March 29, 2024

ORGANIZATION – ECOJUSTICE – WRETCHED ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORIST ORGANIZATION

 

 

 

 

 

The purpose of this archive is to provide information that will lead to a successful litigation against Ecojustice.

 

 

 

 

Overview

 

 

Ecojustice is an Anti-Pesticide and Environmental-Terrorist Organization.

 

Ecojustice is also a FUND-RAISING, PROFIT-SEEKING, and LOBBYING organization, and it is NOT a science, research, or health organization.

Ecojustice is presently UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR CHARITY FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY.

 

It is listed among CANADA’S PROMINENT ANTI-PESTICIDE & ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS.

 

 

ORGANIZATIONS  –  ANTI-PESTICIDE & ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-48S

 

 

Ecojustice is a PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT in the CONSPIRACY TO PROHIBIT against pest control products used in the Urban Landscape. 

 

Its ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORIST ACTS OF SUBVERSION have EXTENSIVELY DAMAGED the Professional Lawn Care Industry.

 

Ecojustice-Lunatic HIRED-GUNS give Government Officials the FALSE AND FRAUDULENT IMPRESSION that children and adults are being exposed to cancer-causing agents whenever a pest control product is used. 

 

DESPICABLE Ecojustice-Lunatics use children as WEAPONS OF COERCION AND ULTIMATE ENVIRONMENTAL TERROR in order to convince Government Officials of the necessity of PROHIBITION.

 

Any PROHIBITION of pest control products is NOT JUSTIFIED because STRICT REGULATIONS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ALREADY PROTECT OUR HEALTH and OUR ENVIRONMENT.

 

Ecojustice has MERCILESSLY TERRORIZED, BASELESSLY SMEARED, FALSELY ACCUSED, GROTESQUELY PUNISHED, INNOCENTLY CONVICTED, SHAMELESSLY PERSECUTED, and WRONGFULLY DEPRIVED those people working in the Professional Lawn Care Industry.

 

SUBVERSIVE Anti-Pesticide CONSPIRACIES by Ecojustice have led to NEEDLESS and SENSELESS PROHIBITION of pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.

 

Because of these CONSPIRACIES, DAMAGES to the Professional Lawn Care Industry have been EXTENSIVE because there were NO valid economical alternatives to replace the prohibited products.

 

Consequently, Professional Lawn Care Companies were UNABLE to provide adequate weed and insect control, and were UNABLE to keep their customers satisfied.

 

Because of SUBVERSIVE Anti-Pesticide CONSPIRACIES by Ecojustice, EXTENSIVE DAMAGES in the Province of Ontario alone reached 500,000,000 DOLLARS, with up to almost 800 BUSINESS FAILURES and BANKRUPTCIES, and UP TO 12,500 UNEMPLOYED.

 

40 to 70 per cent of Professional Lawn Care customers were ANNIHILATED.

 

Because of SUBVERSIVE Anti-Pesticide CONSPIRACIES by Ecojustice, Professional Lawn Care businesses have been forced to TERMINATE many or most of their employees.

 

It is IRONICAL that Ecojustice-Lunatic HIRED-GUNS obtain SAFE, SECURE, WELL-PAYING JOBS, with PAY-OFFS in the form of AWARDS, INCENTIVES, BONUSES, and BOUNTIES  …  these PAY-OFFS are AT THE EXPENSE OF the jobs they ultimately destroy in the Professional Lawn Care Industry.

 

 

CARNAGE CAUSED BY CATASTROPHIC ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-26P

 

 

Ecojustice is RIDICULOUSLY IMPLYING that its NON-EXPERT ASSESSMENT concerning pest control products is somehow being withheld from Health Canada and EVERY other regulatory agency in the world.

 

INDISPUTABLE and CONCLUSIVE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH shows that, as reported through Health Canada’s VAST TOXICOLOGY DATABASE, NO HARM WILL OCCUR when pest control products are used according to label directions.

 

The RISK ASSESSMENT of pest control products indicates that they are PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC.

 

There is NOT ONE KNOWN ILLNESS or DEATH from the proper use of pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.

 

The following educational, regulatory, research, scientific, and trade agencies have CONCLUSIVELY SUPPORTED or VALIDATED the concept that pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE    ●   American Chemical Society    ●   American Council for Science and Health   ●   American Cancer Society   ●   British Columbia's Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides   ●   Canadian Medical Association   ●   CropLife Canada   ●   Health Canada   ●   Institute of Public Affairs   ●   International Agency for Research on Cancer   ●   Ontario Pesticides Advisory Committee   ●   The Fraser Institute   ●   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency   ●   World Health Organization.

 

Ecojustice has a HUGE VESTED INTEREST IN PERPETUATING the IMAGINARY DANGER of pest control products. 

 

Doing this attracts HUGE SUMS OF PROFIT.

 

There is a GROWING and CONCLUSIVE BODY OF EVIDENCE about Ecojustice SQUANDERING AND MISAPPROPRIATING its PUBLIC DONATIONS on SUBVERSIVE and PARTISAN Anti-Pesticide CONSPIRACIES.

 

It is PITIFULLY LUDICROUS to believe that Ecojustice is somehow concerned about health and the environment.

 

Ecojustice COULD NOT CARE LESS about health and the environment.

 

Ecojustice is a VAST FUND-RAISING MILLIONAIRE MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR PROFIT-MAKING MACHINE.

 

Ecojustice is operated by a handful of Non-Expert Fund-Raisers who are PAID-FOR-PROFIT as SUBVERSIVE Anti-Pesticide LOBBYISTS.

 

Ecojustice is GOVERNMENT-FINANCED with TAX-FREE MONEY.

 

Ecojustice DOES NOT DESERVE ANY DONATIONS OR SUPPORT.

 

Nor does it deserve a TAX-EXEMPT status.

 

Ecojustice DOES deserve to FACE THE SPOTLIGHT OF SCRUTINY and TERROR OF THE COURTS !

 

On The Pesticide Truths Web-Site, NORAHG manages a VAST ARCHIVE of REPORTS, MEDIA REFERENCES, AUDIO CLIPS, and VIDEOS.

 

We know who they are, and where they are hiding, and what they have said and done.

 

All names, statements, activities, and affiliations have been ARCHIVED for anyone wishing to lodge an OFFICIAL COMPLAINT or lay CRIMINAL CHARGES.

 

 

COMPLAINT CHANNELS  –  BUSINESS, FUND-RAISING, GOVERNMENT, & TAXATION AGENCIES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1PE

 

COMPLAINT CHANNELS  –  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR  –  MEDIA CONTACTS LIBRARY ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3dm

 

 

When CRIMINAL CHARGES for FRAUD and CONSPIRACY are laid, legal experts say that the ARCHIVE is sufficient to lead to a SUCCESSFUL PROSECUTION!

 

The following Web-Pages contain DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE concerning the SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES of following  …

 

Then  …  people should talk to their lawyer and local media outlets.

 

Thanks to The Pesticide Truths Web-Site, they have all the DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE that they need.

 

LET ECOJUSTICE FEEL THE SPOTLIGHT OF THE MEDIA AND THE TERROR OF THE COURTS !

 

 

 

History of Wretched Ecojustice

 

 

Ecojustice Canada was established in Vancouver in 1990 under the name Sierra Legal Defence Fund ( SLDF ). 

 

The name of the founder was Stewart Elgie. 

 

Sierra Legal Defence Fund was changed to Ecojustice Canada in 2007, but SLDF still operates as a FINANCIAL SHIELD for Ecojustice for the collection of profit. 

