Hero Speaking Out Against TERRORISM
On May 17th, 2012, British Columbia’s Special Committee on Cosmetic Pesticides announced that it WILL NOT RECOMMEND PROHIBITION against the use of pest control products in the Urban Landscape.
During the presentations to the committee, Rob Fleming, the New Democrat Environment Critic, demonstrated a COMPLETE DISREGARD FOR THE PROCESS.
On November 8th, 2011, Fleming got up a few short minutes into a presentation by Dr. Keith Solomon, and left, only to return at the end of the presentation.
Dr. Solomon is a world-renowned toxicologist and expert on pest control products and their effects on human health and the environment.
According to Solomon, there are NO TOXICOLOGICAL OR HEALTH REASONS that justify Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION.
There is NO EVIDENCE of ANY causal link between the use of pest control products and cancer.
There is NOT a pesticide registered in Canada that causes cancer or has any links to cancer.
Rob Fleming clearly demonstrated that he is an Anti-Pesticide Enviro-Lunatic with NO INTEREST IN THE TRUTH.
New Democratic Party is the POLITICAL SHIELD for Anti-Pesticide and Environmental-Terrorist Organizations.
New Democratic Party HAS A POLITICAL AGENDA TO BAN PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS regardless of the facts presented by world-renowned experts like Dr. Keith Solomon.
Overview from an Independent Perspective
On May 17th, 2012, British Columbia’s Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides announced that it WILL NOT RECOMMEND PROHIBITION against the use of pest control products in the Urban Landscape.
The Elected Government Officials ( a.k.a. Members of the Legislative Assembly, MLAs ) serving on the Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides were ―
● Bill Bennett, MLA ( Kootenay East ), Chair ― Liberal
● Rob Fleming, MLA ( Victoria-Swan Lake ), Deputy Chair ― New Democrat Anti-Pesticide Lunatic
● Scott Fraser, MLA ( Alberni-Pacific Rim ) ― New Democrat Anti-Pesticide Lunatic
● Barry Penner, MLA ( Chilliwack-Hope ) ― Liberal and former Attorney General
● Michael Sather, MLA ( Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows ) ― New Democrat Anti-Pesticide Lunatic
● John Slater, MLA ( Boundary-Similkameen ) ― Liberal
● Ben Stewart, MLA ( Westside-Kelowna) ― Liberal
● John Yap, MLA ( Richmond-Steveston ) ― Liberal
The Committee was first appointed in June 2011 and was given the task of examining the scope of a possible PROHIBITION against pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.
New Democrats operate their party as a POLITICAL SHIELD for Anti-Pesticide and Environmental-Terrorist Organizations.
New Democratic Party of British Columbia ( BC NDP ) is a social-democratic political party.
The party currently forms the official opposition to the governing Liberal Party following the 2009 provincial election.
Most of these organizations are presently UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR CHARITY FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY.
These organizations are FUND-RAISING, PROFIT-SEEKING, and LOBBYING organizations ― they are NOT science, research, health, or physicians’ organizations.
New Democratic Party has made four attempts to bring into law a province-wide PROHIBITION against the use of pest control products in the Urban Landscape.
On May 30th, 2012, Opposition NDP Anti-Pesticide Leader Adrian Dix INTRODUCED A BILL called the Cosmetic Use of Pesticides Control Act in the legislature.
No Surprise New Democrats Are Opposed To Pesticides
According to Jacquie Doherty …
I am well aware the British Columbia’s Special Committee on Cosmetic Pesticides did not have a consensus, but the majority of members agreed THERE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE TO BAN THE USE OF COSMETIC PESTICIDES.
That is how a democracy works, majority rules.
Am I surprised the New Democratic Party ( NDP ) were opposed ?
Not in the least.
New Democrats have stated that a PROVINCE-WIDE PESTICIDE BAN is one of their election platforms.
I was surprised, however, with one of the NDP committee members’ COMPLETE DISREGARD FOR THE PROCESS.
A colleague and I made a presentation to the committee on behalf the Integrated Environmental Plant Management Association of Western Canada and its members who are certified pesticide applicators.
As a presenter, I was fortunate to sit in on other presentations that day, one of which was by DR. KEITH SOLOMON, a world-renowned toxicologist and expert on pest control products and their effects on human health and the environment.
You can only imagine my surprise when Rob Fleming, the New Democrat Deputy Chair of the committee, got up a few short minutes into Dr. Solomon’s presentation, and left, only to return at the end of the presentation.
So, am I surprised there was not a « consensus » or « unanimous » findings between committee members ?
Not in the least.
The New Democratic Party HAD A POLITICAL AGENDA TO BAN COSMETIC PESTICIDES regardless of the facts presented at those hearings.
Yes, precautionary measures are taken as they are with many household products or everyday consumer goods that have labels advising proper use.
Will Anti-Pesticide Activists be calling for a ban on all these products as well ?
Sign-posting is a requirement in cities like Kamloops, British Columbia.
