–
Overview – Summary
Bayer Repairs Its Reputation
How To Defend Glyphosate
Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup herbicide, which has been manufactured by Bayer since June 7th 2018, when the Monsanto brand was discontinued.
Bayer has faced LAWSUITS against glyphosate.
A California jury mandated an UNJUSTIFIED JACKPOT AWARD to a school grounds-keeper who falsely-alleged that he was dying of non-Hodgkin lymphoma because of his exposure to Roundup.
Another California jury mandated an UNJUSTIFIED JACKPOT AWARD to a couple who falsely-argued that Roundup caused their cancers.
Bayer has said that it was appealing the jury-verdicts since it was confident that glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer when used appropriately.
In April 2019, Bayer announced that over 13,000 lawsuits [ ?!?! ] related to Roundup had been launched in the US.
UNJUSTIFIED JACKPOT AWARDS will NEVER end !
During the California trials, the plaintiffs’ profit-seeking, political, & subversive lawyers had manipulated the juries’ emotions by using fake-news about glyphosate in order to obtain verdicts that lead to UNJUSTIFIED JACKPOT AWARDS.
Their legal arguments trumped scientific evidence and manipulated these juries into falsely-believing that glyphosate causes harm ― the logic of science-based evidence has been replaced with emotion and virtue signaling.
According to science-based evidence, glyphosate is ONLY toxic to plants because it is an herbicide.
There is no known biological mechanism by which glyphosate could cause cancer, therefore its carcinogenicity is NOT EVEN theoretically possible.
World-wide, science-based national regulatory agencies and leading experts have been siding with the overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrating that glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer ― there is NO bio-medical and NO epidemiological evidence to support the false-claim that glyphosate causes cancer.
Bayer plans to STRIKE BACK against glyphosate-hating fanatжcs !
Bayer has sought to REPAIR ITS REPUTATION, and to somehow appease glyphosate-hating fanatжcs, by announcing that it would invest 5,600,000,000 dollars US in R&D research.
With this R&D investment, Bayer will aim at better understanding of how pesticide resistance develops, discovering new pesticides, and devising more precise application methods.
Can Bayer ever appease glyphosate-hating fanatжcs ?!?!
No !
And there is a cost to society for this attempted-appeasement.
Observers have commented that Bayer is DIVERTING R&D research from solving more pressing problems, such as, developing cures for cancer or controlling disease-carrying vermin in the tropics.
The cost to society for this attempted-appeasement will likely be more suffering in the world than there would otherwise have been.
Glyphosate-hating fanatжcs will NEVER be appeased and environmental-terrжr will NEVER end !
Bayer faces hostile glyphosate-hating activists with lunatжc-doctrines that are fanatжcal in character, ruthless in purpose, and subversive in method.
In the 9|11 era of environmental-terrжr … fanatжcal enviro-terrжrist conspiracies have now spread against agriculture.
These conspiracies will attempt to prohibit glyphosate from the hated agriculture industry.
Bayer must STRIKE BACK against glyphosate-hating fanatжcs !
―――――――――――――――――――――
–
–
―――――――――――――――――――――
June 14th, 2019
Reuters
Selected And Adapted Excerpts
Reference –
Bayer To Invest $5.6 Billion In Weedkiller Research To Help Reputation
―――――――――――――――――――――
STRIKING BACK
Glyphosate Research
On June 14th, 2019, Bayer sought to REPAIR ITS REPUTATION after damage caused by US litigation over [ false ] claims its glyphosate causes cancer, saying it would invest 5,000,000,000 Euros ( 5,600,000,000 Dollars US ) in herbicide research.
Bayer’s shares hit seven-year lows after a California couple received UNJUSTIFIED JACKPOT AWARDS of more than 2,000,000,000 Dollars US in the largest-ever US jury award over claims that glyphosate-based herbicide Roundup [ somehow ] causes cancer. [ ?!?! ]
As well as saying it would invest 5,000,000,000 Euros in research over the next ten years, Bayer promised to reduce its environmental impact by 30 per cent through 2030 via measures such as more precise and more sparing application of crop chemicals.
According to Bayer ―
While glyphosate will continue to play an important role in agriculture and in Bayer’s portfolio, the company is committed to offering more choices for growers.