 

 

 

Offices of Wretched Ecojustice

 

 

Ecojustice has offices across Canada  ― 

 

●   Ecojustice Canada Alberta Office

 

●   Ecojustice Canada Toronto Office

 

●   Ecojustice Canada Vancouver Office

 

●   uOttawa-Ecojustice Environmental Law

    Clinic University of Ottawa, Faculty of

    Law

 

●   Yellowknife and Alberta

 

 

 

Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic

 

 

In 2007, Ecojustice Canada partnered with University Of Ottawa, a nest of Enviro-Maniac-Lawyers, to establish the first inter-disciplinary clinic of its kind in Canada.   

 

The result was the creation of a SHIELD TANDEM ORGANIZATION called University of Ottawa-Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic ( UOEELC ) a.k.a. Ottawa Environmental Law And Policy Clinic ( OELPC ), or University Of Ottawa's Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic, or simply Environmental Law Clinic.

 

Environmental Law Clinic was established with generous support from The J. W. McConnell Family Foundation and Law Foundation of Ontario, organizations that have also funded other Environmental-Terror activities.

 

 

 

Clients of Wretched Ecojustice

 

 

In several cases, Ecojustice Canada has represented the following Environmental-Terror-Organizations  ―

 

●   David Suzuki Foundation

 

●   Environmental Defence

 

●   Federation of Canadian Municipalities

 

●   Friends Of The Earth Canada ( FOE )

 

●   Greenpeace Canada

 

●   Nature-Action Quebec

 

●   Pollution Probe

 

●   Sierra Club Of Canada

 

●   Toronto Environmental Alliance

 

●   World Wildlife Fund Of Canada ( WWF )

 

Ecojustice Canada also has a close alliance with Canadian Environmental Law Association ( CELA ).

 

 

 

Budget and Funding of Wretched Ecojustice

 

 

Ecojustice Canada has claimed to be a non-profit INDEPENDENT charity that DOES NOT accept government grants. 

 

The fact that Ecojustice does not accept government grants is NOT IMPRESSIVE  ―  Ecojustice is still financed by clients and allies who DO accept government grants.

 

Ecojustice has claimed that thirty-thousand ACTIVE SUPPORTERS donate their money to them  ―  this has made Ecojustice a MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR MONEY-MAKING MACHINE. 

 

Ecojustice has an OPERATING BUDGET of about FOUR MILLION DOLLARS PER YEAR, and employs a contingent of FORTY staff members.   

 

Ecojustice has been funded by several organizations, including …

 

●   David Suzuki Foundation

 

●   Ducks Unlimited

 

●   Laidlaw Foundation  ―  105,00 dollars ( 2002 – 2007 )

 

●   Mountain Equipment Co-Op  ―  28,000 dollars ( 1997 – 2007 )

 

●   Santa Barbara Foundation

 

●   Sustainability Network ( training bursary )

 

●   The EJLB Foundation

 

●   The Body Shop Canada

 

●   The Ivey Foundation  ―  172,580 dollars ( 2004 – 2006 )

 

●   The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation

 

●   The Salamander Foundation  ―  50,000 dollars ( 2008 )

 

●   World Wildlife Fund of Canada ( WWF )

 

 

 

Funding Details of Wretched Ecojustice

 

 

Here are some details about some of the money received by Ecojustice Canada from organizations that FINANCIALLY SUPPORT SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES against pest control products  ―

 

●  Bullitt Foundation  ―  734,000 dollars since thr early 2000s

 

●  Laidlaw Foundation  ―  20,000 dollars ( 2002 );  45,000 dollars ( 2005 );  40,000 dollars ( 2007 ). 

 

●  Mountain Equipment Co-Op  ―  5,000 dollars ( 1997 );  5,000 dollars ( 1998 );  8,000 dollars ( 2005 );  10,000 dollars ( 2007 ).

 

●  The J. W. McConnell Family Foundation.

 

●  The Ivey Foundation  ―  37,580 dollars ( 2004 );  50,000 dollars ( 2005 );  85,000 dollars ( 2006) .

 

●  The Salamander Foundation  ―  50,000 dollars ( 2008 ).

 

The J. W. McConnell Family Foundation is known for its work under the name McConnell Initiatives.  Several Environmental-Terrorist-Organizations have participated, and likely have been remunerated, in McConnell annual meetings of the capacity building group, in addition to grant recipients  ― 

 

●  Canadian Institute For Environmental Law And Policy 

 

●  Canadian Parks And Wilderness Society 

 

●  ECOJUSTICE CANADA ( Sierra Legal Defense Fund ) 

 

●  Sierra Club Of Canada 

 

 

 

Ontario Prohibition and Wretched Ecojustice

 

 

It would not be unexpected that a portion of the massive amount of funding given to Ecojustice would have helped build infra-structures that were used to change public policy and to impose life-style changes, such as the Ontario Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act. 

 

Coincidentally, sizable amounts of money were provided to Ecojustice Canada during the period of time covering the public debates on the Toronto municipal PROHIBITION and the Ontario provincial PROHIBITION ( 2001 – 2008 ).

 

 

 

Coalition-For-Pesticide-Reform-Ontario

 

 

Ecojustice was a PRINCIPAL PARTISAN ARCHITECT with the Ontario McGuinty Government in CONSPIRING TO PROHIBIT pest control products used in the Urban Landscape. 

 

In 2008, Ecojustice Canada financially supported the PUBLIC AFFAIRS SHIELD ORGANIZATION called Coalition-For-Pesticide-Reform-Ontario.

 

This ENVIRO-TERROR-COALITION was created to influence public policy regarding the Ontario Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act. 

 

Ecojustice actively supported LUNATIC-PROHIBITION in the Province of Ontario. 

 

In 2008, Coalition-For-Pesticide-Reform-Ontario created an advertisement that contained the following statement that was supported by Ecojustice  ―

 

In a world of multiple chemical exposures, we must remove needless risks from lawn and garden pesticides.

 

In fact, Coalition-For-Pesticide-Reform-Ontario was funded by OVER ONE-DOZEN Environmental-Terrorist-Organizations, brimming with millions of dollars in budgets, donations, and grants. 

 

They are listed below  ―

 

●   Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment ( CAPE ) 

 

●   Canadian Environmental Law Association ( CELA ) 

 

●   Children’s Hospital Of Eastern Ontario ( CHEO ) 

 

●   David Suzuki Foundation 

 

●   ECOJUSTICE CANADA 

 

●   Environmental Defence 

 

●   Ontario College of Family Physicians ( OCFP )

 

●   Ontario Medical Association ( OMA )  ─  Pediatrics Section 

 

●   Ontario Public Health Association ( OPHA ) 

 

●   Organic Landscape Alliance ( OLA ) 

 

●   Prevent Cancer Now 

 

●   Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario ( RNAO ) 

 

●   The Learning Disabilities Association of Canada ( LDAC ) 

 

 

According to Ecojustice in a May 2010 Media Release  ―

 

Pesticides banned in Ontario  ―  Last spring, Ontario enacted a powerful pesticide ban  ―  a step made possible by Ecojustice’s defence of municipal pesticide bylaws, including our 2001 Supreme Court win that protected Hudson, Quebec’s right to ban toxics.  Ontario has enacted the most comprehensive pesticide ban in North America with over 200 pesticide products banned for sale and use.

 

 

 

National Prohibition and Wretched Ecojustice

 

 

Ecojustice continues to SUBVERT the Legislative System across Canada with a CONSPIRACY THAT SEEKS NATIONAL PROHIBITION of pest control products.

 

According to Ecojustice in a May 2010 Media Release  ―

 

Staff lawyer Justin Duncan continues to work on this file, seeking provincial bans in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, British Columbia and Alberta, with a goal to bring forward a NATIONAL BAN in the coming years.

