Glyphosate Vindicated By The European Union ( EU ) – Victory Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrists – 2017 11 27

 

 

  

 

 

 

Vindication By The European Union ( EU )

 

 

Glyphosate Wins EU Approval For 5 Years

 

 

 

 

November 27th, 2017

 

The New York Times

 

Selected And Adapted Excerpts

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Vindication By The European Union

 

Glyphosate Re-Approved By 18⁄26 Nations

 

 

The Majority Of EU Nations Do Not

Want Anti-Glyphosate Prohibition

 

 

On November 27th, 2017, the European Union ( EU ) voted to EXTEND its RE-APPROVAL of the world’s best-selling herbicide for an abbreviated period of 5 YEARS, with France and Germany splitting over the move. 

 

With Glyphosate’s registration set to expire in December 2017, 18 of the union’s member states voted IN FAVOUR OF extending its use for 5 YEARS, 8 nations voted against the proposal and one abstained. 

 

The vote was weighted by population size. 

 

The majority of EU nations DO NOT WANT ANTI-GLYPHOSATE PROHIBITION. 

 

The European Union has VINDICATED Glyphosate. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Vindication By The European Union

 

Glyphosate Re-Approved For Only 5 Years Rather Than 10 Or 15

 

 

Glyphosate Was Not Approved For The Typical

10 Or 15-Years Because The EU Review Process

Was Driven More By Politics Than By Science

 

 

The vote capped an unusually lengthy and combative European review process that unfolded amid claims and counter-claims about the supposed cancer-causing risks of Glyphosate. 

 

The deliberations frustrated the Agrochemical Industry. 

 

The Agrochemical Industry criticized the review process was DRIVEN MORE BY POLITICS THAN SCIENCE after it became clear that Glyphosate’s use would NOT be RE-APPROVED for the 15 years typical for such chemicals, or even for 10 years. 

 

The Glyphosate Task Force, an Agrochemical Industry group that includes Monsanto and Syngenta, said in a statement that it was 

 

  profoundly disappointed at the outcome of today’s meeting whereby member states categorically IGNORED SCIENTIFIC ADVICE. 

 

The decision was 

 

  NOT RELATED TO ANY SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENT and mainly influenced by public perception and DRIVEN BY POLITICS. 

 

[ Anti-glyphosate terrжrism will NEVER end ! ] 

 

Nonetheless, the European Union has VINDICATED Glyphosate. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Vindication By The European Union

 

Glyphosate Favoured In Germany

 

 

Chancellor Merkel’s Conservative

Christian Democrats Will Continue

To Conspire Against Glyphosate

 

 

Germany, which had abstained in a previous round of voting on the issue, appeared to help sway the outcome of the vote. 

 

Anti-Pesticide Lunatжc-Chancellor Angela Merkel has been unable to form a coalition government after the country’s recent election. 

 

Fortunately, Germany’s care-taker government swung its support IN FAVOUR of Glyphosate. 

 

The decision appeared to be contentious even within Germany’s care-taker government. 

 

As reported by Der Spiegel, a split between ministers was with Germany’s environment minister, Barbara Hendricks, a member of the Social Democrats, expressing opposition to Glyphosate and blaming Merkel’s conservative Christian Democrats for the decision. 

 

The two parties are in the process of negotiating over potentially creating a new coalition. 

 

Nonetheless, Germany’s care-taker government has VINDICATED Glyphosate. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Vindication By The European Union

 

Prohibition Conspiracy In France

 

 

President Macron Will Conspire To Prohibit

Against Glyphosate Within 3 Years

 

 

France has led the conspiracy against allowing the use of Glyphosate in the European Union. 

 

After the EU approval was announced, Anti-Pesticide Lunatжc-President Emmanuel Macron of France said that he had asked government officials to draw up a plan for banning Glyphosate in his country within 3 years. 

 

Consequently, French government officials are recklessly and arbitrarily conspiring against Glyphosate, which is considered scientifically-safe and will cause NO harm. 

 

[ Anti-glyphosate terrжrism will NEVER end ! ] 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Vindication By The European Union

 

Anti-Pesticide & Environmental-Terrжrist Organizations

 

 

Fanatжcal Environmental Activists Attempt To

Deceive The Public By Falsely-Alleging That EU

Governments Protect The Agrochemical Industry

 

 

Fanatжcal environmental activists said that the Agrochemical Industry had tainted scientific reviews in Europe by meddling in them.  [ ?!?! ] 

 

Angeliki Lysimachou, a fanatжcal-lunatжc toxicologist at Pesticide Action Network Europe, a notorious anti-pesticide & environmental-terrжrist organization, found fault with the vote. 

 

According to fanatжcal Lysimachou   

 

This decision reveals, once again, the sad truth that governments are more keen to PROTECT THE HIGHLY PROFITABLE PESTICIDE INDUSTRY than the health of their people and the environment.  [ ?!?! ] 

 

[ Anti-glyphosate terrжrism will NEVER end ! ] 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

IARC Has Been Discredited

 

 

IARC Failed To Provide Any New Research

Concerning Glyphosate, & Has Never

Proven That Glyphosate Causes Cancer

 

 

On March 20th, 2015, International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) arbitrarily classified Glyphosate as « probably carcinogenic » on the basis of « limited evidence » of cancer among humans.  [ ?!?! ] 

 

IARC has been ridiculously implying that its false-evaluation of Glyphosate has somehow been withheld from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ), German Federal Institute For Risk Assessment, Health Canada, and EVERY other science-based national regulatory agency in the world. 

 

According to these agencies, the weight of evidence has been AGAINST carcinogenicity. 

 

In other words, according to EVERY science-based national regulatory agency in the world, Glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer. 

 

Glyphosate DOES NOT cause cancer ! 

 

IARC has NEVER proven that Glyphosate causes cancer. 

 

And, IARC has NEVER classified Glyphosate as « Group 1 – Carcinogenic To Humans ». 

 

Glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer ! 

 

The IARC hazard study did NOT indicate the risk of getting cancer. 

 

On the other hand, national regulatory agencies, like US EPA and Health Canada, DO evaluate risks. 

 

IARC merely looked at what is called hazard, and NOT risk. 

 

IARC DID NOT take into consideration how much of, or how commonly, a risk Glyphosate poses in the real world. 

 

Moreover, IARC failed to provide any new research concerning Glyphosate. 

 

In fact, Glyphosate WILL NOT cause harm and WILL NOT cause cancer ! 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

Glyphosate Vindicated By US National Cancer Institute ( NCI )

 

 

Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer

 

 

The IARC’s hazard study has been disputed by EVERY other science-based national regulatory agency in the world, including two in Europe    the European Food Safety Authority and the European Chemicals Agency. 

 

The latest major study, published in November 2017 by NCI researchers concluded that    Glyphosate was NOT statistically significantly associated with cancer. 

 

This large long-term research was published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute ( JNCI ) on November 9th, 2017. 

 

This was the largest research study of agricultural workers in history, a gold standard, over the longest period of time. 

 

It definitively demonstrated in a real-world environment that Glyphosate DOES NOT cause cancer.

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

Impact Of The Proposed Prohibition

By The European Union ( EU )

 

 

EU Re-Approval Of Glyphosate Dodges Farming Economic Woes    For Now

 

 

 

 

November 28th, 2017

 

Genetic Literacy Project

 

Selected And Adapted Excerpts

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Vindication By The European Union

 

Glyphosate Approved For Only 5 Years

 

 

The EU May Still Be Able To

Prohibit Glyphosate’s Use After

The 5-Year Re-Approval Period

 

 

Glyphosate’s use in Europe may have a 5-YEAR lease on life, thanks to an EU vote that pitted Germany ( in favor of the chemical ) against France ( which was opposed ). 

