British Columbia Pesticide Ban – Attempt By Lunatics To Entrap Government Official – Bill Bennett – Bill Wells – 2012 05 31

 

 

 

 

Lying Sack Of Anti-Pesticide Lunatic Crap !

 

 

 

Overview

 

 

Anti-Pesticide Activists are basically LUNATIC-LIARS !

 

They LIE and LIE and LIE and LIE. 

 

They NEVER Stop !

 

These Lunatic-Liars CONSPIRE AGAINST pest control products, or any other product they arbitrarily deem as unwanted.

 

To paraphrase Robert F. Kennedy  …

 

Anti-pesticide lunatics are against everything all the time.

 

In the 9|11 Era of Anti-Pesticide Lunatic-Terrorism, at least ONE MALICIOUS ACT OF TERROR is Perpetrated EVERY SINGLE DAY by Anti-Pesticide LUNATIC-LIARS.

 

Anti-Pesticide LUNATIC-LIARS make the LIE big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually the public believes them.

 

If these LUNATIC-LIARS wore Swastikas, and lived in the 1930s and 1940s, they would be leading the Third Reich.

 

Anti-Pesticide Activists have created hostile ideology global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method.

 

Anti-Pesticide Activists are LUNATIC-LIARS !

 

They LIE … and LIE …  and LIE !

 

THEY NEVER STOP LYING !

 

 

 

British Columbia’s Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides

 

 

On May 17th, 2012, the British Columbia’s Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides tabled it’s report.

 

The committee DID NOT recommend PROHBITION against the use of pest control products in the Urban Environment.

 

Pest control products CAUSE NO HARM and are SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE.

 

Not surprisingly, the Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides AGREED  …  and deserves CONGRATULATION.

 

According to Bill Bennett, Chair of the Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides  ―

 

The majority of the committee DOES NOT THINK THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, at this time, WARRANTS AN OUTRIGHT BAN.

 

We are not prepared to say to home-owners that purchasing 2,4-D is prohibited, under all circumstances, or that they cannot hire a qualified person to apply it to their lawns.

 

Instead of an all-out ban, the committee put forth 17 recommendations aimed at promoting the safe use of pest control products.

 

Not surprisingly, the final decision of the committee was NOT UNANIMOUS since the minority of the committee, composed of members of the New Democratic Party ( NDP ), somehow came to the conclusion that Anti-Pesticide PROHIBITION was necessary.

 

New Democratic Party functions as the POLITICAL SHIELD for Anti-Pesticide and Environmental-Terrorist Organizations  ―  most of these organizations are presently UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR CHARITY FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY.

 

 

 

Anti-Pesticide Lunatic-ENTRAPMENT

 

 

Bill Bennett, Chair of the Special Committee On Cosmetic Pesticides, may have CORRECTLY DESCRIBED people who support a ban as « politically motivated left wing conspiracy theorists ».

 

In a May 30th, 2012, message to Anti-Pesticide Lunatic Bill Wells, Bennett wrote «  I’ll take the 350 scientists at Health Canada over the politically-motivated left wing conspiracy theorists any day  ».

 

Wells had written to Bennett calling the committee’s recommendation against a ban « disgraceful » and expressed MOCK-DISAPPOINTMENT.

 

Bennett’s first response to Wells said, «  I am pleased to hear that you can read and encourage you to put your skill to work reading the Special Committee’s Report.  Perhaps even an old dog can learn a new trick !  »

 

When Wells wrote back saying the chemical industry has somehow under an undue influence on Health Canada, Bennett responded  ―  «  And a commie under every rock and the grassy hill in Dallas and all corporations and all that jazz.  Sorry, I’m not a conspiracy theorist.  »

 

This was clearly an Anti-Pesticide Lunatic-ENTRAPMENT designed to embarrass Bennett.

 

Anti-Pesticide Lunatics like Wells will continue to harass and embarrass Government Officials like Bennett until they hear the answers they want.

 

 

 

Who Is Bill Wells

 

 

Non-Expert Anti-Pesticide Activist Bill Wells is THE LEAST QUALIFIED to provide ANY advice concerning pest control products.

 

Wells has ABSOLUTELY NO recognized training, expertise, or background in matters concerning pest control products.

 

His training is merely in soils mapping and terrain classification.

 

Wells has VESTED INTERESTS in CONSPIRING to PROHIBIT pest control products.

 

Wells is a HIGH-RANKING OFFICIAL within the ORGANIC FOOD INDUSTRY in British Columbia, and actually DERIVED PERSONAL PROFIT from a PESTICIDE-FREE FARM.

 

It is DISTURBING that Wells has attempted to ADD PROFIT TO HIS VESTED INTERESTS  …  AT THE EXPENSE OF THE JOBS HE INTENDS TO DESTROY in the Professional Lawn Care Industry.