Bayer maintains that glyphosate is safe.
Its move follows a third consecutive US jury verdict against Roundup.
A spokesman said the investments in weed control were part of a previously approved budget.
Bayer has beefed up its public relations machine in an attempt to repair its image, which also faces a back-lash in Germany over a COLLAPSE OF INSECT POPULATIONS [ ?!?! ], which environmentalists blame on pesticides used in farming.
See links below entitled Glyphosate Is Not A Threat To Bees and Glyphosate Will Not Harm Bees.
Bayer said it would seek to reduce its environmental foot-print by scaling down crop protection volumes and enabling more precise application.
It would increase transparency around research efforts and the forthcoming process of re-registering glyphosate in the European Union.
According to Bayer ―
This will help to restore and retain bio-diversity, combat climate change, and make the most efficient use of natural resources.
Bayer added it will only sell crop protection products in developing countries if they also meet the safety standards of a majority of eight leading global regulators in jurisdictions such as the EU, the United States or Brazil.
Western crop chemicals companies have faced criticism from [ glyphosate-hating environmental-fanatжcs ] for selling products in developing countries with local approval, even though clearance at home had ended.
A spokesman said NO products had been withdrawn yet and Bayer would now look into its product portfolio.
Explore the following links …
Glyphosate Is Not A Threat To Bees
Glyphosate Will Not Harm Bees
―――――――――――――――――――――
Explore the following link …
The Library Of Striking Back & Taking Action Against
Anti-Pesticide & Environmental Terrжrism
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/striking-back-against-terrorism/
―――――――――――――――――――――
–
–
―――――――――――――――――――――
June 14th, 2019
Reason
Selected And Adapted Excerpts
Reference –
Bayer Wastes $5.6 Billion Trying To Appease Activists
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
Can Bayer Ever Appease
Glyphosate-Hating Fanatжcs ?!?!
Summary –
Bayer faces hostile glyphosate-hating activists with lunatжc-doctrines that are fanatжcal in character, ruthless in purpose, and subversive in method.
In the 9|11 era of environmental-terrжr … fanatжcal anti-pesticide conspiracies commenced against the urban use of pest control products.
Fanatжcal-terrжrist conspiracies have now spread against agriculture.
These acts of subversion will attempt to eliminate pest control products, such as glyphosate, from the hated agriculture industry.
Glyphosate-hating fanatжcs will NEVER be appeased and their environmental-terrжr will NEVER end !
Explore the following link …
The Library Of Terrжrism That Will NEVER End
―――――――――――――――――――――
STRIKING BACK
Glyphosate Lawsuits – Jackpot Awards
[ Profit-seeking, political, & subversive ] trial lawyers have managed to bamboozle three American juries so far into SHOWERING BILLIONS OF DOLLARS onto their suffering clients based on the bogus claim that exposure to Bayer’s glyphosate ( sold as Roundup ) herbicide [ somehow ] gave them cancer.
These UNJUSTIFIED JACKPOT AWARDS are made despite the fact that the vast majority of the scientific literature show that glyphosate is safe to use.
[ Profit-seeking, political, & subversive ] trial lawyers are the willing ( and highly-compensated ) instruments of the long-standing activist campaign against modern bio-tech crops spear-headed by [ glyphosate-hating & environmental-terrжrist organizations ] such as ―
• Environmental Defense Fund
• Greenpeace
• Union Of Concerned Scientists
See segment below entitled Glyphosate-Hating Organizations.
Explore the following links …
Reference –
Bayer’s $2 Billion Roundup Damages Boost Pressure To Settle
Background Information –
$289M Hit Job Against Glyphosate In Jackpot Verdict
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
What Are They For ?!?!
Summary –
Glyphosate-hating & environmental-terrжrist organizations … what are they for ?!?!
They serve no useful or beneficial purpose to society, wasting tax-exempt money operating as mere opponents against the agriculture industry, and do not deserve charity tax-exempt statuses.
They exist for one reason and one only … and that is to make ENVIRO-PROFIT.
Environmental-terrжrist organizations always want some more tax-free ENVIRO-PROFIT for ILLEGAL INTERFERENCE WITH PARTISAN POLITICS AND PUBLIC POLICY, which is in violation of taxation laws.