 

The EU re-approval of Glyphosate came after several rounds of abstentions, and an earlier non-binding vote to prohibit that showed a lack of consensus more than an iron-clad decision.  

 

But 5 years goes quickly, and member nations may still be able to restrict Glyphosate’s use. 

 

[ Anti-glyphosate terrжrism will NEVER end ! ] 

 

And in 5 years, member country governments ( particularly Germany, whose government is currently in its formative stages ), could look very different. 

 

In fact, on November 27th, 2017, the vote for the EU re-approval of Glyphosate was close, when Germany voted in favor of its use after months of not voting. 

 

Whether or not Glyphosate will be prohibited permanently remains up in the air, but the EU electoral drama over the past year has generated discussions over the POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IMPACT. 

 

In the United States, pressure from anti-GMO organizations continues to mount because of Glyphosate’s use with Roundup Ready crops that are genetically-modified to resist Glyphosate. 

 

In Europe, where GMO crops have NEVER been approved, the controversy has revolved around so-called HEALTH ISSUES from using Glyphosate. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Impact Of Proposed Prohibition

 

In response to the proposed prohibition against Glyphosate, the president of the French Grain Producers’ Organization wrote to Vytenis Andriukaitis, European Commissioner responsible for Glyphosate issues ( and the Commissioner for Health ), in October 2017   

 

I will suffer SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE, including a SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN MY PRODUCTION COSTS ( use of larger amounts with other herbicides and increase in the frequency of herbicide treatments ), dirtying of my plots with many weed species, including perennials. 

 

My working methods should evolve with a return to plowing, the removal of new simplified farming techniques, based on plant cover. 

 

I could NOT practice agro-ecology anymore. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Impact Of Proposed Prohibition

 

Manufacturing

 

 

Glyphosate has been registered by Monsanto for use in more than 130 countries as of 2010. 

 

Analysts have estimated that Monsanto could lose out on up to $100 million of sales if Glyphosate is prohibited in Europe, according to Reuters. 

 

Of course, since the patent for Glyphosate is now in the public domain, many other firms also manufacture a version of the herbicide, and could also stand to lose.  

 

Considering the LACK OF A TRUE ALTERNATIVE    with the same effectiveness on weeds, toxicity profile, and cost of use    THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS LOOK SIGNIFICANT. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Impact Of Proposed Prohibition

 

France

 

 

According to a story in Bloomberg, the French research institute Arvalis suggested an anti-glyphosate prohibition would have an ECONOMIC IMPACT on the country’s agriculture industry of 976 MILLION EUROS ( 1.1 BILLION DOLLARS US ). 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Impact Of Proposed Prohibition

 

Germany

 

 

And in Germany, the Kleffmann Group said restrictions could HURT barley and corn output    with PROFIT MARGIN SHRINKAGE between 40 and 70 per cent    as farmers start planting alternative, more profitable crops. 

 

The German Kleffmann Group, and others, noted that the loss of Glyphosate would FORCE MORE FARMERS INTO CONVENTIONAL PLOWING ( tillage ), which INCREASES output of carbon dioxide, consumption of diesel fuel, and use of heavy machinery, with all the accompanying environmental problems that herbicides like Glyphosate were designed to eliminate. 

 

That comes to 180,000 more tons of diesel and 18 million more hours of labor in Germany alone. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Impact Of Proposed Prohibition

 

United Kingdom

 

 

Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, where, in 2014, 2.2 million hectares of farms    a third of arable land    was treated with Glyphosate, Oxford Economics estimated the impact would REDUCE wheat yields by 12 per cent, oilseed/rape yields by 14 per cent, and cereal production by 15 per cent. 

 

Agricultural contributions to the nation’s GDP would shrink by about 930 million British pounds ( 1.23 billion dollars US ).  

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Impact Of Proposed Prohibition

 

World-Wide

 

 

A prohibition also will affect world trade of not only Glyphosate, but also of foods grown. 

 

If a true anti-glyphosate comes to fruition, then it would be up to the EU and/or member countries to decide to prohibit imports of food grown with Glyphosate. 

 

And a lot of food grown with Glyphosate is imported into Europe. 

 

Annually, the EU imports tens of millions of tons of genetically-modified ( Roundup Ready ) soybeans and other crops, used for animal feed. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Impact Of Proposed Prohibition

 

Tolerance Levels

 

 

The import of food grown with Glyphosate could be halted if the EU decides that, based on [ supposed ] HEALTH ISSUES, that the TOLERANCE LEVEL of Glyphosate in imports ( or any other foods and crops ) is reduced from 20.00 milligrams per kilogram to 0.01 milligrams per kilogram. 

 

If the decision by the EU is made for NON-HEALTH ISSUES, then the TOLERANCE LEVEL can be higher than 0.01 milligrams per kilogram. 

 

But with Vytenis Andriukaitis, the EU Health Commissioner in charge of Glyphosate issues, and the arguments so far being based on HEALTH ISSUES ( and the IARC monograph’s [ false ] connection to cancer ), THE DECISION TO PROHIBIT AGAINST GLYPHOSATE WILL LIKELY BE A HEALTH-BASED ONE. 

 

The farmers DO NOT have much of a voice here since the dossier will be handled by the Directorate General for Health and Food Safety. 

 

Which means, David Zaruk, a Belgium-based risk specialist, says, that farmers WILL NOT have as much influence on the decision as they might if it were being debated by the EU Agriculture Commissioner. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Impact Of Proposed Prohibition

 

Anti-Pesticide & Environmental-Terrжrist Organizations

 

 

Anti-pesticide groups like Pesticide Action Network, Friends of the Earth, European Green Party, and others, are [ falsely ] tying Glyphosate to HEALTH ISSUES, and NOT as a GMO issue, since there are NO Glyphosate-resistant seeds in the EU. 

 

Some organic groups point to the possibility of Glyphosate-free farming, but admit it WILL NOT BE CHEAP OR EASY. 

 

Fanatжcal-lunatжc Urs Niggli, from the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture ( FiBL ) in Frick, Switzerland, maintains that farming can go on without Glyphosate, but   

 

  for a truly environmentally friendly agriculture without Glyphosate, the WHOLE SYSTEM WOULD HAVE TO BE CHANGED in the USA, Brazil and partly also in the EU    establish multi-factorial crop rotations, sow ground cover crops like clover and grass regularly to suppress the weeds, as well as undercutting for maize and grain.  [ ?!?! ] 

 

[ Anti-glyphosate terrжrism will NEVER end ! ] 

 

About the author    Andrew Porterfield is a writer and editor, and has worked with numerous academic institutions, companies and non-profits in the life sciences. 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

For The Whole Truth About GLYPHOSATE & EUROPEAN UNION, Please Explore The Following References 

 

 

GLYPHOSATE FRANCE 2017 12 01 — THREE YEARS TOO SHORT TO REPLACE GLYPHOSATE, FRENCH FARMERS SAY ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-12-01-France-Three-Years-Too-Short-To-Replace-Glyphosate-French-Farmers-Say.pdf

 

 

GLYPHOSATE EUROPEAN UNION 2017 11 28 — VICTORY — RE-APPROVAL & FARMING WOES — GENETIC LITERACY ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-11-28-European-Union-Re-Approval-Farming-Woes-Gen-Lit.pdf

 

 

GLYPHOSATE EUROPEAN UNION 2017 11 27 — VICTORY — APPROVAL FOR 5 YEARS ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-11-27-European-Union-Wins-Approval-For-5-Years.pdf

 

 