 

Moreover, it is now common knowledge that Organic Food is a DISMALLY BOGUS FAILURE.

 

Anti-Pesticide Activists like Wells are NOT CREDIBLE experts on pest control products.

 

Wells is also CLOSELY ATTACHED to Anti-Pesticide Organizations like Canadian Cancer Society, New Democratic Party, and Wildsight  ―  these ATTACHMENTS make his opinion COMPLETELY SUSPECT.

 

 

 

Communications Show Wells’ BIAS

 

 

Wells immediately shared his communications with Anti-Pesticide New Democrat Lunatic Michelle Mungall  [ she was on Wells’ « cc » list ].

 

New Democratic Party functions as the POLITICAL SHIELD for Anti-Pesticide and Environmental-Terrorist Organizations  ―  most of these organizations are presently UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR CHARITY FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY.

 

Mungall also expressed MOCK-PARTISAN-OUTRAGE  ―

 

«  When I first read it, I was very shocked  » she said.    [  ?!?!  ]

 

«  It was an inappropriate way to respond to anybody  …  I would never respond to someone like that in an e-mail.  »   [  Blah !  Blah !  Blah !  ]

 

While Wells was unavailable to speak on the phone, now FEARING THE SPOTLIGHT OF THE MEDIA, Mungall CLAIMED to have spoken with him.

 

«  He was quite upset  » Mungall ALLEGED [ which is HEAR-SAY ].

 

«  He was quite frustrated.  He definitely felt dismissed.  »    [  ?!?!  ] 

 

Bennett’s response clearly shows that he DID NOT DISMISS Wells.

 

In fact, Wells received more of a response than he deserved.

 

 

 

Is Wells More Knowledgeable Than Health Canada ?!?!?

 

 

NO ! 

 

Wells has conveniently considered the hundreds of qualified scientists of Health Canada’s respected Pest Management Regulatory Agency to be incompetent and/or incapable of arriving at correct scientific findings concerning conventional pest control products.

 

In order to allow SOUND SCIENCE to be effectively practiced, it would be preferable leave the interpretation of scientific research about pest control products to those people who ARE COMPETENT to do it  ―  Health Canada, and NOT Wells.

 

Health Canada requires each new pest control product to go through a comprehensive set of over TWO-HUNDRED SEPARATE TESTS and a REVIEW of all scientifically credible studies that exist to ensure that the product will NOT CAUSE HARM TO PEOPLE, ANIMALS OR THE ENVIRONMENT.

 

Not surprisingly, Wells HAS NEVER conducted a serious scientific study on pest control products  …  evidently because he is NOT COMPETENT OR MOTIVATED to do so.

 

Nonetheless, Wells COULD NOT EVEN BE BOTHERED to have used the EXTENSIVE TOXICOLOGY DATABASE that is available from either Health Canada or U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

 

Health Canada, and NOT Anti-Pesticide Activists like Wells, has THE ESSENTIAL EXPERTISE on the subject of pest control products.

 

 

 

Wells’ ENTRAPMENT E-Mail  ―  2012 05 24

 

 

From: Bill Wells

 

Sent: May-24-12 10:39 AM

 

To: Bill Bennett

 

CC: Michelle Mungall  [ New Democratic Party ] 

 

Subject: Not going to ban cosmetic pesticides  …

 

Mr. Bennett,

 

I read where you are just Not going to ban cosmetic pesticides  …  no matter what knowledgeable land management professionals, citizens, medical doctors, or anyone else has to say about it.   [  ?!?!  ] 

 

Do I have that right ?

 

You must realize that your KANGAROO REPORT [  ?!?!  ] sending the message that pesticides are benign and nothing to worry about is an embarrassment to BC in general [  ?!?!  ] , and to any thinking person who can sees the membership of your ‘panel’. [  ?!?!  ] 

 

For over twenty-five years as a member of the BC Institute of Agrologists ( much of the time as councillor from Kootenay Boundary Branch ), I witnessed the chemical and genetic engineering industries aggressively attempt ( and succeed ) to manipulate agricultural practice toward their benefit.  [  ?!?!  ] 

 

And of course the home-gardeners are a large potential market bloc too, so that market is pandered to by the « lawn care profession », who attempt to convince unsuspecting home-owners and smallholders that what they must have are monocultured [ sic ] lawns kept green by a wide variety of killing chemicals  ―  many which to not mix together well, not to mention other lasting problems.  [  ?!?!  ] 

 

I am retired now, but I can still read a paper and type a ltter [ sic ].