 

Justin Duncan’s work this past year covered a remarkable range  ―  from ensuring Canadians know the pollution caused by mines, to securing a provincial ban of cosmetic pesticide use for Ontario.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts of Subversion in the Town of Hudson

 

 

In 1991, the Town of Hudson, Quebec, governed by a SUBVERSIVE GROUP OF LUNATICS, enacted a by-law that PROHIBITED the use of pest control products that were FEDERALLY LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE, and TOTALLY IRREPLACEABLE. 

 

They easily capitulated under the pressure of a mere handful of Lunatic-Enviro-Terrorists.

 

The Agriculture and Golf Industries were provided with an Exception Status. 

 

Mr. William H. Gathercole crafted the original Golf Industry Exception Status, which endures to this day for virtually all jurisdictions in North America. 

 

In 1992, two Professional Lawn Care companies, ChemLawn and Spraytech, were each fined three hundred dollars for accidentally spraying pest control products on lawns located in the Town of Hudson. 

 

The fines were legally challenged by the Professional Lawn Care Industry on the basis that the by-law was invalid, since it was PROHIBITORY and DISCRIMINATORY, and LIMITED or NEUTRALIZED PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL LAWS.

 

 

 

Legally Fighting Against the Environmental-Vermin in Quebec

 

 

In 1994, in a Quebec court, the Town of Hudson won the right to maintain its needless, senseless, and malicious PROHIBITION of pest control products. 

 

Consequently, the case continued to be legally challenged by the Green Space Industry before The Supreme Court of Canada.  As we all know, the attempt was ill-fated. 

 

On June 28th, 2001, The Supreme Court of Canada, which was clearly infested with Enviro-Maniac-Activists, upheld the ACTS OF SUBVERSION perpetrated by the Town of Hudson.

 

Enviro-Maniac-Judge Claire L’Heureux-Dubé presided on The Supreme Court of Canada when it UPHELD the LUNATIC-PROHIBITION of the Town of Hudson. 

 

On June 10th, 2002, Dubé retired, and began an indiscreet public association with those Lunatic-Enviro-Terrorists involved in concocting and defending the Hudson PROHIBITION. 

 

This situation was INCOMPREHENSIBLE to many observers !

 

 

 

Hudson Prohibition Defended by Wretched Ecojustice

 

 

On behalf of the Federation Of Canadian Municipalities, World Wildlife Fund of Canada, and Nature-Action Quebec, Ecojustice Canada provided expertise in the precedent-setting case in support of the NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS PROHIBITION of pest control products in the Town of Hudson.

 

According to Ecojustice in a September 2001 Media Release  ―

 

[ Ecojustice ] lawyers intervened on behalf of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, World Wildlife Fund, and Nature-Action Quebec.  Our lawyers Jerry DeMarco and Stewart Elgie argued that municipalities have a critical role in protecting the health of the residents and the environment, and that pesticide reduction measures are within the bounds of their local powers.

 

The Hudson PROHIBITION was defended by FOURTEEN Environmental-Terrorist-Organizations that SQUANDERED and MISAPPROPRIATED a large portion of the millions of dollars that they received in public funds, donations, and grants. 

 

The organizations are listed below  ―

 

●   Breast Cancer Prevention Coalition 

 

●   Canadian Environmental Law Association 

 

●   ECOJUSTICE CANADA 

 

●   Federation of Canadian Municipalities 

 

●   Healthy Lawns ― Healthy People 

 

●   Nature-Action Quebec Inc. 

 

●   Parents’ Environmental Network 

 

●   Pesticide Action Group Kitchener 

 

●   Sierra Club of Canada 

 

●   Toronto Environmental Alliance 

 

●   Vaughan Environmental Action Committee 

 

●   Working Group on the Health Dangers of the Urban Use of Pesticides 

 

●   Environmental Action Barrie 

 

●   World Wildlife Fund Canada

 

 

 

The 2,4-D NAFTA Challenge in the Province of Quebec

 

 

In 2009, Dow AgroSciences proceeded with a LAWSUIT against Government of Canada under the North American Free Trade Agreement ( NAFTA ).

 

Dow sought a REPEAL of Quebec's LUNATIC-PROHIBITION of pest control products containing the herbicide 2,4-D.

 

Furthermore, Dow demanded at least TWO MILLION DOLLARS IN DAMAGES.

 

Dow asserted the Quebec LUNATIC-PROHIBITION is tantamount to « expropriation » of Dow investments, and accuses Canada of breaching « basic due process, transparency, good faith and natural justice ».

 

Dow said Quebec's LUNATIC-PROHIBITION is NOT based on science, and should have been REPEALED after Health Canada’s respected Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA ) declared 2,4-D SAFE when used as directed.

 

In fact, Quebec legislated its LUNATIC-PROHIBITION under pressure from Environmental-Terrorist-Organizations  ―  the same ones that CONSPIRED to PROHIBIT pest control products in municipalities and provinces across Canada.

 

In all likelihood, the LUNATIC-PROHIBITION in Quebec will be SUCCESSFULLY REPEALED, and the Government of Canada will be required to pay MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in restitution.

 

Nonetheless, the gutless Federal Trade Minister Stockwell Day vowed a « vigorous defence » of Quebec's LUNATIC-PROHIBITION, and asserted that NAFTA preserves Canada's ability to regulate in the public interest to protect health and the environment. 

 

What the Trade Minister DID NOT understand is THIS   ―   you cannot run a country that has Environmental-Terrorist-Organizations dictating public policy on matters such as the NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS PROHIBITION of conventional pest control products. 

 

The government and the public were DUPED into LUNATIC-PROHIBITION by greedy millionaire Environmental-Terrorist-Organizations merely seeking to promote themselves, hence attracting MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in memberships and donations.

 

These same organizations are currently TERRORIZING Government Officials in municipalities and provinces across Canada.

 

Observers hope that these Environmental-Terrorist-Organizations will be sued for their involvement in the CONSPIRACY to PROHIBIT pest control products that are, in fact, HEALTH-CANADA-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC, and CAUSE NO HARM.

 

No wonder the Prohibition-Terrorists have gone BERSERK !

 

 

 

Enviro-Terror-Alliance Against 2,4-D NAFTA Challenge

 

 

In 2009, an ENVIRO-TERROR-ALLIANCE was formed with SEVEN Environmental-Terrorist-Organizations to SUBVERT and ANNIHILATE the threat against the Quebec LUNATIC-PROHIBITION of pest control products.

 

The ENVIRO-TERROR-ALLIANCE opposed the Dow AgroSciences 2,4-D NAFTA Challenge of Quebec’s provincial PROHIBITION under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement ( NAFTA ). 

 

The ENVIRO-TERROR-ALLIANCE also wanted the Government of Canada to acknowledge that it makes sense to eliminate pest control products under the PRETEXT of protecting human health and the environment.

 

In fact, the Government of Canada has TRUE experts to evaluate the safety of pest control products  ―  the RESPECTED Pest Management Regulatory Agency of Health Canada.

 

The ENVIRO-TERROR-ALLIANCE had NO experts in pest control products, and are blindly being led by the PUPPET-MASTER himself and his foundation, DAVID SUZUKI.

 

This ENVIRO-TERROR-ALLIANCE was set up to pool the public affairs expertise of Lunatic-Enviro-Terrorists, and to DUPE the public into believing that the 2,4-D NAFTA Challenge is a threat to human health and the environment.

 

This ENVIRO-TERROR-ALLIANCE was also designed to give everyone the impression that the Environmental-Terrorist-Movement has considerable size and power when, in fact, it does not.