GLYPHOSATE EUROPEAN UNION 2017 11 19 — SWITZERLAND — SWISS GOVERNMENT REJECTS BAN PLAN ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-11-19-Switzerland-Swiss-Government-Rejects-Ban-Plan.pdf

 

 

GLYPHOSATE EUROPEAN UNION 2017 11 14 — EUROPEAN FARMERS — FINDING REPLACEMENT FOR GLYPHOSATE IS NO EASY TASK ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-11-14-European-Farmers-Finding-Replacement-For-Glyphosate-Is-No-Easy-Task.pdf

 

 

GLYPHOSATE EUROPEAN UNION 2017 03 16 — SAFETY — FOUND NOT CARCINOGENIC — KEY EUROPEAN SAFETY AGENCY JOINS CONSENSUS ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-03-16-Found-Not-Carcinogenic-Key-European-Safety-Agency-Joins-Consensus.pdf

 

 

GLYPHOSATE EUROPEAN UNION 2016 06 30 — ROUNDUP WELCOMES GLYPHOSATE APPROVAL IN EUROPEAN UNION ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-06-30-Roundup-Welcomes-Glyphosate-Approval-In-European-Union-1.pdf

 

 

GLYPHOSATE EUROPEAN UNION 2016 06 28 — EUROPEAN COMMISSION TO EXTEND GLYPHOSATE LICENCE FOR 18 MONTHS ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-06-28-European-Commission-To-Extend-Glyphosate-Licence-For-18-Months-1.pdf

 

 

GLYPHOSATE EUROPEAN UNION 2016 06 10 — UNITED KINGDOM — DAVID CAMERON CONVINCED GLYPHOSATE WILL BE RE AUTHORISED BY EUROPEAN UNION ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-06-10-David-Cameron-Convinced-Glyphosate-Will-Be-Reauthorised-By-EU-1.pdf

 

 

GLYPHOSATE EUROPEAN UNION 2015 05 26 — NETHERLANDS — TOXICOLOGIST CRITICAL OF DODGY SCIENCE IN GLYPHOSATE BANS ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2015-05-26-Prohibition-Toxicologist-Critical-Of-Dodgy-Science-In-Glyphosate-Bans-Netherlands.pdf

 

 

GLYPHOSATE EUROPEAN UNION 2014 06 00 — GERMANY — FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT ( BfR ) RE-EVALUATION ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2014-06-00-Germany-Federal-Institute-For-Risk-Assessment-BfR-Re-Evaluation.pdf

 

 

GLYPHOSATE EUROPEAN UNION 2014 03 00 — GERMANY — NO MORE POISONOUS THAN PREVIOUSLY ASSUMED ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2014-03-00-Germany-No-More-Poisonous-Than-Previously-Assumed.pdf

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

For The Whole Truth About INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER ( IARC ), Please Explore The Following Reports & Blogs 

 

 

GLYPHOSATE IARC HAZARD REPORT NOT LIKELY CARCINOGENIC — PANEL — EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY ( EFSA ) ( Blog )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/01/08/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-the-2015-glyphosate-expert-panel-of-scientists-european-food-safety-authority-efsa-2015-12-08-2/

 

 

GLYPHOSATE IARC HAZARD REPORT SCIENTISTS FIND NO EVIDENCE GLYPHOSATE CAUSES CANCER — DR KEITH R SOLOMON ( Report )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2015/12/07/scientists-find-no-evidence-glyphosate-causes-cancer-the-western-producer/

 

 

GLYPHOSATE IARC HAZARD REPORT AS SOCIAL MEDIA OUTPACES GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE, STUPID PROLIFERATES — ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS ( Report )

 

Glyphosate: Facts are very hard to find in the glyphosate fear-mongering campaigns. When a herbicide so beneficial to farmers is less toxic than salt or vinegar, would entail a personal daily consumption of over 400kg of fruit and vegetables to pose any health hazard and has been subject to thousands of studies, and still suffers relentless attacks from those without toxicological backgrounds, it is evident that stupid has reared its ugly face. Stupid even got inside of IARC, but that apparently is not very difficult.

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2015/11/23/as-social-media-outpaces-governance-structure-stupid-proliferates/

 

 

GLYPHOSATE IARC HAZARD REPORT GLYPHOSATE IS UNLIKELY TO POSE A CARCINOGENIC HAZARD TO HUMANS — THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT SUPPORT CLASSIFICATION WITH REGARD TO ITS CARCINOGENIC POTENTIAL — EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY ( EFSA ) ( Report )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2015/11/14/efsa-roundup-so-safe-it-can-be-used-as-desiccant-on-crops/

 

 

GLYPHOSATE IARC HAZARD REPORT WHY DO REGULATORS CONCLUDE THAT THIS HERBICIDE IS SAFE WHILE ONLY IARC CLAIMS IT PROBABLY CAUSES CANCER ?!?! ( Blog )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2015/08/10/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-why-do-national-government-regulators-in-america-germany-canada-conclude-that-it-is-safe-while-only-world-health-organization-who-aka-iarc-cla/

 

 

GLYPHOSATE IARC HAZARD REPORT EXPERT REACTION TO CARCINOGENICITY CLASSIFICATION OF FIVE PESTICIDES BY IARC ( Report )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2015/03/20/expert-reaction-to-carcinogenicity-classification-of-five-pesticides-by-the-international-agency-for-research-on-cancer-iarc-science-media-centre/

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

Background Information

 

Glyphosate

 

Vindicated Around The World

 

 

The Victories Against
Anti-Glyphosate Terr
жrism

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

See Also    The Media History Of Victories Against Anti-Pesticide Terrжrism LINK

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/victories-against-terr%d0%b6rists-reports-blogs/

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Background Information

 

FACTS About Glyphosate

 

 

FACT Glyphosate Is Scientifically-Safe & Will Cause No Harm

 

National regulatory agencies & leading experts have been siding with the overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrating that glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer    there is NO bio-medical and NO epidemiological evidence to support the claim that glyphosate causes cancer

 

FACT Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer

 

FACT Glyphosate Is So Safe, You Can Drink A Glass Of It ?!?!

 

FACT There Have Been Tremendous Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism

 

The unfounded chemophobic assault against science-based investigations has been NEUTRALIZED 

 

FACT The IARC Has Been Debunked

 

The false-accusation of cancer by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) have been scientifically proven as WRONG 

 

FACT The Pesticide-Hating IARC Has Been Discredited

 

FACT The Lies & The False Allegations Have Been Refuted

 

The lies and the false allegations by anti-pesticide and environmental-terrжrists masquerading as health experts have been REFUTED 

 

FACT Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated Around The World

 

Glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer, according to leading scientific experts at national regulatory agencies in Australia, European Union, Genotoxic Expert Panel Review, New Zealand, Nova Scotia, Switzerland, United Nations, & United States ( America )

 

FACT Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated By The US National Cancer Institute ( NCI ) 

 

The NCI researchers have concluded that glyphosate was NOT statistically significantly associated with cancer 

 

FACT Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated By America

 

The United States has declared that the US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) has given glyphosate its safest possible classification 

 

FACT Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated By Canada

 

Health Canada has found that glyphosate DOES NOT present risks of concern to human health or the environment when used according to label directions 

 

FACT Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated By Australia

 

Australian concerns about the effect of glyphosate on health have been totally REFUTED, with the government concluding that glyphosate DOES NOT pose a cancer risk to humans 

 

FACT Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated By The Genotoxic Expert Panel Review

 

The Genotoxic Expert Panel Review has REFUTED the idea that glyphosate causes cancer    this group of 16 leading scientific experts, from Canada, the United States, Denmark, Brazil, the United Kingdom, & other countries, has decisively concluded that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans    the Genotoxic Expert Panel Review disagreed with the conclusion of the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) that there is sufficient evidence that glyphosate is carcinogenic for lab animals such as mice & rates 