We must STRIKE BACK against glyphosate-hating fanatжcs.
Explore the following link …
Enviro-Profit — Money Squandered On Partisan, Political, & Subversive Activities
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/enviro-profit/
―――――――――――――――――――――
STRIKING BACK
Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer
The world’s science-based national regulatory and research agencies have consistently re-affirmed that glyphosate DOES NOT cause cancer.
These include ―
• Australia
• Canada
• European Union
• Japan
• United States
• US National Cancer Institute
• World Health Organization.
See later segment entitled Glyphosate-Hating Organizations.
Explore the following link …
Glyphosate Vindication Around The World
―――――――――――――――――――――
STRIKING BACK
Glyphosate Lawsuit – IARC Incompetence
[ Profit-seeking, political, & subversive ] trial lawyers make their case in part by citing a HIGHLY POLITICIZED International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) monograph and a BADLY FLAWED META-ANALYSIS that purportedly found that exposure to glyphosate increased the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma ( NHL ) in humans by 41 per cent.
Explore the following links …
IARC Merchants Of Environmentalist Doubt
Reference — glyphosate — 2017 11 15 — IARC — Merchants Of Environmentalist Doubt — Reason
New Study About Roundup & Cancer Doesn’t Say What You Probably Think It Does
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer
Summary –
It is now common knowledge that glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer. International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) has NOT even classified glyphosate as Group 1 – Carcinogenic To Humans.
However, IARC HAS arbitrarily classified glyphosate as Group 2A – Probably Carcinogenic To Humans on the basis of « limited evidence », clearly implying that its study is SEVERELY FLAWED, DISTORTED, and UNBALANCED.
Nonetheless, the IARC’s study has NOT classified glyphosate as Group 1 – Carcinogenic To Humans, which means glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer.
International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) is a mere subsidiary of World Health Organization ( WHO ).
On the issue of glyphosate and cancer, WHO has OVER-RULED IARC.
WHO and the Food & Agriculture Organization ( FAO ), both science-based national regulatory agencies of the United Nations, have stated that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans.
WHO and FAO have both looked at all pertinent published and un-published studies to assess the health risk to consumers from dietary exposure to glyphosate residues in food.
WHO and FAO have both stated that … « glyphosate is UNLIKELY to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans ».
Explore the following links …
The IARC Glyphosate-Gate
IARC No Longer Has Credibility Since Its Meta-Analysis Goes Looking For Problems Where None Exist
United Nations Discredits IARC Anti-Glyphosate Hazard Report
https://pesticidetruths.com/2016/05/21/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-victory-against-terrorists-proposal-for-prohibition-against-glyphosate-herbicide-stopped-in-the-european-union-real-trends-against-pe/
―――――――――――――――――――――
STRIKING BACK
Glyphosate Lawsuit – IARC Fraud
Interestingly, it was later revealed that ONE OF THE CONSULTANTS on the IARC monograph was a paid by the Environmental Defense Fund and is now an expert witness for [ profit-seeking, political, & subversive ] trial lawyers.
No conflict of interest there !
See next segment entitled The IARC Glyphosate-Gate.
Explore the following link …
Chris Portier Denies Being Paid By EDF Is A Conflict
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
The IARC Glyphosate-Gate
Summary –
International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) is an anti-glyphosate & environmental-terrжrist organization.
IARC, the ONLY major science body to insist that glyphosate causes cancer [ ?!?! ], has been caught doctoring documents and manipulating evidence to support its conclusion.
IARC conducts bad science.
Occasionally, bad science is promoted by lunatжcs who receive pay-offs and practice scientific fraud.
The motivation seems to be financial.
A key IARC lunatжc-advisor who lobbied against glyphosate has, in essence, received a PAY-OFF of 160,000 dollars.
He was bribed by lawyers who stand to profit from potential lawsuits involving glyphosate.
This is a truly gigantic scandal that has ( predictably ) received scant press coverage.
IARC has severely and perhaps irreparably damaged the reputation of its parent, the World Health Organization ( WHO ).
Anti-glyphosate lunatжcs are crooks and lying sacks of crжp !
