Anti-Pesticide SECRETARIES are LYING, STUPID, NON-EXPERT, and UNDER-EDUCATED.
In a Letter to the Editor in Regina, Saskatchewan, Anti-Pesticide Lunatic Laura Anonen boasted being some kind of so-called executive assistant for an Environmental-Terrorist Organization.
Anonen is a MERE SECRETARY.
Can we conclude that Laura Anonen is a STUPID, NON-EXPERT, UNDER-EDUCATED SECRETARY ?!?!
Traditionally, Anti-Pesticide SECRETARIES are LYING SACKS OF LUNATIC CWAP !
Observers have seen Lunatic-Women pass themselves off as lawyers, researchers, and executives, when, in fact, THEY ARE ALL MERE NON-EXPERT AND NON-EDUCATED SECRETARIES whose opinions on pest control products are WORTHLESS AND USELESS.
Are we to believe that an assessment from a MERE NON-EXPERT AND NON-EDUCATED SECRETARY, like Anonen, is somehow worth more than Health Canada ?!?!
These Anti-Pesticide SECRETARIES, along with other NON-EXPERT Anti-Pesticide Activists, ALLEGE, with NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF, that pest control products are the cause of health and environmental issues.
Anti-Pesticide Activists are NOT CREDIBLE experts on pest control products.
And neither are Anti-Pesticide SECRETARIES who LIE ABOUT THEIR CREDENTIALS.
This PROBLEM WITH LACK-OF-ACTIVIST-CREDIBILITY reflects the overall larger problem with ALL Anti-Pesticide Activists.
There are NO Anti-Pesticide Activists who are scientists or researchers with credentials in the field of pest control products.
They are NOT COMPETENT to talk about pest control products.
NON-EXPERT Anti-Pesticide Activists COMPENSATE for their INCOMPETENCE by becoming COMPULSIVE LIARS.
For example, Anti-Pesticide Activists LIED to Government Officials and the public that safe, effective, and affordable Green Alternatives were already available to replace conventional pest control products.
They LIED !
Moreover, instead of increasing the public’s awareness of the largest known preventable causes of health issues, such as smoking and diet, Anti-Pesticide Activists prefer SCAMMING, DECEIVING, and ALARMING the public into believing there is some IMAGINARY DANGER with conventional pest control products.
Rather than providing information for improving the lifestyle choices of the public that could, without a doubt, actually save lives, Anti-Pesticide Activists prefer CONCOCTING MYTHS, DECEPTIONS, FEAR-MONGERING, FRAUDULENT LIES, MISCONCEPTIONS, COERCION, THREATS, TERROR, and PARANOID CONSPIRACIES about conventional pest control products.
NON-EXPERT Anti-Pesticide Activist LIES are followed by a hysterical rush to adopt new PROHIBITIONS.
Can we conclude that Laura Anonen is a STUPID, NON-EXPERT, UNDER-EDUCATED SECRETARY ?!?!
Perhaps Anonen should consider another line of work … one more suited to her level of expertise … in MAID SERVICES
Anonen may be more suited to perform typical domestic chores such as cooking, ironing, washing, cleaning, grocery shopping, walking the family dog, and tending to the household children.
On July 23rd, 2012, several observers responded with COMMENTS ( see below ) to the Letter to the Editor CONCOCTED by Laura Anonen in The Regina Leader-Post.
Anonen herself responded with an ANONYMOUS COMMENT, since the spotlight of scrutiny was too much for her to bear.
REGINA PESTICIDE BAN – CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT – LAURA ANONEN ( SECRETARY ) – 2012 07 23
COMMENTS RESPONDING TO ANONEN'S LETTER TO THE EDITOR
You are an executive assistant ?
SECRETARY, in other words ?
NOT A SCIENTIST.
Are you trying to tell people that you are smarter than a scientist whose main job is to make sure these products are safe for use ?
And who every day of their lives deal with these pesticides and chemicals ?
"The 2012 Ontario College of Family Physicians Systematic Review" ?
I thought it was peer-reviewed literature ?
Maybe you should spend more time as an assistant rather than going deep into something you clearly don’t know all the facts about.
It pains me to see people’s IGNORANCE on this, and how UNDER-EDUCATED people actually are on this topic.
Response to Donavon from Ecocanuck ( a.k.a. Laura Anonen )
First, the title "Executive Assistant" does not mean secretary.
She [ Anonen ] is actually a University graduate who studied Environmental Policy and took environment science and health and environment courses.
[ This may be absolute proof that you can graduate from a school, and still be IGNORANT AND STUPID. ]
Plus, it doesn’t take a scientist to know that using chemicals on your lawn that your children, pets and family play and walk on is harmful to our health.