 

FACT Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated By New Zealand

 

New Zealand has rebuked the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) by announcing that it found NO glyphosate-cancer link    furthermore, the government has stated that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to be carcinogenic, and should NOT be classified as a mutagen or carcinogen 

 

FACT Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated By Nova Scotia

 

In the Province of Nova Scotia, the Chief Public Health Office has issued a statement saying that there is NO evidence that glyphosate creates a risk to human health if used properly    even water can be toxic if too much is consumed in a short period of time 

 

FACT Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated By Switzerland

 

Another VICTORY for evidence-based science has been won in Switzerland, where the government has stated that there was INSUFFICIENT scientific evidence to justify a ban on the general use of glyphosate, especially for farming 

 

FACT Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated By The United Nations

 

The World Health Organization ( WHO ) & the Food & Agriculture Organization ( FAO ), both agencies of the United Nations, have stated that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Glyphosate

 

Monsanto

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

Glyphosate Is Scientifically-Safe

& Will Cause No Harm

 

Monsanto Company is an American multi-national agro-chemical and agricultural bio-technology corporation. 

 

Monsanto is a leading producer of Roundup, a glyphosate-based herbicide. 

 

Roundup branded herbicides are some of the most effective methods that farmers use to control weeds. 

 

But is Roundup    and its main active ingredient glyphosate    safe ?!?! 

 

How does it really work ?!?! 

 

Give it a minute. 

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

Targeted, Effective, & Proven

 

Whether you battled weeds at your home or in your fields Roundup a branded herbicides are some of the most effective methods for controlling them. 

 

But what about the main active ingredient glyphosate ?!?!

 

Is it harmful ?!?! 

 

How does it work ?!?! 

 

Give it a minute ?!?! 

 

Glyphosate-based products were introduced in the seventies and became popular with farmers for the wide variety of weeds they helped control and their history of safe use. 

 

In fact, in addition to the US EPA, regulatory agencies in more than one hundred and sixty countries have approved glyphosate-based products. 

 

Here’s how it works. 

 

Glyphosate is applied to weeds    once absorbed it travels to the roots where it blocks a specific enzyme found in plants    and NOT animals or humans. 

 

Without that enzyme, the weed can’t make the building blocks that it needs to grow, the entire weed withers to the ground. 

 

Any remaining glyphosate is broken down in the soil into naturally-occurring substances like carbon dioxide and phosphate. 

 

To further target only weeds, certain crops have been specifically modified so that glyphosate doesn’t affect them. 

 

This means farmers don’t have to turn over their soil as much to control weeds, which reduces emissions. 

 

It also reduces soil erosion, in some cases, by as much as 90 per cent. 

 

Targeted, effective, and proven    all reasons glyphosate is the most widely-used weed control product in the world today. 

 

That’s a lot to cover in a minute, so if you still have questions check out https://monsanto.com/  

 

 

 

GLYPHOSATE -- ROUNDUP -- GIVE IT A MINUTE -- MONSANTO ( Video Recording, 1 Min 22 Sec )

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Victories Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism

 

World-Wide

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated

Around The World

 

Glyphosate is scientifically-safe and will cause NO harm. 

 

National regulatory agencies & leading experts have been siding with the overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrating that glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer    there is NO bio-medical and NO epidemiological evidence to support the claim that glyphosate causes cancer. 

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

Glyphosate Will Not Cause Cancer

 

The unfounded chemophobic assault against science has been NEUTRALIZED. 

 

The lies and the false allegations by anti-pesticide & environmental-terrжrists masquerading as health experts have been REFUTED. 

 

The False-Accusations Of Cancer By International

Agency For Research On Cancer ( IARC ) Have

Been Scientifically Proven As Wrong

 

The Pesticide-Hating IARC Has Been Discredited

 

Glyphosate has been VINDICATED around the world. 

 

Glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer, according to leading scientific experts in   

 

   Australia

 

   Canada

 

   European Union

 

   Genotoxic Expert Panel Review

 

   New Zealand

 

   Nova Scotia

 

   National Cancer Institute

 

   Switzerland

 

   United Nations

 

   United States ( America )

 

National regulatory agencies and leading experts are siding with the overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrating that glyphosate WILL NOT cause cancer. 

 

There is NO bio-medical and NO epidemiological evidence to support the claim that glyphosate causes cancer. 

 

Glyphosate is scientifically-safe and will cause NO harm. 

 

 

 

BLOG      GLYPHOSATE WORLD-WIDE

 

 

GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE WILL NOT CAUSE CANCER — GLYPHOSATE VINDICATED AROUND THE WORLD ( Blog )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/10/14/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-glyphosate-vindicated-around-the-world-2016-09-30/

 

 

 

THE LIBRARY OF REFERENCES      GLYPHOSATE WORLD-WIDE

 

 

IARC — QUESTIONABLE EVIDENTIARY WEIGHT — ANOTHER NAIL IN IARC’S COFFIN ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-09-23-IARC-Questionable-Evidentiary-Weight-Another-Nail-In-IARCs-Coffin-ACSH.pdf

 

 

WHO — HOT WATER CAUSES CANCER — DON’T BELIEVE IT ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-08-10-Hot-Water-Causes-Cancer-Dont-Believe-It-Column-1.pdf

 

 

CARCINOGENIC — INDEPENDENT GLOBAL SCIENTISTS WEIGH IN ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-03-23-Carcinogenic-Independent-Global-Scientists-Weigh-In-Gen-Lit-1.pdf

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Victory Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism

 

National Cancer
Institute

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated By Research

Conducted By The US National Cancer Institute ( NCI ) 

 

The NCI researchers have concluded that glyphosate was NOT statistically significantly associated with cancer. 

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

Glyphosate Herbicide Is NOT A Carcinogen

 

The U.S. National Cancer Institute has found NO association between glyphosate and cancer. 

 

The NCI researchers concluded that glyphosate was NOT statistically significantly associated with cancer. 

 

This large long-term research was published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute ( JNCI ) on November 9th, 2017. 

 

This was the largest research study of agricultural workers in history, a gold standard, over the longest period of time. 

 

It definitively demonstrated in a real-world environment that glyphosate DOES NOT cause cancer. 

 

 

 

BLOG      GLYPHOSATE & US NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE

 

 

GLYPHOSATE VINDICATED BY US NCI ( Blog )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2017/11/29/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-victory-against-anti-pesticide-terr%D0%B6rists-glyphosate-vindicated-by-us-national-cancer-institute-2017-11-09/

 

 

 

THE LIBRARY OF REFERENCES      GLYPHOSATE & US NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE

 

 

NO SIGNIFICANT LINK BETWEEN WEED-KILLER & CANCER ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-11-09-US-National-Cancer-Institute-No-Significant-Link-Between-Weed-Killer-Cancer.pdf

 

 

FARM STUDY FINDS NO FIRM CANCER LINK — VERSION 2 ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-11-09-US-National-Cancer-Institute-Farm-Study-Finds-No-Firm-Cancer-Link-2.pdf

 

 

FARM STUDY FINDS NO FIRM CANCER LINK — VERSION 1 ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-11-09-US-National-Cancer-Institute-Farm-Study-Finds-No-Firm-Cancer-Link-1.pdf

 

 

CANCER INCIDENCE IN AGRICULTURAL HEALTH STUDY ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-11-09-US-National-Cancer-Institute-Cancer-Incidence-In-Agricultural-Health-Study.pdf

 

 

 

GLYPHOSATE -- US NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE -- NO LINK BETWEEN CANCER & WEED-KILLER ( Video Recording, 0 Min 41 Sec )

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Victory Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism

 

America

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated

By The United States

 

The United States has declared that the US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) has given glyphosate its safest possible classification. 