Explore the following link …
The IARC Glyphosate-Gate
―――――――――――――――――――――
STRIKING BACK
Bayer R&D Investment
This Will Fail & More Pressing
Problems Will Be Neglected
Battered by the bad publicity stemming from the RIDICULOUS & UNJUSTIFIED JACKPOT AWARDS, Bayer is now pledging to INVEST 5,600,000,000 Dollars US IN ADDITIONAL METHODS TO COMBAT WEEDS over the next decade.
Explore link below entitled Bayer Raises The Bar In Transparency, Sustainability, & Engagement.
Bayer says that this R&D investment will aim at better understanding of how pesticide resistance develops, discovering new pesticides, and devising more precise application methods.
Doubtless some considerable proportion of the pharmaceutical and crop science company’s annual R&D SPENDING of 5,800,000,000 Dollars US is already devoted to achieving those goals.
Explore link below entitled Bayer & Science For A Better Life.
Since the [ glyphosate-hating fanatжcal- ] activists basically OPPOSE MODERN AGRICULTURE, Bayer’s pledge of additional R&D funding to find new ways to kill weeds will do nothing to mollify them.
To meet its commitment, Bayer is presumably diverting funds from solving other pressing problems, such as, finding new ways to CONTROL DISEASE CARRYING VERMIN in the tropics or developing NEW CANCER CURES.
Explore links below entitled Bayer& Neglect Of Tropical Diseases and Bayer & The Future Of Cancer Therapy Is Now.
The price of this attempt at appeasement is likely more suffering in the world than there would otherwise have been.
Explore the following links …
Bayer Raises The Bar In Transparency, Sustainability, & Engagement
Bayer & Science For A Better Life
Reference — glyphosate — 2018 00 00 — Bayer — Science For A Better Life — Annual Report
Bayer & Neglect Of Tropical Diseases
Reference — glyphosate — 2019 00 00 — Bayer — Neglected Tropical Diseases
Bayer & The Future Of Cancer Therapy Is Now
Reference — glyphosate — 2019 00 00 — Bayer — The Future Of Cancer Therapy Is Now
―――――――――――――――――――――
–
–
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
US National Cancer Institute
Fact …
No Association Between Glyphosate & Cancer
Summary –
The US National Cancer Institute ( US NCI ), a science-based research organization, concluded that ― glyphosate was NOT statistically significantly associated with cancer.
This large long-term research was published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute ( JNCI ).
This was the largest research study of agricultural workers in history, a gold standard, over the longest period of time.
It definitively demonstrated in a real-world environment that glyphosate DOES NOT cause cancer.
Statement By National Institutes Of Health ( NIH ) Conclusions ―
In this large, prospective cohort study, no association was apparent between glyphosate and any solid tumors or lymphoid malignancies overall, including NHL and its subtypes.
Reference –
US NCI — Glyphosate Use & Cancer Incidence In Agriculture
Background Information –
Glyphosate Vindication By US NCI
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
United Nations
Fact …
Glyphosate Is Unlikely To Pose
A Carcinogenic Risk To Humans
Summary –
Glyphosate is VINDICATED by the World Health Organization ( WHO ) and the Food & Agriculture Organization ( FAO ).
Both are science-based national regulatory agencies of the United Nations, and both have stated that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans.
FAO and WHO looked at all pertinent published and un-published studies to assess the health risk to consumers from dietary exposure to glyphosate residues in food.
The United Nations (UN ) has itself VINDICATED glyphosate.
The UN announced its assessment that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to cause cancer in people and that it is UNLIKELY to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans exposed to it through food.
Statement By Joint FAO/WHO Meeting On Pesticide Residues ( JMPR ) Evaluation Of Data ―
The overall weight of evidence indicates that administration of glyphosate and its formulation products at doses as high as 2000 mg/kg body weight by the oral route, the route most relevant to human dietary exposure, was NOT ASSOCIATED with genotoxic effects in an overwhelming majority of studies conducted in mammals, a model considered to be appropriate for assessing genotoxic risks to humans.