 

 

 

Wretched Ecojustice and others Fighting 2,4-D NAFTA Challenge

 

 

The following SEVEN Environmental-Terrorist-Organizations, led by the PUPPET-MASTER himself and his foundation, David Suzuki, called upon the Government of Canada to vigorously defend Quebec’s LUNATIC-PROHIBITION of pest control products  ―

 

●   Canadian Environmental Law Association ( CELA )

 

●   David Suzuki Foundation

 

●   ECOJUSTICE CANADA

 

●   Equiterre ( Suzuki’s ambassador in the Province of Quebec )

 

●   New Democratic Party of Canada ( at the time, the third federal opposition party, and the POLITICAL SHIELD for the Environmental-Terrorist-Movement )

 

●   Sierra Club of Canada

 

●   University Of Ottawa-Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic ( UOEELC )

 

In fact, ONLY THREE Environmental-Terrorist-Organizations ( CELA, Ecojustice, and Suzuki ) were supporting this fight since the other groups are a REDUNDANT REPETITION OF ONE ANOTHER using the same organizations under a different group name.

 

●   ECOJUSTICE & UOEELC  ―  In 2007, Ecojustice Canada partnered with University of Ottawa, a nest of Enviro-Lunatic-Lawyers, to create the SHIELD TANDEM ORGANIZATION called University of Ottawa-Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic ( UOEELC ). 

 

ECOJUSTICE & UOEELC ARE BASICALLY ONE-IN-THE-SAME GROUP.

 

●   ECOJUSTICE, NDP, & ÉQUITERRRE  ―  In 2001, when the LUNATIC-PROHIBITION of the Town of Hudson was being challenged before The Supreme Court of Canada, Ecojustice Canada provided legal counsel for the Federation of Canadian Municipalities ( managed by some of the same people that now run New Democratic Party of Canada ), Nature-Action Quebec ( an early version of Equiterre ) and World Wildlife Fund. 

 

ECOJUSTICE, NDP, & ÉQUITERRE ARE BASICALLY ONE-IN-THE-SAME GROUP. 

 

●   SUZUKI & ÉQUITERRE  ―  In 1992-1993, Equiterre was established as an AMBASSABOR and PUBLIC POLICY SHIELD organization for David Suzuki Foundation in the Province of Quebec. 

 

SUZUKI & ÉQUITERRE ARE BASICALLY ONE-IN-THE-SAME GROUP.

 

●   SIERRA & UOEELC  ―  Enviro-Lunatic-Lawyer Will Amos has operated with these two organizations.  Amos has been Board Member and Secretary for Sierra Club of Canada.  He is also Staff Lawyer for University of Ottawa-Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic ( UOEELC ). 

 

SIERRA & UOEELC ARE BASICALLY ONE-IN-THE-SAME GROUP.

 

●   NDP, FCM, SUZUKI, ECOJUSTICE, & SIERRA  ―  Enviro-Lunatic-Politician Jack Layton was Leader of New Democratic Party of Canada, at the time the third federal opposition party.  Before his days with NDP, Layton was leader of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities ( FCM ), an Environmental-Terrorist-Organization that was granted intervener status before The Supreme Court of Canada when Ecojustice was defending the Hudson PROHIBITION.  Coincidentally, Layton was also raised in Hudson.

 

NDP, FCM & ECOJUSTICE ARE BASICALLY ONE-IN-THE-SAME GROUP.

 

 

 

Subversive Video and Wretched Ecojustice

 

 

Ecojustice FINANCED the presentation of « A-Terrorist-Reaction ». 

 

« A-Terrorist-Reaction » was a foreign AMATEUR HOME-MADE VIDEO that was concocted to GLORIFY Environmental-Terrorism, and DEFEND the LUNATIC-PROHIBITION of pest control products.

 

« A-Terrorist-Reaction » was a deliberate attempt to SUBVERT THE LEGISLATIVE and JUSTICE SYSTEMS in Canada.

 

« A-Terrorist-Reaction » was a deliberate attempt to POLLUTE the 2,4-D NAFTA Challenge in the Province of Quebec.

 

« A-Terrorist-Reaction » is also a deliberate attempt to DIVERT the 133 criminal charges against 29 Lunatic-Enviro-Terrorists in the Province of Ontario.

 

« A-Terrorist-Reaction » was a DISGRACEFULLY FALSE, MISLEADING, and BOGUS AMATEUR HOME-MADE VIDEO that REINVENTS and DISTORTS the HISTORY of the CONSPIRACY to PROHIBIT pest control products in the Town of Hudson, Quebec. 

 

The only true impartial witnesses to the Hudson affair never appeared in the video.

This AMATEUR HOME-MADE VIDEO was recognized as DISGRACEFUL, FALSE, MISLEADING, and BOGUS, with overtones of a classic American film, « The Birth of a Nation », which itself glorifies terrorism in the form of the violent racism of the Ku Klux Klan.

 

The presentation of this DISGRACEFULLY FALSE, MISLEADING, and BOGUS AMATEUR HOME-MADE VIDEO is intended to POLLUTE any judgment against those Lunatic-Enviro-Terrorists facing CRIMINAL CHARGES in the conspiracy to PROHIBIT pest control products.

 

The presentation of this DISGRACEFULLY FALSE, MISLEADING, and BOGUS AMATEUR HOME-MADE VIDEO was intended to CONFUSE the proceedings involving the 2,4-D NAFTA Challenge in the Province of Quebec.

 

The presentation of « A-Terrorist-Reaction » was intended to POLLUTE THE LEGISLATIVE and JUSTICE SYSTEMS whenever the services of Claire L’Heureux-Dubé were used to not only PRESENT the amateur video, but also to ANSWER QUESTIONS from the audience. 

 

Dubé presided as judge on The Supreme Court of Canada when it upheld the LUNATIC-PROHIBITION of the Town of Hudson. 

 

Dubé now associates with those Enviro-Lunatics involved in defending the Hudson PROHIBITION. 

 

This situation is INCOMPREHENSIBLE !

 

In the City of Ottawa, the presentation of « A-Terrorist-Reaction » was FINANCED by the WRETCHED uOttawa-Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic, uOttawa Ecojustice Clinic, and University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, a NEST of Enviro-Maniac-Lawyers.

 

Coincidentally, Ecojustice Canada provided expertise in the decision by The Supreme Court of Canada, presided by former Justice Dubé, which upheld the LUNATIC-PROHIBITION of the Town of Hudson. 

 

Coincidentally, University of Ottawa’s Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic also represented Enviro-Lunatic-Activists in the lawsuit against the Government of Canada in opposing the 2,4-D NAFTA Challenge under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement

( NAFTA ).

 

Demands were made to have « A-Terrorist-Reaction » BANNED from PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS in Canada until all legal proceedings have been resolved.

 

Demands were made to have Paul Tukey, the promoter of the video, and his associates, BANNED from ENTERING CANADA until all legal proceedings have been resolved.

 

Demands were made to have University of Ottawa's Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic BANNED FROM INTERVENING in the 2,4-D NAFTA Challenge.

 

Demands were made to have WRETCHED uOttawa-Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic, UOttawa Ecojustice Clinic, and University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law SANCTIONNED by the Ontario Bar Association. 

 

Demands have been made to have uOttawa-Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic, UOttawa Ecojustice Clinic, and University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law CHARGED WITH FRAUD and CONSPIRACY under the Criminal Code of Canada.

 

Demands were made to have Claire L’Heureux-Dubé BANNED from making PUBLIC STATEMENTS until all legal proceedings have been resolved.