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

The United States has declared that the US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA ) has given glyphosate its safest possible classification. 

 

In September 2016, the US Environmental Protection Agency made the following declaration 

 

The EPA Gave Glyphosate Its

Safest Possible Classification

 

The US EPA has successfully separating a health scare from a health threat. 

 

On September 12th, 2016, the US EPA reported that glyphosate DOES NOT cause cancer. 

 

According to the US EPA   

 

  the available data at this time DO NOT support a carcinogenic process for glyphosate. 

 

The US EPA’s assessment of glyphosate was based upon an extensive data-base exists for evaluating the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate, including 23 epidemiological studies, 15 animal carcinogenicity studies, and nearly 90 genotoxicity studies for the active ingredient glyphosate. 

 

On April 29th, 2016, the US EPA had also classified glyphosate as « not likely to be carcinogenic to humans », the SAFEST classification on the scale. 

 

The US EPA’s assessment of glyphosate discredited the anti-glyphosate report by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) which conveniently disregarded several studies on the effects of exposure to glyphosate purely on the basis that these studies showed NO positive results. 

 

The US EPA report also noted that the studies IARC chose to include in its report had significant limitations. 

 

Additionally, IARC’s anti-glyphosate report was based on a review of the scientific literature that was NOT comprehensive. 

 

IARC deliberately overstated the risks with its arbitrary and selective « cherry picking » studies against glyphosate. 

 

NO pesticide regulator in the world considers glyphosate to be a carcinogen, and both US EPA reports once again reinforce this important fact. 

 

The US EPA is successfully separating a health scare from a health threat. 

 

 

 

THE LIBRARY OF REPORTS & BLOGS      GLYPHOSATE & US EPA

 

 

GLYPHOSATE DOES NOT CAUSE CANCER – AGAIN ( Blog )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/09/25/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-again-us-epa-is-successfully-separating-a-health-scare-from-a-health-threat-2016-09-17/

 

 

GLYPHOSATE ISSUE PAPER — EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC POTENTIAL ( Report, with Official Document, Scribd )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/09/20/glyphosate-issue-paper-evaluation-of-carcinogenic-potential-epas-office-of-pesticide-programs-september-12-2016/

 

 

PANEL FINDS GLYPHOSATE WILL NOT CAUSE CANCER ( Blog )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/05/13/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-us-epa-review-panel-report-has-discredited-iarc-2016-05-03-2/

 

 

DECISION IS PROTECTIVE OF ALL, INCLUDING THE DEVELOPING FETUS, INFANTS & CHILDREN, THE ELDERLY, & FARM-WORKERS ( Report )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2014/10/16/ontario-pesticide-ban-failure-24-d-is-safe-glyphosate-is-safe-registration-of-enlist-duo-ingredients-used-in-pesticide-products-us-epa/

 

 

 

THE LIBRARY OF REFERENCES      GLYPHOSATE, US EPA, & MORE

 

 

EPA — GLYPHOSATE DOES NOT CAUSE CANCER, AGAIN ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-09-27-EPA-States-That-Glyphosate-Does-Not-Cause-Cancer-Again-ACSH-1.pdf

 

 

EPA — EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC POTENTIAL ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-09-12-Issue-Paper-Evaluation-Of-Carcinogenic-Potential-EPA-1.pdf

 

 

EPA — EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC POTENTIAL — HIGHLIGHTED TEXT ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-09-12-Issue-Paper-Evaluation-Of-Carcinogenic-Potential-EPA-HIGHLIGHTED-TEXT-1.pdf

 

 

EPA — PANEL FINDS GLYPHOSATE NOT LIKELY TO CAUSE CANCER ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-05-03-EPA-Panel-Finds-Glyphosate-Not-Likely-To-Cause-Cancer.pdf

 

 

EPA — MAGICALLY MAKES GLYPHOSATE SAFETY REPORT DISAPPEAR ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-05-03-EPA-Magically-Makes-Glyphosate-Safety-Report-Disappear-ACSH.pdf

 

 

EPA — ONCE AGAIN, CONCLUDES THAT GLYPHOSATE DOES NOT CAUSE CANCER ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-05-02-Once-Again-EPA-Concludes-That-Glyphosate-Does-Not-Cause-Cancer-Monsanto-1.pdf

 

 

EPA — SUMMARY OF MEETING WITH MONSANTO ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2015-03-30-EPA-Summary-Of-Meeting-Between-EPA-Monsanto-Company.pdf

 

 

EPA — FINAL WORK PLAN ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Reference-glyphosate-2009-12-00-Final-Work-Plan-EPA.pdf

 

 

EPA — GLYPHOSATE RE-REGISTRATION ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Reference-glyphosate-1993-09-00-Pesticide-Reregistration-EPA.pdf

 

 

IN CALIFORNIA, GLYPHOSATE PHOBIA RESULTS IN HAZMAT SUITS, RESPIRATORS ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-05-31-In-California-Glyphosate-Phobia-Results-In-Hazmat-Suits-Respirators-Gen-Lit-1.pdf

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Victory Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism

 

Canada

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

Glyphosate Has Been

Vindicated By Canada

 

Health Canada has found that glyphosate DOES NOT present risks of concern to human health or the environment when used according to label directions. 

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

Health Canada has found that glyphosate DOES NOT present risks of concern to human health or the environment when used according to label directions. 

 

As of 2017, Health Canada is granting continued registration of products containing glyphosate for sale and use in Canada. 

 

The evidence in favour of glyphosate is overwhelming. 

 

Products containing glyphosate are UNLIKELY to affect your health. 

 

Dietary risks from food and water are NOT of concern. 

 

Non-occupational risks are NOT of concern. 

 

Non-occupational risks from by-stander dermal exposure are NOT of concern. 

 

Glyphosate products are NOT expected to pose risks of concern to the environment. 

 

Overall, there are currently NO environmental incident reports involving glyphosate in Canada. 

 

Health Canada, as well as all other national regulatory agencies world-wide, have VINDICATED glyphosate. 

 

These agencies include those within the European Union, the United States, and the United Nations. 

 

 

 

THE LIBRARY OF REPORTS & BLOGS      GLYPHOSATE & HEALTH CANADA

 

 

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON RE-EVALUATION DECISION RVD2017-01 ( Blog )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2017/05/17/update-glyphosate-herbicide-vindicated-by-health-canada-frequently-asked-questions-on-the-re-evaluation-of-glyphosate-the-library-of-updates-warnings-2017-04-28/

 

 

RE-EVALUATION DECISION RVD2017-01 ( Blog )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2017/05/10/glyphosate-herbicide-vindicated-by-health-canada-re-evaluation-decision-the-library-of-victories-against-anti-pesticide-science-hating-fanaticism-2017-04-28/

 

 

PROPOSED RE-EVALUATION DECISION PRVD2015-01 – HEALTH CANADA CONSULTATION NOTICE ( Report )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2015/04/14/glyphosate-april-13-2015-proposed-re-evaluation-decision-prvd2015-01-health-canada-consultation-notice/

 

 

PESTICIDE INCIDENT REPORT — UNLIKELY DEATH BY ROUNDUP ( Pesticide Link )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2012/01/21/death-by-roundup-herbicide-evaluation-of-pesticide-incident-report-2011-4967-pesticides-and-pest-management-health-canada/

 

 