Fertilizer is applied to our clients’ lawns, so yes, we do leave after-care instructions for the home-owner.
The fact is … there is NOT a pesticide registered in Canada that causes cancer or has any links to cancer.
It is the job of Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA ) and its 350 qualified scientists to ensure their safety before they can be registered for use.
For example, over 40,000 studies have been done on 2,4-D Herbicide alone.
I would welcome a list of the many, many effective, non-toxic alternatives referred to by Anti-Pesticide Activists.
Keep in mind all pesticides sold in Canada must go through the same regulatory process.
The PMRA looks at all the data, NOT ONLY A FEW SPECIFICALLY SELECTED EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES as did Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment.
It is odd how Anti-Pesticide Activists trust the PMRA on the safety of the alternative products but not on the conventional ones, as they all must go through the same scrutiny.
Unless, of course, they are referring to alternatives that do not have a government registration number.
But I’m sure, with their so-called expertise on the issue, Anti-Pesticide Activists are aware that would be illegal.
Jacquie Doherty is President of Integrated Environmental Plant Management Association of Western Canada ( I.E.P.M.A. ), and Owner of Grassroots Choice Lawn Care Ltd. in Kamloops, British Columbia.
Summary of Doctor Keith R. Solomon’s
Presentation to British Columbia’s
Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides,
November 8th, 2011
● There are NO TOXICOLOGICAL OR HEALTH REASONS that justify Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION.
● NOT EVERY pest control product is highly toxic.
● NOT EVERY pest control products is highly dangerous.
● Pest Management Regulatory Agency uses the PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH to set guidelines for exposures for humans.
● At least in home and garden use, most pest control products are actually VERY NON-PERSISTENT.
● There is really A LACK OF EVIDENCE linking pest control product exposure to human risks of cancer.
● There is NO EVIDENCE of ANY causal link between the use of pest control products and cancer.
● Pest control products are LESS TOXIC THAN TABLE SALT.
● EPIDEMIOLOGY STUDIES are really based only on CORRELATION and SUGGESTED LINKS, and they CANNOT ESTABLISH CAUSALITY ON THEIR OWN.
● If Government Officials want to IMPOSE A PESTICIDE BAN FOR POLITICAL REASONS, that’s fine. That’s within their mandate. But if they do that, they should be honest enough to admit that they are actually doing that.
What Is IEPMA ?
The Integrated Environmental Plant Management Association of Western Canada supports the use of pest control products under the guidelines of …
● Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency, and
● British Columbia’s Integrated Pest Management Act and Regulations.
Integrated Environmental Plant Management Association of Western Canada DOES NOT SUPPORT FURTHER RESTRICTIONS.
IEPMA believes in a SCIENCE-BASED APPROACH when dealing with pest control products.
Who Is Keith Solomon ?
Doctor Keith R. Solomon, Ph.D., is a Professor in the Department of Environmental Biology at the University of Guelph.
Solomon is also Director of the Centre for Toxicology.
He conducts research into the fate and effects of pest control products and other substances in the environment, exposure of humans to pest control products and industrial chemicals, and risk assessment.
Solomon also teaches courses in toxicology and pesticides.
Solomon is a Graduate of Rhodes University in Chemistry and Zoology.
The MYTH of Cancer
It is COMMON KNOWLEDGE that there are NO pest control products that are known or probable carcinogens.
It is a MYTH to believe that pest control products somehow cause cancer.
Environmental Protection Agency’s ( EPA ) and Health Canada’s EXTENSIVE TOXICOLOGY DATABASES INDISPUTABLY PROVE that pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE and DO NOT CAUSE CANCER !
Both EPA and Health Canada require each new pest control product to go through about TWO-HUNDRED SEPARATE TESTS to examine health and environmental impacts as well as value, and costing about 250 MILLION DOLLARS.
There is NOT ONE KNOWN CANCER DEATH from the proper use of pest control products used in the Urban Landscape.
BOGUS Green Alternatives
It is IMPOSSIBLE for home-owners or professionals to keep their properties beautiful by using so-called Green Alternative Pesticides.
There are NO viable, efficacious, economical, or low-risk alternatives to replace conventional pest control products.
Green Alternative Pesticides ( a.k.a. Organic or Natural Pesticides ) are BOGUS and DISMAL FAILURES ― they DO NOT WORK and they are NOT INNOVATIVE products.
Overall, Green Alternative Pesticides are INEFFECTIVE, INADEQUATE, HIGH-RISK, MORE TOXIC, and STUNNINGLY EXPENSIVE !
In many cases, Green Alternative Pesticides are questionably HIGHER IN TOXICITY, and pose HIGHER ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS.
GET RID OF THE NEW DEMOCRATS !
Everyone in the Green Space Industry ― no matter where they live ― must meet with their Member of the Legislative Assembly ( MLA ), preferably not from New Democratic Party.
In order to meet and inform the MLA, you must donate the maximum amount to the party, which is 1,100 dollars in British Columbia.