[ WRONG ! – Children are NOT at risk ! http://wp.me/P1jq40-2ha ]
Pesticides are meant to kill.
[ They are meant to kill SELECTIVELY, but CAUSE NO HARM to children, people, or the environment. ]
DDT was once thought safe too.
[ DDT was/is a SAFE product, and continues to be crucial for the control of malaria in Africa. http://wp.me/P1jq40-1I5 ]
Go ahead and use as many toxins as you want on your lawn and let it seep into the ground and water.
[ Pest control products used in the Urban Landscape DO NOT enter our lakes and rivers through surface run-off and storm sewers. http://wp.me/P1jq40-27X ]
Then maybe your opinion will change when you're sick.
[ Observers are already SICK … SICK from Anonen because she makes their brains HURT with her STUPID CONCOCTED STORIES. According to the Government of Quebec, pest control products like 2,4-D are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE. According to Anti-Pesticide Activists, Quebec’s position was somehow coerced in order to avoid a lawsuit. NON-EXPERT and UNDER-EDUCATED activists like Anonen are WRONG ! The Province of Quebec is NOT THE ONLY LEADING AUTHORITY that has publicly stated that, or has validated the concept that, in one form or another, pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE. The following educational, regulatory, research, scientific, and trade agencies have CONCLUSIVELY SUPPORTED or VALIDATED the concept that pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE ● American Chemical Society ● American Council for Science and Health ● American Cancer Society ● British Columbia’s Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides ● Canadian Medical Association ● CropLife Canada ● Environment Alberta – Government of Alberta ● Government of Quebec ● Health Canada ● Institute of Public Affairs ● International Agency for Research on Cancer ● Ontario Pesticides Advisory Committee ● The Fraser Institute ● U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ● World Health Organization. http://wp.me/P1jq40-1J8 ]
So, YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT THAT EDUCATED ON THIS SUBJECT.
I don’t understand how you can sit there and say put as many "toxins" as you want on your lawn and let it seep into the ground and water.
MY BRAIN HURTS FROM THIS COMMENT.
Do you even realize how many pesticides there are in the food you eat ?
On the golf courses you play on ?
Did you actually do your due diligence and see that almost every single domestic pesticide out there DISSIPATES IN THE SOIL WITHIN 24 HOURS and there are NO RESIDUAL EFFECTS ?
Pesticides are meant to kill … to kill weeds, insects, fungis, bacteria.
And get sick from a herbicide, because that’s what this whole topic is about, I’m sorry … YOU OBVIOUSLY DON’T KNOW MUCH ABOUT THESE PRODUCTS.
You eat this stuff every day, and some even worse, as they are agricultural grade.
Again … you are UNDER-EDUCATED on this subject.
Ontario College of Family Physicians ( OCFP ) and its Literature Review has been DISCREDITED, DEBUNKED, and REFUTED by Health Canada and by The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution.
OCFP is RIDICULOUSLY IMPLYING that its NON-EXPERT ASSESSMENT is somehow being withheld from Health Canada and EVERY other regulatory agency in the world.
INDISPUTABLE and CONCLUSIVE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH shows that, as reported through Health Canada's VAST TOXICOLOGY DATABASE, NO HARM WILL OCCUR when pest control products are used according to label directions.
The RISK ASSESSMENT of pest control products indicates that they are PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC.
There is NOT ONE KNOWN ILLNESS or DEATH from the proper use of pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.
WILLIAM H. GATHERCOLE AND NORAH G
Conveniently IGNORING Leading Authorities
Anti-Pesticide Activists CONVENIENTLY IGNORE the fact that pest control products are HEALTH-CANADA-APPROVED, FEDERALLY-LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE, PRACTICALLY-NON-TOXIC, and CAUSE NO HARM.
Anti-Pesticide Activists also CONVENIENTLY IGNORE the expertise of ANY leading authority on matters concerning pest control products.
They do so when it suits THEM !
Scientifically Safe ― Agencies
These LEADING AUTHORITIES are educational, regulatory, research, scientific, and trade agencies from around the world.
They are considered as being many or all or the following …
They have publicly stated that, or have validated the concept that, in one form or another, pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE.
These agencies are NOT unduly influenced by any stake-holder in those industries manufacturing and using pest control products.
The following educational, regulatory, research, scientific, and trade agencies have CONCLUSIVELY SUPPORTED or VALIDATED the concept that pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY-SAFE ―
● American Chemical Society
● American Council for Science and Health
● American Cancer Society
● British Columbia’s Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides
● Canadian Medical Association
● CropLife Canada
● Environment Alberta ― Government of Alberta
● Government of Quebec
● Health Canada
● Institute of Public Affairs
● International Agency for Research on Cancer
● Ontario Pesticides Advisory Committee
● The Fraser Institute
● U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
● World Health Organization.