POLYETHOXYLATED TALLOW AMINE ( POEA ) — RE-EVALUATION NOTE REV2010-02 GLYPHOSATE ( Web-Page )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate/

 

 

 

THE LIBRARY OF REFERENCES      GLYPHOSATE, HEALTH CANADA, & MORE

 

 

HEALTH CANADA — RE-EVALUATION DECISION RVD2017-01 ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-04-28-Re-Evaluation-Decision-RVD2017-01-Health-Canada.pdf

 

 

HEALTH CANADA — FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON THE RE-EVALUATION OF GLYPHOSATE ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-04-28-Frequently-Asked-Questions-On-The-Re-Evaluation-Of-Glyphosate-Health-Canada-.pdf

 

 

HEALTH CANADA — PROPOSED RE-EVALUATION DECISION PRVD2015-01 ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2015-06-17-Health-Canada-Proposed-Re-Evaluation-Decision-PRVD2015-01.pdf

 

 

HEALTH CANADA & CFIA — GLYPHOSATE TESTING SHOWS FOOD IS SAFE ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-04-27-CFIA-Glyphosate-Testing-Shows-Canada%E2%80%99s-Food-Is-Safe.pdf

 

 

HEALTH CANADA & CFIA — STATEMENT ON LUNATЖC SERALINI ET AL PUBLICATION ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2012-10-25-Seralini-Health-Canada-CFIA-Statement-On-S%C3%A9ralini-et-al-2012-Publication.pdf

 

 

LUNATЖC MESSAGES TO PM JUSTIN TRUDEAU ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-2015-Lunat%D0%B6c-Messages-To-PM-Justin-Trudeau.pdf

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Victory Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism

 

Australia

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

Glyphosate Has Been

Vindicated By Australia

 

Australian concerns about the effect of glyphosate on health have been totally REFUTED, with the government concluding that glyphosate DOES NOT pose a cancer risk to humans. 

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

Australian concerns about the effect of glyphosate on health have been totally REFUTED, with the government concluding that glyphosate DOES NOT pose a cancer risk to humans. 

 

On October 4th, 2016, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority ( APVMA ) published its assessment of the IARC report and other recent assessments against Glyphosate. 

 

APVMA has concluded that 

 

Glyphosate Does Not Pose

A Cancer Risk To Humans

 

Concerns have been raised about human exposure to the common herbicide glyphosate, following a FLAWED assessment by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) which had classified glyphosate in a group of chemicals that is « probably carcinogenic to humans ».  [ ?!?! ] 

 

The IARC concerns have been totally REFUTED in Australia. 

 

Glyphosate is a broad-spectrum herbicide which works by inhibiting an enzyme found in plants. 

 

There are around 500 products containing glyphosate registered for use in Australia. 

 

Glyphosate has been registered for use in Australia for over 40 years. 

 

 

 

REPORT       GLYPHOSATE & AUSTRALIA

 

 

GLYPHOSATE DOES NOT POSE A CANCER RISK TO HUMANS ( Report with Official Document, Scribd )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/10/03/the-apvma-has-completed-its-assessment-of-the-iarc-report-and-other-recent-assessments-of-glyphosate-and-has-concluded-that-glyphosate-does-not-pose-a-cancer-risk-to-humans/

 

 

 

LIBRARY OF REFERENCES       GLYPHOSATE & AUSTRALIA

 

 

DOES NOT POSE A RISK TO HUMANS ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-10-04-Does-Not-Pose-A-Risk-To-Humans-Australian-Government.pdf

 

 

SAFE TO USE ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Reference-glyphosate-2010-08-31-Safe-To-Use-Australia.pdf

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Victory Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism

 

Genotoxic Expert
Panel Review

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated By

The Genotoxic Expert Panel Review

 

The Genotoxic Expert Panel Review has REFUTED the idea that glyphosate causes cancer    this group of 16 leading scientific experts, from Canada, the United States, Denmark, Brazil, the United Kingdom, and other countries, has decisively concluded that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans    the Genotoxic Expert Panel Review disagreed with the conclusion of the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) that there is sufficient evidence that glyphosate is carcinogenic for lab animals such as mice and rates. 

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

Yet another study has REFUTED the idea that glyphosate causes cancer. 

 

In a paper published on-line in critical reviews in toxicology, four independent panels of experts, named the Genotoxic Expert Panel Review, looked at the relevant research on glyphosate and whether it is carcinogenic. 

 

The group of 16 scientists, from Canada, the United States, Denmark, Brazil, the United Kingdom, and other countries, decisively concluded that   

 

Glyphosate Is Unlikely To Pose

A Carcinogenic Risk To Humans

 

The Genotoxic Expert Panel Review bluntly REJECTED the findings of the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ), which decided in March 2015 that glyphosate is probably carcinogenic to humans.  [ ?!?! ] 

 

According the Exposure Experts of the Genotoxic Expert Panel Review 

 

Even when using worst-case assumptions, systemic exposures to applicators, by-standers, and the general public are very small    there is an extremely large margin of safety from exposure to glyphosate via normal uses. 

 

According the Epidemiology Panel of the Genotoxic Expert Panel Review   

 

Glyphosate epidemiologic literature DOES NOT indicate a causal relationship between glyphosate exposure and NHL ( non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma ). 

 

According the Leading Experts of the Genotoxic Expert Panel Review   

 

Extensive reviews of the genotoxicity    all support a conclusion that glyphosate is inherently NOT genotoxic. 

 

The Genotoxic Expert Panel Review disagreed with the IARC conclusion that there is sufficient evidence that glyphosate is carcinogenic for lab animals such as mice and rates. 

 

The conclusions of the 16 member Genotoxic Expert Panel Review support the findings of agencies around the world. 

 

Health Canada, the European Food Safety Authority and a joint WHO and United Nations Food and Agriculture Panel published similar scientific reviews in 2015 and 2016. 

 

All of these organizations reported that glyphosate is NOT carcinogenic for humans. 

 

 

 

LIBRARY OF REFERENCES      GLYPHOSATE & GENOTOXIC EXPERT PANEL REVIEW

 

 

GENOTOXICITY EXPERT PANEL REVIEW ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-09-28-Genotoxicity-Expert-Panel-Review-1.pdf

 

 

GENOTOXICITY EXPERT PANEL REVIEW — GLYPHOSATE NOT CANCER-CAUSING ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-09-28-Genotoxicity-Expert-Panel-Review-Glyphosate-Not-Cancer-Causing-1.pdf

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Victory Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism

 

New Zealand

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

Glyphosate Has Been

Vindicated By New Zealand

 

New Zealand has rebuked the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) by announcing that it found NO glyphosate-cancer link    furthermore, the government has stated that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to be carcinogenic and should NOT be classified as a mutagen or carcinogen. 

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

In August 2016, the Environmental Protection Agency in New Zealand ( NZ EPA ) announced that it found   

 

No Glyphosate-Cancer Link

 

New Zealand is REBUKING the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ). 

 

The New Zealand Glyphosate Review, commissioned by New Zealand’s Environmental Protection Authority, says the broad-spectrum herbicide is 

 

Unlikely To Be Carcinogenic & Should Not

Be Classified As A Mutagen Or Carcinogen

 

From the Executive Summary of the New Zealand Glyphosate Review   

 

The majority of human studies DID NOT show an association between exposure to glyphosate and cancer. 

 

Although a small number of studies with a limited number of participants * found a weak association between glyphosate exposure and increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma ( NHL ), others did not. 

 

The studies that found NO association between glyphosate exposure and NHL included the largest and most reliable, which included over 50,000 participants. 

 

Based on the inconsistency in the results of the studies on glyphosate exposure and NHL, and the lack of any association in the largest, most robust study, it was concluded that there is NO convincing evidence of an association between glyphosate exposure and the development of cancer in humans. 