Reference –
Joint FAO-WHO Meeting On Pesticide Residues
Background Information –
United Nations Discredits IARC Anti-Glyphosate Hazard Report
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
United States
Fact …
No Risk To Public Health With Glyphosate
Summary –
Glyphosate is VINDICATED in America and continues to be registered as a successful and safe product.
The US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ), the nation’s science-based national regulatory agency, has evaluated the herbicide glyphosate, and has re-affirmed that there is NO RISK to public health when used properly.
According to scientific up-to-date knowledge, there is NO RISK to human health from current uses of glyphosate.
There is NO RISK to children or adults from currently registered uses.
There is NO indication that children are more sensitive to glyphosate.
Furthermore, glyphosate is NOT a carcinogen.
Statement By US Environmental Protection Agency ―
The draft human health risk assessment concludes that glyphosate is NOT LIKELY to be carcinogenic to humans.
The Agency’s assessment found NO other meaningful risks to human health when the product is used according to the pesticide label.
Reference –
US EPA Releases Draft Risk Assessments For Glyphosate
Background Information –
US EPA Reaffirms No Risk To Public Health With Glyphosate
Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer, Again
US Panel Finds Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
European Union
Fact …
Glyphosate Vindicated By The European Union
Summary
Glyphosate is VINDICATED in the European Union ( EU ).
The majority of EU nations DO NOT WANT anti-glyphosate prohibition.
On November 27th, 2017, the EU voted to EXTEND its RE-APPROVAL of glyphosate for a period of 5 YEARS.
Glyphosate was NOT approved for the typical 10 or 15-years because the EU review process was driven more by politics than science.
Nonetheless, the European Union has VINDICATED glyphosate.
With the EU RE-APPROVAL, the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) has been DISCREDITED, again, and forever.
The IARC’s hazard report has been disputed by EVERY science-based national regulatory agency in the world, including two in Europe ― the European Food Safety Authority and the European Chemicals Agency, the EU’s science-based national regulatory agencies.
The latest major study, published in November 2017 by National Cancer Institute, concluded that … glyphosate was NOT statistically significantly associated with cancer.
Nonetheless, the EU may still be able to prohibit glyphosate’s use after the 5-year re-approval period.
Anti-glyphosate terrжrism will NEVER end !
But, it is inescapable that glyphosate DOES NOT cause cancer !
Statement By European Chemicals Agency’s ( ECHA ) Committee for Risk Assessment ( RAC ) ―
RAC concluded that the available scientific evidence DID NOT meet the criteria in the CLP Regulation to classify glyphosate for specific target organ toxicity, or as a carcinogen, as a mutagen or for reproductive toxicity.
Reference –
European Union — Glyphosate Not Classified As A Carcinogen — ECHA
Background Information –
Glyphosate Wins Approval For 5 Years In European Union
Glyphosate Not Carcinogenic
Glyphosate License Extended For 18 Months By EU
Glyphosate Not Likely Carcinogenic — European Food Safety Authority
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
Canada
Fact …
Glyphosate Continues To Be Registered
Summary –
Glyphosate is VINDICATED by Canada.
After concluding a 7-year-evaluation of risks, Health Canada granted the CONTINUED REGISTRATION of glyphosate with minor risk mitigation strategies.
Health Canada is the nation’s science-based national regulatory agency.
Health Canada found that glyphosate DOES NOT present risks of concern to human health or the environment when used according to label directions.
The evidence in favour of glyphosate is overwhelming, according to Health Canada.
Products containing glyphosate are UNLIKELY to affect your health.
Health Canada, as well as EVERY science-based national regulatory agency in the world, have VINDICATED glyphosate.
These agencies include those within the European Union, the United States, and the United Nations.
Health Canada made the right decision, and deserves congratulations.
Statement By Health Canada Executive Summary ―
The overall finding from the re-examination of glyphosate is highlighted as follows ―
• Glyphosate is NOT genotoxic and is unlikely to pose a human cancer risk.
• Dietary ( food and drinking water ) exposure associated with the use of glyphosate is NOT expected to pose a risk of concern to human health.
• Occupational and residential risks associated with the use of glyphosate are NOT of concern, provided that updated label instructions are followed.
• The environmental assessment concluded that spray buffer zones are necessary to mitigate potential risks to non-target species ( for example, vegetation near treated areas, aquatic invertebrates and fish ) from spray drift.