 

 

 

CULPRIT  –  TUKEY, PAUL  –  THE BIN LADEN OF ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORISM ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3AG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Consequences of the Wretched Ecojustice Legacy

 

 

According to observers, there are CONSEQUENCES of the WRETCHED Ecojustice Legacy.

 

If Canada is to become a haven for ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORISM, companies and investors will SHUN CANADA, and GO ELSEWHERE ! 

 

There are now very clear indications that this is occurring in the Pest Control Product Industry.

 

It will be many years before anybody realizes that the Canadian market is now finished as far as many chemical manufacturers are concerned. 

 

For the foreseeable future, Canada will no longer benefit from ANY additional investment regarding new technologies in pest control products. 

 

That’s it. 

 

Game over. 

 

Just like the companies that vacated the Province of Quebec in the 1970s because of a new separatist government, chemical manufacturers have already planned their exodus from Canada. 

 

Businesses abhor operating in markets made UNSTABLE by TERRORISM, whether it is political or environmental. 

 

Consequently, the manufacturers are TERRIFIED at the prospect of investing hundreds of millions of dollars on the research and registration of new products in an unstable Canada. 

 

The exit strategies are now assured. 

 

This exodus will apply to ALL manufacturers and distributors of pest control products that are, in fact, FEDERALLY LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE, and TOTALLY IRREPLACEABLE.

 

These are CONSEQUENCES to the WRETCHED Ecojustice Legacy.

 

The CONSEQUENCES of Environmental-Terrorism is DESTROYED ECONOMIES, LOST JOBS AND HARDSHIP FOR PEOPLE, and WEAKENED COMMUNITIES.

 

 

 

Repealing Pesticide Ban In Ontario

 

 

On May 31st, 2012, a Private Member’s Bill introduced by Ted Chudleigh, Member of Provincial Parliament ( MPP ) for Halton in Ontario, was defeated by Anti-Pesticide members of the Liberal and New Democratic Party ( NDP ) caucuses.

 

In Ontario, the Liberal and New Democratic ( NDP ) Parties function as the POLITICAL SHIELDS for Anti-Pesticide Organizations.

 

The Chudleigh Bill was designed to AMEND the Pesticides Act which came into effect on April 22nd, 2009.

 

On May 9th, 2012, Mr. Chudleigh moved first reading his Bill 88, An Act to AMEND the Pesticides Act to provide for the use of pesticides for cosmetic purposes WITH A LICENCE.

 

It passed first reading.

 

According to Mr. Chudleigh, in the House on May 9th, 2012  ―

 

Basically, this bill ALLOWS A PROFESSIONAL APPLICATOR TO APPLY APPROVED PESTICIDES to control weeds or pests on your lawn or garden.

 

On May 30th, 2012, Anti-Pesticide Organizations FRANTICALLY sent a letter to ALL Ontario Members of Provincial Parliament ( MPPs ) urging them to OPPOSE the Chudleigh Bill.

 

Not surprisingly, the Liberals and NDP MPPs GANGED UP TO DEFEAT the Chudleigh Bill on its second reading on May 31st, 2012.

 

However, the Chudleigh Bill had a GREAT DEAL OF VALUE, for among other things, it BROUGHT TOGETHER THE GREAT SWELL OF THE PUBLIC who now think THE ORIGINAL 2009 PROHIBITION HAS GONE WAY TOO FAR.

 

The MAJORITY of Ontarians AGREE with Mr. Chudleigh, since according to a recent Ontario poll, MORE THAN HALF of Ontario residents believe that the provincial government DID NOT DO THE RIGHT THING by implementing Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION.

 

Ontario residents WOULD RATHER HAVE THE BAN SCRAPPED OR MODIFIED.

 

It should be noted that the Chudleigh Bill ONLY INCLUDED APPLICATION BY PROFESSIONAL APPLICATORS, and DID NOT include application of pest control products by residents/home-owners.

 

INDISPUTABLE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH shows that, as reported through Health Canada’s VAST TOXICOLOGY DATABASE, NO HARM WILL OCCUR when pest control products are used according to label directions.

 

The RISK ASSESSMENT of pest control products indicates that they are PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC.

 

Thankfully, Mr. Chudleigh AGREED  ―  and deserves CONGRATULATION.

 

May 30th, 2012, Anti-Pesticide Organizations FRANTICALLY sent a letter to ALL Ontario

Members of Provincial Parliament ( MPPs ) urging them to OPPOSE the Chudleigh Bill.

 

If these organizations want to be involved with SUBVERSIVE PARTISAN POLITICS and ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORISM, then their CHARITY TAX-EXEMPT STATUSES MUST BE REVOKED.

 

 

 

FRANTIC Letter Sent to Ontario Government Officials

 

 

May 30, 2012

 

Dear Member of Provincial Parliament,

 

Oppose Bill 88, Pesticides Amendment Act ( Licence for Cosmetic Purposes ), 2012

 

We ask you to vote against Bill 88, which would amend the Pesticides Act to reintroduce banned lawn and garden chemicals. Ontario’s world-class [ ?!?! ] cosmetic pesticide ban, as it now stands, protects both human health and the environment  [ ?!?! ].

 

We fully support maintaining a comprehensive ban on the sale and cosmetic use of pesticides.

 

Since the legislation came into effect in 2009  …

 

1)   Concentrations in urban streams of lawn chemicals such as 2,4-D, Dicamba and MCPP, were reduced by up to 97%.  [ WRONG ! ]

 

[  On the issue of the Province of Ontario, the 2009 PROHIBITION of pest control products DEFINITELY DID NOT improve water quality in streams and rivers.  For more than ten years, well BEFORE the 2009 PROHIBITION, there were CONSISTENTLY LOW LEVELS of pest control products in Ontario streams.  ALMOST UNDETECTABLE LEVELS of pest control products were found in Ontario streams EVEN BEFORE the 2009 PROHIBITION.  Both before and after the 2009 PROHIBITION, the presence of pest control products were measured in the PARTS PER TRILLION RANGE and WELL BELOW water quality guidelines.   In fact, previous studies have shown that, for more than ten years, there have been CONSISTENTLY LOW LEVELS of pest control products in Ontario streams.  The 2009 Ontario PROHIBITION did NOT protect the environment.  ]

 

 

 

PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS  –  WATER QUALITY  –  MYTH ABOUT WATER ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-27X

 

 

2)   The third review of the health effects of pesticides, released in May of this year by Ontario College of Family Physicians, reconfirms that pesticides are harmful to reproductive and respiratory systems and neurodevelopmental behaviour.  [ WRONG ! ]

 

[  Ontario College of Family Physicians is a DISCREDITED, RADICAL, and SCIENTIFICALLY IGNORANT Anti-Pesticide Organization.  OCFP is a MERE TRADE ASSOCIATION, and it is NOT a science, research, or health organization.  It is INDIRECTLY OPERATED as a PUBLIC INFORMATION SHIELD by Canadian Cancer Society and Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment.  These organizations are presently UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR CHARITY FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY.  The OCFP Anti-Pesticide Literature Review was BOGUS, BIASED, DISGRACEFUL, FALSE, INARGUABLY DISCREDITED, MISLEADING, and SUBVERSIVE, and has ABSOLUTELY NO CREDIBILITY in the legitimate scientific community.  It has been DISCREDITED, DEBUNKED, and REFUTED by Health Canada and by The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution.  OCFP DID NOT conduct a serious scientific study  …  it conducted a mere Literature Review, and could only use those references found in the OPEN PUBLIC LITERATURE.  What did OCFP use as its reference sources ?  GOOGLE and WIKIPEDIA.  ]

 

 

 

ORGANIZATION  –  ONTARIO COLLEGE OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS  –  DISCREDITED, RADICAL, AND SCIENTIFICALLY IGNORANT MAD MEN PRETENDING TO BE SCIENTISTS WHO ARE LAZY & STUPID ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-37C

 

 

The landmark Supreme Court of Canada ruling on Spraytech vs Hudson, Quebec in 2001 upheld the concept of governments being able to apply the precautionary principle as « trustees of the environment ».