 

 *    used by WHO’s IARC committee in its decision that glyphosate was « probably carcinogenic to humans »

 

The New Zealand Glyphosate Review takes into account studies reviewed by 

 

   European Food Safety Authority ( EFSA )

 

   FAO/WHO Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues ( JMPR )

 

   International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC )

 

   US Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA )

 

 

 

LIBRARY OF REFERENCES      GLYPHOSATE & NEW ZEALAND

 

 

FINDS NO GLYPHOSATE-CANCER LINK, REBUKES WHO’S IARC ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-08-29-IARC-New-Zealand-Finds-No-Glyphosate-Cancer-Link-Rebukes-IARC-Gen-Lit.pdf

 

 

REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE RELATING TO CARCINOGENICITY ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-08-00-Review-Of-The-evidence-Relating-To-Carcinogenicity-New-Zealand-1.pdf

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Victory Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism

 

Nova Scotia

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

Glyphosate Has Been

Vindicated By Nova Scotia

 

In the Province of Nova Scotia, the Chief Public Health Office has issued a statement saying that there is NO evidence that glyphosate creates a risk to human health if used properly    even water can be toxic if too much is consumed in a short period of time. 

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

In the Province of Nova Scotia, Chief Public Health Officer, Dr Robert Strang, is firing back over health concerns surrounding the province’s approval for the application of glyphosate. 

 

In August 2016, Nova Scotia Environment gave the green light to Northern Pulp, and three other companies, to spray more than 2,600 hectares of woodland in Colchester, Cumberland, Hants and Pictou counties with VisionMax, which contains glyphosate. 

 

On September 2nd, 2016, Dr Strang issued a statement saying that   

 

There Is No Evidence That Glyphosate Creates

A Risk To Human Health If Used Properly

 

Even Water Can Be Toxic If Too Much Is

Consumed In A Short Period Of Time

 

Dr Strang said although the World Health Organization has identified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen under certain conditions [ ?!?! ], Health Canada has ruled that glyphosate is NOT a health risk to humans so long as it is properly applied. 

 

According to Dr Strang   

 

To determine the actual risk you have to ask exactly how is the chemical going to be used    when, how, where, and how much    and work all that through in a risk assessment to say what’s the possible human exposure and what are the health risks from that exposure. 

 

All the evidence would say that the way it is proposed to be used in Nova Scotia for forestry application DOES NOT pose any human health risk.  

 

Dr Strang went on to cite a recent New Brunswick study with similar findings, and said it’s about weighing risks and benefits. 

 

In 2011, glyphosate was one of a number of ingredients whose use was arbitrarily prohibited in the urban landscape by the government of Nova Scotia. 

 

 

 

REFERENCE      GLYPHOSATE & NOVA SCOTIA

 

 

SPRAY DOESN’T POSE ANY HUMAN HEALTH RISK ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-09-05-Spray-Doesn%E2%80%99t-Pose-Any-Human-Health-Risk-Nova-Scotia-1.pdf

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Victory Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism

 

Switzerland

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

Glyphosate Has Been

Vindicated By Switzerland

 

Another VICTORY for evidence-based science has been won in Switzerland, where the government has stated that there was INSUFFICIENT scientific evidence to justify a ban on the general use of glyphosate, especially for farming. 

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

Now, another VICTORY for evidence-based science has been won, this time in Switzerland.

 

According to Swissinfo, a news-site based in Switzerland 

 

The House of Representatives has rejected a petition from various organizations * such as Greenpeace and the Consumers’ Association for French-speaking Switzerland, which have been calling for a ban on the use of all synthetic chemical pesticides, such as the weed-killer ingredient glyphosate.

 

A majority of parliamentarians said ** there was INSUFFICIENT scientific evidence to justify a ban on the general use of glyphosate, especially for farming.

 

 *    anti-pesticide & environmental-terrжrist organizations

**   on September 30th, 2016

 

In November 2017, the Federal Council, Switzerland’s executive, rejected the Green Party’s proposal to prohibit the use of glyphosate. 

 

The Federal Council believes that glyphosate residues in Switzerland are LOW and HARMLESS to health. 

 

It sees NO reason to prohibit its use. 

 

 

 

LIBRARY OF REFERENCES      GLYPHOSATE & SWITZERLAND

 

 

NO SWISS BAN FOR WEED-KILLER GLYPHOSATE  ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-09-30-No-Swiss-Ban-For-Weed-Killer-Glyphosate-Switzerland.pdf

 

 

A SLOW BUT STEADY VINDICATION ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-09-30-A-Slow-But-Steady-Vindication-ACSH-1.pdf

 

 

SWISS GOVERNMENT REJECTS BAN PLAN ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2017-11-19-Switzerland-Swiss-Government-Rejects-Ban-Plan.pdf

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Victory Against Anti-Glyphosate Terrжrism

 

United Nations

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

Glyphosate Has Been Vindicated

By The United Nations

 

The World Health Organization ( WHO ) & the Food & Agriculture Organization ( FAO ), both agencies of the United Nations, have stated that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans. 

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

On May 16th, 2016, the World Health Organization ( WHO ) and the Food and Agriculture Organization ( FAO ), both agencies of the United Nations, stated that 

 

Glyphosate Is Unlikely To Pose

A Carcinogenic Risk To Humans

 

The United Nations announced its assessment that glyphosate is UNLIKELY to cause cancer in people and that it is UNLIKELY to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans exposed to it through food ! 

 

The United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization ( FAO ) and World Health Organization ( WHO ) looked at all pertinent published and un-published studies to assess the health risk to consumers from dietary exposure to glyphosate residues in food. 

 

 

 

BLOG      GLYPHOSATE & UNITED NATIONS

 

 

UNITED NATIONS HAS DISCREDITED THE IARC ANTI-GLYPHOSATE HAZARD REPORT ( Blog )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/2016/05/21/glyphosate-herbicide-will-not-cause-cancer-victory-against-terrorists-proposal-for-prohibition-against-glyphosate-herbicide-stopped-in-the-european-union-real-trends-against-pe/

 

 

 

LIBRARY OF REFERENCES      GLYPHOSATE & WHO ( UNITED NATIONS )

 

 

JOINT FAO-WHO MEETING ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES 2016 EXTRAORDINARY MEETING ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-09-00-WHO-Joint-FAO-WHO-Meeting-On-Pesticide-Residues-2016-Extraordinary-Meeting.pdf

 

 

FOOD SAFETY — FREQUENTLY-ASKED QUESTIONS ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-05-16-WHO-Food-Safety-Frequently-Asked-Questions.pdf

 

 

JOINT FAO-WHO MEETING ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES 2016 EXTRAORDINARY MEETING ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-05-00-WHO-Joint-FAO-WHO-Meeting-On-Pesticide-Residues-2016-Extraordinary-Meeting.pdf

 

 

JOINT FAO-WHO MEETING ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES — SUMMARY REPORT ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-05-00-WHO-Joint-FAO-WHO-Meeting-On-Pesticide-Residues-Summary-Report.pdf

 

 

JOINT FAO-WHO MEETING ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES — LIST OF EXPERTS ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-05-00-WHO-Joint-FAO-WHO-Meeting-On-Pesticide-Residues-List-Of-Experts.pdf

 

 

JOINT FAO-WHO MEETING ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES — ROSTER OF EXPERTS ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-01-16-WHO-Joint-FAO-WHO-Meeting-On-Pesticide-Residues-Roster-Of-Experts.pdf

 

 