• When used according to revised label directions, glyphosate products are NOT expected to pose risks of concern to the environment.
• All registered glyphosate uses have value for weed control in agriculture and non-agricultural land management.
Reference –
Health Canada Re-Evaluation Decision RVD2017-01
Reference — glyphosate — 2017 04 28 — Canada — Re-Evaluation Decision RVD2017-01 — Health Canada
Background Information –
Health Canada Has Granted Continued Registration For Glyphosate
Glyphosate Re-Evaluation Decision By Health Canada
Frequently-Asked Questions On Glyphosate
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
Australia
Fact …
Glyphosate Does Not Pose A Cancer Risk To Humans
Summary –
Glyphosate is VINDICATED by Australia.
Australian concerns about the effect of glyphosate on health have been totally REFUTED, with the government concluding that glyphosate DOES NOT pose a cancer risk to humans.
Australian concerns about the effect of glyphosate on health have been totally REFUTED, with the government concluding that glyphosate DOES NOT pose a cancer risk to humans.
In 2016, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority ( APVMA ), the nation’s science-based national regulatory agency, published its assessment of the IARC report and other recent assessments against glyphosate.
Australian Pesticides & Veterinary Medicines Authority ―
Proposed regulatory position ―
Based on this nomination assessment, the APVMA concludes that the scientific weight-of-evidence indicates that ―
Exposure to glyphosate DOES NOT pose a carcinogenic or genotoxic risk to humans
There is NO scientific basis for revising the APVMA’s satisfaction that glyphosate or products containing glyphosate ―
• would NOT be an undue hazard to the safety of people exposed to it during its handling or people using anything containing its residues
• would NOT be likely to have an effect that is harmful to human beings
• would NOT be likely to have an unintended effect that is harmful to animals, plants or things or to the environment
• would be effective according to criteria determined by the APVMA by legislative instrument, and
• would NOT unduly prejudice trade or commerce between Australia and places outside Australia.
There are NO scientific grounds for placing glyphosate and products containing glyphosate under formal reconsideration.
The APVMA will continue to maintain a close focus on any new assessment reports or studies that indicate that this position should be revised.
Reference –
Australia Consideration Of The Evidence For Reconsideration Of Glyphosate
Background Information –
Glyphosate Does Not Pose A Cancer Risk To Humans In Australia
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
Brazil
Fact …
Glyphosate Does Not Pose
A Hazard To The Average Person
Summary –
Glyphosate is VINDICATED by Brazil.
Brazil’s Anvisa, the nation’s science-based national regulatory agency, stated that glyphosate DOES NOT pose a hazard to the average person.
Additionally, a Brazilian court over-turned an injunction prohibiting products containing glyphosate.
Clearly, there will be NO prohibition against glyphosate in Brazil.
This country is the world’s fifth-largest country by area and the fifth most populous.
It is the world’s largest exporter of soybeans and relies heavily on glyphosate products.
Anvisa ( Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária ) ―
Press Release ―
… the product has NOT been classified as mutagenic, carcinogenic, toxic for reproduction, teratogenic ( causing fetal malformation ), among others.
Reference –
Brazil Health Agency Says Glyphosate Doesn’t Cause Cancer
Background Information –
No Prohibition In Brazil Since Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
Japan
Fact …
No Concern Relevant To Human Health With Glyphosate
Statement By Food Safety Commission of Japan ( FSCJ ) ―
In conclusion, NO concern relevant to human health is raised on the glyphosate herbicide tolerant and lepidopteran and coleopteran-resistant maize line, DP-004114-3.
Reference –
Japan & Herbicide Tolerant & Lepidopteran & Coleopteran Resistant Maize Line
―――――――――――――――――――――
–
–
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
Environmental Defense Fund
Description
Glyphosate-hating & environmental-terrжrist organization.
Lunatжc Statement ―
Conventional farms that use synthetic herbicides and pesticides inefficiently can contribute to climate and water pollution. [ ?!?! ]
Reference –
EDF Organic Farming As The Best Choice For Our Environment & Growing World
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
Greenpeace
Description
Glyphosate-hating & environmental-terrжrist organization.
