STATES ( USA )  –  Pre-Emption Laws

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victory Against Pesticide-Hating Fanatжc & His Organization

Tukey, Paul

SafeLawns

Victory …

Tukey Abandons His Organization
& Goes into Self-Imposed Exile

Summary

Years of demands and complaints against pesticide-hating fanatжc Paul Tukey culminated with his demise  ―  a victory for businesses operating in the green space industry.

The neck of the Tukey-lunatжc-vermжn has been snapped ( proverbially ) !

Can an audit by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service be next ?!?!

Links

Abandons SafeLawns

America’s Master Bastжrd Anti-Pesticide Terrжrist Is Gone

Debug the Myths — West Coast

Letter To The Editor — Short Version

Letter To The Editor — Long Version

Lunatжc Terrжrist Of The Year

Banned From Canada Blooms Show

The Avengers

The Bin Laden Of Environmental-Terrжrism

See Also WASHINGTON MALL ( Washington, DC )

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Victories Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists

   United States ( USA )  –
Pre-Emption Laws

Victories …

Virtually All Proposed Prohibitions
Have Been Stopped

Key points …

Vast Majority Of States Have
Legislated Pre-Emption Laws

With Pre-Emption States,
No Anti-Pesticide Prohibitions

Summary

A VAST MAJORITY of states have PRE-EMPTION LAWS to prevent municipalities from crafting their own laws regarding the use of pest control products and fertilizers.

Here are the PRE-EMPTION VICTORIES   ―

EXPLICIT PRE-EMPTION  –  NO PROHIBITIONS

Localities That Are Explicitly Pre-Empted From Adopting Stricter Legislation That Would Regulate The Use Of Pest Control Products

Alabama

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Florida

Georgia

Idaho

                                 Illinois ( Except Chicago )

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Minnesota

Maine

Maryland

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

New Hampshire

New Mexico

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

West Virginia

Wisconsin

EXCLUSIVE AUTHORITY PRE-EMPTION  –  NO PROHIBITIONS

Authority Is Delegated To A Commissioner Or A Pesticide Board To Receive Petitions From Localities For A Variance From The State Pesticide Laws

Connecticut

Delaware

Massachusetts

Mississippi

New York

Rhode Island

South Carolina

Virginia

EXPLICIT RIGHT TO PETITION PRE-EMPTION  –  NO PROHIBITIONS

Authority Is Delegated To A Commissioner To Receive Petitions
From Localities For An Exemption From The State Pesticide Laws

Indiana

Louisiana

Michigan

New Jersey

Washington

Links

A Vast Majority Of States Have Legislated Pre-Emption Laws — Virtually All Proposed Prohibitions Stopped

State Laws Banning Phosphorus Fertilizer Use

School Prohibitions — Pre-Emption — Children NOT At Risk

See Also TRUMP, The Era Of

――――――――――――――――――――

Background Information

   United States ( USA )  –
Glyphosate 

Victory …

Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer

Summary

The United States has declared that the US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) has given glyphosate its safest possible classification.

Links

Glyphosate Vindicated Around The World — ACSH

Glyphosate Not Cancer-Causing … Again

Glyphosate Evaluation Of Carcinogenic Potential — EPA’s Office Of Pesticide Programs

Glyphosate Not Cancer-Causing

See Also TRUMP, The Era Of

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

Vermont, State of

Link

Phosphorus Ban — Don’t « P » On Your Lawn

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

Virginia, State of

Links

Phosphorus Prohibition — Golf Industry

Phosphorus Prohibition

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Failures With Pesticide-Free Maintenance

Wallingford, City of

Connecticut

Failures …

Failures With Pesticide-Free Maintenance

Failures With Manual Weed Picking

Failures With Integrated Pest Management

Failures With Stunningly Exorbitant Costs

Summary

Whenever residents of Wallingford, Connecticut, see an baseball in-field over-grown with weeds, they get really upset about the pesticide ban failure.

Anti-pesticide prohibition has inflicted a host of problems that were not really thought out properly.

Because of Wallingford’s reckless and arbitrary prohibition against pest control products used in the urban landscape, municipal employees cannot use safe and effective herbicides  —  instead, they pull the weeds by hand and use weed trimmers.