 

Across the country, Canadians living in communities with pesticide bans have healthy, chemical-free lawns and gardens that are as beautiful as ever. [  WRONG !  WRONG !  WRONG !  ] 

 

Please feel free to contact any of the undersigned health and environmental organizations  ―

 

Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment www.cape.ca   Farrah Khan farrah@cape.ca 416-306-2273

 

Canadian Cancer Society – Ontario Division www.cancer.ca   Joanne Di Nardo – jdinardo@ontario.cancer.ca 416-323-7067

 

Canadian Environmental Law Association www.cela.ca  Kathleen Cooper kcooper@cela.ca 416-960-2284 ext. 221

 

David Suzuki Foundation www.davidsuzuki.org   Lisa Gue lgue@davidsuzuki.org 613-594-5428

 

Ecojustice www.ecojustice.ca   Justin Duncan jduncan@ecojustice.ca 416-368-7533 ext. 522

 

Environmental Defence www.environmentaldefence.ca

Rick Smith rsmith@environmentaldefence.ca 416-323-9521 ext.225

 

Learning Disabilities Association of Canada www.ldac-taac.ca/   Barbara McElgunn mcelgunnb@rogers.com 416-281-9676

 

Ontario College of Family Physicians  www.ocfp.on.ca/English/OCFP/Communications/CurrentIssues/Pesticides/   Jan Kasperski jk_ocfp@CFPC.CA 416-867-9646 ext. 27

 

Lynn Marshall lynn.marshall@utoronto.ca

Ontario Medical Association – Pediatrics Section

 

Dr. Hiro Yamashiro pedsontario@gmail.com

 

Pesticide Free Ontario www.pesticidefree.ca & www.pesticidereform.ca   Susan Koswan info@pesticidefree.ca 519-578-8508

 

Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario www.rnao.org   Kim Jarvi kjarvi@rnao.org 416-599-1925

 

Toronto Environmental Alliance  torontoenvironment.org   Heather Marshall, Toxics Campaigner heather@torontoenvironment.org 416-596-0660 

 

 

According to Ecojustice  ―

 

Ontario is currently the vanguard in the battle against needless [ ?!?! ] pesticide use in North America.

 

Bill 88 would set Ontario back years in the protection of family health in the province.  [ WRONG ! ]

 

Let’s keep moving forward rather than backwards.

 

Bill 88 should be rejected.

 

 

 

[  Ecojustice is an example of an Environmental-Terrorist-Organization that BENEFITTED from the Ontario PESTICIDE BAN.  It was a PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT with the McGuinty Government in CONSPIRING TO PROHIBIT pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.  It would not be unexpected that a portion of the massive amount of funding given to Ecojustice would have helped build infra-structures that were used to change public policy and to impose life-style changes, such as the Ontario Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act.  Coincidentally, sizable amounts of money were provided to Ecojustice Canada during the period of time covering the public debates on the Toronto municipal PROHIBITION and the Ontario provincial PROHIBITION ( 2001-2008 ).  Ecojustice is a FUND-RAISING, PROFIT-SEEKING, and LOBBYING organization, and NOT a science, research, or health organization.  Health Canada, and NOT Ecojustice, has THE ESSENTIAL EXPERTISE on the subject of pest control products.  Ecojustice is RIDICULOUSLY IMPLYING that its NON-EXPERT ASSESSMENT is somehow being withheld from Health Canada and EVERY other regulatory agency in the world.  Pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE and CAUSE NO HARM.  There are NO pest control products used in the Urban Landscape that are known or probable carcinogens.  Pest control products are GOVERNMENT-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC, and CAUSE NO HARM.  ] 

 

 

 

STRIKING BACK Against Anti-Pesticide Terrorists

 

 

Everyone in the Green Space Industry  ―  no matter where they live  ―  must meet with their Member of Provincial Parliament ( MPP ), regardless of party affiliation.

 

In order to meet and inform the MPP, you must donate the maximum amount to the party, which is 1,240 dollars in Ontario.

 

The cost of this donation is insignificant when compared to the catastrophic business losses inflicted by anti-pesticide prohibition.

 

Any business owner in the Green Space Industry who does not bother to meet with the local MPP is a pitiful fool and an idiot, and does not deserve a career, or a business, or any success.

 

COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN.

 

Anti-Pesticide Terrorists are NOT CREDIBLE SOURCES OF INFORMATION upon which political decisions are made  ―  they LIE and LIE and LIE.

 

There is NO RECOURSE but OFFICIAL COMPLAINTS as well as LITIGATION against Anti-Pesticide Terrorists.

 

They DO NOT DESERVE ANY DONATIONS OR SUPPORT.

 

They DO NOT DESERVE ANY GOVERNMENT GRANTS.

 

Nor do they deserve TAX-EXEMPT STATUSES.

 

They DO deserve to FACE THE SPOTLIGHT OF SCRUTINY and THE TERROR OF THE COURTS !

 

Anti-Pesticide Terrorists in organizations like Canadian Cancer Society are presently UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR CHARITY FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY.

 

The Government of Canada DOES NOT want its society to continue living in the 9|11 Era of Anti-Pesticide Enviro-Lunatic Profit-Hungry Terrorism !

 

And neither should anyone in the Green Space Industry.

 

All names, statements, activities, and affiliations have been ARCHIVED for anyone wishing to lodge an OFFICIAL COMPLAINT or lay CRIMINAL CHARGES against Anti-Pesticide Terrorists.

 

On The Pesticide Truths Web-Site, NORAHG manages a VAST ARCHIVE of REPORTS, MEDIA REFERENCES, AUDIO CLIPS, and VIDEOS on ALL Anti-Pesticide Terrorists.

 

We know who they are, and where they are hiding, and what they have said and done.

 

When CRIMINAL CHARGES FOR FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY ARE LAID, legal experts say that the NORAHG ARCHIVE is sufficient to lead to a SUCCESSFUL PROSECUTION against Anti-Pesticide Terrorists !

 

Business owners in the Green Space Industry should talk to their lawyers, members of the legislative assembly, and local media outlets.

 

Thanks to The Pesticide Truths Web-Site, they have all the DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE that they need.

 

LET THESE TERRORISTS FACE THE SPOTLIGHT OF SCRUTINY and THE TERROR OF THE COURTS !

 

Anti-Pesticide Terrorists are GOVERNMENT-FINANCED with TAX-FREE MONEY  ―  they must not be allowed this money to defend themselves in court.

 

Demand a REVOCATION of their organizations’ REGISTERED CHARITY TAX-EXEMPT STATUS !

 

SUE THE BASTERDS’ BRAINS OUT !