Lunatжc Statement ―
We call on the European Commission to propose to Member States a ban on glyphosate, to reform the pesticide approval procedure, and to set EU-wide mandatory reduction targets for pesticide use. [ ?!?! ]
Reference –
Greenpeace Demands Ban Glyphosate & Protect People & The Environment
Background Information –
Investigate Greenpeace Tax-Free Profit & Revoke Its Charity Status World-Wide
―――――――――――――――――――――
Background Information
Union Of Concerned Scientists
Description
Glyphosate-hating & environmental-terrжrist organization.
Lunatжc Statement ―
Monsanto and the American Chemistry Council have launched a full-throttle attack on the international scientific body, the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ), after it issued a review of the scientific literature in 2015 that concluded that the herbicide, glyphosate, is a probable carcinogen. [ ?!?! ]
Reference –
Union Of Concerned Scientists States Monsanto Drags IARC Into The Depths Of Its Disinformation Campaign
―――――――――――――――――――――
–
–
―――――――――――――――――――――
Explore the following links …
The Complete Library Of Victories
Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-complete-library-of-victories/
Conspiracy Against Glyphosate —
Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism
Glyphosate Is Scientifically-Safe
According To Real Experts
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate/
The Entire Media History Of Glyphosate –
The Library Of Reports & Blogs By Force Of Nature
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-blogs/
The Entire Media History Of Glyphosate —
The Library Of Reports In Pesticide Truths
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-reports-blogs/
The Entire Media History Of Glyphosate
— The Complete Library Of References
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-references/
―――――――――――――――――――――
–
–
―――――――――――――――――――――
Explore the following links …
Myth-Busting
The Myth Of Cancer
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/cancer/
Myth-Busting
No Conclusive Link Between Pesticides & Cancer
Victories
The History Of Victories Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/victories-against-terrorists/
Victories
Victories Against Glyphosate-Hating Terrжrism
Victories
Liberating Society From Anti-Pesticide Occupation
Victories
The Trend Against Pesticide Bans Continues Again & Again
Victories
Various Statements About Rescinding Prohibitions
https://pesticidetruths.com/victories-against-terrorists-statements/
Victories
Real Trends AGAINST Pesticide Bans — Posters
Victories
The Public Does Not Want Pesticide Bans
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/the-wisdom-of-canadian-consumer-specialty-products-association/
The Avengers
The Neck Of The Anti-Pesticide & Enviro-Lunatжc
Terrжrist-Vermжn Must Be Snapped ( Proverbially )
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/the-avengers/
Liars
The Media Library Of Lying Sacks Of Crжp
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/liars/
Striking Back
Taking Action Against Anti-Pesticide
& Environmental Terrжrism
https://pesticidetruths.com/toc/striking-back-against-terrorism/
―――――――――――――――――――――
―――――――――――――――――――――
WE SPEAK THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT GLYPHOSATE FROM AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE !
We are the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that conspire to destroy the Green space and other industries ( NORAHG ). As a non-profit and independent organization, we are environmentalists who are dedicated to reporting about truth-challenged glyphosate-hating fanatжcs ( HUJE ) who conspire to destroy businesses that are dependent on the use of safe and effective conventional pest control products. We also report on the work of several highly-rated leading experts who have recognized expertise, training, and background in matters concerning pest control products, and who promote environmental realism and pesticide truths. https://wp.me/p1jq40-8DV
Not surprisingly, glyphosate-hating fanatжcs have demonstrated that they are incapable of processing overwhelming scientific evidence. Should we trust these fanatжcs, who conveniently ignore scientific evidence, and attempt to impose their politicized-doctrines and twisted life-style choices against our society ?!?!
NORAHG was the brain-child of Mr William H Gathercole and his colleagues in 1991. Mr Gathercole is now retired, although his name continues to appear as founder. We dare to defy the glyphosate-hating fanatжcs by exploring the whole truth from an independent perspective on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site … https://pesticidetruths.com/ If you wish to receive free reports on issues that concern you, please contact us at … force.of.de.nature@gmail.com WILLIAM H GATHERCOLE AND NORAH G
―――――――――――――――――――――
―――――――――――――――――――――