Within 18 months, Wallingford had a substantial change in the turf thickness on the athletic fields, and weeds were out of control around the buildings and landscape beds  —  converting green spaces into weed-infested garbage dumps.

After prohibition was imposed, Wallingford’s schools were forced to spend exorbitant amounts of money  —  they were forced to buy over 40,000 dollars’ worth of equipment, and were forced to hire more personnel to pull weeds.

The exorbitant cost of a so-called organic pesticide-free program  —  with NO conventional pest control products  —  was significantly more expensive than an Integrated Pest Management ( IPM ) program that allows the use of pest control products as a last resort.

According to David Paul, director of facilities for the city school system, organic green alternative pesticides « just don’t work, and whatever does remotely work is so expensive it’s not conducive to our budgets ».

In Wallingford, green alternative pesticides have been a dismal failure.

Moreover, Wallingford municipal employees were forced to resort to manual labour, and are required to hand-pull weeds, just like cotton-pickers.

Those who support over-turning the prohibition believe not using pest control products can still create a harmful environment for students.

Actually, children are at risk with prohibition.

Sports fields are over-grown with clovers and dandelions.

Clover also attracts sting and potentially deadly bees.

If children play on a weed-infested pesticide-free sports field, what happens if they get stung by bees ?!?!

If children play on a weed-infested pesticide-free sports field, what happens if they have a deadly allergy to bees ?!?!

Link

In-Fields Overgrown With Weeds — Pesticide, Herbicide Ban Makes Field Maintenance Challenging

See Also GARBAGE DUMP GREEN SPACES
See Also INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT ( IPM )
See Also STUNNINGLY EXORBITANT COSTS

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism
Failures Of Pesticide-Free Maintenance

Washington Mall

Washington, D.C.

Failures …

Pesticide-Free Maintenance Failures

It’s Not My Fault That I’m Incompetent  –  Paul Tukey

Summary

Contractors failed to adequately maintain the Washington Mall, in Washington, DC.

Despite the photographic evidence indicating their incompetence, the contractors, led by pesticide-hating fanatжc Paul Tukey, persisted in delivering vague and unverifiable excuses regarding the dismal failure of organic pesticide-free maintenance.

In an audio recording, contractors even blamed the Republican Party for their incompetence.

Links

Failure At Washington Mall

Not My Fault — Audio Recording

See Also GARBAGE DUMP GREEN SPACES
See Also TUKEY, Paul ( SafeLawns )

――――――――――――――――――――

US Environmental Terrжrism

Wisconsin, State of

Link

Fertilizer Prohibition

――――――――――――――――――――

General Issues

Explore the following links …

2012 Election — Obama — Children Singing, Sick People Just Die, & Oil Fills The Sea

Fighting Lunatжcs With A Mascot For Children

Lunatжc Doctors Favor Bans — Letter to the Editor, Short Version

Lunatжc Doctors Favor Bans — Letter to the Editor, Long Version

Tax-Exempt Funding in America — Canada

Reduced Regulatory Burdens Act

Increased Lobbying Against Regulations

Fiesta Herbicide — Bogus — Engage Agro

Beneficiaries Of Non-Profit Culture

Agriculture — Food & Farming

Legislative Day & Remembrance

Common Terrжrist Bastжrds

Debug the Myths

――――――――――――――――――――

――――――――――――――――――――

WE SPEAK THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT THE UNITED STATES FROM AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE !

We are the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that conspire to destroy the Green space and other industries ( NORAHG ).  As a non-profit and independent organization, we are environmentalists who are dedicated to reporting about truth-challenged pesticide-hating fanatжcs ( HUJE ) who conspire to destroy businesses that are dependent on the use of safe and effective conventional pest control products.  We also report on the work of several highly-rated leading experts who have recognized expertise, training, and background in matters concerning pest control products, and who promote environmental realism and pesticide truths.

We dare to defy the pesticide-hating fanatжcs by exploring the whole truth from an independent perspective on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site   …   https://pesticidetruths.com/   If you wish to receive free reports on issues that concern you, please contact us at   …   force.of.de.nature@gmail.com   WILLIAM H GATHERCOLE AND NORAH G

――――――――――――――――――――

――――――――――――――――――――

Loading

13 thoughts on “U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL TERRЖRISM

Leave a Reply