 

 

COMPLAINT CHANNELS  –  BUSINESS, FUND-RAISING, GOVERNMENT, & TAXATION AGENCIES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1PE

 

COMPLAINT CHANNELS  –  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR  –  MEDIA CONTACTS LIBRARY ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3dm

 

COMPLAINT CHANNELS  –  HERE’S HOW TO SUE THE BASTERDS’ BRAINS OUT !  –  LITIGATION AGAINST ANTI-PESTICIDE ACTIVISTS  –  2012 01 28 ( Report )

 

http://wp.me/p1jq40-33F

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wretched Ecojustice

The NORAHG Library of Force Of Nature Reports

 

 

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2012 10 15 — NATIONAL Prohibition — Groups Ask For Review Of Pesticides — Suzuki — Equiterre — pdf

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2012 10 00 — BACKGROUNDER – Busting The Facts About Cosmetic Pesticide Bans — MUTIPLE TITLES — NO CAPS — pdf

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2012 10 01 — Collision Course — NO GOLF EXCEPTION — Manitoba Public Consultation — CELA-CAPE — pdf

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2012 06 28 — Manitoba Conspiracy — Letter to Minister — CAPE, CCS, CELA, OCFP, Suzuki — pdf

Force Of Nature — EcoJustice — 2012 05 30 — TERROR Talk — FRANTIC Letter Sent to Ontario Government Officials — pdf

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2012 04 22 — Terror NEVER Ends — Canada's Anti-Pesticide Terrorists — LIST — pdf

Force Of Nature — EcoJustice — 2011 11 14 — Enviro-PROFIT — Who Is Funding Enviro-Terrorists in Canada — pdf

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2011 07 18 — Enviro-PROFIT — No David vs Goliath — Canadian Sources of Profit — pdf

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2010 12 04 — Appeasing Enviro-Lunatics — Vancouver — pdf — 300 dpi

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2010 09 11 — CARD — Enviro-Terror Organizations — Lists — pdf — 300 dpi

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2010 06 15 — CARD — Enviro-Terror Organizations — Lists — pdf — 300 dpi

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2010 05 00 — Terror NEVER Ends — NATIONAL Prohibition — pdf — 300 dpi

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2010 02 24 — Reining A Terrorist Reaction — Tukey — Subversion in Ontario — pdf

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2010 02 17 — Culprits — Devon Page — Ontario — 4 — Coalition for Pest. Reform — pdf

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2010 02 00 — Quebec Prohibition — A Terrorist Reaction Video — History — pdf

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2009 06 21 — CARD — Enviro-Terror Organizations — List — Defend Industry — pdf

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2009 05 12 — Quebec Prohibition — Challenging NAFTA ( 2001 ) — 2,4–D — pdf

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — 2009 05 05 — Quebec Prohibition — NAFTA — Suzuki — Equiterre — pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wretched Ecojustice

BACKGROUNDER  –  Busting The Facts About Cosmetic Pesticide Bans

 

 

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — BACKGROUNDER – Busting The Facts About Cosmetic Pesticide Bans — WITHOUT CAPITALIZATION — 2012 10 00

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — BACKGROUNDER – Busting The Facts About Cosmetic Pesticide Bans — WITH CAPITALIZATION — 2012 10 00

Force Of Nature — Ecojustice — BACKGROUNDER – Busting The Facts About Cosmetic Pesticide Bans — ORIGINAL DOCUMENT — 2012 10 00

 

 

 

 

Wretched Ecojustice

The Library of Pesticide Truths Reports

 

 

 

EcoJustice Lawyer Kaitly Mitchell COMES CLEAN — Cosmetic Pesticide Ban —  Playing on Laws — 2012 06 28 ( Report )

 

https://pesticidetruths.com/2012/06/28/ecojustice-lawyer-kaitly-mitchell-comes-clean-cosmetic-pesticide-ban-playing-on-laws-ecojustice/

 

 

 

 

 

 

NORAHG has archived more information on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site  …

 

 

THE PESTICIDE TRUTHS WEB-SITE

 

https://pesticidetruths.com/

 

 

AGRICULTURE  –  TARGETED BY ANTI-PESTICIDE ACTIVISTS  …  AND MORE ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2Mt

 

 

CULPRITS  –  CANADA'S PROMINENT ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORISTS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-46L

 

 

CULPRIT  –  BELL, WARREN  –  HYPERANXIOUS, IRRATIONAL, NON-EXPERT, ADOLESCENT, PROFITEERING, ANTI-PESTICIDE LUNATIC ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1JY

 

 

CULPRIT  –  CARSON, RACHEL  –  THE QUEEN OF JUNK SCIENCE ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2SN

 

 

CULPRIT  –   CAVERS, DONOVAN  –  GREEN PARTY PROFITEER  –  KAMLOOPS, BRITISH COLUMBIA ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3mO

 

 

CULPRIT  –  COTTAM GHOST-WRITERS  –  DECEIVING THE PUBLIC ANONYMOUSLY ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2V6

 

 

CULPRIT  –  FORMAN, GIDEON  –  LUNATIC MING THE MERCILESS ENVIRO-TERRORIST ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-29l

 

 

CULPRIT  –  FORMAN, GIDEON  –  REFERENCES FOR LITIGATION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2Wg

 

 

CULPRIT  –  FORMAN, GIDEON  –  SLIDE SHOW  –  PAID-FOR-PROFIT PRESENTATION  –  LIES & MIS-INFORMATION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3oc

 

 

CULPRIT  –  SEELY, KATHRYN  –  THE LUNATIC GRINNING MISTRESS OF MIS-INFORMATION IN BRITISH COLUMBIA ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3fR

 

 

CULPRIT  –  TUKEY, PAUL  –  THE BIN LADEN OF ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORISM ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3AG

 

 

ENVIRO-PROFIT  –  MONEY SQUANDERED ON PARTISAN, POLITICAL, and SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1IE

 

 

ENVIRO-TERRORISTS UNMASKED  –  WRONG FOR OVER 50 YEARS ! ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-27n

 

 

FAILURE OF INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT ( IPM )  –  #@!!% IPM NONSENSE ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2bJ

 

 

FAILURE OF ORGANIC PESTICIDE-FREE MAINTENANCE ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3yl

 

 

GREEN ALTERNATIVES  …  BOGUS & DISMAL FAILURES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-24g

 

 

MYTH-BUSTING  –  CANCER, THE MYTH OF ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2nl

 

 

MYTH-BUSTING  –  PESTICIDE BANS  –  THE MYTHS ABOUT ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3jm

 

 

ORGANIZATIONS  –  ANTI-PESTICIDE & ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-48S

 

 

ORGANIZATION  –  CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT  –  GLOATING, TREACHEROUS, AND REPUGNANT ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3s4

 

 

ORGANIZATION  –  CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY  –  SUBVERSIVE, CONTEMPTIBLE, AND RADICAL ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1OW

 

 

ORGANIZATION  –  CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY  –  NO DIRECT PROOF PESTICIDES CAUSE CANCER ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-4qC

 

 

ORGANIZATION  –  CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY  –  REFERENCES FOR LITIGATION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2I8

 

 

ORGANIZATION  –  DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION  –  DANGEROUS, HYPOCRITICAL, AND INSATIABLE ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-21m

 

 

ORGANIZATION  –  DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION  –  REFERENCES FOR COMPLAINTS AND LITIGATION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-4aU

 

 

ORGANIZATION  –  ONTARIO COLLEGE OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS  –  DISCREDITED, RADICAL, AND SCIENTIFICALLY IGNORANT MAD MEN PRETENDING TO BE SCIENTISTS WHO ARE LAZY & STUPID ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-37C

 

 

ORGANIZATION  –  THE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR  –  PROFITING FROM PROHIBITION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2pp

 

 

ORGANIZATION  –  THE ONTARIO TRILLIUM FOUNDATION  –  SUBVERSIVE FINANCIAL SUPPORTER OF ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORISM ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2s4

 

 

PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS  –  BEE COLONY COLLAPSE DISORDER ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2BA

 

 

PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS  –  CHILDREN ARE NOT AT RISK ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2ha

 

 

PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS  –  PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE  –  INVALIDATED WEAPON OF COERCION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2qM

 

 

PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS  –  WATER QUALITY  –  MYTH ABOUT WATER ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-27X

 

 

PROVINCE OF ALBERTA  –  CONSPIRACY TO PROHIBIT PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS IN THE URBAN LANDSCAPE ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2vo

 

 

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  –  CONSPIRACY TO PROHIBIT PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS IN THE URBAN LANDSCAPE ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1O6

 

 

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  –  COQUITLAM, CITY OF  –  AN ENVIRONMENT THAT IS UNHAPPY, UGLY, UNEMPLOYED, UNENLIGHTENED, AND UNHEALTHY ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3vl

 

 

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  –  COQUITLAM, CITY OF  –  REFERENCES FOR LITIGATION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3Qv

 

 

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  –  KELOWNA, CITY OF  –  ANTI-PESTICIDE WOMEN COUNCILLORS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3mr

 

 

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  –  SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2c2

 

 

PROVINCE OF ONTARIO  –  LIVING IN ENVIRONMENTAL INFAMY ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-238

 

 

PROVINCE OF ONTARIO  –  2011 POLL REGARDING PROHIBITION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3kB

 

 

PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN  –  CONSPIRACY TO PROHIBIT PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3EV

 

 

RECORDINGS  –  AUDIO RECORDINGS  –  ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2xa

 

 

RECORDINGS  –  VIDEO RECORDINGS  –  ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3DY

 

 

SPEAKING OUT AGAINST ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORISM  –  HEROES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1LE

 

 

STRIKING BACK AGAINST ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORISM ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2Eu

 

 

STRIKING BACK  –  FIGHTING PESTICIDE BANS IN COURT  –  STRIKING BACK AGAINST TERRORISM  –  2012 05 25 ( Report )

 

http://wp.me/p1jq40-4nj

 

 

TERROR NEVER ENDS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2TD

 

 

TERROR TALK  –  WEASEL WORDS, GREEN TALK, AND PHRASES USED BY ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORISTS TO CONCOCT FEAR-MONGERING, FRAUDULENT LIES, MISCONCEPTIONS, COERCION, THREATS, DECEPTIONS, TERROR, AND PARANOID CONSPIRACIES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-4u1

 

 

 

THE WISDOM OF CANADIAN CONSUMER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION  –  THE PUBLIC DOES NOT WANT PESTICIDE BANS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2bo

 

 

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM  –  STATE PRE-EMPTION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2hW

 

 

 

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM  –  HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3yC

 

 

 

VICTORIES AGAINST TERRORISTS !  –  TREND TOWARDS PESTICIDE BANS HAS STOPPED ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1JO

 

 

THE COMPLETE LIBRARY OF REPORTS & REFERENCES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2rr

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loading

5 thoughts on “ORGANIZATION – ECOJUSTICE – WRETCHED ENVIRONMENTAL-TERRORIST ORGANIZATION

  1. This is a joke, right?  Do you, and those reading this, actually believe that by inserting the terms 'wretched', 'lunatic', 'subversive', and 'eco-terrorist' in fornt of anything you disagree with, that makes it true?  How did we as a whole nation manage to get sucked in by these obviously subversive eco-terrorists, i.e. the Breast Cancer Prevention Coalition;  the World Wildlife Fund; The Learning Disabilities Association of Canada; the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario; the Ontario Medical Association (OMA)-Pediatrics Section; and worst of all…the Ontario College of Family Physicians! Gasp!  When my father was in hospital suffering from cancer, I know I was really worried about those terrorist nurses and doctors all over the place – NOT!  I note that each of these supposedly 'subversive eco-terrorost organisations' do not use equally offensive & negating  terms when discussing the lawn care industry and pesticide producers.   You obviously have a limited understanding of both economics and politics as well.  I think the picture of a sexy chick at the bottom is a definite intellectual clincher – how can you argue against such a winning smile?

    1. Thanks for posting CAGEN.

      These Organisation are misleading the public with false information and receiving funding from the Federal Government at the same time.  There are a lot worse names they should be called.  The Nurses and Doctors that took care of your ailing father did what they were trained to do.  They are not experts in Pesticide Safety.  You should ask the hospital where they receive their funding, you will find out in Ontario they receive funding from the Federal and Provincial Government, not WWF, OCFP, Cancer Soceity or Coalitions.

      A mere 10% of the funds these chairties received went to cancer research. The rest went to management staff and the promotion of unverifiable facts in the media.

      Try this link, its full of real SCIENTIFIC facts. https://pesticidetruths.com/pesticide-qa-links/

      If you have any disputable facts on Health Canada Approved Lawn Pesticides (real facts on the dangers) please provide some links.

      We won't be upset if you cannot come through.

      ————————————————————————————————————————–

      Here is what Health Canada says about The Ontario College of Family Physicians

      http://uncleadolph.blogspot.ca/2010/03/questions-and-answers-ontario-college.html

      Has Health Canada reviewed the Ontario College of Family Physician's report on pesticides and, if so, what actions did PMRA take as a result?

      Scientists within Health Canada and elsewhere have carefully reviewed the Ontario College of Family Physicians report. This report examined a small group of epidemiology studies, and reported potential associations between pesticides and certain cancers. The wider scientific community raised significant concerns with respect to how this literature study was conducted because it did not consider all of the relevant epidemiological evidence.
      Epidemiology studies are typically designed to look for associations, rather than causes.
      Epidemiological studies have value and are used by Health Canada in different evaluation scenarios where they are considered alongside toxicity studies which examine toxic effects over various dose levels.
      Examining animal toxicity studies that analyze the absorption and break down of toxins, combined with exposure studies, is a preferred method for assessing risks to human health. Health Canada uses this approach, which is also supported by the international scientific community, in determining if a pesticide can be used safely.
       

      Some groups indicate that there is a "growing body of evidence suggesting a connection between pesticides and cancer". What is Health Canada doing about this?

      Health Canada does not register pesticides that are known to cause cancer or other illnesses when used according to the label directions.
      Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency is responsible for administering the Pest Control Products Act on behalf of the Minister of Health. Before a pesticide is allowed to be used or sold in Canada, it must undergo a rigorous scientific assessment process which provides reasonable certainty that no harm, including chronic effects such as cancer, will occur when pesticides are used according to label directions.
      Under this pre-market approval process, results from more than 200 types of scientific studies must be submitted to determine if the pesticide would cause any negative effects to people, animals, birds, insects, plants, as well as on the soil and in the water. This assessment takes into consideration sensitive sub-groups, such as pregnant and nursing women, infants, children and seniors.
      Additionally, Health Canada scientists review the scientific literature for studies which refer to pesticides. Health Canada recognizes the value of epidemiology studies in risk assessment. The most useful and relevant epidemiological studies are those that properly characterize exposure in terms of how the product is used.
       

      Are my pets safe if they walk on a lawn that has been treated with pesticides?

      Potential exposure may occur if pets are allowed on the treated lawn before the pesticide residue has been allowed to dry. They may be exposed through contact with their paws, licking of their bodies, or through eating grass. In order to minimize exposure, after treating your lawn, it is important to follow the label instructions as well as the instructions given to you by your lawn care professional, and restrict pets from the treated lawn until it has dried. No harm is expected, but avoiding exposures whenever possible is recommended.
       

      Is it safe to use the herbicide 2,4-D on my lawn?

      Following extensive consultation and scientific review using the most current scientific methods, Health Canada has determined that 2,4-D meets Canada's strict health and safety standards, and as such can be used safely when label directions are followed. Health Canada's review concurs with the findings of regulators in other OECD countries, including the United States, European Union, New Zealand and the Word Health Organization.

       

       

Leave a Reply