The cost of this donation is insignificant when compared to the catastrophic business losses inflicted by anti-pesticide prohibition.
Any business owner in the Green Space Industry who does not bother to meet with the local MLA is a pitiful fool and an idiot, and does not deserve a career, or a business, or any success.
COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN.
Anti-Pesticide Terrorists are NOT CREDIBLE SOURCES OF INFORMATION upon which political decisions are made ― they LIE and LIE and LIE.
There is NO RECOURSE but OFFICIAL COMPLAINTS as well as LITIGATION against Anti-Pesticide Terrorists.
They DO NOT DESERVE ANY DONATIONS OR SUPPORT.
They DO NOT DESERVE ANY GOVERNMENT GRANTS.
Nor do they deserve TAX-EXEMPT STATUSES.
They DO deserve to FACE THE SPOTLIGHT OF SCRUTINY and THE TERROR OF THE COURTS !
Anti-Pesticide Terrorists in organizations like Canadian Cancer Society are presently UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR CHARITY FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY.
The Government of Canada DOES NOT want its society to continue living in the 9|11 Era of Anti-Pesticide Enviro-Lunatic Profit-Hungry Terrorism !
And neither should anyone in the Green Space Industry.
All names, statements, activities, and affiliations have been ARCHIVED for anyone wishing to lodge an OFFICIAL COMPLAINT or lay CRIMINAL CHARGES against Anti-Pesticide Terrorists.
On The Pesticide Truths Web-Site, NORAHG manages a VAST ARCHIVE of REPORTS, MEDIA REFERENCES, AUDIO CLIPS, and VIDEOS on ALL Anti-Pesticide Terrorists.
We know who they are, and where they are hiding, and what they have said and done.
When CRIMINAL CHARGES FOR FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY ARE LAID, legal experts say that the NORAHG ARCHIVE is sufficient to lead to a SUCCESSFUL PROSECUTION against Anti-Pesticide Terrorists !
Business owners in the Green Space Industry should talk to their lawyers, members of the legislative assembly, and local media outlets.
Thanks to The Pesticide Truths Web-Site, they have all the DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE that they need.
LET THESE TERRORISTS FACE THE SPOTLIGHT OF SCRUTINY and THE TERROR OF THE COURTS !
Anti-Pesticide Terrorists are GOVERNMENT-FINANCED with TAX-FREE MONEY ― they must not be allowed this money to defend themselves in court.
Demand a REVOCATION of their organizations’ REGISTERED CHARITY TAX-EXEMPT STATUS !
SUE THE BASTERDS’ BRAINS OUT !
For the original copy of this Force Of Nature Report, go to the following link …
NORAHG has archived even more REPORTS BY DOHERTY on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site …
Force Of Nature — Hero — 2011 11 08 — Jacquie Doherty — BC Special Committee on Cosmetic Pesticides ( Report )
Force Of Nature — Hero — 2011 03 19 — Jacquie Doherty — Ban Not Needed — British Columbia ( Report )
Pesticide Truths – No Surprise NDP Was Opposed To Pesticides – Letter to the Editor – Kamloops Daily News – 2012 06 01
NORAHG has archived even more information on The Pesticide Truths Web-Site …
CARNAGE CAUSED BY CATASTROPHIC ANTI-PESTICIDE PROHIBITION ( Web-Page )
COMPLAINT CHANNELS – BUSINESS, FUND-RAISING, GOVERNMENT, & TAXATION AGENCIES ( Web-Page )
COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN
COMPLAINT CHANNELS – LETTERS TO THE EDITOR – MEDIA CONTACTS LIBRARY ( Web-Page )
GREEN ALTERNATIVES … BOGUS & DISMAL FAILURES ( Web-Page )
HEROES SPEAKING OUT AGAINST ANTI-PESTICIDE TERRORISM ( Web-Page )
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR / LETTERS OF COMPLAINT ( Web-Page )
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR – RESPONDING TO LUNATIC JIHADISTS – BELL-FORMAN-KAMINSKY-CCS ( Web-Page )
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR – RESPONDING TO SCREECHING MONKEYS ( Web-Page )
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR – RESPONDING TO SCREECHING MONKEYS – 2012 ( Web-Page )
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR – RESPONDING TO SCREECHING MONKEYS – 2011 ( Web-Page )
ORGANIZATION – CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT – GLOATING, TREACHEROUS, AND REPUGNANT ( Web-Page )
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – CONSPIRACY TO PROHIBIT PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS IN THE URBAN LANDSCAPE ( Web-Page )
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – COQUITLAM, CITY OF – AN ENVIRONMENT THAT IS UNHAPPY, UGLY, UNEMPLOYED, UNENLIGHTENED, AND UNHEALTHY ( Web-Page )
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – COQUITLAM, CITY OF – REFERENCES FOR LITIGATION ( Web-Page )
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – KELOWNA, CITY OF – ANTI-PESTICIDE WOMEN COUNCILLORS ( Web-Page )
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES ( Web-Page )