MAIN FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS OF CORE ASSESSMENT GROUP ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2015-09-11-WHO-Main-Findings-Recommendations-Of-Core-Assessment-Group.pdf

 

 

PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN FOOD 2015 JOINT FAO-WHO MEETING ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2015-09-00-WHO-Pesticide-Residues-In-Food-2015-Joint-FAO-WHO-Meeting-On-Pesticide-Residues.pdf

 

 

JOINT FAO-WHO MEETING ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES 2016 EXTRAORDINARY MEETING ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-09-00-WHO-Joint-FAO-WHO-Meeting-On-Pesticide-Residues-2016-Extraordinary-Meeting.pdf

 

 

ENDGAME FOR GLYPHOSATE — THE GLOBAL FALLOUT FROM WHO ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2015-06-17-WHO-Endgame-For-Glyphosate-The-Global-Fallout-From-WHO.pdf

 

 

UN EXPERTS FIND GLYPHOSATE UNLIKELY TO CAUSE CANCER ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2016-05-16-WHO-UN-Experts-Find-Glyphosate-Unlikely-To-Cause-Cancer-1.pdf

 

 

FIVE THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT WHO SAYING ROUNDUP COULD CAUSE CANCER ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2015-03-25-WHO-Five-Things-You-Should-Know-About-WHO-Saying-Roundup-Could-Cause-Cancer.pdf

 

 

PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN FOOD — CORE ASSESSMENT GROUP — GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2015-00-00-WHO-Pesticide-Residues-In-Food-Core-Assessment-Group-Guidance-Document.pdf

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Glyphosate

 

Drink Test

 

 

 

MORE DETAILS

 

 

Glyphosate Is So Safe, You

Can Drink A Glass Of It ?!?!

 

Of course, this will change few opinions among the true believers.

 

Monsanto-haters and GMO-phobes are implacable.

 

We can already hear their objections 

 

If Glyphosate is so safe, why don’t you drink a glass of it ?!?!

 

That’s absurd.

 

Organic farmers use manure to fertilize crops.

 

Perhaps they should DRINK a glass of that.

 

Nonetheless, any drink test is a ridiculously worthless stunt. 

 

You could no more drink a glass of diluted pest control product than you could a glass of water filled with common table salt. 

 

Both will upset your stomach, and only an idiot would consider drinking either of them. 

 

According to Dr Keith R Solomon   

 

These materials * are less toxic than table salt. 

 

I’m NOT suggesting you use them ** on your fish and chips, but just to put it into some sort of perspective. 

 

 *    pest control products used in the urban landscape

**   pest control products

 

Dr Keith Ross Solomon is a Doctorate-Level Expert and World Leading Scientific Expert in the Field of Environmental Biology, Toxicology, and Pesticide Safety. 

 

He is also Professor in the Department of Environmental Biology at the University of Guelph, Ontario, as well as Director of the Centre for Toxicology in Guelph, Ontario.   http://wp.me/P1jq40-1Lk  

 

Pest control products, like 2,4-D and glyphosate, are NO more dangerous than table salt, and, in fact, 2,4-D tastes like salt water. 

 

In the early 1940s, Dr R Milton Carleton was the co-developer of another ingredient that is just as safe as glyphosate, 2,4-D herbicide. 

 

Dr Carleton usually carried a flask around with him that contained 2,4-D from which he would drink on request « just to prove it was harmless ». 

 

Anyone who knew the distinctive fish smell of 2,4-D knew that Dr Carleton was actually drinking the real stuff. 

 

2,4-D and glyphosate are LESS TOXIC than Aspirin, baking soda, caffeine, cannabis, nicotine, table salt, and Tylenol. 

 

2,4-D and glyphosate are NO MORE TOXIC than ethanol ( an edible beverage constituent in beer, wine, and other intoxicating beverages ), mouthwash ( Listerine ), and Vitamin C. 

 

Pest control products like 2,4-D and glyphosate are scientifically-safe, practically non-toxic, will cause NO harm, WILL NOT cause cancer, and WILL NOT cause irreversible damage if consumed orally. 

 

The probable lethal dose for a person ingesting the concentrated form of 2,4-D or glyphosate is one litre, the volume of an entire milk carton. 

 

By comparison, drinking six litres of water, which is considered harmless, can lead to water poisoning or dilutional hyponatremia, which is a potentially fatal disturbance in brain functions. 

 

In essence, water is only five times safer than 2,4-D or glyphosate. 

 

Dr Carleton was NOT harmed by drinking 2,4-D    he lived to the age of 87. 

 

 

 

REPORT

 

 

THE DR CARLETON STORY WAS AUTHORED BY MR ART C DRYSDALE ( Report ) 

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Force-Of-Nature-24-D-Herbicide-2000-09-00-Wisdom-of-Drysdale-Birth-Development-Of-24-D-Carleton-Ames-pdf.pdf

 

 

 

LIBRARY OF REFERENCES

 

 

HE’S NOT A MONSANTO LOBBYIST, & WEED KILLER ISN’T SAFE TO DRINK — NORAHG RESPONSE ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2015-03-27-Moore-Hes-Not-A-Monsanto-Lobbyist-Weed-Killer-Isnt-Safe-To-Drink-NORAHG-RESPONSE.pdf

 

 

LOBBYIST REFUSES GLASS OF WATER CONTAINING CARCINOGEN [ ?!?! ] DESPITE SAYING IT’S SAFE ( Reference )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reference-glyphosate-2015-03-26-Moore-Lobbyist-Refuses-Glass-Of-Water-Containing-Carcinogen-Despite-Saying-Its-Safe.pdf

 

 

 

 

GLYPHOSATE -- LEFT-WING PESTICIDE-HATING FANATЖC DRINKS ROUNDUP AT PUBLIC MEETING -- WASHOE, NEVADA ( Video Recording, 1 Min 25 Sec )

 

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

Glyphosate

 

The Entire
Media History

 

 

 

GLYPHOSATE THE LIBRARY OF REFERENCES ( Web-Page )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-references/

 

 

GLYPHOSATE THE LIBRARY OF REPORTS & BLOGS ( Web-Page )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-reports-blogs/

 

 

GLYPHOSATE THE LIBRARY OF BLOGS ( Web-Page )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate-blogs/

 

 

GLYPHOSATE SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE ACCORDING TO REAL EXPERTS ( Web-Page )

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/glyphosate/

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

WE SPEAK THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT GLYPHOSATE FROM AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE !

 

We are the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that conspire to destroy the Green space and other industries ( NORAHG ).  As a non-profit and independent organization, we are environmentalists who are dedicated to reporting about truth-challenged pesticide-hating fanatжcs ( HUJE ) who conspire to destroy businesses that are dependent on the use of safe and effective conventional pest control products.  We also report on the work of several highly-rated leading experts who have recognized expertise, training, and background in matters concerning pest control products, and who promote environmental realism and pesticide truths. 

 

Not surprisingly, enviro-fanatжcs have demonstrated that they are incapable of processing overwhelming scientific evidence.  Should we trust these fanatжcs, who conveniently ignore scientific evidence, and attempt to impose their politicized-doctrines and twisted life-style choices against our society ?!?! 

 

NORAHG was the brain-child of Mr William H Gathercole and his colleagues in 1991.  Mr Gathercole is now retired, although his name continues to appear as founder.  We dare to defy the pesticide-hating fanatжcs by exploring the whole truth from an independent perspective on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site      http://pesticidetruths.com/   If you wish to receive free reports on issues that concern you, please contact us at      force.of.de.nature@gmail.com   WILLIAM H GATHERCOLE AND NORAH G  

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

――――――――――――――――――――

 

 

 

 

Uncategorized
https://wp.me/p1jq40-b1q