 

I read how disrespectfully you and your committee treated at least one very knowlegeable [ sic ] and experienced medical doctor  ―  knowledgeable and experienced about effects of chemicals from home-gardening poisons.  [  ?!?!  ] 

 

Since I am now retired, and am in a position to express not only my scientific opinion [  ?!?!  ] that products like Killex and Round-Up have no place in home-gardens, in public places, and near domestic water sources, but I’m in a position to express my personal and moral disappointment that a committee of the BC Legislature would be so prejudiced in reaching their « decision » that they ignore and humiliate those who would come to them to provide them with actual facts and knowledgeable guidance.  [  ?!?!  ] 

 

Your committee came to a wrong and disgraceful conclusion.  [  ?!?!  ] 

 

Willilam H. Wells, retired PAg

 

 

 

Bennett’s Response E-Mail  ―  2012 05 27

 

 

From: Bennett, Bill

 

Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 05:53 PM

 

To: Bill Wells

 

Subject: Fw: Not going to ban cosmetic pesticides . . .

 

Dear Sir,

 

I am pleased to hear that you can read and encourage you to put your skill to work reading the Special Committee’s Report.

 

Perhaps even an old dog can learn a new trick !

 

Sincerely,

 

Bill Bennett

 

MLA Kootenay East

 

 

 

Wells’ ENTRAPMENT E-Mail  ―  2012 05 30

 

 

From: Bill Wells

 

Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 09:15 AM

 

To: Bennett, Bill

 

CC: Mungall, Michelle  [ New Democratic Party ] 

 

Subject: Re: Fw: Not going to ban cosmetic pesticides  …

 

Dear Mr. Bennett,

 

I have read your report.

 

I don’t know what dog you refer to.

 

I try to teach my old dog the new trick of staying off lawns where somebody has sprayed a bunch of herbicides, as many labels actually do suggest.

 

As for me, I’m learning new tricks every day.

 

One is to be evermore [ sic ] cautious and vigilant of SNAKE OIL SALES DEPARTMENTS.  [  ?!?!  ] 

 

The majority’s finding that they rely on the PMRA’s « impressive » scientific scrutiny would be fine if the PMRA was free from EXCESSIVE INFLUENCE BY THE AG CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, had it’s [ sic ] own independent scientists working in independent laboratories, and if the Harper government weren’t busily reducing funding for a wide range of scientific inquiry and environmental protections.

 

But it looks like you and the likes of MR. WILLIAM GATHERCOLE and his friends have won the day.

 

Most of my acquaintances and professional colleagues hope this is only a temporary victory for you.

 

Bill Wells, Kaslo, B.C.

 

 

 

Bennett’s Response E-Mail  ―  2012 05 30

 

 

Subject: Re: Fw: Not going to ban cosmetic pesticides  …

 

Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:12:52

 

From: Bennett, Bill

 

To: Wells, Bill

 

And a commie under every rock and the grassy hill in Dallas and all corporations are evil and all that jazz.

 

Sorry, I’m not a conspiracy theorist.

 

I’ll take the 350 scientists at Health Canada over the politically motivated left wing conspiracy theorists any day.

 

 

 

ANTI-PESTICIDE

LUNATIC VERMIN

ARE TOTAL LYING

SACKS OF CRAP !

 

…  They lie about the safety

of pest control products !

 

…  They even attempt

to entrap and embarrass

politicians who do

not agree with them

 

 

 

 

For the original copy of this Force Of Nature Report, go to the following link  …

 

http://pesticidetruths.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Force-Of-Nature-British-Columbia-Conspiracy-2012-05-31-LIAR-Wells-Lunatic-Entrapment-Bennett-pdf-300-dpi.pdf

 

 

 

 

For more information about BRITISH COLUMBIA, go to  …

 

 

 

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  -  CONSPIRACY TO PROHIBIT PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS IN THE URBAN LANDSCAPE ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-1O6

 

 

 

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  -  COQUITLAM, CITY OF  -  AN ENVIRONMENT THAT IS UNHAPPY, UGLY, UNEMPLOYED, UNENLIGHTENED, AND UNHEALTHY ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3vl

 

 

 

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  -  COQUITLAM, CITY OF  -  REFERENCES FOR LITIGATION ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3Qv

 

 

 

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  -  KELOWNA, CITY OF  -  ANTI-PESTICIDE WOMEN COUNCILLORS ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-3mr

 

 

 

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  -  SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PESTICIDES ( Web-Page )

 

http://wp.me/P1jq40-2c2

 

 

 

 

 

Uncategorized

One comment on “British Columbia Pesticide Ban – Attempt By Lunatics To Entrap Government Official – Bill Bennett – Bill Wells – 2012 05 31

  1. windmill June 3, 2012 8:34 pm

    He was dismissed? Sort of like Dr. Solomon was dismissed? I think not.

Comments are closed.